Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
HIGHLIGHTS
Graphical Abstract
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Two-stage aging trajectory prediction of LFP lithium-ion battery based on transfer learning with the cycle life prediction

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission & College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400000, China
Department of Vehicle Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kettering University, Flint, MI-48504, USA

Handling Editor: Professor Fengchun Sun

Show Author Information

HIGHLIGHTS

· The principles for extracting features that are suitable for cycle life prediction from the battery cycling profiles are summarized. Then a novel feature extracted from the battery voltage is found to be effective in achieving accurate cycle life prediction.

· It is found that the cycle-to-cycle evolution of the proposed feature has a high correlation with the battery cycle life for LFP lithium-ion battery, which indicates that the change of battery voltage in charging process is related to the battery cycle life.

· Accurate long-term aging trajectory prediction can be achieved when satisfactory transfer learning is done by finetuning with informative prior information like the battery cycle life which is related to the aging trend of the battery.

· The whole aging process of the batteries is found to be slower when they have longer cycle life even under the same operating condition, which indicates that the difference in aging trajectories indeed has already shown in earlier cycles.

Graphical Abstract

View original image Download original image

Abstract

With the wide application of the LFP lithium-ion batteries, more attention is paid to the battery life and future aging behaviors as the safety and performance of the battery are guaranteed by accurate battery aging monitoring. In recent years, long-term aging trajectory prediction of the lithium-ion battery is always a challenge due to its complex nonlinear aging behaviors especially the aging behaviors in the two aging stages are quite different when the battery experiences the two-stage aging process under fast-charging conditions. Thus, it is harder to achieve accurate long-term aging trajectory prediction of the LFP lithium-ion batteries on the condition of the two-stage aging process. To address it, a novel transfer learning strategy combined with the cycle life prediction technology is presented in this paper. Specifically, a new cycle life prediction method is proposed based on feature extraction and deep learning technology and achieves accurate cycle life prediction. The transfer learning is started by developing a base aging model offline to learn the information of the two-stage aging process. Then, taking the predicted cycle life as its prior information, the Bayesian model migration technology is employed to predict the aging trajectory accurately, and the uncertainty of the aging trajectory is quantified. Two batches of the battery datasets are used for performance evaluation and comparison with two benchmarks. It is novel to combine the cycle life prediction and transfer learning technique to achieve accurate two-stage aging trajectory prediction with only a few data available (first 30%).

References

[1]

Zhou D, Li Z, Zhu J, Zhang H, Hou L. State of health monitoring and remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on temporal convolutional network. IEEE Access 2020;8:53307–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981261.

[2]

Lin CP, Cabrera J, Yang F, Ling MH, Tsui KL, Bae S-J. Battery state of health modeling and remaining useful life prediction through time series model. Appl Energy 2020;275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115338.

[3]

Li X, Yuan C, Wang Z. Multi-time-scale framework for prognostic health condition of lithium battery using modified Gaussian process regression and nonlinear regression. J Power Sources 2020;467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228358.

[4]

Li P, Zhang Z, Xiong Q, Ding B, Hou J, Luo D, et al. State-of-health estimation and remaining useful life prediction for the lithium-ion battery based on a variant long short term memory neural network. J Power Sources 2020;459:228069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228069.

[5]
Shu X, Li G, Shen J, Lei Z, Chen Z, Liu Y. A uniform estimation framework for state of health of lithium-ion batteries considering feature extraction and parameters optimization. Energy Aug 1 2020;204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117957. Art no. 117957.
[6]

Wu Y, Xue Q, Shen J, Lei Z, Chen Z, Liu Y. State of health estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on healthy features and long short-term memory. IEEE Access 2020;8:28533–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2972344.

[7]

Xiong R, Zhang Y, Wang J, He H, Peng S, Pecht M. Lithium-ion battery health prognosis based on a real battery management system used in electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2019;68(5):4110–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2864688.

[8]

Wang Z, Zeng S, Guo J, Qin T. State of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on the constant voltage charging curve. Energy 2019;167:661–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.008.

[9]

Shu X, Shen J, Li G, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Liu Y. A flexible state-of-health prediction scheme for lithium-ion battery packs with long short-term memory network and transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification 2021;7(4):2238–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2021.3074638.

[10]

Wu Y, Zhang Y, Li G, Shen J, Chen Z, Liu Y. A predictive energy management strategy for multi-mode plug-in hybrid electric vehicles based on multi neural networks. Energy 2020;208:118366.

[11]

Adam A, Knobbe E, Wandt J, Kwade A. Application of the differential charging voltage analysis to determine the onset of lithium-plating during fast charging of lithium-ion cells. J Power Sources 2021;495:229794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229794.

[12]

Ouyang Q, Wang Z, Liu K, Xu G, Li Y. Optimal charging control for lithium-ion battery packs: a distributed average tracking approach. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2020;16(5):3430–8.

[13]

Reniers JM, Mulder G, Howey DA. Review and performance comparison of mechanical-chemical degradation models for lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 2019;166(14):A3189-200. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0281914jes.

[14]

Li J-F, Lin C-H, Chen K-C. Cycle life prediction of aged lithium-ion batteries from the fading trajectory of a four-parameter model. J Electrochem Soc 2018;165(16):A3634-41. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0211816jes.

[15]

Khodadadi Sadabadi K, Jin X, Rizzoni G. Prediction of remaining useful life for a composite electrode lithium ion battery cell using an electrochemical model to estimate the state of health. J Power Sources 2021;481:228861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228861.

[16]

Yang X-G, Leng Y, Zhang G, Ge S, Wang C-Y. Modeling of lithium plating induced aging of lithium-ion batteries: transition from linear to nonlinear aging. J Power Sources 2017;360:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.110.

[17]

Xiong R, Li L, Tian J. Towards a smarter battery management system: a critical review on battery state of health monitoring methods. J Power Sources 2018;405:18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.019.

[18]

Wang Z, Liu N, Guo Y. Adaptive sliding window LSTM NN based RUL prediction for lithium-ion batteries integrating LTSA feature reconstruction. Neurocomputing 2021;466:178–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.09.025.

[19]

Zhou Y, Huang M, Chen Y, Tao Y. A novel health indicator for on-line lithium-ion batteries remaining useful life prediction. J Power Sources 2016;321:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.119.

[20]

Tang T, Yuan H. A hybrid approach based on decomposition algorithm and neural network for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2022;217:108082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108082.

[21]

Zhang Y, Xiong R, He H, Pecht MG. Lithium-ion battery remaining useful life prediction with box–cox transformation and Monte Carlo simulation. Ieee T Ind Electron 2019;66(2):1585–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2018.2808918.

[22]

Lu J, Yao K, Gao F. Process similarity and developing new process models through migration. AIChE J 2009;55(9):2318–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11822.

[23]

Luo L, Yao Y, Gao F. Bayesian improved model migration methodology for fast process modeling by incorporating prior information. Chem Eng Sci 2015;134:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.04.045.

[24]

Luo L, Gao F. Model migration through bayesian adjustments. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015;48(8):112–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.08.166.

[25]

Tang X, Zou C, Yao K, Lu J, Xia Y, Gao F. Aging trajectory prediction for lithium-ion batteries via model migration and Bayesian Monte Carlo method. Appl Energy 2019;254:113591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113591.

[26]

Tang X, Liu K, Wang X, Liu B, Gao F, Widanage WD. Real-time aging trajectory prediction using a base model-oriented gradient-correction particle filter for Lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 2019;440:227118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227118.

[27]

Tang X, Yao K, Zou C, Liu B, Gao F. Predicting battery aging trajectory via a migrated aging model and bayesian Monte Carlo method. Energy Proc 2019;158:2456–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.320.

[28]

Tang X, Liu K, Wang X, Gao F, Macro J, Widanage WD. Model migration neural network for predicting battery aging trajectories. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification 2020;6(2):363–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/tte.2020.2979547.

[29]

Kim S, Choi YY, Kim KJ, Choi J-I. Forecasting state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries using variational long short-term memory with transfer learning. J Energy Storage 2021;41:102893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102893.

[30]

Severson KA, Attia PM, Jin N, Perkins N, Jiang B, Yang Z, et al. Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation. Nat Energy 2019;4(5):383–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0356-8.

[31]

Liu K, Tang X, Teodorescu R, Gao F, Meng J. Future ageing trajectory prediction for lithium-ion battery considering the knee point effect. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/tec.2021.3130600. 1–1.

[32]

Tian Y, Lin C, Li H, Du J, Xiong R. Detecting undesired lithium plating on anodes for lithium-ion batteries – a review on the in-situ methods. Appl Energy 2021;300:117386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117386.

[33]

Attia PM, Grover A, Jin N, Severson KA, Markov TM, Liao Y-H, et al. Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning. Nature 2020;578(7795):397–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1994-5.

[34]

He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. IEEE 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2016.90.

[35]
Zhang S, Zhai B, Guo X, Wang K, Peng N, Zhang X. Synchronous estimation of state of health and remaining useful lifetime for lithium-ion battery using the incremental capacity and artificial neural networks. J Energy Storage Dec 2019;26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.100951. Art no. 100951.
[36]

Li X, Wang Z, Zhang L, Zou C, Dorrell DD. State-of-health estimation for Li-ion batteries by combing the incremental capacity analysis method with grey relational analysis. J Power Sources Jan 15 2019;410:106–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.10.069.

[37]

Su L, Wu M, Li Z, Zhang J. Cycle life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on data-driven methods," eTransportation. 2021. p. 100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etran.2021.100137.

[38]

Zhang Q, Yang L, Guo W, Qiang J, Peng C, Li Q, et al. A deep learning method for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life prediction based on sparse segment data via cloud computing system. Energy 2021:122716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122716.

[39]

Hsu CW, Xiong R, Chen NY, Li J, Tsou NT. Deep neural network battery life and voltage prediction by using data of one cycle only. Appl Energy 2022;306:118134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118134.

[40]

Yang F, Wang D, Xu F, Huang Z, Tsui K-L. Lifespan prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on various extracted features and gradient boosting regression tree model. J Power Sources 2020;476:228654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228654.

[41]

Yang Y. A machine-learning prediction method of lithium-ion battery life based on charge process for different applications. Appl Energy 2021;292:116897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116897.

[42]

Hong J, Lee D, Jeong E-R, Yi Y. Towards the swift prediction of the remaining useful life of lithium-ion batteries with end-to-end deep learning. Appl Energy 2020;278:115646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115646.

[43]

Ma Y, Wu L, Guan Y, Peng Z. The capacity estimation and cycle life prediction of lithium-ion batteries using a new broad extreme learning machine approach. J Power Sources 2020;476:228581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228581.

[44]

Yin A, Tan Z, Tan J. Life prediction of battery using a neural Gaussian process with early discharge characteristics. Sensors 2021;21(4):1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041087.

[45]

Alipour M, Tavallaey SS, Andersson AM, Brandell D. Improved battery cycle life prediction using a hybrid data-driven model incorporating linear support vector regression and Gaussian process regression. ChemPhysChem 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202100829.

[46]

Greenbank S, Howey D. Automated feature extraction and selection for data-driven models of rapid battery capacity fade and end of life. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2022;18(5):2965–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2021.3106593.

[47]

He W, Williard N, Osterman M, Pecht M. Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on Dempster–Shafer theory and the Bayesian Monte Carlo method. J Power Sources 2011/12/01/2011;196(23):10314–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.040.

[48]

Casciato MJ, Vastola JT, Lu JC, Hess DW, Grover MA. Initial experimental design methodology incorporating expert conjecture, prior data, and engineering models for deposition of iridium nanoparticles in supercritical carbon dioxide. Ind Eng Chem Res 2013;52(28):9645–53.

[49]

Andrieu C, Freitas ND, Doucet A, Jordan MI. An introduction to MCMC for machine learning. Mach Learn 2003;50(1):5–43.

Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation
Cite this article:
Zhou Z, Liu Y, You M, et al. Two-stage aging trajectory prediction of LFP lithium-ion battery based on transfer learning with the cycle life prediction. Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, 2022, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2022.100008
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return