AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Variability in total cost of vehicle ownership across vehicle and user profiles

UCD Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Richview, Clonskeagh, Ireland
EnvEcon Decision Support, 11 Priory Office Park, Blackrock, Dublin, Ireland
UCD Earth Institute and UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy, Belfield, Dublin, 4, Ireland
Show Author Information

Abstract

Widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) is a common and critical component of international strategies to mitigate environmental pollution, climate change and oil dependency. The ability of consumers to assess the total cost of ownership (TCO) of EVs relative to internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) remains an important factor for EV uptake. The TCO of vehicles is not universal across different car segments and user profiles. We analyse and compare the TCO of ICEVs and EVs from 17 car segments across short- and long-term ownership periods, and further advance existing TCO approaches by integrating detailed activity-based driving profiles, taxation, grant structures and pricing. Results show that EV options in the most popular Irish car segments have existing battery EV options with a TCO averaging respectively 26% and 42% less than their equivalent petrol and diesel ICEV options over a 4-year ownership term when the current grant is included. This integrated method for granular TCO evaluation offers important insights for this market and affords scope to investigate how changes in travel patterns, car-segment pricing, taxation, grant policy, fuel costs, and carbon pricing and other transport policies can all affect TCO values over time across a broad range of market offerings.

References

 

Ai, N., Zheng, J., Chen, W.Q., 2019. U.S. end-of-life electric vehicle batteries: dynamic inventory modeling and spatial analysis for regional solutions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 145, 208–219.

 

Biresselioglu, M.E., Demirbag Kaplan, M., Yilmaz, B.K., 2018. Electric mobility in Europe: a comprehensive review of motivators and barriers in decision making processes. Transport. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 109, 1–13.

 

Brand, C., Cluzel, C., Anable, J., 2017. Modeling the uptake of plug-in vehicles in a heterogeneous car market using a consumer segmentation approach. Transport. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 97, 121–136.

 

Breetz, H.L., Salon, D., 2018. Do electric vehicles need subsidies? Ownership costs for conventional, hybrid, and electric vehicles in 14 U.S. cities. Energy Pol. 120, 238–249.

 

Bubeck, S., Tomaschek, J., Fahl, U., 2016. Perspectives of electric mobility: total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany. Transport Pol. 50, 63–77.

 

Byers, E.A., Gasparatos, A., Serrenho, A.C., 2015. A framework for the exergy analysis of future transport pathways: application for the United Kingdom transport system 2010-2050. Energy 88, 849–862.

 

Caserini, S., Pastorello, C., Gaifami, P., Ntziachristos, L., 2013. Impact of the dropping activity with vehicle age on air pollutant emissions. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 4, 282–289.

 

Clinch, J.P., O'Neill, E., 2009. Applying spatial economics to national spatial planning. Reg. Stud. 43, 157–178.

 

Danielis, R., Giansoldati, M., Rotaris, L., 2018. A probabilistic total cost of ownership model to evaluate the current and future prospects of electric cars uptake in Italy. Energy Pol. 119, 268–281.

 

Danielis, R., Giansoldati, M., Scorrano, M., 2019. Consumer-and society-oriented cost of ownership of electric and conventional cars in Italy. Work. Pap. SIET Soc. Ital. di Econ. dei Trasp. e della Logist. 19 (3), 1–21.

 

Delucchi, M.A., Lipman, T.E., 2001. An analysis of the retail and lifecycle cost of batterypowered electric vehicles. Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 6, 371–404.

 
Department of the Environment Climate and Communications, 2021. Climate Action Plan 2021. Dublin.
 
Department of Transport, 2021. Transport Trends 2020, an Overview of Ireland's Transport Sector 1–33.
 
Department of Transport, 2022. Public consultation on the electrical vehicle charging infrastructure strategy [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.gov.ie/en/consultation/0a579-public-consultation-on-the-electrical-vehicle-charging-infrastructure-strategy/, 5.4.22.
 
Department Transport Tourism and Sport, 2020. Irish Bulletin of Vehicle and Driver Statistics 2019. Dublin.
 

Dumortier, J., Siddiki, S., Carley, S., Cisney, J., Krause, R.M., Lane, B.W., Rupp, J.A., Graham, J.D., 2015. Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers' intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle. Transport. Res. Part A Policy Pract 72, 71–86.

 
Environment Agency, European, 2021. Greenhouse gas emissions from transport in Europe [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-transport, 2.10.22.
 
 
European Parliament, 2018. More electric cars on EU roads by 2030 [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20180911IPR13114/more-electric-cars-on-eu-roads-by-2030, 11.12.21.
 

Fu, M., Kelly, J.A., Clinch, J.P., King, F., 2012. Environmental policy implications of working from home: modelling the impacts of land-use, infrastructure and sociodemographics. Energy Pol. 47, 416–423.

 

Fu, M., Kelly, J.A., Clinch, J.P., 2017. Estimating annual average daily traffic and transport emissions for a national road network: a bottom-up methodology for both nationally-aggregated and spatially-disaggregated results. J. Transport Geogr. 58, 186–195.

 

Gass, V., Schmidt, J., Schmid, E., 2014. Analysis of alternative policy instruments to promote electric vehicles in Austria. Renew. Energy 61, 96–101.

 

Guo, Y., Kelly, J.A., Clinch, J.P., 2021. Road transport electrification – is timing everything? Implications of emissions analysis' outcomes for climate and air policy. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 12, 100478.

 

Hagman, J., Ritzén, S., Stier, J.J., Susilo, Y., 2016. Total cost of ownership and its potential implications for battery electric vehicle diffusion. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 18, 11–17.

 

Hamza, K., Laberteaux, K.P., Chu, K.C., 2021. On modeling the cost of ownership of plugin vehicles. World Electr. Veh. J. 12.

 

Hennessy, H., Tol, R.S.J., 2011. The impact of tax reform on new car purchases in Ireland. Energy Pol. 39, 7059–7067.

 
Hoekstra, A., Steinbuch, M., 2020. Comparing the Lifetime Green House Gas Emissions of Electric Cars with the Emissions of Cars Using Gasoline or Diesel, 2020.
 
International Energy Agency, 2020a. Tracking transport 2020 [WWW Document] Int. Energy Agency. URL. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-transport-2020, 2.10.22.
 
International Energy Agency, 2020b. Global EV Outlook 2020. Paris.
 
International Energy Agency, 2021. Global EV Outlook 2021 [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2021, 1.22.21.
 

Jiang, H.D., Xue, M.M., Liang, Q.M., Masui, T., Ren, Z.Y., 2022. How do demand-side policies contribute to the electrification and decarburization of private transportation in China? A CGE-based analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 175, 121322.

 

Kelly, J.A., Ryan, L., Casey, E., O'Riordan, N., 2009. Profiling road transport activity: emissions from 2000 to 2005 in Ireland using national car test data. Transport Pol. 16, 183–192.

 

Kim, J., Seung, H., Lee, J., Ahn, J., 2020. Asymmetric preference and loss aversion for electric vehicles: the reference-dependent choice model capturing different preference directions. Energy Econ. 86, 104666.

 

LaMonaca, S., Ryan, L., 2022. The state of play in electric vehicle charging services – a review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 154, 111733.

 

Lebeau, K., Lebeau, P., Macharis, C., Van Mierlo, J., 2013. How expensive are electric vehicles? A total cost of ownership analysis. World Electr. Veh. J. 6, 996–1007.

 

Letmathe, P., Suares, M., 2017. A consumer-oriented total cost of ownership model for different vehicle types in Germany. Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 57, 314–335.

 

Lévay, P.Z., Drossinos, Y., Thiel, C., 2017. The effect of fiscal incentives on market penetration of electric vehicles: a pairwise comparison of total cost of ownership. Energy Pol. 105, 524–533.

 

Lin, B., Wu, W., 2021. The impact of electric vehicle penetration: a recursive dynamic CGE analysis of China. Energy Econ. 94, 105086.

 

McCollum, D., Krey, V., Kolp, P., Nagai, Y., Riahi, K., 2014. Transport electrification: a key element for energy system transformation and climate stabilization. Clim. Change 123, 651–664.

 

Micari, S., Foti, S., Testa, A., De Caro, S., Sergi, F., Andaloro, L., Aloisio, D., Napoli, G., 2022. Reliability assessment and lifetime prediction of Li-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Electr. Eng. 104, 165–177.

 

Moon, S., Lee, D.J., 2019. An optimal electric vehicle investment model for consumers using total cost of ownership: a real option approach. Appl. Energy 253.

 

Ouyang, D., Zhou, S., Ou, X., 2021. The total cost of electric vehicle ownership: a consumer-oriented study of China's post-subsidy era. Energy Pol. 149, 112023.

 

O'Neill, E., Moore, D., Kelleher, L., Brereton, F., 2019. Barriers to electric vehicle uptake in Ireland: perspectives of car-dealers and policy-makers. Case Stud. Transp. Pol. 7, 118–127.

 

Palmer, K., Tate, J.E., Wadud, Z., Nellthorp, J., 2018. Total cost of ownership and market share for hybrid and electric vehicles in the UK, US and Japan. Appl. Energy 209, 108–119.

 

Parker, N., Breetz, H.L., Salon, D., Conway, M.W., Williams, J., Patterson, M., 2021. Who saves money buying electric vehicles? Heterogeneity in total cost of ownership. Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 96, 102893.

 
Revenue, 2021. Vehicle registration tax manual [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/vehicle-registration-tax/index.aspx, 2.10.21.
 

Rusich, A., Danielis, R., 2015. Total cost of ownership, social lifecycle cost and energy consumption of various automotive technologies in Italy. Res. Transport. Econ. 50, 3–16.

 
Ryan, L., Petrov, I., Kelly, A., Guo, Y., La Monaca, S., 2019. An Assessment of the Social Costs and Benefits of Vehicle Tax Reform in Ireland (No. 153). OECD Environment Working Papers, OECD Environment Working Papers, Paris.
 

Scorrano, M., Danielis, R., Giansoldati, M., 2020. Dissecting the total cost of ownership of fully electric cars in Italy: the impact of annual distance travelled, home charging and urban driving. Res. Transport. Econ. 80.

 
Society of the Irish Motor Industry, 2021. SIMI recommended vehicle price guides [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.simi.ie/en/motorstats/recommended-price-guide, 11.12.21.
 

Steinhilber, S., Wells, P., Thankappan, S., 2013. Socio-technical inertia: understanding the barriers to electric vehicles. Energy Pol. 60, 531–539.

 

Sterner, T., 2007. Fuel taxes: an important instrument for climate policy. Energy Pol. 35, 3194–3202.

 

Thiel, C., Perujo, A., Mercier, A., 2010. Cost and CO2 aspects of future vehicle options in Europe under new energy policy scenarios. Energy Pol. 38, 7142–7151.

 

Weiss, M., Dekker, P., Moro, A., Scholz, H., Patel, M.K., 2015. On the electrification of road transportation - a review of the environmental, economic, and social performance of electric two-wheelers. Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 41, 348–366.

 

Wu, G., Inderbitzin, A., Bening, C., 2015. Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles compared to conventional vehicles: a probabilistic analysis and projection across market segments. Energy Pol. 80, 196–214.

Communications in Transportation Research
Article number: 100071
Cite this article:
Guo Y, Kelly JA, Clinch JP. Variability in total cost of vehicle ownership across vehicle and user profiles. Communications in Transportation Research, 2022, 2(1): 100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100071

590

Views

15

Crossref

18

Web of Science

20

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 01 April 2022
Revised: 04 June 2022
Accepted: 04 June 2022
Published: 24 June 2022
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return