AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

The amino acids differences in epitopes may promote the different allergenicity of ovomucoid derived from hen eggs and quail eggs

Mengzhen HaoShuai YangShiwen HanHuilian Che( )
Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, Ministry of Education, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China

Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Quail egg ovomucoid can inhibit activation of basophils and eosinophils, while hen egg ovomucoid has been shown to be a major allergen, named Gal d 1. At present, the differences in structure and function between two ovomucoid are unclear. We found the homology of ovomucoid in quail eggs and hen eggs reached 77%. Compared with hen egg ovomucoid, the distribution of secondary structure was different in AA52−53, AA57−58, AA66−68, AA71−72, AA131−133, AA139−140, AA157−159 and AA184−185. Among 9 epitopes of egg ovomucoid, there were different amino acids from quail egg ovomucoid in 8 epitopes. Recombination quail egg ovomucoid had trypsin inhibition activity and quail egg ovomucoid didn't specifically bind to serum of eggs allergic patients. Quail egg ovomucoid can significantly inhibit RBL-2H3 cells degranulation and protect cells morphology to a certain extent, indicating quail egg ovomucoid can inhibit cells activation and have potential anti-allergic effects, which is related to trypsin inhibitory activity. The difference in sensitization compare to hen egg ovomucoid may be due to amino acids differences affecting protein structure by changing antigenic epitopes.

References

[1]

R.S. Gupta, C.M. Warren, B.M. Smith, et al., The public health impact of parent-reported childhood food allergies in the United States, Pediatrics 142 (2018) e20181235. http://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-1235.

[2]

R.S. Gupta, C.M. Warren, B.M. Smith, et al., Prevalence and severity of food allergies among US adults, JAMA Network Open 2 (2019) e185630. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5630.

[3]

W. Loh, M.L.K. Tang, The epidemiology of food allergy in the global context, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (2018) 2043. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15092043.

[4]

D. Silva, M. Geromi, S. Halken, et al., Primary prevention of food allergy in children and adults: systematic review, Allergy 69 (2014) 581-589. http://doi.org/10.1111/all.12334.

[5]

W. Yu, D. Freeland, K. Nadeau, Food allergy: immune mechanisms, diagnosis and immunotherapy, Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16 (2016) 751-765. http://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.111.

[6]

J. Gu, T. Matsuda, R. Nakamura, et al., Chemical deglycosylation of hen ovomucoid: protective effect of carbohydrate moiety on tryptic hydrolysis and heat denaturation, J. Biochem. 106 (1989) 66-70. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a122821.

[7]

Y. Mine, J.Wei Zhang, Identification and fine mapping of IgG and IgE epitopes in ovomucoid, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 292 (2002) 1070-1074. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2002.6725.

[8]

A.C. Benichou, M. Armanet, A. Bussiere, et al., A proprietary blend of quail egg for the attenuation of nasal provocation with a standardized allergenic challenge: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, Food Sci. Nutr. 2 (2014) 655-663. http://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.147.

[9]

P. Lianto, F. Ogutu, Y. Zhang, et al., Inhibitory effects of quail egg on mast cells degranulation by suppressing PAR2-mediated MAPK and NF-κB activation, Food Nutr. Res. 62 (2018) 1084. http://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v62.1084.

[10]

H. Lineweaver, C.W. Murray, Identification of the trypsin inhibitor of egg white with ovomucoid, J. Biol. Chem. 171 (1947) 565-581.

[11]

R.E. Feeney, G.E. Means, J.C. Bigler, Inhibition of human trypsin, plasmin, and thrombin by naturally occurring inhibitors of proteolytic enzymes, J. Biol. Chem. 244 (1969) 1957-1960. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)94352-8.

[12]

Y. Jin, R.E. Goodman, A.O. Tetteh, et al., Bioinformatics analysis to assess potential risks of allergenicity and toxicity of HRAP and PFLP proteins in genetically modified bananas resistant to Xanthomonas wilt disease, Food Chem. Toxicol. 109 (2017) 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.024.

[13]

A. Saidi, Z. Hajibarat, Z. Hajibarat, et al., Bioinformatics evaluation of transgenic organisms for allergenicity potential, J. Plant. Res. 34 (2021) 1036-1046.

[14]

G.S. Ladics, Assessment of the potential allergenicity of genetically-engineered food crops, J. Immunotoxicol. 16 (2019) 43-53. http://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2018.1533904.

[15]

R. Goodman, S. Vieths, H. Sampson, et al., Erratum: allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops—what makes sense?, Nat. Biotechnol. 26 (2008) 241-241. http://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0208-241a.

[16]

T.P. Hopp, K.R. Woods, Prediction of protein antigenic determinants from amino acid sequences, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78 (1981) 3824-3828. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.78.6.3824.

[17]

J. Kyte, R.F. Doolittle, A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein, J. Mol. Biol. 157 (1982) 105-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0.

[18]

P.A. Karplus, G.E. Schulz, Prediction of chain flexibility in proteins, Naturwissenschaften 72 (1985) 212-213. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01195768.

[19]

E.A. Emini, J.V. Hughes, D.S. Perlow, et al., Induction of hepatitis A virus-neutralizing antibody by a virus-specific synthetic peptide, J. Virol. 55 (1985) 836-839. http://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.55.3.836-839.1985.

[20]

B.A. Jameson, H. Wolf, The antigenic index: a novel algorithm for predicting antigenic determinants, Comput. Appl. Biosci. 4 (1988) 181-186. http://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/4.1.181.

[21]

X. Guo, S. Jiang, X. Li, et al., Sequence analysis of digestion-resistant peptides may be an efficient strategy for studying the linear epitopes of Jug r 1, the major walnut allergen, Food Chem. 322 (2020) 126711. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126711.

[22]

G.R. Sharmila, P.M. Halami, G. Venkateswaran, Identification and characterization of a calcium dependent bacillopeptidase from Bacillus subtilis CFR5 with novel kunitz trypsin inhibitor degradation activity, Food Res. Int. 103 (2018) 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.049.

[23]

I. Ahmed, J. Ma, Z. Li, et al., Effect of tyrosinase and caffeic acid crosslinking of turbot parvalbumin on the digestibility, and release of mediators and cytokines from activated RBL-2H3 cells, Food Chem. 300 (2019) 125209. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125209.

[24]

R.S. Gupta, M.M. Walkner, M. Greenhawt, et al., Food allergy sensitization and presentation in siblings of food allergic children, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 4 (2016) 956-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2016.04.009.

[25]

A. Homann, G. Schramm, U. Jappe, Glycans and glycan-specific IgE in clinical and molecular allergology: sensitization, diagnostics, and clinical symptoms, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 140 (2017) 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.04.019.

[26]

J.G. Beeley, Location of the carbohydrate groups of ovomucoid, Biochem. J. 159 (1976) 335-345. http://doi.org/10.1042/bj1590335.

[27]

I. Kato, J. Schrode, W.J. Kohr, et al., Chicken ovomucoid: determination of its amino acid sequence, determination of the trypsin reactive site, and preparation of all three of its domains, Biochemistry 26 (1987) 193-201. http://doi.org/10.1021/bi00375a027.

[28]

J.T. Christeller, Evolutionary mechanisms acting on proteinase inhibitor variability, FEBS J. 272 (2005) 5710-5722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04975.x.

[29]

G. Pejler, M. Åbrink, M. Ringvall, et al., Mast cell proteases, Adv. Immunol. 95 (2007) 167-255.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065277607950063.

[30]

P. Rallabhandi, Q.M. Nhu, V.Y. Toshchakov, et al., Analysis of proteinase-activated receptor 2 and TLR4 signal transduction: a novel paradigm for receptor cooperativity, J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008) 24314-24325. http://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M804800200.

[31]

B. McNeil, P. Pundir, S. Meeker, et al., Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions, Nature 519 (2014) 237-241. http://doi.org/10.1038/nature14022.

[32]
US 2015/0057232 A1, United States Patent Application Publication, 2015.
Food Science and Human Wellness
Pages 861-870
Cite this article:
Hao M, Yang S, Han S, et al. The amino acids differences in epitopes may promote the different allergenicity of ovomucoid derived from hen eggs and quail eggs. Food Science and Human Wellness, 2023, 12(3): 861-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2022.09.028

654

Views

79

Downloads

8

Crossref

6

Web of Science

7

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 07 June 2021
Revised: 20 July 2021
Accepted: 22 September 2021
Published: 15 October 2022
© 2023 Beijing Academy of Food Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return