AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (786.6 KB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Do forest health threats affect upland oak regeneration and recruitment? Advance reproduction is a key co-morbidity

Lance A. Vickersa,1( )Benjamin O. KnappaDaniel C. DeybLauren S. Pile Knappb
School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, 203 Anheuser-Busch Natural Resources Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, 202 Anheuser-Busch Natural Resources Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

1 Present address: Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Kentucky, 203 Thomas Poe Cooper Building, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0073, USA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

We analyzed national forest inventory data collected from circa 2000–2018 across 37 states in the eastern United States to better understand the influence of forest health related canopy disturbances on the regeneration and recruitment dynamics of upland oaks (Quercus). We found low levels of oak recruitment across all disturbance types examined but limited evidence of any direct effects from the type of disturbance on the population of regenerating oaks. The general lack of differences in oak regeneration response between forest health disturbances and disturbances caused by harvested or non-disturbed plots does not indicate that the effects of forest health disturbances were benign, however. Instead, low level of oak recruitment across all disturbance types highlights the pervasiveness of the trend of shifting composition in once oak-dominated forests where oak is absent or sparse in the regeneration layer. Our results show that oak recruitment was higher when oak was present as advance reproduction prior to disturbance from any cause examined. Collectively, these results lead us to conclude that the widespread inadequacy of oak advance reproduction in mature oak-dominated forests is the prevailing threat to oak forest health and sustainability. We suggest the status of advance reproduction be treated as a co-morbidity when weighing the risk and potential outcomes from other threats to upland oak forests in the eastern United States.

References

 

Appel, D.N., 1995. The oak wilt enigma: perspectives from the Texas epidemic. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 33, 103-118.

 
Bechtold, W.A., Patterson, P.L., 2005. The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program - national sampling design and estimation procedures. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-80. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville. https://doi.org/10.2737/SRS-GTR-80.
 

Bobiec, A., Reif, A., Öllerer, K., 2018. Seeing the oakscape beyond the forest: a landscape approach to the oak regeneration in Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 33, 513-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0619-y.

 

Brooks, M.E., Kristensen, K., van Benthem, K.J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C.W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H.J., Mächler, M., Bolker, B.M., 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9 (2), 378-400. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-066.

 
Brose, P.H., Gottschalk, K.W., Horsely, S.B., Knopp, P.D., Kochenderfer, J.N., McGuinness, B.J., Miller, G.W., Ristau, T.E., Stoleson, S.H., Stout, S.L., 2008. Prescribing regeneration treatments for mixed-oak forests in the Mid-Atlantic region. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-33. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-33.
 

Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, second ed. Springer, New York.

 
Burns, R.M., Honkala, B.H., 1990. Silvics of North America. USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook 654. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/misc/ag_654/table_of_contents.htm. (Accessed 11 September 2023).
 
Burrill, E.A., Wilson, A.M., Turner, J.A., Pugh, S.A., Menlove, J., Christiansen, G., Conkling, B.L., David, W., 2018. The forest inventory and analysis database: database description and user guide version 8.0 for Phase 2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/database-documentation/. (Accessed 11 September 2023).
 

Cavender-Bares, J., 2016. Diversity, distribution and ecosystem services of the North American oaks. Int. Oaks 27, 37-48.

 

Cavender-Bares, J., 2019. Diversification, adaptation, and community assembly of the American oaks Quercus, a model clade for integrating ecology and evolution. New Phytol. 221, 669-692.

 

Conrad, A.O., Crocker, E.V., Li, X., Thomas, W.R., Ochuodho, T.O., Holmes, T.P., Nelson, C.D., 2020. Threats to oaks in the eastern United States: perceptions and expectations of experts. J. For. 118 (1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz056.

 

Dey, D.C., 2014. Sustaining oak forests in eastern North America: regeneration and recruitment, the pillars of sustainability. For. Sci. 60, 926-942. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.13-114.

 
Edmonds, R.L., Agee, J.K., Gara, R.I., 2010. Forest Health and Protection. Waveland Press, Inc., Long Grove. . ISBN: 0-07-021338-0.
 

Egler, F.E., 1954. Vegetation science concepts I. Initial floristic composition, a factor in old-field vegetation development with 2 figs. Vegetatio 4, 412-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275587.

 

Fei, S., Kong, N., Steiner, K.C., Moser, W.K., Steiner, E.B., 2011. Change in oak abundance in the eastern United States from 1980 to 2008. For. Ecol. Manag. 262, 1370-1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.030.

 

Fei, S., Morin, R.S., Oswalt, C.M., Liebhold, A.M., 2019. Biomass losses resulting from insect and disease invasions in US forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116 (35), 17371-17376. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820601116.

 

Fox, J., Weisberg, S., 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression, third ed. Sage, USA.

 

Gingrich, S.F., 1967. Measuring and evaluating stocking and stand density in upland hardwood forests in the Central States. For. Sci. 13, 38-52.

 

Götmark, F., Kiffer, C., 2014. Regeneratoin of oaks (Quercus robur/Q. patraea) and three other tree species during long-term succession after catastrophic disturbance (windthrow). Plant Ecol. 215, 1067-1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0365-4.

 
Gottschalk, K.W., 1993. Silvicultural Guidelines for Forest Stands Threatened by the Gypsy Moth. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-171, Radnor, PA. https://doi.org/10.2737/NE-GTR-171.
 

Haller, D.J., Wimberly, M.C., 2020. Estimating the potential for forest degradation in the eastern United States woodlands from an introduction of sudden oak death. Forests 11 (12), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121334.

 

Heitzman, E., Grell, A., Spetich, M., Starkey, D., 2007. Changes in forest structure associated with oak decline in severely impacted areas of northern Arkansas. South. J. Appl. Finance 31, 17-22.

 

Heydari, M., Prévosto, B., Abdi, T., Mirzaei, J., Mirab-balou, M., Rostami, N., Khosravi, M., Pothier, D., 2017. Establishment of oak seedlings in historically disturbed sites: regeneration success as a function of stand structure and soil characteristics. Ecol. Eng. 107, 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.016.

 

Hilbe, J.M., 2011. Negative Binomial Regression, second ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973420.

 

Johnson, P.S., Shifley, S.R., Rogers, R., Dey, D.C., Kabrick, J.M., 2019. The Ecology and Silviculture of Oaks, third ed. CABI Books, CABI.

 

Kolb, T.E., Steiner, K.C., McCormick, L.H., Bowersox, T.W., 1990. Growth response of nortnern red-oak and yellow-poplar seedlings to light, soil moisture, and nutrients in relation to ecological strategy. For. Ecol. Manag. 38, 35-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(90)90086-Q.

 

Krajicek, J.E., Brinkman, K.A., Gingrich, S.F., 1961. Crown competition – a measure of density. For. Sci. 7 (1), 35-42.

 

Larsen, D.R., Johnson, P., 1998. Linking the ecology of natural oak regeneration to silviculture. For. Ecol. Manag. 106 (1), 1-7.

 
Lenth, R., 2023. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.8.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. (Accessed 11 September 2023).
 
Loftis, D.L., 2004. Upland oak regeneration and management. pp. 163–167. In: Spetich, M.A. (Ed.), Upland oak ecology symposium: history, current conditions, and sustainability. Gen. Tech. Rep. USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC, p. 311. GTR-SRS-73.
 

Loftis, D.L., 1990. Predicting post-harvest performance of advance oak reproduction in the Southern Appalachians. For. Sci. 36, 908-916.

 
Loftis, D.L., McGee, C.E., 1993. Oak Regeneration: Serious Problems, Practical Recommendations. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. Asheville, NC. https://doi.org/10.2737/SE-GTR-84.
 

Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M.S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., Makowski, D., 2021. Performance: an R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. J. Open Source Softw. 6 (60), 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139.

 

McEwan, R.W., Dyer, J.M., Pederson, N., 2011. Multiple interacting ecosystem drivers: toward an encompassing hypothesis of oak forest dynamics across eastern North America. Ecography 34, 244-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06390.x.

 
McNab, W.H., Cleland, D.T., Freeouf, J.A., Keys, J.E., Nowacki, G.J., Carpenter, C.A., 2007. Description of "Ecological Subregions: Sections of the Conterminuous United Stated" First Approximation. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report GTRWO-76B, Washington DC.
 
McShea, W.J., Healy, W.M. (Eds.), 2002. Oak Forest Ecosystems Ecology and Management for Wildlife. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
 

McShea, W.J., Healy, W.M., Devers, P., Fearer, T., Koch, F.H., Stauffer, D., Waldon, J., 2007. Forestry matters: decline of oaks will impact wildlife in hardwood forests. J. Wildl. Manag. 71 (5), 1717-1728. https://doi.org/10.2193/2006-169.

 

Meunier, J., Bronson, D.R., Scanlon, K., Gray, R.H., 2019. Effects of oak wilt (Bretziella fagacearum) on post harvest Quercus regeneration. For. Ecol. Manag. 432, 575-581.

 
Miles, P.D., 2017. Forest Inventory EVALIDator Web-Application. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, St. Paul, MN. Northern Research Station, Version 1.6.0.03. http://apps.fs.fed.us/Evalidator/evalidator.jsp. (Accessed 11 September 2023).
 
Miller, G.W., Stringer, J.W., Mercker, D.C., 2007. Technical Guide to Crop Tree Release in Hardwood Forests. Publication PB1774. University of Tennessee Cooperative Extension, Knoxville, TN.
 

Miller, K.M., McGill, B.J., 2019. Compounding human stressors cause major regeneration debt in over half of eastern US forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 1355-1366. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13375.

 
Moser, W.K., Hansen, M., McWilliams, W., Sheffield, R., 2006. Oak composition and structure in the eastern United States. In: Dickinson, M.B. (Ed.), Fire in Eastern Oak Forests: Delivering Science to Land Managers. Proceedings of a Conference, 2005 November 15-17, Columbus, OH. USDA for. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA. Northern Research Station.
 

Novick, K., Jo, I., D'Orangeville, L., Benson, M., Au, T.F., Barnes, M., Denham, S., Fei, S., Heilman, K., Hwang, T., Keyser, T., Maxwell, J., Miniat, C., McLachlan, J., Pederson, N., Wang, L., Wood, J.D., Phillips, R.P., 2022. The drought response of eastern US oaks in the context of their declining abundance. Bioscience 72 (4), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab135.

 
Peters, M.P., Prasad, A.M., Matthews, S.N., Iverson, L.R., 2020. Climate Change Tree Atlas. U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station and Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science, Delaware, OH, Version 4. https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas. (Accessed 11 September 2023).
 
Potter, K., Conkling, B., 2021. Forest health monitoring: national status, trends, and analysis. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. https://doi.org/10.2737/SRS-GTR-266. SRS-GTR-266, Asheville, NC.
 
R Core Team, 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. (Accessed 11 September 2023).
 

Radcliffe, D.C., Hix, D.M., Matthews, S.N., 2021. Predisposing factors' effects on mortality of oak (Quercus) and hickory (Carya) species in mature forests undergoing mesophication in Appalachian Ohio. For. Ecosyst. 8, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00286-z.

 

Schwarz, G.W., 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6 (2), 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.

 

Shifley, S.R., Moser, W.K., Nowak, D.J., Miles, P.D., Butler, B.J., Aguilar, F.X., DeSantis, R.D., Greenfield, E.J., 2014. Five anthropogenic factors that will radically alter forest conditions and management needs in the Northern United States. For. Sci. 60 (5), 914-925. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.13-153.

 
Stringer, J., Thomas, B., Ammerman, B., Niman, C., Agyeman, D., Thapa, B., Ochuodho, T., 2021. Kentucky Forest Sector Economic Contribution Report 2020- 2021. University of Kentucky Extension Publication FORFS 22-01. https://forestry.ca.uky.edu/files/ky_contribution_report2020-2021.pdf. (Accessed 11 September 2023).
 

Vickers, L.A., McWilliams, W.H., Knapp, B.O., D'Amato, A.W., Saunders, M.R., Shifley, S.R., Kabrick, J.M., Dey, D.C., Larsen, D.R., Westfall, J.A., 2019a. Using a tree-seedling mortality budget as an indicator of landscape-scale forest regeneration security. Ecol. Indic. 96 (1), 718-727.

 

Vickers, L.A., McWilliams, W.H., Knapp, B.O., D'Amato, A.W., Dey, D.C., Dickinson, Y.L., Kabrick, J.M., Kenefic, L.S., Kern, C.C., Larsen, D.R., Royo, A.A., Saunders, M.R., Shifley, S.R., Westfall, J.A., 2019b. Are current seedling demographics poised to regenerate northern US forests? J. For. 117, 592-612. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz046.

 

Ward, J.S., 2009. Intensity of precommercial crop tree release increases diameter growth and survival of upland oaks. Can. J. For. Res. 39, 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1139/x08-165.

 

Wurzburger, N., Elliott, K.J., Miniat, C.F., 2023. Forest mycorrhizal dominance depends on historical land use and nitrogen-fixing trees. J. Appl. Ecol. 60 (8), 1551-1561. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14443.

 

Zuur, A., Ieno, E., Walker, N., Saveliev, A., Smith, G., 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York.

Forest Ecosystems
Article number: 100152
Cite this article:
Vickers LA, Knapp BO, Dey DC, et al. Do forest health threats affect upland oak regeneration and recruitment? Advance reproduction is a key co-morbidity. Forest Ecosystems, 2023, 10(6): 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2023.100152

247

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 11 October 2023
Revised: 22 November 2023
Accepted: 23 November 2023
Published: 28 November 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return