AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home iLIVER Article
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

A retrospective study of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for hepatocellular carcinoma

Min DuaYumeng CaibYanrui PangbYuan Jib( )
Pathology Department, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
Pathology Department, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression plays an important role in selecting patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who will benefit from anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 monotherapy and directing those with lower levels to alternative treatments.

Methods

In total, 156 hepatocellular carcinoma tumors were stained with three PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays (SP142, 28-8, and E1L3N). Two junior pathologists and one senior pathologist evaluated the pathological slides and recorded the percentages of tumor and immune cells stained at any intensity.

Results

Analytical comparisons demonstrated that the anti-PD-L1 assay SP142 is a significantly stronger reagent that stains a higher percent of both tumor and immune cells, while 28-8 and E1L3N behave similarly to each other. The correlation coefficients of the three assays ranged from 0.77 to 0.92 for tumor cells and from 0.66 to 0.75 for immune cells. Next, 1% and 5% tumor cell staining cutoffs were designated using various combinations of assays and cutoffs. Across all three reagents, 14 samples showed concordance above the 5% threshold, eight showed concordance within the range of 1% to 5% interval, and 93 showed concordance below the 1% threshold. The remaining 41 samples showed a combination of discordant results across all three reagents. High PD-L1 expression in tumor and immune cells tended to not be recurrent.

Conclusions

The anti-PD-L1 assays 28-8 and E1L3N were closely aligned with regard to staining tumor and immune cells, whereas SP142 showed higher percentages of staining for both cell types. All three assays indicated greater variability in immune cell staining than in tumor cells.

References

[1]

Beatty GL, Gladney WL. Immune escape mechanisms as a guide for cancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21(4): 687-92.

[2]

Shen X, Zhao B. Efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-L1 expression status in cancer: meta-analysis. BMJ 2018;362: k3529.

[8]

Brody R, Zhang Y, Ballas M, et al. PD-L1 expression in advanced NSCLC: insights into risk stratification and treatment selection from a systematic literature review. Lung Cancer 2017;112: 200-15.

[9]
[10]
Lin SY, Yang CY, Liao BC, et al. Tumor PD-L1 expression and clinical outcomes in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab: real-world data in Taiwan. J Cancer 2018 Apr 19;9(10): 1813-20.
[11]
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Dako PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx. October 2015. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf15/P150025c.pdf. [Accessed 10 August 2016].
[12]
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpma/pma_template.cfm?id=p160006. [Accessed 10 January 2016].
[13]

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68(6): 394-424.

[14]

Lai E, Astara G, Ziranu P, et al. Introducing immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients: too early or too fast? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021;157: 103167.

[15]

Llovet JM, De Baere T, Kulik L, et al. Locoregional therapies in the era of molecular and immune treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;18(5): 293-313.

[16]

Faivre S, Rimassa L, Finn RS. Molecular therapies for HCC: looking outside the box. J Hepatol 2020;72(2): 342-52.

[17]

El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet 2017;389(10088): 2492-502.

[18]

Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a nonrandomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19(7): 940-52.

[19]

Yau T, Hsu C, Kim TY, et al. Nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: sorafenib-experienced Asian cohort analysis. J Hepatol 2019;71(3): 543-52.

[20]

Vennapusa B, Baker B, Kowanetz M, et al. Development of a PD-L1 complementary diagnostic immunohistochemistry assay (SP142) for atezolizumab. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2019;27(2): 92-100.

[21]

Huang RSP, Haberberger J, Severson E, et al. A pan-cancer analysis of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and gene amplification, tumor mutation burden and microsatellite instability in 48,782 cases. Mod Pathol 2021;34(2): 252-63.

[22]

Chan AWH, Tong JHM, Kwan JSH, et al. Assessment of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression by 4 diagnostic assays and its clinicopathological correlation in a large cohort of surgical resected non-small cell lung carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2018; 31(9): 1381-90.

[23]

Gevaert T, Cimadamore A, Montironi R, Eckstein M. PD-L1 testing for urothelial carcinoma: interchangeability, reliability and future perspectives. Curr Drug Targets 2021;22(2): 162-70.

[24]

Tsao MS, Kerr KM, Kockx M, et al. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry comparability study in real-life clinical samples: results of Blueprint phase 2 project. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13(9): 1302-11.

[25]

Torlakovic E, Lim HJ, Adam J, et al. "Interchangeability" of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Mod Pathol 2020;33(1): 4-17.

[26]

Hirsch FR, McElhinny A, Stanforth D, et al. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays for lung cancer: results from phase 1 of the Blueprint PD-L1 IHC assay comparison project. J Thorac Oncol 2017;12(2): 208-22.

[27]

Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373(17): 1627-39.

[28]

Ferris RL, Blumenschein Jr G, Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab vs investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year longterm survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression. Oral Oncol 2018;81: 45-51.

[29]

Zhang P, Bao Z, Xu L, et al. PD-L1 expression indicates favorable prognosis for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with pemetrexed. Oncotarget 2017;8(39): 66293-304.

[30]

Fujimoto D, Sato Y, Uehara K, et al. Predictive performance of four programmed cell death ligand 1 assay systems on nivolumab response in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13(3): 377-86.

[31]

Carlsson J, Sundqvist P, Kosuta V, et al. PD-L1 expression is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2020; 28(3): 213-20.

[32]

Lassalle S, Nahon-Esteve S, Frouin E, et al. PD-L1 expression in 65 conjunctival melanomas and its association with clinical outcome. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(23): 9147.

[33]

Chi D, Xu W, Tao X, et al. PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer and its relationship with TLR-4 expression. J BUON 2020;25(3): 1423-9.

[34]

Akisada N, Nishimoto K, Takao S, et al. PD-L1 expression in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Med Mol Morphol 2021;54(1): 52-9.

[35]

Mou H, Yang QA, Yu L, et al. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;36(9): 2601-9.

[36]

Pei R, Zhang W, Wang S, et al. Prognostic value of PD-L1 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Lab 2019;65(5).

[37]

Calderaro J, Rousseau B, Amaddeo G, et al. Programmed death ligand 1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship with clinical and pathological features. Hepatology 2016;64(6): 2038-46.

[38]

Jung HI, Jeong D, Ji S, et al. Overexpression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 2017; 49(1): 246-54.

[39]

Tibaldi C, Lunghi A, Baldini E. Use of programmed cell death protein ligand 1 assay to predict the outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. World J Clin Oncol 2017;8(4): 320-8.

[40]

Thunnissen E, de Langen AJ, Smit EF. PD-L1 IHC in NSCLC with a global and methodological perspective. Lung Cancer 2017;113: 102-5.

[41]

Zhang L, Ding J, Li HY, Wang ZH, Wu J. Immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, where are we? Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2020; 1874(2): 188441.

[42]

Paver EC, Cooper WA, Colebatch AJ, et al. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) as a predictive marker for immunotherapy in solid tumours: a guide to immunohistochemistry implementation and interpretation. Pathology 2021;53(2): 141-56.

iLIVER
Pages 187-193
Cite this article:
Du M, Cai Y, Pang Y, et al. A retrospective study of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for hepatocellular carcinoma. iLIVER, 2022, 1(3): 187-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iliver.2022.08.005

716

Views

2

Crossref

Altmetrics

Received: 30 September 2021
Revised: 10 August 2022
Accepted: 14 August 2022
Published: 07 September 2022
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return