Home Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
HIGHLIGHTS
Graphical Abstract
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

Autonomous eVTOL: A summary of researches and challenges

Senwei Xianga(), Anhuan Xiea, Minxiang Yea, Xufei Yanb, Xiaojia Hana, Hongjiao Niua, Qiang Lia, Haishan Huangb
Research Center for Intelligent Robotics, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou 311121, China
TianMuShan Laboratory, Hangzhou 310023, China
Show Author Information

HIGHLIGHTS

● A review of autonomous eVTOL including flight control, sensing & perception, safety & reliability, and decision-making.

● Detailed analyses of technical, regulatory, and societal challenges associated with autonomous eVTOL are presented.

● Identifies future trends and recommends strategies for the development of autonomous eVTOL.

● Provides valuable insights into the present status and future prospects of autonomous eVTOL.

Graphical Abstract

View original image Download original image

Abstract

Due to the rising concept of advanced air mobility (AAM), electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) aircraft has become the hotspot for academic research and commercial application. This paper provides a comprehensive review of latest researches related to autonomous eVTOL. It examines key technologies involved in autonomous eVTOL, including automated flight control, sensing & perception, safety & reliability, and decision making. It also addresses the technical, regulatory, and societal challenges associated with the wholesale adoption of autonomous eVTOL into AAM. The paper concludes with a discussion of future trends and recommendations, including the importance of integration with air traffic management, urban infrastructure and human–machine interaction. It aims to be a useful resource for those involved in the research, policy, and industry of autonomous eVTOL technology.

Keywords

eVTOLAAMAutonomyKey technologyChallenge

References

[1]
https://www.nasa.gov/aam/overview/.
[2]

Goyal R, Reiche C, Fernando C, Cohen A. Advanced air mobility: demand analysis and market potential of the airport shuttle and air taxi markets. Sustainability 2021;13(13):7421.

Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Johnson M, Homola J. An overview of advanced air mobility research at NASA[J].
[4]
Ahmed SS, Fountas G, Lurkin V, Anastasopoulos PC, Bierlaire M, Mannering FL. The state of urban air mobility research: an assessment of challenges and opportunities. 2023. Available at SSRN 4341268.
Crossref
[5]

Cohen AP, Shaheen SA, Farrar EM. Urban air mobility: history, ecosystem, market potential, and challenges. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 2021;22(9):6074–87.

Crossref Google Scholar
[6]
NASA electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft technology for public services – a white paper. 2021. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205000636.
[7]
Ding M, Zhang Y, Zhu S, Song W, Zhao P, Yan X, et al. Aerodynamic Simulation of a Typical Multirotor e VTOL. IEEE; 2022. p. 765–9.
Crossref
[8]
Xiang S, Ye M, Zhu S, Gu J, Xie A, Men Z. A multi-stage precision landing method for autonomous eVTOL based on multi-marker joint localization[C]//2022 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE 2022:1–6.
Crossref
[9]

Floros MW, Johnson W. Performance analysis of the slowed-rotor compound helicopter configuration. J Am Helicopter Soc 2009;54(2). 22002-22002.

Crossref Google Scholar
[10]

Floros MW, Johnson W. Stability and control analysis of the slowed-rotor compound helicopter configuration. J Am Helicopter Soc 2007;52(3):239–53.

Crossref Google Scholar
[11]

Xufei YAN, Renliang C. Augmented flight dynamics model for pilot workload evaluation in tilt-rotor aircraft optimal landing procedure after one engine failure. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(1):92–103.

Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Findings from NASA and Joby's first published eVTOL acoustic test data. eVTOL Magazine; July 14, 2022.
[13]

Bacchini A, Cestino E. Electric VTOL configurations comparison. Aerospace 2019;6(3):26.

Crossref Google Scholar
[14]
Doo JT, Pavel MD, Didey A, Hange C, Diller NP, Tsairides MA, et al. NASA electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft technology for public services–A white paper. 2021.
[15]
Daedalean's roadmap. 2028, https://flyers.daedalean.ai/Roadmap_2022-2028_Whitepaper.pdf?_ga=2.77188883.722190533.1678853284-1398664118.1678853284.
[16]
Goodrich Kenneth H, Theodore Colin R. Description of the NASA urban air mobility maturity level (UML) scale. AIAA Scitech 2021 forum; 2021.
Crossref
[17]

Holden J, Goel N. Uber elevate: fast-forwarding to a future of on-demand urban air transportation. San Francisco, CA: Uber Technologies. Inc.; 2016.

[18]

Schweiger Karolin, Preis Lukas. Urban air mobility: systematic review of scientific publications and regulations for vertiport design and operations. Drones 2022;6(7):179.

Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
The roadmap to scalable urban air mobility, Volocopter, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d27bb3e330ac30001dc14fd/t/6165c265c89c61365aa517f5/1634058869091/Volocopter+v2+Roadmap+to+Scalable+UAM.pdf.
[20]

Aboudonia A, El-Badawy A, Rashad R. Active anti-disturbance control of a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle using the command-filtering backstepping approach. Nonlinear Dynam 2017;90(1):581–97.

Crossref Google Scholar
[21]

Choi SY, Cha D. Unmanned aerial vehicles using machine learning for autonomous flight; state-of-the-art. Adv Robot 2019;33(6):265–77.

Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Bolandi H, Rezaei M, Mohsenipour R, Nemati H, Smailzadeh SM. Attitude control of a quadrotor with optimized PID controller. 2013.
Crossref
[23]

Kim J, Gadsden SA, Wilkerson SA. A comprehensive survey of control strategies for autonomous quadrotors. Can J Electr Comput Eng 2019;43(1):3–16.

Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Thompson D. Robust control of an evtol through transition with a gain scheduling LQR controller[D]. College Park: University of Maryland; 2020.
[25]
Masar I, Stöhr E. Gain-scheduled LQR-control for an autonomous airship[C]. In: 18th international conference on process control; 2011. p. 14–7.
[26]
Zulu A, John S. A review of control algorithms for autonomous quadrotors. 2016. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.02622.
[27]

Raffo GV, Ortega MG, Rubio FR. An integral predictive/nonlinear H∞ control structure for a quadrotor helicopter. Automatica 2010;46(1):29–39.

Crossref Google Scholar
[28]

Afari S, Golubev V, Lyrintzis AS, Mankbadi R. Review of control technologies for quiet operations of advanced air-mobility. Appl Sci 2023;13(4):2543.

Crossref Google Scholar
[29]

Huo X, Huo M, Karimi HR. Attitude stabilization control of a quadrotor UAV by using backstepping approach[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering; 2014. p. 2014.

Crossref Google Scholar
[30]
Fang Z, Gao W. Adaptive integral backstepping control of a micro-quadrotor[C]//2011 2nd International conference on intelligent control and information processing. IEEE 2011;2:910–5.
Crossref
[31]
Runcharoon K, Srichatrapimuk V. Sliding mode control of quadrotor[C]//2013 the international conference on technological advances in electrical, electronics and computer engineering (TAEECE). IEEE; 2013. p. 552–7.
Crossref
[32]

Liao Jingxian, Bang Hyochoong. Transition nonlinear blended aerodynamic modeling and anti-harmonic disturbance robust control of fixed-wing tiltrotor UAV. Drones 2023;7(4):255.

Crossref Google Scholar
[33]
Voos H. Nonlinear control of a quadrotor micro-UAV using feedback-linearization [C]//2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics. IEEE; 2009. p. 1–6.
Crossref
[34]

Piltan F, Bairami MA, Aghayari F, Allahdadi S. Design adaptive artificial inverse dynamic controller: design sliding mode fuzzy adaptive new inverse dynamic fuzzy controller. Int J Robot Autom 2011;3(1):13.

Google Scholar
[35]
Junell JL, Van Kampen EJ, de Visser CC, Chu QP. Reinforcement learning applied to a quadrotor guidance law in autonomous flight[C]//AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference. 2015. 1990.
Crossref
[36]

Russell SJ. Artificial intelligence a modern approach[M]. Pearson Education, Inc.; 2010.

[37]

Koch W, Mancuso R, West R, Bestavros A. Reinforcement learning for UAV attitude control. ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems 2019;3(2):1–21.

Crossref Google Scholar
[38]

Hwangbo J, Sa I, Siegwart R, Hutter M. Control of a quadrotor with reinforcement learning. IEEE Rob Autom Lett 2017;2(4):2096–103.

Crossref Google Scholar
[39]
Bansal S, Akametalu AK, Jiang FJ, Laine F, Tomlin CJ. Learning quadrotor dynamics using neural network for flight control[C]//2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE; 2016. p. 4653–60.
Crossref
[40]

Dierks T, Jagannathan S. Output feedback control of a quadrotor UAV using neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Network 2009;21(1):50–66.

Crossref Google Scholar
[41]

Yoon J, Lee J. Approximate multi-objective optimization of a quadcopter through proportional-integral-derivative control. Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A 2015;39(7):673–9.

Crossref Google Scholar
[42]

O’Connell M, Shi G, Shi X, Azizzadenesheli K, Anandkumar A, Yue Y, et al. Neuralfly enables rapid learning for agile flight in strong winds. Sci Robot 2022;7(66): eabm6597.

Crossref Google Scholar
[43]

Böling Jari M, Seborg Dale E, Hespanha Joao P. Multi-model adaptive control of a simulated pH neutralization process. Control Eng Pract 2007;15(6):663–72.

Crossref Google Scholar
[44]

Kanellakis C, Nikolakopoulos G. Survey on computer vision for UAVs: current developments and trends. J Intell Rob Syst 2017;87:141–68.

Crossref Google Scholar
[45]
Araar O, Aouf N. A new hybrid approach for the visual servoing of vtol uavs from unknown geometries. In: 22nd mediterranean conference on control and automation. IEEE; 2014, June. p. 1425–32.
Crossref
[46]

García Carrillo LR, Dzul López AE, Lozano R, Pégard C. Combining stereo vision and inertial navigation system for a quad-rotor UAV. J Intell Rob Syst 2012;65(1–4):373–87.

Crossref Google Scholar
[47]
Guanglei M, Haibing P. The application of ultrasonic sensor in the obstacle avoidance of quad-rotor UAV. In: 2016 IEEE Chinese guidance, navigation and control conference (CGNCC). IEEE; 2016, August. p. 976–81.
[48]
Wolfe RC. NASA ERAST non-cooperative DSA flight test. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Tech. Rep.; 2003.
[49]
Korn B, Edinger C. UAS in civil airspace: demonstrating "sense and avoid" capabilities in flight trials. In: Proc. Of digital avionics systems conference; 2008.
Crossref
[50]
Utt J, McCalmont J, Deschenes M. Test and integration of a detect and avoid system. In: Proc. Of AIAA "unmanned unlimited" technical conference; 2004.
Crossref
[51]

Lai J, Mejias L, Ford JJ. Airborne vision-based collision-detection system. J Field Robot 2011;28:137–57.

Crossref Google Scholar
[52]
Kim Y, Kim S, Choi JW, Kum D. CRAFT: camera-radar 3D object detection with spatio-contextual fusion transformer. 2022. preprint arXiv:2209.06535.
Crossref
[53]

Wei Z, Zhang F, Chang S, Liu Y, Wu H, Feng Z. MmWave radar and vision fusion for object detection in autonomous driving: a review. Sensors 2022:2542.

Crossref Google Scholar
[54]
Bansal K, Rungta K, Bharadia D. RadSegNet: a reliable approach to radar camera fusion. 2022. preprint arXiv:2208.03849.
[55]

Nabati R, Qi H. Rrpn: radar region proposal network for object detection in autonomous vehicles. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2019:3093–7.

Crossref Google Scholar
[56]

Nobis F, Geisslinger M, Weber M, Betz J, Lienkamp M. October. A deep learningbased radar and camera sensor fusion architecture for object detection. Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF) 2019:1–7.

Crossref Google Scholar
[57]
Nabati R, Qi HC. Center-based radar and camera fusion for 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision. USA: Waikoloa, HI; 2021. p. 5–9.
Crossref
[58]
Chen X, Zhang T, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao H. FUTR3D: a unified sensor fusion framework for 3D detection. 2022. preprint arXiv:2203.10642.
Crossref
[59]
Kowol K, Rottmann M, Bracke S, Gottschalk H. YOdar: uncertainty-based sensor fusion for vehicle detection with camera and radar sensors. 2020. preprint arXiv:2010.03320.
Crossref
[60]

Badshah A, Islam N, Shahzad D, Jan B, Farman H, Khan M, et al. Vehicle navigation in GPS denied environment for smart cities using vision sensors. Comput Environ Urban Syst 2019;77:101281.

Crossref Google Scholar
[61]
Timotheatos S, Piperakis S, Argyros A, Trahanias P. Vision based horizon detection for UAV navigation[C]//Advances in service and industrial robotics: proceedings of the 27th international conference on robotics in alpe-adria danube region (RAAD 2018). Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 181–9.
Crossref
[62]
Cao S, Lu X, Shen S. Gvins: tightly coupled gnss–visual–inertial fusion for smooth and consistent state estimation 2022;38(4):2004–21.
Crossref
[63]
Xiang S, Wang T, Ye M, Yang W, Zhang Y, Xie A. Visual localization for autonomous eVTOL based on semantic map[C]//VFS 79th. Annu Forum Proc 2023. https://doi.org/10.4050/F-0079-2023-18193.
Crossref
[64]
Guo X, Denman S, Fookes C, Sridharan S. A robust UAV landing site detection system using mid-level discriminative patches[C]. In: International conference on pattern recognition. IEEE; 2017.
Crossref
[65]
Guo X, Denman S, Fookes C, Mejias L, Sridharan S. Automatic UAV forced landing site detection using machine learning[C]. In: International conference on digital lmage computing: techniques & applications. IEEE; 2014.
Crossref
[66]
Mejias L, Fitzgerald DL. A multi-layered approach for site detection in UAS emergency landing scenarios using geometry-based image segmentation[C]. In: International conference on unmanned aircraft systems. IEEE; 2013.
Crossref
[67]
Guerin J, Delmas K, Guiochet J. Evaluation of runtime monitoring for UAV emergency landing[J]. 2022.
Crossref
[68]
Wang T, Xiang S, Men Z, Ye M, Zhang Y, Xie A. An emergency landing spot detection algorithm based on semantic segmentation and safety evaluation[C]. In: VFS 79th annual forum proceedings; 2023. https://doi.org/10.4050/F-0079-2023-18018.
Crossref
[69]
Desaraju VR, Michael N, Humenberger M, Brockers R, Weiss S, Matthies LH. Vision-based landing site evaluation and trajectory generation toward rooftop landing[C]. In: Robotics: science & systems X; 2014.
Crossref
[70]
Mittal M, Valada A, Burgard W. Vision-based autonomous landing in catastrophestruck environments[J]. 2018.
[71]
Hinzmann T., Stastny T., Cadena C., Siegwart R., Gilitschenski I. Free LSD: priorfree visual landing site detection for autonomous planes[C]. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2018.
Crossref
[72]
Kulkarni CS, Pradeep P, Chatterji GB. Simulation Studies for an Urban Air Mobility Aircraft using Hardware-In-Loop Experiments. AIAA AVIATION 2022. Forum 2022:3648.
Crossref
[73]
Nielsen Seth M. A visually realistic simulator for autonomous eVTOL aircraft. Diss. Brigham Young University; 2021.
[74]
FAA National Simulator Program. https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/nsp; 2023.
[75]
Joby completes submission of stage three certification plans to the FAA. 2023. https://www.jobyaviation.com/news/joby-completes-submission-stage-three-certification-plans/.
Crossref
[76]
Bell's HSVTOL technology development hits new milestone. 2022. https://news.bellflight.com/en-US/209963-bell-s-hsvtol-technology-development-hits-new-milestone.
[77]
VoloDrone completes deconfliction flights in Germany. 2022. https://www.volocopter.com/newsroom/volodrone-completes-deconfliction-flights-in-germany/.
[78]
Boeing autonomous passenger air vehicle completes first flight. 2023. https://www.defenceturkey.com/en/content/boeing-autonomous-passenger-airvehicle-completes-first-flight-3409.
[79]

Yin S, Xiao B, Ding SX, Zhou D. A review on recent development of spacecraft attitude fault tolerant control system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2016;63(5):3311–20.

Crossref Google Scholar
[80]
ARP4761, guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne system and equipment[S]. Warrendale, WA, USA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 1996. p. 22–8.
[81]

Wang X, Wang S, Yang Z, Zhang C. Active fault-tolerant control strategy of large civil aircraft under elevator failures. Chin J Aeronaut 2015;28(6):1658–66.

Crossref Google Scholar
[82]

Gao Z, Ding SX. Actuator fault robust estimation and fault-tolerant control for a class of nonlinear descriptor systems. Automatica 2007;43(5):912–20.

Crossref Google Scholar
[83]

Wang T, Xie W, Zhang Y. Sliding mode fault tolerant control dealing with modeling uncertainties and actuator faults. ISA Trans 2012;51(3):386–92.

Crossref Google Scholar
[84]

Zhang X, Zhao X. Architecture design of distributed redundant flight control computer based on time-triggered buses for UAVs. IEEE Sensor J 2020;21(3):3944–54.

Crossref Google Scholar
[85]

Gao Z, Cecati C, Ding SX. A survey of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant techniques—Part Ⅰ: fault diagnosis with model-based and signal-based approaches. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2015;62(6):3757–67.

Crossref Google Scholar
[86]

Xue YX, Zhen ZY, Yang LQ, Wen LD. Adaptive fault-tolerant control for carrierbased UAV with actuator failures. Aero Sci Technol 2020;107:106227.

Crossref Google Scholar
[87]

Saied M, Tabikh AR, Francis C, Hamadi H, Lussier B. An informational approach for fault tolerant data fusion applied to a UAV’s attitude, altitude, and position estimation. IEEE Sensor J 2021;21(24):27766–78.

Crossref Google Scholar
[88]

Yu Z, Zhang Y, Jiang B, Fu J, Jin Y, Chai T. Composite adaptive disturbance observerbased decentralized fractional-order fault-tolerant control of networked UAVs. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 2020;52(2):799–813.

Crossref Google Scholar
[89]

D’Amato E, Nardi VA, Notaro I, Scordamaglia V. A particle filtering approach for fault detection and isolation of UAV IMU sensors: design, implementation and sensitivity analysis. Sensors 2021;21(9):3066.

Crossref Google Scholar
[90]

Zhong M, Ding SX, Zhou D, He X. An Hi/H∞ optimization approach to eventtriggered Fault Detection for linear discrete time systems. IEEE Trans Automat Control 2020;65(10):4464–71.

Crossref Google Scholar
[91]

Han X, Hu Y, Xie A, Yan X, Wang X, Pei C, et al. Quadratic-kalman-filter-based sensor Fault Detection approach for unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Sensor J 2022;22(19):18669–83.

Crossref Google Scholar
[92]

Boubeta-Puig J, Moguel E, Sánchez-Figueroa F, Hernández J, Preciado JC. An autonomous UAV architecture for remote sensing and intelligent decision-making. IEEE Internet Computing 2018;22(3):6–15.

Crossref Google Scholar
[93]

Ashraf A, Majd A, Troubitsyna E. Online path generation and navigation for swarms of UAVs[J]. Scientific Programming; 2020. p. 2020.

Crossref Google Scholar
[94]
Zermani S, Dezan C, Euler R. Embedded decision making for UAV missions[C]//2017 6th mediterranean conference on embedded computing (MECO). IEEE; 2017. p. 1–4.
Crossref
[95]

Hu X, Chen Y, Luo H. Robust decision making for UAV air-to-ground attack under severe uncertainty. J Cent S Univ 2015;22(11):4263–73.

Crossref Google Scholar
[96]

Yue L, Yang R, Zhang Y, Yu L, Wang Z. Deep reinforcement learning for UAV intelligent mission planning. J Complex 2022:2022.

Crossref Google Scholar
[97]
https://it.sohu.com/a/680798319_121117463.
[98]

Gunning D. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai). Defense advanced research projects agency (DARPA), nd Web 2017;2(2):1.

Google Scholar
[99]
14 CFR Part 23-AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS. NORMAL CATEGORY AIRPLANES, federal aviation administration. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-23.
[100]
14 CFR Part 27-AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS. NORMAL CATEGORY ROTORCRAFT, federal aviation administration. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-27.
[101]
14 CFR Part 29-AIRWORTHINESS STANDARDS. TRANSPORT CATEGORY ROTORCRAFT, federal aviation administration. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-29.
[102]
14 CFR Part 21-certification procedures for products and articles, federal aviation administration. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-21.
[103]
Docket No. FAA-2021-0638 airworthiness criteria: special class airworthiness criteria for the Joby aero, inc. Model JAS4-1 powered-lift. Federal Aviation Administration; 2022. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/11/08/2022-23962/airworthiness-criteria-special-class-airworthiness-criteria-for-the-joby-aero-inc-model-jas4-1.
[104]
Docket No. FAA–2022–1548 airworthiness criteria: special class airworthiness criteria for the archer aviation inc. Model M001 powered-lift. Federal Aviation Administration; 2022. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/20/2022-27445/airworthiness-criteria-special-class-airworthiness-criteria-for-the-archer-aviation-inc-model-m001.
[105]
SC-VTOL-01 Special Condition for small-category VTOL aircraft. European Union Aviation Safety Agency; 2019. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/SC-VTOL-01.pdf.
[106]
https://verticalmag.com/q-and-a/david-solar-easa-regulatory-framework-evtol-certification/.
[107]
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/product-certification-consultations/special-condition-vtol.
[108]
http://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/XXGK/BZGF/ZYTJHHM/202202/P020220222611863596239.pdf.
[109]
UAM operation concept V1.0. Federal Aviation Administration; 2020. https://nari.arc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/UAM_ConOps_v1.0.pdf.
[110]
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/newsroom-and-events/news/easa-publishesproposal-implementation-u-space-europe.
[111]
Introduction of a regulatory frameworkfor the operation of drones. European Union Aviation Safety Agency; 2022. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/136705/en.
[112]
http://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/XXGK/ZFGW/202209/P020220916379000148422.pdf.
[113]
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/research-projects/emco-sipo-extended-minimum-crew-operations-single-pilot-operations-safety-risk.
[114]
RTCA/DO-178C software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification[S]. Washington DC: RTCA Inc.; 2011.
[115]
RTCA/DO-254 design assurance guidance for airborne electronic hardware[S]. Washington DC: RTCA Inc.; 2000.
[116]
Artificial Intelligence Roadmap. European Union Aviation Safety Agency; 2020. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/109668/en.
[117]
Societal acceptance of urban air mobility in Europe. European Union Aviation Safety Agency; 2021. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/uam-full-report.pdf.
[118]
eVTOL Passenger Acceptance. National Aeronautics and space administration. 2020. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20200000532/downloads/20200000532.pdf.
Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation
Volume 3 Issue 1,
February 2024
Article number: 100140
DOI: 10.1016/j.geits.2023.100140
Cite this article:
Xiang S, Xie A, Ye M, et al. Autonomous eVTOL: A summary of researches and challenges. Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, 2024, 3(1): 100140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2023.100140
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return