Kazakhstan is currently drafting new construction regulations that comply with the major provisions of the Eurocodes. Such regulations are created on the basis of seismic zoning maps of various degrees of detail, developed by our Institute of Seismology using a new methodological approach for Kazakhstan. The article is about creating the first normative map of the Detailed Seismic Zoning on a probabilistic foundation for the Republic of Kazakhstan's East Kazakhstan region. We carried out the probabilistic assessment of seismic hazard using a methodology consistent with the main provisions of Eurocode 8 and updated compared with that used in developing maps of Kazakhstan's General Seismic Zoning and seismic microzoning of Almaty. The most thorough and current data accessible for the area under consideration were combined with contemporary analytical techniques. Updates have been done to not only the databases being used but also the way seismic sources were shown, including active faults now. On a scale of 1:1000000, precise seismic zoning maps of the East Kazakhstan region were created for two probabilities of exceedance: 10 % and 2 % in 50 years in terms of peak ground accelerations and macroseismic intensities. The obtained seismic hazard distribution is generally consistent with the General Seismic Zoning of Kazakhstan's previous findings. However, because active faults were included and a thoroughly revised catalog was used, there are more pronounced zones of increased danger along the fault in the western part of the region. In the west of the territory, acceleration values also increased due to a more accurate consideration of seismotectonic conditions. Zoning maps are the basis for developing new state building regulations of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
C.A. Cornell, Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 (1968) 1583-1606.
E.H. Field, T.H. Jordan, C.A. Cornell, OpenSHA: a developing community-modeling environment for seismic hazard analysis, Seismol Res. Lett. 74 (2003) 406-419.
M. Pagani, D. Monelli, G. Weatherill, L. Danciu, H. Crowley, V. Silva, P. Henshaw, L. Butler, M. Nastasi, L. Panzeri, others, OpenQuake engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model, Seismol Res. Lett. 85 (2014) 692-702.
N.V. Silacheva, U.K. Kulbayeva, N.A. Kravchenko, Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Kazakhstan and Almaty city in peak ground accelerations, Geod. Geodyn (2018) 131-141.
J.K. Gardner, L. Knopoff, Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64 (1974) 1363-1367.
N.N. Mikhailova, N.N. Poleshko, Seismicity and the nature of the stress-strain state in weakly seismic regions of Kazakhstan, Bulletin of the National Nuclear Center of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2) (2013) 140-154.
D.M. Bachmanov, A.I. Kozhurin, V.G. Trifonov, Database of active faults in Eurasia, Geodynamics and tectonophysics 8 (4) (2017) 711-736.
L. Donald, Wells, J. Kevin, Coppersmith, New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, BSSA 84 (No. 4) (1994) 974-1002.
R. Youngs, K. Coppersmith, Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates, BSSA 75 (4) (1985) 939-964.
S. Akkar, J.J. Bommer, Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV andspectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region and the Middle East, Seism. Res. Ltrs 81 (2) (2010) 195-206.
J.X. Zhao, J. Zhang, A. Asano, Y. Ohno, T. Oouchi, T. Takahashi, H. Ogawa, K. Irikura, H.K. Thio, P.G. Somerville, Fukushima, Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period, Bull Seismol Soc Am 96 (2006) 898-913.
S. Akkar, M.A. Sandikkaya, J.J. Bommer, Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East, Bull Earthq Eng 12 (1) (2014) 359-387.
N. Silacheva, U. Kulbayeva, N. Kravchenko, A. Kudabayeva, Bank of ground motion parameters for the territory of Kazakhstan, Geotech. Geol. Eng. 40 (2016) (2022) 3819-3826.
T.I. Allen, D.J. Wald, C.B. Worden, Intensity attenuation in active crustal regions, J. Seismol. 16 (2012) 409-433.
D. Bindi, S. Parolai, A. Oth, K. Abdrakhmatov, A. Muraliev, J. Zschau, Intensity prediction equations for central Asia, Geophys J Int 187 (2011) 327-337.
K. Aki, Attenuation of shear waves in the lithosphere for frequencies from 0.05 to 25 Hz, Phys. Earth Planet. In. 21 (1980) 50-60.
B.L.N. Kennett, Lg waves and structural boundaries, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76 (1986) 1133-1141.