AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

On the relationship between the activity at point of interests and road traffic

Máté Kolata( )Tamás Tettamantia,bTamás BécsiaDomokos Esztergár-Kissc
Department of Control for Transportation and Vehicle Systems, Faculty of Transportation Eng. and Vehicle Eng., Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, 1111, Pest, Hungary
Systems and Control Laboratory, Institute for Computer Science and Control of the Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Budapest, 1053, Pest, Hungary
Department of Transport Technology and Economics, Faculty of Transportation Eng. and Vehicle Eng., Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, 1111, Pest, Hungary
Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

The estimation and analysis of road traffic represent the preliminary steps towards satisfying the current needs for smooth, safe, and green transportation. Therefore, effective traffic monitoring is an essential topic alongside the planning of sustainable transportation systems and the development of new traffic management concepts. In contrast to classical traffic detection solutions, this study investigates the correlation between travelers' social activities and road traffic. The s's primary goal is to investigate the presence of the relationship between social activity and road traffic, which might allow an infrastructure-independent traffic monitoring technique as well. People's general activities at Point of Interest (POI) locations (measured as occupancy parameter) are correlated with traffic data so that, finally, proper proxys can be defined for link-level average traffic speed estimation. The method is tested and evaluated using real-world traffic and POI occupancy data from Budapest (District XI.). The results of the correlation investigation justify an indirect relationship between activity at POIs and road traffic, which holds promise for future practical applicability.

References

 
Adetiloye, T., Awasthi, A., 2019. Multimodal big data fusion for traffic congestion prediction. In: Multimodal Analytics for Next-Generation Big Data Technologies and Applications. Springer, pp. 319–335.
 

Alessandretti, L., Aslak, U., Lehmann, S., 2020. The scales of human mobility. Nature 402–407.

 

Alomari, E., Katib, I., Mehmood, R., 2020. Iktishaf: a big data road-traffic event detection tool using Twitter and spark machine learning. Mobile Network. Appl. 1–16.

 

Artusi, R., Verderio, P., Marubini, E., 2002. Bravais-pearson and spearman correlation coefficients: meaning, test of hypothesis and confidence interval. Int. J. Biol. Markers 17, 148–151.

 

Balsa-Barreiro, J., Menendez, M., Morales, A.J., 2022. Scale, context, and heterogeneity: the complexity of the social space. Sci. Rep. 12, 9037.

 

Byun, S., Shin, I.K., Moon, J., Kang, J., Choi, S.I., 2021. Road traffic monitoring from UAV images using deep learning networks. Rem. Sens. 13.

 

Cao, D., Wang, S., Lin, D., 2018. Chinese microblog users' sentiment-based traffic condition analysis. Soft Comput. 22, 7005–7014.

 

Carr, J., 2014. An introduction to genetic algorithms. Senior Project 1, 7.

 

Chai, T., Draxler, R.R., 2014. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE). Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. (GMDD) 7, 1525–1534.

 

Cherrett, T., Bell, H., McDonald, M., 2000. Traffic management parameters from single inductive loop detectors. Transport. Res. Rec. 1719, 112–120.

 

D'Andrea, E., Ducange, P., Lazzerini, B., Marcelloni, F., 2015. Real-time detection of traffic from Twitter stream analysis. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 16, 2269–2283.

 

De Winter, J.C., Gosling, S.D., Potter, J., 2016. Comparing the pearson and spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: a tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychol. Methods 21, 273.

 

Di Bucchianico, A., 2008. Coefficient of Determination (R 2). Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability 1.

 

Eichberger, A., Szalay, Z., Fellendorf, M., Liu, H., 2022. Advances in automated driving systems. Energies 15.

 

Fekih, M., Bonnetain, L., Furno, A., Bonnel, P., Smoreda, Z., Galland, S., Bellemans, T., 2021. Potential of cellular signaling data for time-of-day estimation and spatial classification of travel demand: a large-scale comparative study with travel survey and land use data. Transportation Letters 1–19, 0.

 
Hong, J., Zhang, X., Wei, Z., Li, L., Ren, Y., 2007. Spatial and temporal analysis of probe vehicle-based sampling for real-time traffic information system. In: 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE, pp. 1234–1239.
 

Hruboš, M., Nemec, D., Bubeníková, E., Holečko, P., Spalek, J., Mihálik, M., Bujňák, M., Andel, J., Tichý, T., 2021. Model-based predictive detector of a fire inside the road tunnel for intelligent vehicles. J. Adv. Transport. 2021, 6634944.

 

Jain, N.K., Saini, R., Mittal, P., 2019. A review on traffic monitoring system techniques. Soft Comput.: Theories and Applications 569–577.

 
Kolat, M., Tettamanti, T., Becsi, T., Esztergar-Kiss, D., 2023. Poi and road traffic. URL: https://github.com/bmetrafficlab/poiandroadtraffic.git.
 

Kovács, A., Leelőssy, Ádám, Tettamanti, T., Esztergár-Kiss, D., Mészáros, R., Lagzi, I., 2021. Coupling traffic originated urban air pollution estimation with an atmospheric chemistry model. Urban Clim. 37, 100868.

 

Lipfert, F.W., Wyzga, R.E., 2008. On exposure and response relationships for health effects associated with exposure to vehicular traffic. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 18, 588–599.

 
Lopez, P.A., Behrisch, M., Bieker-Walz, L., Erdmann, J., Flötteröd, Y.P., Hilbrich, R., Lücken, L., Rummel, J., Wagner, P., Wießner, E., 2018. Microscopic traffic simulation using sumo. In: The 21st IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE.
 

Mariani, M., Styven, M.E., Ayeh, J.K., 2019. Using facebook for travel decision-making: an international study of antecedents. Int. J. Contemp. Hospit. Manag. 31, 1021–1044.

 
Mirjalili, S., 2019. Genetic algorithm. In: Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks. Springer, pp. 43–55.
 
Miwa, T., Tawada, Y., Yamamoto, T., Morikawa, T., 2004. En-route updating methodology of travel time prediction using accumulated probe-car data. In: Proc. Of the 11th ITS World Congress. Citeseer.
 

Möhring, M., Keller, B., Schmidt, R., Dacko, S., 2021. Google popular times: towards a better understanding of tourist customer patronage behavior. Tourism Rev. 76, 533–569.

 

Moyano, A., Stçpniak, M., Moya-Gómez, B., García-Palomares, J.C., 2021. Traffic congestion and economic context: changes of spatiotemporal patterns of traffic travel times during crisis and post-crisis periods. Transportation 48, 3301–3324.

 

Nowoświat, A., Żuchowski, R., Pudełko, B., 2022. Effectiveness of the simulation of acoustic protection for a specific urban situation. Period. Polytech. Transp. Eng. 50, 227–234.

 

Osorio-Arjona, J., García-Palomares, J.C., 2019. Social media and urban mobility: using twitter to calculate home-work travel matrices. Cities 89, 268–280.

 

Papageorgiou, M., 2004. Overview of road traffic control strategies. IFAC Proc. Vol. 37, 29–40.

 
Pentland, A., 2015. Social Physics: How Social Networks Can Make Us Smarter. Penguin.
 

Pourebrahim, N., Sultana, S., Niakanlahiji, A., Thill, J.C., 2019. Trip distribution modeling with Twitter data. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 77, 101354.

 

Rathore, M.M., Attique Shah, S., Awad, A., Shukla, D., Vimal, S., Paul, A., 2021. A cyber-physical system and graph-based approach for transportation management in smart cities. Sustainability 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147606.

 
Ritchie, H., Roser, M., Rosado, P., 2020. CO2 and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Our World in Data.
 

Shahwani, H., Attique Shah, S., Ashraf, M., Akram, M., Jeong, J.P., Shin, J., 2022. A comprehensive survey on data dissemination in vehicular ad hoc networks. Vehicular Communications 34, 100420.

 

Tettamanti, T., Horváth, M., Varga, I., 2014. Road traffic measurement and related data fusion methodology for traffic estimation. Transport and Telecommunication 15, 269–279.

 

Thonhofer, E., Palau, T., Kuhn, A., Jakubek, S., Kozek, M., 2018. Macroscopic traffic model for large scale urban traffic network design. Simulat. Model. Pract. Theor. 80, 32–49.

 
Turksma, S., 2000. The various uses of floating car data, road transport information and control. In: Tenth International Conference. Conference Publication No. 472), London, pp. 4–6.
 

Zhang, Z., He, Q., Zhu, S., 2017. Potentials of using social media to infer the longitudinal travel behavior: a sequential model-based clustering method. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 85, 396–414.

Communications in Transportation Research
Article number: 100102
Cite this article:
Kolat M, Tettamanti T, Bécsi T, et al. On the relationship between the activity at point of interests and road traffic. Communications in Transportation Research, 2023, 3: 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2023.100102

221

Views

6

Crossref

5

Web of Science

6

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 13 June 2023
Revised: 31 August 2023
Accepted: 07 September 2023
Published: 29 October 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return