AI Chat Paper
Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
• Blockage of any one of seven key marine chokepoints will re-route global shipping.
• Numerous countries depend on three other chokepoints for access to shipping.
• Closure of key chokepoints will cause regional shipping delays and port backlogs.
• ~40% of shipped goods in 2019 had to pass through the South and East China Seas.
Global supply chain disruptions caused by the six-day blockage of the Suez Canal in March 2021 and the reduction in shipping through the Bosporus Strait since the onset of the Ukraine War in February 2022 are recent demonstrations of the critical importance of marine chokepoints to international trade and thus global economic security. To better understand and anticipate effects of a chokepoint closure on global trade, we combine GIS data of international shipping lanes with 2019 bilateral trade data to estimate how the closure of each of eleven chokepoints could change trade flows through other chokepoints and between countries. Estimates from the closure scenarios reveal alternate-shipping route linkages between seven chokepoints whereby if one were closed for an extended period, trade through one or more of the others would change significantly. The estimates also underscore the economic importance of the Danish Straits, the Bosporus Strait, the Strait of Hormuz, and the South China Sea and East China Sea to those countries that must rely on these chokepoints for access to maritime trade. Moreover, the estimates project delays and shifts in coastal seaport activity that could lead to knock-on effects that disrupt global supply chains long after a chokepoint blockage is cleared.
Adland, R., Jia, H., Strandenes, S.P., 2017. Are AIS-based trade volume estimates reliable? The case of crude oil exports. Marit. Pol. Manag. 44 (5), 657–665.
Alamoush, A., Ballini, F., Ölçer, A.I., 2022. Ports, maritime transport, and industry: the immediate impact of COVID-19 and the way forward. Marit. Technol. Res. 4 (1), 250092.
Bartle, J.R., Lutte, R.K., Leuenberger, D.Z., 2021. Sustainability and air freight transportation: lessons from the global pandemic. Sustainability 13 (7), 3738.
Cahalan, A., 2021. Maritime law: the ship that keeps on given-legal implications of the Suez Canal debacle. LSJ: Law Society of NSW Journal 78, 74–76.
Chen, J.H., Lu, F., Li, M.X., Huang, P.F., Liu, X.L., Mei, Q., 2016. Optimization on arrangement of precaution areas serving for ships’ routeing in the Taiwan strait based on massive AIS data. Int. Conf. Data Min. Big Data 123–133.
de Souza, F.L.U., Pitombo, C.S., Yang, D., 2021. Port choice in Brazil: a qualitative research related to in-depth interviews. J. Shipping Trade 6 (1), 13.
Dolatabadi, B.A., Kamrava, M., 2022. Iran’s changing naval strategy in the Persian Gulf: motives and features. Br. J. Middle E. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2022.2105815.
Faucon, B., 2021. Ever given, the ship that blocked the Suez, makes it to port. Wall St. J.
Fravel, M.T., 2011. China’s strategy in the South China Sea. Contemp. S. Asia 33 (3), 292–319.
Graham, N.E., Georgakakos, K.P., Vargas, C., Echevers, M., 2006. Simulating the value of El Niño forecasts for the Panama Canal. Adv. Water Resour. 29 (11), 1665–1677.
Hartman, G.L., West, E.D., Herman, T.K., 2011. Crops that feed the World 2. Soybean—worldwide production, use, and constraints caused by pathogens and pests. Food Secur. 3, 5–17.
Hassen, T.B., El Bilali, H., 2019. Food security in the gulf cooperation Council countries: challenges and prospects. J. Food Secur. 7 (5), 159–169.
Klare, M., 2002. Resource Wars: the New Landscape of Global Conflict. Macmillan.
Komiss, W., Huntzinger, L., 2011. The Economic Implications of Disruptions to Maritime Oil Chokepoints. Center for Naval Analysis.
Lanteigne, M., 2008. China's maritime security and the “Malacca Dilemma.”. Asian Secur. 4 (2), 143–161.
McKenna, M.F., Katz, S.L., Condit, C., Walbridge, S., 2012. Response of commercial ships to a voluntary speed reduction measure: are voluntary strategies adequate for mitigating ship-strike risk? Coast. Manag. 40 (6), 634–650.
Meade, R., 2021. Suez Blockage Extends as Salvors Fail to Free Ever Given. Lloyd’s List.
Miller, K., Hyodo, T., 2021. Impact of the Panama Canal expansion on Latin American and Caribbean ports: difference in difference (DID) method. J. shipping Trade 6 (1), 1–23.
Nižetić, S., 2020. Impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on air transport mobility, energy, and environment: a case study. Int. J. Energy Res. 44 (13), 10953–10961.
Notteboom, T., Pallis, T., Rodrigue, J.-P., 2021. Disruptions and resilience in global container shipping and ports: the COVID-19 pandemic versus the 2008–2009 financial crisis. Marit. Econ. Logist. 23 (2), 179–210.
Peele, R.B., 1997. The importance of maritime chokepoints. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters 27 (2), 8.
Pierce, J.R., Schott, P.K., 2009. Concording US harmonized system categories over time. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Qu, X., Meng, Q., 2012. The economic importance of the Straits of Malacca and Singapore: an extreme-scenario analysis. Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev. 48 (1), 258–265.
Rodrigue, J.-P., 2020. The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledge.
Salameh, M.G., 2016. US LNG Exports could prove a game changer in the global gas market. IAEE Energy Forum Int. Assoc. Energy Econ. Fourth Quarter.
Shepard, J.U., Pratson, L.F., 2020. Maritime piracy in the Strait of Hormuz and implications of energy export security. Energy Pol. 140, 111379.
Showalter, D.E., 2006. Pendulum of war: the three battles of El Alamein. Historian 68 (4), 861–863.
Sien, C.L., 1998. The importance of the straits of Malacca and Singapore. Singapore J. Int. Comp. Law 2, 301.
Talmadge, C., 2008. Closing time: assessing the Iranian threat to The Strait of Hormuz. Int. Secur. 33 (1), 82–117.
Wellesley, L., Preston, F., Lehne, J., Bailey, R., 2017. Chokepoints in global food trade: assessing the risk. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 25, 15–28.
World Shipping Council, 2019. The Top 50 Container Ports. World Shipping Council.
WTO, 2021. World Trade Statistical Review 2021. WTO.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
