AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (7.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Multiple action sites of ultrasound on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus

Xinyu Liaoa,b,cJiao Lia,bYuanjie Suoa,bShiguo Chena,bXingqian Yea,bDonghong Liua,b,cTian Dinga,b,c( )
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, National Engineering Laboratory of Intelligent Food Technology and Equipment, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
Key Laboratory for Agro-Products Postharvest Handling of Ministry of Agriculture, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Agro-Food Processing, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
Fuli Institute of Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Ultrasound, is thought to a potential non-thermal sterilization technology in food industry. However, the exact mechanisms underlying microbial inactivation by ultrasound still remain obscure. In this study, the action modes of ultrasound on both Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms were estimated. From colony results, ultrasound acted as an irreversible effect on both Eshcerichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus without sublethal injury. The result in this study also showed that a proportion of bacteria subpopulation suffered from serious damage of intracellular components (e.g. DNA and enzymes) but with intact cell envelopes. We speculated that the inactivated effects of ultrasound on microbes might more than simply completed disruption of cell exteriors. Those microbial cells who had not enter the valid area of ultrasonic cavitation might be injected with free radicals produced by ultrasound and experienced interior injury with intact exterior structure, and others who were in close proximity to the ultrasonic wave field would be immediately and completely disrupted into debris by high power mechanic forces. These findings here try to provide extension for the inactivation mechanisms of ultrasound on microorganisms.

References

[1]

T.J. Mason, L. Paniwnyk, J.P. Lorimer, The uses of ultrasound in food technology, Ultrason. Sonochem. 3 (1996) S253-S260.

[2]

P. Piyasena, E. Mohareb, R.C. McKellar, Inactivation of microbes using ultrasound: a review, Int. J. Food Microb. 87 (2003) 207–216.

[3]

E.N. Harvey, A.L. Loomis, The destruction of luminous bacteria by high frequency sound waves, J. Bacteriol. 17 (1929) 373–376.

[4]
M.J.W. Povey, T.J. Mason, in: M.J.W. Povey, T.J. Mason (Eds.), Ultrasound in Food Processing. Ultrasound in Food Processing, 1998, p. 282.
[5]

J. Wu, W.L. Nyborg, Ultrasound: cavitation bubbles and their interaction with cells, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60 (2008) 1103–1116.

[6]

S. Drakopoulou, S. Terzakis, M.S. Fountoulakis, et al., Ultrasound-induced inactivation of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria in secondary treated municipal wastewater, Ultrason. Sonochem. 16 (2009) 629–634.

[7]

M. Ashokkumar, The characterization of acoustic cavitation bubbles – an overview, Ultrason. Sonochem. 18 (2011) 864–872.

[8]

N.K. Rastogi, Opportunities and challenges in application of ultrasound in food processing, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 51 (2011) 705–722.

[9]

R.M. Appleyard, Understanding physical inactivation processes: combined preservation opportunities using heat, ultrasound and pressure, Int. J. Food Microbiol. 28 (1995) 197–219.

[10]

S.Z. Salleh-Mack, J.S. Roberts, Ultrasound pasteurization: the effects of temperature, soluble solids, organic acids and pH on the inactivation of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Ultrason. Sonochem. 14 (2007) 323–329.

[11]

J. Li, J. Ahn, D. Liu, et al., Evaluation of ultrasound-induced damage to Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by flow cytometry and transmission electron microscopy, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82 (2016) 1828–1837.

[12]

D.E. Hughes, W.L. Nyborg, Cell disruption by ultrasound, Science (1962) 138.

[13]

M. Ashokkumar, T. Vu, F. Grieser, et al., Ultrasonic treatment of Cryptosporidium oocysts, Water Sci. Technol. 47 (2003) 173–177.

[14]

B.A. Wordon, B. Mortimer, L.D. McMaster, Comparative real-time analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell viability, injury and death induced by ultrasound (20 kHz) and heat for the application of hurdle technology, Food Res. Int. 47 (2012) 134–139.

[15]

J.F. Brilhante De Sao Jose, N.J. de Andrade, A.M. Ramos, et al., Decontamination by ultrasound application in fresh fruits and vegetables, Food Control 45 (2014) 36–50.

[16]

S. Gao, G.D. Lewis, M. Ashokkumar, et al., Inactivation of microorganisms by low-frequency high-power ultrasound: 2. A simple model for the inactivation mechanism, Ultrason. Sonochem. 21 (2014) 454–460.

[17]
S. Kentish, H. Feng, in: M.P. Doyle, T.R. Klaenhammer (Eds.), Applications of Power Ultrasound in Food Processing. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 2014, pp. 263–284.
[18]

W. Tao, Y. Xiao, H. Antuo, et al., Ultrasonic disruption of yeast cells: underlying mechanism and effects of processing parameters, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 28 (2015) 59–65.

[19]

G.J. Price, Applications of high-intensity ultrasound in polymer chemistry, Chem. Ind. Lond. (1993) 75–78.

[20]

K.D. Stanley, D.A. Golden, R.C. Williams, et al., Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by high-intensity ultrasonication in the presence of salts, Foodbourne Pathog. Dis. 1 (2004) 267–280.

[21]

J. Li, T. Ding, X. Liao, et al., Synergetic effects of ultrasound and slightly acidic electrolyzed water against Staphylococcus aureus evaluated by flow cytometry and electron microscopy, Ultrason. Sonochem. 38 (2017) 711–719.

[22]
B.M.Mackey, in: B.M. Lund, T.C. Baird-parker,G.W.Gould(Eds.),Injured bacteria. The microbiological safety and quality of food, Aspen Publishers, Inc., Gaithersburg, 2000, pp. 315–341.
[23]

X. Xuan, T. Ding, J. Li, et al., Estimation of growth parameters of Listeria monocytogenes after sublethal heat and slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) treatment, Food Control 71 (2017) 17–25.

[24]

F. Ahmed, C. Russell, Synergism between ultrasonic waves and hydrogen peroxide in the killing of microorganisms, J. Appl. Bacteriol. 39 (1975) 31–40.

[25]
(a) H. Alliger, Ultrasonic disruption, Am. Lab. 10 (1975) 75–85;(b) M. Lovgren, et al., In vitro effect of ultrasound on bacteria and suggested protocol for sonication and diagnosis of prosthetic infections, J. Clin. Microbiol. 47 (2009) 2496–2501.
[26]

G. Huang, S. Chen, C. Dai, et al., Effects of ultrasound on microbial growth and enzyme activity, Ultrason. Sonochem. 37 (2017) 144–149.

[27]

P.R. Clarke, C.R. Hill, Physical and chemical aspects of ultrasonic disruption of cells, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 47 (1970) 649.

[28]

N.J. Rusell, M. Colley, R.K. Simpson, et al., Mechanism of action of pulsed high electric field (PHEF) on the membranes of food-poisoning bacteria is an ‘all-or-nothing' effect, Int. J. Food Microbiol. 55 (2000) 133–136.

[29]

P.J.J. Lyon, Fullerene water suspension (nC(60)) exerts antibacterial effects via ros-independent protein oxidation, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008) 8127–8132.

[30]
F.M. Harold, The vital force: a study of bioenergetics, WH Freeman, New York, 1986.
[31]

D. Novo, N.G. Perlmutter, R.H. Hunt, et al., Accurate flow cytometric membrane potential measurement in bacteria using diethyloxacarbocyanine and a ratiometric technique, Cytometry 35 (1999) 55–63.

[32]

N.Z. Jiao, Y.J. Yang, T.W. Luo, Membrane potential based characterization by flow cytometry of physiological states in an aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacterium, Aquat. Microbiol. Ecol. 37 (2004) 149–158.

[33]

C.S. Lunde, S.R. Hartou6ni, J.W. Janc, et al., Telavancin disrupts the functional integrity of the bacterial membrane through targeted interaction with the cell wall precursor lipid Ⅱ, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53 (2009) 3375–3383.

[34]

H.R. Malcolm, D.E. Elmore, J.A. Maurer, Exploring the response of bacterial cyclic nucleotide gated (bCNG) ion channels to mechanical stress, Biophys. J. 1001 (2011), 104–104.

[35]
T. Sawada, Ion channels activated by mechanical forces in bacterial and eukaryotic cells, in: K. Akasaka, H. Matsuki (Eds.), Subcellular Biochemistry, 2015, pp. 613–626.
[36]

L. Chikahisa, Y. Oyama, Tri-n-butyltin increases intracellular Ca2+ in mouse thymocytes: a flow-cytometric study using fluorescent dyes for membrane potential and intracellular Ca2+, Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 71 (1992) 190–195.

[37]

C. Pieri, R. Recchion, F. Moroni, et al., A sodium channel opener inhibits stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, Mol. Immunol. 29 (1992) 517–524.

[38]

H. Nikaido, Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67 (2003) 593.

[39]

N.S.M. Yusof, B. Babgi, Y. Alghamdi, et al., Physical and chemical effects of acoustic cavitation in selected ultrasonic cleaning applications, Ultrason. Sonochem. 29 (2016) 568–576.

Food Science and Human Wellness
Pages 102-109
Cite this article:
Liao X, Li J, Suo Y, et al. Multiple action sites of ultrasound on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Food Science and Human Wellness, 2018, 7(1): 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2018.01.002

419

Views

13

Downloads

50

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

55

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 24 November 2017
Revised: 07 January 2018
Accepted: 22 January 2018
Published: 15 February 2018
© 2018 “Society information”.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return