AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

Advancements in heterojunction, cocatalyst, defect and morphology engineering of semiconductor oxide photocatalysts

Guojing Wanga,cShasha Lvb( )Yuanhua ShendWei LiaLinhan LineZhengcao Lia( )
State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials (MOE), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Key Laboratory of Beam Technology and Material Modification, Ministry of Education, College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Department of Precision Instrument, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

Peer review under responsibility of The Chinese Ceramic Society.

Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Photocatalytic technology has emerged as a crucial avenue for harnessing solar energy, presenting itself as a viable solution to address the current energy crisis and environmental pollution. The past 50 years have witnessed significant progress and breakthroughs in scientific research on photocatalytic technology. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the mechanism of photocatalytic technology and methods to improve the photocatalytic efficiency of semiconductor photocatalysts, such as TiO2 and ZnO. In this paper, common modification methods are divided into four categories: heterojunction construction, cocatalysts, defects, and morphological engineering. The origin and development of photocatalysts in each category are briefly summarized; moreover, the latest progress in each type of modification is discussed. S-scheme heterojunctions retain the high reduction and oxidation capacity of photogenerated electrons and holes by sacrificing half of the photogenerated carriers, showing excellent performance in photocatalysis and great application potential. The challenges associated with current modification schemes are presented. There is growing interest in quantitative and atomic-level modulation as attractive approaches to tackling these challenges. Regulating the electronic spin state and internal field is important for minimizing photogenerated carrier recombination in photocatalysis. This review will inspire researchers and promote the application of photocatalytic technology.

References

[1]

Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972;238:37–8.

[2]

Carey JH, Lawrence J, Tosine HM. Photodechlorination of PCB's in the presence of titanium dioxide in aqueous suspensions. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1976;16:697–701.

[3]

Puruden AL, Ollis DF. Degradation of chloroform by photoassisted heterogeneous catalysis in dilute aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide. Environ Sci Technol 1983;17:628–31.

[4]

Pruden AL, Ollis DF. Photoassisted heterogeneous catalysis: the degradation of trichloroethylene in water. J Catal 1983;82:404–17.

[5]

Low J, Yu J, Jaroniec M, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA. Heterojunction photocatalysts. Adv Mater 2017;29:1601694.

[6]

Osterloh FE. Inorganic materials as catalysts for photochemical splitting of water. Chem Mater 2007;20:35–54.

[7]

Qu Y, Duan X. Progress, challenge and perspective of heterogeneous photocatalysts. Chem Soc Rev 2013;42:2568–80.

[8]

Kubacka A, Fernandez-Garcia M, Colon G. Advanced nanoarchitectures for solar photocatalytic applications. Chem Rev 2012;112:1555–614.

[9]

Li X, Yu J, Jaroniec M. Hierarchical photocatalysts. Chem Soc Rev 2016;45:2603–36.

[10]
Li R, Li C. Photocatalytic water splitting on semiconductor-based photocatalysts, vol. 60; 2017. p. 1–57.
[11]

Tahir MB, Asiri AM, Nawaz T. A perspective on the fabrication of heterogeneous photocatalysts for enhanced hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2020;45:24544–57.

[12]

Zhang Y, Wu B, Tang Y, Qi D, Wang N, Wang X, et al. Prolonged electron lifetime in ordered TiO2 mesophyll cell-like microspheres for efficient photocatalytic water reduction and oxidation. Small 2016;12:2291–9.

[13]

Zheng L, Teng F, Ye X, Zheng H, Fang X. Photo/electrochemical applications of metal sulfide/TiO2 heterostructures. Adv Energy Mater 2019;10:1902355.

[14]

Hou W, Cronin SB. A review of surface plasmon resonance-enhanced photocatalysis. Adv Funct Mater 2013;23:1612–9.

[15]

Akple MS, Low J, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA, Yu J, Zhang J. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic H2-production of g-C3N4/WS2 composite heterostructures. Appl Surf Sci 2015;358:196–203.

[16]

Bessekhouad Y, Robert D, Weber JV. Bi2S3/TiO2 and CdS/TiO2 heterojunctions as an available configuration for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant. J Photochem Photobiol, A: Chem 2004;163:569–80.

[17]

Asahi R, Morikawa T, Ohwaki T, Aoki K, Taga Y. Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 2001;293:269–71.

[18]

Diebold U. The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surf Sci Rep 2003;48:53–229.

[19]

Kumar DP, Kumari VD, Karthik M, Sathish M, Shankar MV. Shape dependence structural, optical and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanocrystals for enhanced hydrogen production via glycerol reforming. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 2017;163:113–9.

[20]

Luo Z, Wang T, Zhang J, Li C, Li H, Gong J. Dendritic hematite nanoarray photoanode modified with a conformal titanium dioxide interlayer for effective charge collection. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2017;56:12878–82.

[21]

Li Z, Teng Y, Chen C, Lv S, Wang G, Zhang Z. Effect of Xe ion irradiation on photocatalytic performance of oblique TiO2 nanowire arrays. Appl Surf Sci 2015;327:478–82.

[22]

Matsunami N, Uebayashi M, Hirooka K, Shimura T, Tazawa M. N ion irradiation enhancement of photocatalytic activity of TiO2. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 2009;267:1654–7.

[23]

Betancourt AP, Goswami DY, Bhethanabotla VR, Kuhn JN. Scalable and stable silica-coated silver nanoparticles, produced by electron beam evaporation and rapid thermal annealing, for plasmon-enhanced photocatalysis. Catal Commun 2021;149:106213.

[24]

Tuan PV, Hieu LT, Hoang CM, Tuong HB, Tan VT, Hoa TTQ, et al. Effects of annealing temperature on the structure, morphology, and photocatalytic properties of SnO2/rGO nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 2021;32:015201.

[25]

Li W, Wang G, Feng Y, Li Z. Efficient photocatalytic performance enhancement in Co-doped ZnO nanowires coupled with CuS nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 2018;428:154–64.

[26]

Wang Y, Wang Q, Zhan X, Wang F, Safdar M, He J. Visible light driven type Ⅱ heterostructures and their enhanced photocatalysis properties: a review. Nanoscale 2013;5:8326–39.

[56]

Liu Y, Ji G, Dastageer MA, Zhu L, Wang J, Zhang B, et al. Highly-active direct Z-scheme Si/TiO2 photocatalyst for boosted CO2 reduction into value-added methanol. RSC Adv 2014;4:56961–9.

[57]

Jia X, Tahir M, Pan L, Huang Z, Zhang X, Wang L, et al. Direct Z-scheme composite of CdS and oxygen-defected CdWO4: an efficient visible-light-driven photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Appl Catal, B 2016;198:154–61.

[27]

McDaniel H, Heil PE, Tsai CL, Kim KK, Shim M. Integration of type Ⅱ nanorod heterostructures into photovoltaics. ACS Nano 2011;5:7677–83.

[28]

Zhang W, Mohamed AR, Ong WJ. Z-scheme photocatalytic systems for carbon dioxide reduction: where Are We Now? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2020;59:22894–915.

[29]

Yan J, Wu H, Chen H, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Liu SF. Fabrication of TiO2/C3N4 heterostructure for enhanced photocatalytic Z-scheme overall water splitting. Appl Catal B Environ 2016;191:130–7.

[30]

Miseki Y, Fujiyoshi S, Gunji T, Sayama K. Photocatalytic Z-scheme water splitting for independent H2/O2 production via a stepwise operation employing a vanadate redox mediator under visible light. J Phys Chem C 2017;121:9691–7.

[31]

Wang Q, Li Y, Hisatomi T, Nakabayashi M, Shibata N, Kubota J, et al. Z-scheme water splitting using particulate semiconductors immobilized onto metal layers for efficient electron relay. J Catal 2015;328:308–15.

[32]

Yuan X, Jiang L, Chen X, Leng L, Wang H, Wu Z, et al. Highly efficient visible-light-induced photoactivity of Z-scheme Ag2CO3/Ag/WO3 photocatalysts for organic pollutant degradation. Environ Sci: Nano 2017;4:2175–85.

[33]

Jo W-K, Selvam NCS. Z-scheme CdS/g-C3N4 composites with RGO as an electron mediator for efficient photocatalytic H2 production and pollutant degradation. Chem Eng J 2017;317:913–24.

[34]

Zhou P, Yu J, Jaroniec M. All-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems. Adv Mater 2014;26:4920–35.

[35]

Ng BJ, Putri LK, Kong XY, Teh YW, Pasbakhsh P, Chai SP. Z-scheme photocatalytic systems for solar water splitting. Adv Sci 2020;7:1903171.

[36]

Wang G, Tang Z, Wang J, Lv S, Xiang Y, Li F, et al. Energy band engineering of Bi2O2.33-CdS direct Z-scheme heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic reduction of CO2. J Mater Sci Technol 2022;111:17–27.

[37]

Wang L, Bie C, Yu J. Challenges of Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanisms. Trends Chem 2022;4:973–83.

[38]

Xu Q, He R, Li Y. Problems and mistakes for electron transfer mechanism in Z-Scheme photocatalytic system. Acta Phys - Chim Sin 2022;0:2211009.

[39]

Li Z, Xiong S, Wang G, Xie Z, Zhang Z. Role of Ag2S coupling on enhancing the visible-light-induced catalytic property of TiO2 nanorod arrays. Sci Rep 2016;6:19754.

[40]

Xie Z, Liu X, Wang W, Wang X, Liu C, Xie Q, et al. Enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanorod arrays/CdS quantum dots by coating TiO2 through atomic layer deposition. Nano Energy 2015;11:400–8.

[41]

Zeng Q, Li X, Xi M, Wu L, Xu Z, Zhou Z. Fabrication of TiO2/CdS/TiO2 nanotube/Ti mesh electrode and application in photoelectro-catalytic cell system for degradation of methylene blue under visible light illumination. Asian J Chem 2013;25:8527–32.

[42]

Chen C, Li Z, Lin H, Wang G, Liao J, Li M, et al. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance of ZnO nanowires integrated with CdS and Ag2S. Dalton Trans 2016;45:3750–8.

[43]

Xue J, Liu J, Liu Y, Li H, Wang Y, Sun D, et al. Recent advances in synthetic methods and applications of Ag2S-based heterostructure photocatalysts. J Mater Chem C 2019;7:3988–4003.

[44]

Xie Z, Liu X, Wang W, Liu C, Li Z, Zhang Z. Enhanced photoelectrochemical properties of TiO2 nanorod arrays decorated with CdS nanoparticles. Sci Technol Adv Mater 2014;15:055006.

[45]

Kho YK, Iwase A, Teoh WY, Mädler L, Kudo A, Amal R. Photocatalytic H2 evolution over TiO2 nanoparticles. The synergistic effect of anatase and rutile. J Phys Chem C 2010;114:2821–9.

[46]

Gao Y, Zhu J, An H, Yan P, Huang B, Chen R, et al. Directly probing charge separation at interface of TiO2 phase junction. J Phys Chem Lett 2017;8:1419–23.

[47]

Yu J, Low J, Xiao W, Zhou P, Jaroniec M. Enhanced photocatalytic CO2-reduction activity of anatase TiO2 by coexposed {001} and {101} facets. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136:8839–42.

[48]

Bard AJ. Photoelectrochemistry and heterogeneous photocatalysis at semiconductors. J Photochem 1979;10:59–75.

[49]

Bai Y, Nakagawa K, Cowan AJ, Aitchison CM, Yamaguchi Y, Zwijnenburg MA, et al. Photocatalyst Z-scheme system composed of a linear conjugated polymer and BiVO4 for overall water splitting under visible light. J Mater Chem 2020;8:16283–90.

[50]

Bai Y, Ye L, Wang L, Shi X, Wang P, Bai W, et al. g-C3N4/Bi4O5I2 heterojunction with I3/I redox mediator for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 conversion. Appl Catal B Environ 2016;194:98–104.

[51]

Patial S, Kumar R, Raizada P, Singh P, Le QV, Lichtfouse E, et al. Boosting light-driven CO2 reduction into solar fuels: mainstream avenues for engineering ZnO-based photocatalysts. Environ Res 2021;197:111134.

[52]

Meng J, Chen Q, Lu J, Liu H. Z-scheme photocatalytic CO2 reduction on a heterostructure of oxygen-defective ZnO/reduced graphene oxide/UiO-66-NH2 under visible light. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:550–62.

[53]

Yu J, Wang S, Low J, Xiao W. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of direct Z-scheme g-C3N4-TiO2 photocatalysts for the decomposition of formaldehyde in air. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2013;15:16883–90.

[54]

Chen X, Huang X, Yi Z. Enhanced ethylene photodegradation performance of g-C3N4-Ag3PO4 composites with direct Z-scheme configuration. Chem Eur J 2014;20:17590–6.

[55]

Jo WK, Sivakumar Natarajan T. Facile synthesis of novel redox-mediator-free direct Z-scheme CaIn2S4 marigold-flower-like/TiO2 photocatalysts with superior photocatalytic efficiency. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015;7:17138–54.

[58]

Ding J, Dai Z, Qin F, Zhao H, Zhao S, Chen R. Z-scheme BiOBr/Bi2O2CO3 photocatalyst with rich oxygen vacancy as electron mediator for highly efficient degradation of antibiotics. Appl Catal, B 2017;205:281–91.

[59]

Xu F, Meng K, Cheng B, Wang S, Xu J, Yu J. Unique S-scheme heterojunctions in self-assembled TiO2/CsPbBr3 hybrids for CO2 photoreduction. Nat Commun 2020;11:4613.

[60]

Wang L, Zhang J, Yu H, et al. Dynamics of photogenerated charge carriers in inorganic/organic S-scheme heterojunctions. J Phys Chem Lett 2022;13:4695–700.

[61]

Deng H, Fei X, Yang Y, Fan J, Yu J, Cheng B, et al. S-scheme heterojunction based on p-type ZnMn2O4 and n-type ZnO with improved photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity. Chem Eng J 2021;409:127377.

[62]

Wang L, Fei X, Zhang L, Yu J, Cheng B, Ma Y. Solar fuel generation over nature-inspired recyclable TiO2/g-C3N4 S-scheme hierarchical thin-film photocatalyst. J Mater Sci Technol 2022;112:1–10.

[63]

Qiu B, Zhou Y, Ma Y, Yang X, Sheng W, Xing M, et al. Facile synthesis of the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2-graphene nanosheet composites with enhanced photocatalysis. Sci Rep 2015;5:8591.

[64]

Pan X, Zhao Y, Liu S, Korzeniewski CL, Wang S, Fan Z. Comparing graphene-TiO2 nanowire and graphene-TiO2 nanoparticle composite photocatalysts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2012;4:3944–50.

[65]

Wang H, Wang HL, Jiang WF, Li ZQ. Photocatalytic degradation of 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) by multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)/TiO2 composite in aqueous solution under solar irradiation. Water Res 2009;43:204–10.

[66]

An G, Ma W, Sun Z, Liu A, Han B, Miao S, et al. Preparation of titania/carbon nanotube composites using supercritical ethanol and their photocatalytic activity for phenol degradation under visible light irradiation. Carbon 2007;45:1795–801.

[67]

Gao B, Chen GZ, Li Puma G. Carbon nanotubes/titanium dioxide (CNTs/TiO2) nanocomposites prepared by conventional and novel surfactant wrapping sol–gel methods exhibiting enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl Catal, B 2009;89:503–9.

[68]

Liu C, Zhang L, Liu R, Gao Z, Yang X, Tu Z, et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of N-doped TiO2 nanowires and N-doped graphene heterostructures with enhanced photocatalytic properties. J Alloys Compd 2016;656:24–32.

[69]

Moussa H, Girot E, Mozet K, Alem H, Medjahdi G, Schneider R. ZnO rods/reduced graphene oxide composites prepared via a solvothermal reaction for efficient sunlight-driven photocatalysis. Appl Catal, B 2016;185:11–21.

[70]

Wang G, Wang F, Liu S, Li M, Xie M, Yang Z, et al. Construction of heterojuncted photocatalyst with TiO2 quantum dots and graphene oxide nanosheets for highly efficient photocatalysis. Scripta Mater 2021;199:113862.

[71]

Jung J-Y, Lee D, Lee Y-S. CNT-embedded hollow TiO2 nanofibers with high adsorption and photocatalytic activity under UV irradiation. J Alloys Compd 2015;622:651–6.

[72]

Huang K, Li YH, Lin S, Liang C, Wang H, Ye CX, et al. A facile route to reduced graphene oxide–zinc oxide nanorod composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Powder Technol 2014;257:113–9.

[73]

Wang H, Zhang L, Chen Z, Hu J, Li S, Wang Z, et al. Semiconductor heterojunction photocatalysts: design, construction, and photocatalytic performances. Chem Soc Rev 2014;43:5234–44.

[74]

Huang K, Liu H, He J, He Y, Tao X, Yin H, et al. Application of Ag/TiO2 in photocatalytic degradation of 2,2′,4,4′-tetrabromodiphenyl ether in simulated washing waste containing Triton X-100. J Environ Chem Eng 2021;9:105077.

[75]

Tang KY, Chen JX, Legaspi EDR, Owh C, Lin M, Tee ISY, et al. Gold-decorated TiO2 nanofibrous hybrid for improved solar-driven photocatalytic pollutant degradation. Chemosphere 2021;265:129114.

[76]

Xia Y, Le T, Peng J, Ravindra AV, Xu L. Pt quantum dots decorated nest-like 3D porous ZnO nanostructures for enhanced visible-light degradation of RhB. J Porous Mater 2020;27:1339–48.

[77]

An H, Lv Z, Zhang K, Deng C, Wang H, Xu Z, et al. Plasmonic coupling enhancement of core-shell Au@Pt assemblies on ZnIn2S4 nanosheets towards photocatalytic H2 production. Appl Surf Sci 2021;536:147934.

[78]

Su R, Tiruvalam R, He Q, Dimitratos N, Kesavan L, Hammond C, et al. Promotion of phenol photodecomposition over TiO2 using Au, Pd, and Au-Pd nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2012;6:6284–92.

[79]

Patil SS, Mali MG, Tamboli MS, Patil DR, Kulkarni MV, Yoon H, et al. Green approach for hierarchical nanostructured Ag-ZnO and their photocatalytic performance under sunlight. Catal Today 2016;260:126–34.

[80]

Bo T, Yuan J, Liu Y, Cao S, Zhou W. Activated edge of single layered TiO2 nanoribbons through transition metal doping and strain approaches for hydrogen production. Appl Surf Sci 2021;545:148947.

[81]

Shao S, Yu J, Love JB, Fan X. An economic approach to produce iron doped TiO2 nanorods from ilmenite for photocatalytic applications. J Alloys Compd 2021;858:158388.

[82]

Al Farsi B, Al Marzouqi F, Al-Maashani M, Souier MT, Tay Zar Myint M, Al-Abri MZ. Rapid microwave-assisted fabrication of Al-doped zinc oxide nanorods on a glass substrate for photocatalytic degradation of phenol under visible light irradiation. Mater Sci Eng B 2021;264:114977.

[83]

Munawar T, Nadeem MS, Mukhtar F, Hasan M, Mahmood K, Arshad MI, et al. Rare earth metal co-doped Zn0.9La0.05M0.05O (M = Yb, Sm, Nd) nanocrystals; energy gap tailoring, structural, photocatalytic and antibacterial studies. Mater Sci Semicond Process 2021;122:105485.

[84]

Regulska E, Breczko J, Basa A, Dubis AT. Rare-earth metals-doped nickel aluminate spinels for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Catalysts 2020;10:1003.

[85]

Jiang W, Zhao Y, Zong X, Nie H, Niu L, An L, et al. Photocatalyst for high-performance H2 production: Ga-doped polymeric carbon nitride. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2021;60:6124–9.

[86]

Shao L, Liu Y, Wang L, Xia X, Shen X. Electronic structure tailoring of BiOBr (0 1 0) nanosheets by cobalt doping for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 2020;502:143895.

[87]

Li S, Cheng Y, Wang Q, Liu C, Xu L. Design, fabrication and characterization of photocatalyst Ni-doped BiVO4 for high effectively degrading dye contaminant. Mater Res Express 2020;7:115005.

[88]

Popa A, Pana O, Stefan M, Toloman D, Stan M, Leostean C, et al. Interplay between ferromagnetism and photocatalytic activity generated by Fe3+ ions in iron doped ZnO nanoparticles grown on MWCNTs. Physica E 2021;129:114581.

[89]

Song X, Li W, Liu X, Wu Y, He D, Ke Z, et al. Oxygen vacancies enable the visible light photoactivity of chromium-implanted TiO2 nanowires. J Energy Chem 2021;55:154–61.

[90]

Peng F, Lai Q, Zhong J. Study on preparation and photocatalytic activity of V-doping mixed crystalline phase TiO2 powders. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2020;774:012041.

[91]

Sudrajat H, Babel S, Ta AT, Nguyen TK. Mn-doped TiO2 photocatalysts: role, chemical identity, and local structure of dopant. J Phys Chem Solid 2020;144:109517.

[92]

Joseph JA, Nair SB, John SS, Remillard SK, Shaji S, Philip RR. Zinc-doped iron oxide nanostructures for enhanced photocatalytic and antimicrobial applications. J Appl Electrochem 2021;51:521–38.

[93]

Kumaran V, Reshmawhahini VR, Gomathipriya P. Effect of Cu dopant on ZnO photocatalyst in the degradation of navy blue textile dye from synthetic wastewater. Chem Eng Technol 2021;44:942–7.

[94]

Mbiri A, Taffa DH, Gatebe E, Wark M. Zirconium doped mesoporous TiO2 multilayer thin films: influence of the zirconium content on the photodegradation of organic pollutants. Catal Today 2019;328:71–8.

[95]

Li W, Wang G, Chen C, Liao J, Li Z. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanowires doped with Mn2+ and Co2+ ions. Nanomaterials 2017;7:20.

[96]

Belver C, Bedia J, Álvarez-Montero MA, Rodriguez JJ. Solar photocatalytic purification of water with Ce-doped TiO2/clay heterostructures. Catal Today 2016;266:36–45.

[97]

Hu Y, Pan Y, Wang Z, Liu T, Gao Y, Luo B, et al. Lattice distortion induced internal electric field in TiO2 photoelectrode for efficient charge separation and transfer. Nat Commun 2020;11:2129.

[98]

Kim S, Ryou H, Lee IG, Shin M, Cho BJ, Hwang WS. Impact of Al doping on a hydrothermally synthesized β-Ga2O3 nanostructure for photocatalysis applications. RSC Adv 2021;11:7338–46.

[99]

Keerthana SP, Yuvakkumar R, Kumar PS, Ravi G, Vo DN, Velauthapillai D. Influence of tin (Sn) doping on Co3O4 for enhanced photocatalytic dye degradation. Chemosphere 2021;277:130325.

[100]

Elias M, Uddin MN, Saha JK, Hossain MA, Sarker DR, Akter S, et al. A highly efficient and stable photocatalyst; N-doped ZnO/CNT composite thin film synthesized via simple sol-gel drop coating method. Molecules 2021;26:1470.

[101]

Mishra BP, Babu P, Parida K. Phosphorous, boron and sulfur doped g-C3N4 nanosheet: synthesis, characterization, and comparative study towards photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Mater Today 2021;35:258–62.

[102]

Wang Y, Chen G, Weng H, Wang L, Chen J, Cheng S, et al. Carbon-doped boron nitride nanosheets with adjustable band structure for efficient photocatalytic U(Ⅵ) reduction under visible light. Chem Eng J 2021;410:128280.

[103]

Peng F, Cai L, Huang L, Yu H, Wang H. Preparation of nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide with visible-light photocatalytic activity using a facile hydrothermal method. J Phys Chem Solid 2008;69:1657–64.

[104]

Brahimi R, Bessekhouad Y, Trari M. Physical properties of NxTiO2 prepared by sol–gel route. Physica B 2012;407:3897–904.

[105]

Di Valentin C, Finazzi E, Pacchioni G, et al. N-doped TiO2: theory and experiment. Chem Phys 2007;339:44–56.

[106]

Di Valentin C, Pacchioni G, Selloni A, Livraghi S, Giamello E. Characterization of paramagnetic species in N-doped TiO2 powders by EPR spectroscopy and DFT calculations. J Phys Chem B 2005;109:11414–9.

[107]

Krengvirat W, Sreekantan S, Mohd Noor A-F, Negishi N, Oh SY, Kawamura G, et al. Carbon-incorporated TiO2 photoelectrodes prepared via rapid-anodic oxidation for efficient visible-light hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37:10046–56.

[108]

Liu Q-L, Zhao Z-Y, Liu Q-J. Analysis of sulfur modification mechanism for anatase and rutile TiO2 by different doping modes based on GGA + U calculations. RSC Adv 2014;4:32100.

[109]

Zhang H, Tao Z, Xu W, Lu S, Yuan F. First-principles study of dopants and defects in S-doped ZnO and its effect on photocatalytic activity. Comput Mater Sci 2012;58:119–24.

[110]

Xu KJ, Shang CF, F L. Mechanism of sulfur-doping on TiO2 photo-response under visible light. Chin J Nonferrous Metals 2008;18:6.

[111]

Sun XY, Zhang X, Sun X, Qian NX, Wang M, Ma YQ. Improved adsorption and degradation performance by S-doping of (001)-TiO2. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 2019;10:2116–27.

[112]

Cong Y, Zhang J, Chen F, Anpo M, He D. Preparation, photocatalytic activity, and mechanism of nano-TiO2 co-doped with nitrogen and iron (Ⅲ). J Phys Chem C 2007;111:10618–23.

[113]

Ullattil SG, Periyat P, Naufal B, Lazar MA. Self-doped ZnO microrods-high temperature stable oxygen deficient platforms for solar photocatalysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 2016;55:6413–21.

[114]

Nguyen X-S, Nguyen M-Q, Trinh X-T, Joita AC, Nistor SV. Correlation of native point defects and photocatalytic activity of annealed ZnO nanoparticle studied by electron spin resonance and photoluminescence emission. Semicond Sci Technol 2020;35:095035.

[115]

Li Z, Xing L, Zhang Z. Photocatalytic properties of columnar nanostructured TiO2 films fabricated by sputtering Ti and subsequent annealing. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2012;2012:413638.

[116]

Dong F, Wu L, Sun Y, Fu M, Wu Z, Lee SC. Efficient synthesis of polymeric g-C3N4 layered materials as novel efficient visible light driven photocatalysts. J Mater Chem 2011;21:15171.

[117]

Wang G, Zheng J, Bi H, Wang S, Wang J, Sun J, et al. Ti3+ self-doping in bulk of rutile TiO2 for enhanced photocatalysis. Scripta Mater 2019;162:28–32.

[118]

Ghicov A, Macak JM, Tsuchiya H, Kunze J, Haeublein V, Frey L, et al. Ion implantation and annealing for an efficient N-doping of TiO2 nanotubes. Nano Lett 2006;6:1080–2.

[119]

Kim H, Gigax JG, El-Atwani O, Chancey MR, Baldwin JK, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of void swelling of ferritic-martensitic and ferritic HT9 alloys after high-dose self-ion irradiation. Mater Char 2021;173:110908.

[120]

Hu ZY, Chen HQ, Zhao YB, Wang P, Yang K, Zhang J, et al. Abundant free surface in nanoporous copper films enhancing tolerance against helium ion irradiation. J Alloys Compd 2020;843:155829.

[121]

Liu J, Huang H, Liu A, Li Y. The effects of post-irradiation isochronous annealing on defects evolution and hardening in Hastelloy N alloy. J Nucl Mater 2021;548:152855.

[122]

Zhang JD, Fung S, Li-Bin L, Zhi-Jun L. Ti ion valence variation induced by ionizing radiation at TiO2/Si interface. Surf Coat Technol 2002;158–159:238–41.

[123]

Zhou J, Takeuchi M, Ray AK, Anpo M, Zhao XS. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of P25 TiO2 by vanadium-ion implantation under visible light irradiation. J Colloid Interface Sci 2007;311:497–501.

[124]

Li FX, Ishimaru M, Lu P, Afanasyev-Charkin IV, Sickafus KE. Damage evolution in Xe-ion irradiated rutile (TiO2) single crystals. Nucl Instrum Methods B 2000;166:314–21.

[125]

Ishimaru M, Hirotsu Y, Li F, Sickafus KE. Surface morphology of ion-beam-irradiated rutile single crystals. Appl Phys Lett 2000;77:4151–3.

[126]

Zhou Q, Zhang X, Huang Y, Li Z, Zhao Y, Zhang Z. Enhanced surface-enhanced Raman scattering performance by folding silver nanorods. Appl Phys Lett 2012;100:113101.

[127]

Gholami M, Qorbani M, Moradlou O, Naseri N, Moshfegh AZ. Optimal Ag2S nanoparticle incorporated TiO2 nanotube array for visible water splitting. RSC Adv 2014;4:7838.

[128]

Lv S, Li Z, Liao J, Zhang Z, Miao W. Well-aligned NiSi/Si heterostructured nanowire arrays as field emitters. J Vac Sci Technol B 2015;33:02b101.

[129]

Wang Y, Li Z, Sheng X, Zhang Z. Synthesis and optical properties of V2O5 nanorods. J Chem Phys 2007;126:164701.

[130]

Yang Y, Li Z, Ko PJ, Sandhu A. Behavior of multi-component magnetic colloidal systems in tunable magnetic fields and applications in biosensing. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2012;352:012001.

[131]

Wei Q, Zhang Z, Li Z, Zhou Q, Zhu Y. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of porous α-Fe2O3 films prepared by rapid thermal oxidation. J Phys D 2008;41:202002.

[132]

Zhao X, Valente-Feliciano AM, Xu C, Geng RL, Phillips L, Reece CE, et al. Large crystal grain niobium thin films deposited by energetic condensation in vacuum arc. J Vac Sci Technol A 2009;27:620–5.

[133]

Yuan J, Wang Z, Fu X, Xie L, Sun Y, Gao S, et al. Development of electron energy-loss spectroscopy for nanoscience. Micron 2008;39:658–65.

[134]

Hu Z, Li Z, Zhou Z, Shi C, Schut H, Pappas K. Positron and thermal desorption studies on He ion implanted nuclear graphite. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2014;505:012014.

[135]

Li Z, Teng Y, Xing L, Zhang N, Zhang Z. Enhancement of the photocatalytic property of TiO2 columnar nanostructured films by changing deposition angle. Mater Res Bull 2014;50:68–72.

[137]

Nguyen CH, Tran HN, Fu C-C, Lu Y-T, Juang R-S. Roles of adsorption and photocatalysis in removing organic pollutants from water by activated carbon–supported titania composites: kinetic aspects. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 2020;109:51–61.

[138]

Wang G, Li Z, Li M, Feng Y, Li W, Lv S, et al. Synthesizing vertical porous ZnO nanowires arrays on Si/ITO substrate for enhanced photocatalysis. Ceram Int 2018;44:1291–5.

[139]

Feng Y, Wang G, Liao J, Li W, Chen C, Li M, et al. Honeycomb-like ZnO mesoporous nanowall arrays modified with Ag nanoparticles for highly efficient photocatalytic Activity. Sci Rep 2017;7:11622.

[136]

Lu M-C. Photocatalytic oxidation of propoxur insecticide with titanium dioxide supported on activated carbon. J Environ Sci Health, Part B 1999;34:207–23.

[140]

Jaramillo TF, Baeck S-H, Kleiman-Shwarsctein A, McFarland EW. Combinatorial electrochemical synthesis and screening of mesoporous ZnO for photocatalysis. Macromol Rapid Commun 2004;25:297–301.

[141]

Liu Z, Jin Z, Li W, Liu X. Ordered porous ZnO thin films formed by dip-coating method using PS templates. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 2006;40:25–30.

[142]

Ho HP, Lo KC, Siu GG, Surya C, Li KF, Cheah KW. Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy of free-standing GaN separated from sapphire substrates by 532 nm Nd:YAG laser lift-off. Mater Chem Phys 2003;81:99–103.

[143]

Xiao Y, Li L, Li Y, Fang M, Zhang L. Synthesis of mesoporous ZnO nanowires through a simplein situprecipitation method. Nanotechnology 2005;16:671–4.

[144]

Shan CX, Liu Z, Zhang ZZ, Shen DZ, Hark SK. A simple route to porous ZnO and ZnCdO nanowires. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:11176–9.

[145]

Polarz S, Orlov AV, Schuth F, Lu AH. Preparation of high-surface-area zinc oxide with ordered porosity, different pore sizes, and nanocrystalline walls. Chem Eur J 2007;13:592–7.

[146]

Yan C, Chen Z, Zhao X. Enhanced electroluminescence of ZnO nanocrystalline annealing from mesoporous precursors. Solid State Commun 2006;140:18–22.

[147]

Xu F, Zhang P, Navrotsky A, Yuan ZY, Ren TZ, Halasa M, et al. Hierarchically assembled porous ZnO nanoparticles: synthesis, surface energy, and photocatalytic activity. Chem Mater 2007;19:5680–6.

[148]

Jiu J, Kurumada K-i, Tanigaki M. Preparation of nanoporous ZnO using copolymer gel template. Mater Chem Phys 2003;81:93–8.

[149]

Jin XB, Li YX, Su Y, Guo Z, Gu C, Huang J, et al. Porous and single-crystalline ZnO nanobelts: fabrication with annealing precursor nanobelts, and gas-sensing and optoelectronic performance. Nanotechnology 2016;27:355702.

[150]

Park S. High-response and selective hydrogen sensing properties of porous ZnO nanotubes. Curr Appl Phys 2016;16:1263–9.

[151]

Araujo FP, Trigueiro P, Honorio LMC, Oliveira DM, Almeida LC, Garcia RP, et al. Eco-friendly synthesis and photocatalytic application of flowers-like ZnO structures using Arabic and Karaya Gums. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;165:2813–22.

[152]

Khalid NR, Hammad A, Tahir MB, Rafique M, Iqbal T, Nabi G, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Al and Fe co-doped ZnO nanorods for methylene blue degradation. Ceram Int 2019;45:21430–5.

[153]

Adhikari S, Sarkar D, Madras G. Highly efficient WO3-ZnO mixed oxides for photocatalysis. RSC Adv 2015;5:11895–904.

[154]

Bao Y, Wang C, Ma J-Z. Morphology control of ZnO microstructures by varying hexamethylenetetramine and trisodium citrate concentration and their photocatalytic activity. Mater Des 2016;101:7–15.

[155]

Lv H, Ji G, Yang Z, Liu Y, Zhang X, Liu W, et al. Enhancement photocatalytic activity of the graphite-like C3N4 coated hollow pencil-like ZnO. J Colloid Interface Sci 2015;450:381–7.

[156]

Khan UA, Liu J, Pan J, Ma H, Zuo S, Yu Y, et al. Fabrication of highly efficient and hierarchical CdS QDs/CQDs/H-TiO2 ternary heterojunction: surpassable photocatalysis under sun-like illumination. Ind Eng Chem Res 2019;58:79–91.

[157]

Zhang K, Zhou W, Zhang X, Sun B, Wang L, Pan K, et al. Self-floating amphiphilic black TiO2 foams with 3D macro-mesoporous architectures as efficient solar-driven photocatalysts. Appl Catal, B 2017;206:336–43.

[158]

Sun J, Tian S, Cai X, Xiong D, Verma SK, Zhang Q, et al. Low-temperature solution synthesis of a ZnO nanorod array with a mesoporous surface mediated by cadmium ions. CrystEngComm 2016;18:8277–83.

Journal of Materiomics
Pages 315-338
Cite this article:
Wang G, Lv S, Shen Y, et al. Advancements in heterojunction, cocatalyst, defect and morphology engineering of semiconductor oxide photocatalysts. Journal of Materiomics, 2024, 10(2): 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2023.05.014

310

Views

29

Crossref

27

Web of Science

36

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 30 March 2023
Revised: 25 May 2023
Accepted: 26 May 2023
Published: 01 July 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return