AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home hLife Article
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Why is the Omicron main protease of SARS-CoV-2 less stable than its wild-type counterpart? A crystallographic, biophysical, and theoretical study

Mohamed Ibrahim1,#Xinyuanyuan Sun1,#Vinicius Martins de Oliveira2Ruibin Liu2Joseph Clayton2,3Haifa El Kilani1Jana Shen2( )Rolf Hilgenfeld1,4( )
Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA
German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Hamburg - Lübeck - Borstel - Riems Site, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany

#These authors contributed equally to this work

Show Author Information

Highlights

● The enzyme activity and thermal stability of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron Mpro and the P132H+T169S double mutant are reduced.

● Crystal structures of the Omicron Mpro and the double mutant show a stacked configuration of H132 and E240.

● The stacked His132/Glu240 may promote a water-mediated interaction between Asp197 and His132.

● The Omicron Mpro is less stable due to steric repulsion and unfavorable conformations of His132.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

During the continuing evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the Omicron variant of concern emerged in the second half of 2021 and has been dominant since November of that year. Along with its sublineages, it has maintained a prominent role ever since. The Nsp5 main protease (Mpro) of the Omicron virus is characterized by a single dominant mutation, P132H. Here we determined the X-ray crystal structures of the P132H mutant (or O-Mpro) as a free enzyme and in complex with the Mpro inhibitor, the alpha-ketoamide 13b-K, and we conducted enzymological, biophysical, as well as theoretical studies to characterize the O-Mpro. We found that O-Mpro has a similar overall structure and binding with 13b-K; however, it displays lower enzymatic activity and lower thermal stability compared to the WT-Mpro (with “WT” referring to the prototype strain). Intriguingly, the imidazole ring of His132 and the carboxylate plane of Glu240 are in a stacked configuration in the X-ray structures determined here. Empirical folding free energy calculations suggest that the O-Mpro dimer is destabilized relative to the WT-Mpro due to less favorable van der Waals interactions and backbone conformations in the individual protomers. All-atom continuous constant-pH molecular dynamics (MD) simulations reveal that His132 and Glu240 display coupled titration. At pH 7, His132 is predominantly neutral and in a stacked configuration with respect to Glu240 which is charged. In order to examine whether the Omicron mutation eases the emergence of further Mpro mutations, we also analyzed the P132H+T169S double mutant, which is characteristic of the BA.1.1.2 lineage. However, we found little evidence of a correlation between the two mutation sites.

References

[1]

Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020;579:265–9.

[2]

Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020;579:270–3.

[3]
World Health Organization (WHO). Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19 – 01 September 2023 (2023). https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---1-september-2023.
[4]

Gao SJ, Guo H, Luo G. Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2, a global urgent public health alert. J Med Virol 2022;94:1255–6.

[5]

Tegally H, Moir M, Everatt J, Giovanetti M, Scheepers C, Wilkinson E, et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 omicron lineages BA.4 and BA.5 in South Africa. Nat Med 2022;28:1785–90.

[6]

Viana R, Moyo S, Amoako DG, Tegally H, Scheepers C, Althaus CL, et al. Rapid epidemic expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in southern Africa. Nature 2022;603:67986.

[7]

Hilgenfeld R. From SARS to MERS: Crystallographic studies on coronaviral proteases enable antiviral drug design. FEBS J 2014;281:4085–96.

[8]

Li G, Hilgenfeld R, Whitley R, De Clercq E. Therapeutic strategies for COVID-19: Progress and lessons learned. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2023;22:449–75.

[9]

Zhang L, Lin D, Sun X, Curth U, Drosten C, Sauerhering L, et al. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved α-ketoamide inhibitors. Science 2020;368:409–12.

[10]

Khare S, Gurry C, Freitas L, Schultz MB, Bach G, Diallo A, et al. GISAID's role in pandemic response. China CDC Wkly 2021;3:1049–51.

[11]

Zhou Y, Zhi H, Teng Y. The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages, immune escape, and vaccine effectivity. J Med Virol 2023;95:e28138.

[12]

Chen SA, Arutyunova E, Lu J, Khan MB, Rut W, Zmudzinski M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Mpro protease variants of concern display altered viral substrate and cell host target galectin-8 processing but retain sensitivity toward antivirals. ACS Cent Sci 2023;9:696–708.

[13]

Elbe S, Buckland-Merrett G. Data, disease and diplomacy: GISAID's innovative contribution to global health. Glob Chall 2017;1:33–46.

[14]

Carrazco-Montalvo A, Herrera-Yela A, Alarcon-Vallejo D, Gutierrez-Pallo D, Armendariz-Castillo I, Andrade-Molina D, et al. Omicron sub-lineages (BA.1.1.529 + BA.*) current status in Ecuador. Viruses 2022;14:1177.

[15]

Jiang H, Zhou Y, Zou X, Hu X, Wang J, Zeng P, et al. Evaluation of the inhibition potency of nirmatrelvir against main protease mutants of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Biochemistry 2023;62:2055–64.

[16]

Greasley SE, Noell S, Plotnikova O, Ferre R, Liu W, Bolanos B, et al. Structural basis for the in vitro efficacy of nirmatrelvir against SARS-CoV-2 variants. J Biol Chem 2022;298:101972.

[17]

Sacco MD, Hu Y, Gongora MV, Meilleur F, Kemp MT, Zhang X, et al. The P132H mutation in the main protease of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 decreases thermal stability without compromising catalysis or small-molecule drug inhibition. Cell Res 2022;32:498–500.

[18]

Lin C, Zhu Z, Jiang H, Zou X, Zeng X, Wang J, et al. Structural basis for coronaviral main proteases inhibition by the 3CLpro inhibitor GC376. J Mol Biol 2024;436:168474.

[19]

Lin C, Jiang H, Li W, Zeng P, Zhou X, Zhang J, et al. Structural basis for the inhibition of coronaviral main proteases by ensitrelvir. Structure 2023;31:1016–1024.e3.

[20]

Lin M, Zeng X, Duan Y, Yang Z, Ma Y, Yang H, et al. Molecular mechanism of ensitrelvir inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 main protease and its variants. Commun Biol 2023;6:694.

[21]

El-Baba TJ, Lutomski CA, Kantsadi AL, Malla TR, John T, Mikhailov V, et al. Allosteric inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease: Insights from mass spectrometry based assays. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2020;59:23544–8.

[22]

Al Adem K, Ferreira JC, Fadl S, Mustafa M, Rabeh WM. Key allosteric and active site residues of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro are promising drug targets. Biochem J 2023;480:791–813.

[23]

Sztain T, Amaro R, McCammon JA. Elucidation of cryptic and allosteric pockets within the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. J Chem Inf Model 2021;61:3495–501.

[24]

Cooper MS, Zhang L, Ibrahim M, Zhang K, Sun X, Roske J, et al. Diastereomeric resolution yields highly potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. J Med Chem 2022;65:13328–42.

[25]

Ullrich S, Ekanayake KB, Otting G, Nitsche C. Main protease mutants of SARS-CoV-2 variants remain susceptible to nirmatrelvir. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2022;62:128629.

[26]

Suarez D, Diaz N. SARS-CoV-2 main protease: A molecular dynamics study. J Chem Inf Model 2020;60:5815–31.

[27]

Harris JA, Liu R, Martins de Oliveira V, Vazquez-Montelongo EA, Henderson JA, Shen J. GPU-accelerated all-atom particle-mesh Ewald continuous constant pH molecular dynamics in Amber. J Chem Theor Comput 2022;18:7510–27.

[28]
Case DA, Aktulga HM, Belfon K, Ben-Shalom IY, Berryman JT, Brozell SR, et al. Amber 2022 (2022) https://ambermd.org/doc12/Amber22.pdf.
[29]

Henderson JA, Verma N, Harris RC, Liu R, Shen J. Assessment of proton-coupled conformational dynamics of SARS and MERS coronavirus papain-like proteases: Implication for designing broad-spectrum antiviral inhibitors. J Chem Phys 2020;153:115101.

[30]

Ullmann GM. Relations between protonation constants and titration curves in polyprotic acids: A critical view. J Phys Chem B 2003;107:1263–71.

[31]

Wallace JA, Shen JK. Charge-leveling and proper treatment of long-range electrostatics in all-atom molecular dynamics at constant pH. J Chem Phys 2012;137:184105.

[32]

Kellogg EH, Leaver-Fay A, Baker D. Role of conformational sampling in computing mutation-induced changes in protein structure and stability. Proteins 2011;79:830–8.

[33]

Verma N, Henderson JA, Shen J. Proton-coupled conformational activation of SARS Coronavirus main proteases and opportunity for designing small-molecule broad-spectrum targeted covalent inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc 2020;142:21883–90.

[34]

Kneller DW, Phillips G, Weiss KL, Zhang Q, Coates L, Kovalevsky A. Direct observation of protonation state modulation in SARS-CoV-2 main protease upon inhibitor binding with neutron crystallography. J Med Chem 2021;64:4991–5000.

[35]

Chen H, Wei P, Huang C, Tan L, Liu Y, Lai L. Only one protomer is active in the dimer of SARS 3C-like proteinase. J Biol Chem 2006;281:13894–8.

[36]

Liebschner D, Afonine PV, Moriarty NW, Poon BK, Sobolev OV, Terwilliger TC, et al. Polder maps: Improving OMIT maps by excluding bulk solvent. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 2017;73:148–57.

[37]

Liu Y, Kati W, Chen CM, Tripathi R, Molla A, Kohlbrenner W. Use of a fluorescence plate reader for measuring kinetic parameters with inner filter effect correction. Anal Biochem 1999;267:331–5.

[38]

Burkhardt A, Pakendorf T, Reime B, Meyer J, Fischer P, Stübe N, et al. Status of the crystallography beamlines at PETRA Ⅲ. Eur Phys J Plus 2016;131:1–9.

[39]

Krug M, Weiss MS, Heinemann U, Mueller U. XDSAPP: A graphical user interface for the convenient processing of diffraction data using XDS. J Appl Crystallogr 2012;45:568–72.

[40]

Evans P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2006;62:72–82.

[41]

Evans PR. An introduction to data reduction: Space-group determination, scaling and intensity statistics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2011;67:282–92.

[42]

Vagin A, Teplyakov A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010;66:22–5.

[43]

Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, Evans PR, et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2011;67:235–42.

[44]

Moriarty NW, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD. Electronic Ligand Builder and Optimization Workbench (eLBOW): A tool for ligand coordinate and restraint generation. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2009;65:1074–80.

[45]

Liebschner D, Afonine PV, Baker ML, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Croll TI, et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: Recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 2019;75:861–77.

[46]

Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2010;66:486–501.

[47]

Murshudov GN, Skubak P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2011;67:355–67.

[48]

Maier JA, Martinez C, Kasavajhala K, Wickstrom L, Hauser KE, Simmerling C. ff14SB: Improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J Chem Theor Comput 2015;11:3696–713.

[49]

Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983;79:926–35.

[50]
Case DA, Belfon K, Ben-Shalom IY, Brozell SR, Cerutti DS, Cheatham Ⅲ TE, et al. Amber 2020 (2020). https://ambermd.org/doc12/Amber20.pdf.
[51]

Zhao Y, Fang C, Zhang Q, Zhang R, Zhao X, Duan Y, et al. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease in complex with protease inhibitor PF-07321332. Protein Cell 2022;13:689–93.

[52]

Alford RF, Leaver-Fay A, Jeliazkov JR, O'Meara MJ, DiMaio FP, Park H, et al. The Rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J Chem Theor Comput 2017;13:3031–48.

hLife
Pages 419-433
Cite this article:
Ibrahim M, Sun X, Martins de Oliveira V, et al. Why is the Omicron main protease of SARS-CoV-2 less stable than its wild-type counterpart? A crystallographic, biophysical, and theoretical study. hLife, 2024, 2(8): 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlife.2024.06.003

45

Views

1

Crossref

Altmetrics

Received: 11 March 2024
Revised: 06 June 2024
Accepted: 10 June 2024
Published: 15 June 2024
© 2024 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return