AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Short Communication | Open Access

Proteomic analysis of rat brain related to mass effect after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage

Yumei WangZongkun Hou( )Yuhua GongShilei Hao( )Bochu Wang( )
Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Compared to the secondary brain injury after intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), fewer reports focused on the mechanism of primary brain injury induced by mass effect. Here, the tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling proteomics method was used to study the mechanical damage of the mass effect after ICH. A total of 5390 proteins were identified, and 4593 proteins were quantified, included 80 up-regulated proteins (M/N Ratio > 1.2) and 30 down-regulated proteins (M/N Ratio > 1.2). Bioinformatics and enrichment analysis showed that the differentially expressed proteins were mainly involved in immune response, signal transmission, and oxidative phosphorylation. The mass effect affects the synthesis and metabolism of ATP by mechanically stretching and squeezing the brain tissue. Furthermore, the cell morphology and dendritic development of neurons were also significantly influenced by mass effect, which also cause neuronal damage through the formation of oxidative stress and oxygen-glucose deprivation, and activate the neuronal protection and defense mechanisms. Our results provide the relevant channels and key proteins of primary brain injury caused by mass effect after ICH, which offer a scientific basis for the understanding of ICH injury.

References

1

Qureshi AI, Mendelow AD, Hanley DF. Intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet. 2009;373:1632–1644.

2

Zazulia AR, Diringer MN, Derdeyn CP, Powers WJ. Progression of mass effect after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 1999;30:1167–1173.

3

Guo T, Ren P, Li X, et al. Neural injuries induced by hydrostatic pressure associated with mass effect after intracerebral hemorrhage. Sci Rep. 2018;8:9195.

4

Gong Y, Gong Y, Hou Z, et al. Establishment of an experimental intracerebral haemorrhage model for mass effect research using a thermo-sensitive hydrogel. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13838.

5

Zeng Q, Michael IP, Zhang P, et al. Synaptic proximity enables nmdar signalling to promote brain metastasis. Nature. 2019;573:526–531.

6

Qureshi AI, Ali Z, Suri MFK, et al. Extracellular glutamate and other amino acids in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage: an in vivo microdialysis study. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1482–1489.

7
Sharp F, Liu D-Z, Zhan X, Ander B. Intracerebral hemorrhage injury mechanisms: glutamate neurotoxicity, thrombin, and src. Cerebral hemorrhage. Springer; 2008:43-46.
Brain Hemorrhages
Pages 101-105
Cite this article:
Wang Y, Hou Z, Gong Y, et al. Proteomic analysis of rat brain related to mass effect after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Brain Hemorrhages, 2021, 2(3): 101-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hest.2021.01.001

58

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 03 January 2021
Revised: 20 January 2021
Accepted: 23 January 2021
Published: 02 February 2021
© 2021 International Hemorrhagic Stroke Association.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return