Three-dimensional multi-constraint analytical capture zone against maneuvering targets with velocity advantages
), Abstract
Concerning the capture problem against arbitrary maneuvering targets, whose overload is high maneuvering but upper bounded and velocity has advantages, this paper elucidates a three-dimensional multi-constraint analytical capture zone, exhibiting prominent guiding significance to the initial states of the terminal guidance. Unlike most existing capture zone studies, which are represented by initial relative velocity, the proposed capture zone investigates the initial velocity heading angle and side-window angle. First, the asymptotic fast convergence anti-interference guidance law is presented via motion camouflage theory, and it meets the Field of View (FOV) constraint by theoretical analysis. On this basis, the capture zone is derived with overload limits based on the Lyapunov-based function. Then, it is converted to the form defined by the velocity heading and side-window angles, considering the FOV constraint. Finally, the sensitivity of the capture zone to the designed guidance algorithm’s different influencing factors and the gain boundary are deduced and analyzed to provide a theoretical basis for augmenting the analytical capture zone during a practical engagement. The findings reveal the capture zone correlation mechanism of terminal guidance law and give academic support to the subsequent acquisition of arbitrary maneuvering targets, which has potential application value.
Keywords
Electronic Supplementary Material
References
Yang B, Jing WX, Gao CS. Online midcourse guidance method for boost phase interception via adaptive convex programming. Aerosp Sci Technol 2021;118:107037.
Zhou C, He L, Yan XD, et al. Active-set pseudospectral model predictive static programming for midcourse guidance. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;134:108137.
Franzini G, Tardioli L, Pollini L, et al. Visibility augmented proportional navigation guidance. J Guid Contr Dyn 2017;41(4):987–95.
Qian LH, Graham S, Liu HHT. Guidance and control law design for a slung payload in autonomous landing: A drone delivery case study. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2020;25(4):1773–82.
Zhang BL, Zhou D, Shao CT. Closed-form time-to-go estimation for proportional navigation guidance considering drag. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2022;58(5):4705–17.
Zheng Y, Chen Z, Shao XM, et al. Time-optimal guidance for intercepting moving targets with impact-angle constraints. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(7):157–67.
Foust R, Chung SJ, Hadaegh FY. Optimal guidance and control with nonlinear dynamics using sequential convex programming. J Guid Contr Dyn 2019;43(4):633–44.
Green A, Shinar J, Guelman M. Game optimal guidance law synthesis for short range missiles. J Guid Contr Dyn 1992;15(1):191–7.
Li HY, Wang J, He SM, et al. Nonlinear optimal 3-D impact-angle-control guidance against maneuvering targets. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2022;58(3):2467–81.
Yu YL, Guo C, Li TS. Finite-time LOS path following of unmanned surface vessels with time-varying sideslip angles and input saturation. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2022;27(1):463–74.
Chen WX, Hu YD, Gao CS, et al. Trajectory tracking guidance of interceptor via prescribed performance integral sliding mode with neural network disturbance observer. Def Technol 2024;32:412–29.
Chen WX, Hu YD, Gao CS, et al. Three-dimensional trajectory tracking guidance against near-space maneuvering targets with multiple constraints under wind field. Contr Eng Pract 2024;142:105745.
Qiu XQ, Lai P, Gao C, et al. Recorded recurrent deep reinforcement learning guidance laws for intercepting endoatmospheric maneuvering missiles. Def Technol 2023;31:457–70.
Chen WX, Gao CS, Jing WX. Proximal policy optimization guidance algorithm for intercepting near-space maneuvering targets. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;132:108031.
Dhananjay N, Ghose D, Bhat MS. Capturability of a geometric guidance law in relative velocity space. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 2009;17(1):111–22.
Ghosh S, Ghose D, Raha S. Capturability of augmented pure proportional navigation guidance against time-varying target maneuvers. J Guid Contr Dyn 2014;37(5):1446–61.
Lee S, Ann S, Cho N, et al. Capturability of guidance laws for interception of nonmaneuvering target with field-of-view limit. J Guid Contr Dyn 2018;42(4):869–84.
Lee S, Kim Y. Capturability of impact-angle control composite guidance law considering field-of-view limit. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2020;56(2):1077–93.
Oh JH, Ha IJ. Capturability of the 3-dimensional pure PNG law. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1999;35(2):491-503.
Ghosh S, Ghose D, Raha S. Capturability analysis of a 3-D retro-PN guidance law for higher speed nonmaneuvering targets. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol 2014;22(5):1864–74.
Ha IJ, Hur JS, Ko MS, et al. Performance analysis of PNG laws for randomly maneuvering targets. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1990;26(5):713–21.
Dhar A, Ghose D. Capture region for a realistic TPN guidance law. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1993;29(3):995-1003.
Ghose D. Capture region for true proportional navigation guidance with nonzero miss-distance. J Guid Contr Dyn 1994;17(3):627–8.
Wang HJ, Lei HM, Ye JK, et al. A novel capture region of retro proportional navigation guidance law for intercepting high-speed nonmaneuvering targets. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 2018;232(6):1186–98.
Zhou J, Shao L, Wang HJ, et al. Optimal midcourse trajectory planning considering the capture region. J Syst Eng Electron 2018;29(3):587-600.
Li CY, Jing WX. Geometric approach to capture analysis of PN guidance law. Aerosp Sci Technol 2008;12(2):177–83.
Han T, Hu QL, Xin M. Analytical solution of field-of-view limited guidance with constrained impact and capturability analysis. Aerosp Sci Technol 2020;97:105586.
Li KB, Su WS, Chen L. Performance analysis of realistic true proportional navigation against maneuvering targets using Lyapunov-like approach. Aerosp Sci Technol 2017;69:333–41.
Li KB, Bai ZH, Shin HS, et al. Capturability of 3D RTPN guidance law against true-arbitrarily maneuvering target with maneuverability limitation. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(7):75-90.
Li KB, Liang YG, Su WS, et al. Performance of 3D TPN against true-arbitrarily maneuvering target for exoatmospheric interception. Sci China Technol Sci 2018;61(8):1161–74.
Li KB, Su WS, Chen L. Performance analysis of three-dimensional differential geometric guidance law against low-speed maneuvering targets. Astrodynamics 2018;2(3):233–47.
Liu YF, Qi NM, Wang TY. Capture condition for endo-atmospheric interceptors steered by ALCS and ARCS. Contr Theory Technol 2014;12(1):56-67.
Li KB, Chen L, Bai XZ. Differential geometric modeling of guidance problem for interceptors. Sci China Technol Sci 2011;54(9):2283–95.
Xu YJ, Basset G. Sequential virtual motion camouflage method for nonlinear constrained optimal trajectory control. Autom J IFAC 2012;48(7):1273–85.
Li JQ, Li CY, Zhang YH. Guidance strategy of motion camouflage for spacecraft pursuit-evasion game. Chin J Aeronaut 2024;37(3):312–9.
京公网安备11010802044758号