AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home iLIVER Article
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

MAFLD was more easily diagnosed than NAFLD in liver transplant recipients with abnormal liver function

Dali Zhang1Hongbo Wang1Xi HeDanni FengYanling SunZhenwen LiuYinjie Gao( )Hongling Liu( )
Senior Department of Hepatology, the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, No. 100, Xisi Ring Middle Road, Beijing, 100039, China

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Background and aims

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is hepatic steatosis that is require the exclusion of certain etiologies, including drug usage or alcoholic consumption. Conversely, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) needs not to. In this study, we aimed to examine whether MAFLD is more easily diagnosed than NAFLD in liver transplant (LT) recipients with abnormal liver function.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, LT recipients with abnormal liver function were investigated for the prevalence of MAFLD and NAFLD.

Results

We recruited 57 LT recipients with abnormal liver function at a referral hospital. Among these patients, the prevalence of MAFLD and NAFLD was 37.8% and 11.1%, respectively. 17 patients showed hepatic steatosis, with an average NAFLD activity score of 3.5 and a fibrosis score of 1.0. Compared with non-MAFLD patients, MAFLD patients had a significant difference in fasting blood glucose levels (p = 0.009). Among 17 MAFLD patients, 12 were overweight and four were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. The majority of MAFLD diagnoses were based on body mass index (70.6%) and diabetes mellitus history (23.5%), biomarkers that are easily obtained. At 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after LT, MAFLD patients had higher levels of fasting blood glucose (6 months: p = 0.004, 12 months: p = 0.038) and higher trend of body mass index value and plasma triglyceride level but no significance.

Conclusions

MAFLD was more easily diagnosed in LT recipients with abnormal liver function and higher in prevalence than NAFLD. A larger sample size research is required to validate these conclusions.

References

[1]

Wong VW-S, Chan W-K, Chitturi S, et al. Asia-pacific working party on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease guidelines 2017-Part 1: definition, risk factors and assessment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;33(1): 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13857.

[2]

Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018;67(1): 328-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29367.Epub 2017/07/18.PubMed PMID:28714183.

[3]

European Association for the Study of the L, European Association for the Study of D, European Association for the Study of O. EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Obes Facts 2016; 9(2): 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1159/000443344.Epub 2016/04/08.PubMed PMID:27055256;PubMedCentralPMCID:PMCPMC5644799.

[4]

Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunctionassociated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol 2020;73(1): 202-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039.Epub 2020/04/12.PubMed PMID:32278004.

[5]

Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J, et al. MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2020; 158(7): 1999-2014 e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.312.Epub 2020/02/12.PubMed PMID:32044314.

[6]

Losurdo G, Castellaneta A, Rendina M, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: de novo non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in liver-transplanted patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018;47(6): 704-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14521.Epub 2018/01/24.PubMed PMID:29359341.

[7]

Narayanan P, Mara K, Izzy M, et al. Recurrent or de novo allograft steatosis and long-term outcomes after liver transplantation. Transplantation 2019;103(1): e14-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002317.Epub 2018/07/12.PubMed PMID:29994981.

[8]

Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2005;41(6): 1313-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20701.Epub 2005/05/26.PubMed PMID:15915461.

[9]

Watt KD, Charlton MR. Metabolic syndrome and liver transplantation: a review and guide to management. J Hepatol 2010;53(1): 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.01.040.Epub 2010/05/11.PubMed PMID:20451282.

[10]

Gitto S, Villa E. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome after liver transplant. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17(4): 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17040490.Epub 2016/04/07.PubMed PMID:27049380;PubMedCentralPMCID:PMCPMC4848946.

[11]

Tilg H, Effenberger M. From NAFLD to MAFLD: when pathophysiology succeeds. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;17(7): 387-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-020-0316-6.Epub 2020/05/29.PubMed PMID:32461575.

[12]

Thoefner LB, Rostved AA, Pommergaard HC, et al. Risk factors for metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2018;32(1): 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2017.03.004.Epub 2017/05/16.PubMed PMID:28501338.

[13]

Fatourou EM, Tsochatzis EA. Management of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk after liver transplantation. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4(9): 731-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30181-5.Epub 2019/08/08.PubMed PMID:31387736.

[14]

Zhou YJ, Zheng KI, Wang XB, et al. Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease is associated with severity of COVID-19. Liver Int 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14575.Epub 2020/06/24.PubMed PMID:32573883.

[15]

Younossi ZM, Marchesini G, Pinto-Cortez H, et al. Epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: implications for liver transplantation. Transplantation 2019;103(1): 22-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002484.Epub 2018/10/20.PubMed PMID:30335697.

[16]

Galvin Z, Rajakumar R, Chen E, et al. Predictors of de novo nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after liver transplantation and associated fibrosis. Liver Transplant 2019; 25(1): 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.25338.Epub 2019/01/05.PubMed PMID:30609189.

[17]

Olivo R, Guarrera JV, Pyrsopoulos NT. Liver transplantation for acute liver failure. Clin Liver Dis 2018;22(2): 409-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2018.01.014.Epub 2018/04/02.PubMed PMID:29605075.

[18]

Dasarathy S, Dasarathy J, Khiyami A, et al. Validity of real time ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: a prospective study. J Hepatol 2009;51(6): 1061-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2009.09.001. Epub 2009/10/23. PubMed PMID:19846234; PubMed Central PMCID:PMCPMC6136148.

iLIVER
Pages 194-198
Cite this article:
Zhang D, Wang H, He X, et al. MAFLD was more easily diagnosed than NAFLD in liver transplant recipients with abnormal liver function. iLIVER, 2022, 1(3): 194-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iliver.2022.09.001

441

Views

1

Crossref

Altmetrics

Received: 30 July 2022
Revised: 02 September 2022
Accepted: 04 September 2022
Published: 20 September 2022
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return