AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Quantitative method to predict the energetics of helium-nanocavities interactions in metal systems based on electrophobic interaction

Fengping LuoaBowen ZhangaZhiying GaoaJia HuangaHong-Bo Zhoub( )Guang-Hong LubFei GaocYugang WangaChenxu Wanga( )
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Center for Applied Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
Department of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China
Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA

Peer review under responsibility of The Chinese Ceramic Society.

Show Author Information

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Energetics of helium-nanocavities interactions are crucial for unveiling underlying mechanisms of nanocavity evolution in nuclear materials. Nevertheless, it becomes intractable and even not feasible to obtain these energetics via atomic simulations with increasing nanocavity size and increasing helium content in nanocavities. Herein, a universal scaling law of helium-induced interaction energies in nanocavities in metal systems is proposed based on electrophobic interaction of helium. Based on this scaling law and ab-initio calculations, a predictive method for binding energies of helium and displacement defects to nanocavities of arbitrary sizes and with different helium/vacancy ratios is established for BCC iron as a representative and validated by atomic simulations. This predictive method reveals that the critical helium/vacancy ratio for helium-enhanced vacancy binding to nanocavities increases with increasing nanocavity size, and the helium/vacancy ratio giving the highest stability of nanocavities is about 1.6. The Ostwald ripening of nanocavities is delayed by helium to higher temperatures due to reduced vacancy de-trapping rates from nanocavities. The proposed scaling law can be generalized to many metal systems studied in the nuclear materials community. Being readily coupled into mesoscale models of irradiation damages, this predictive method facilitates clarifying helium role in cavity swelling of metallic nuclear materials.

References

[1]

Cawthorne C, Fulton EJ. Voids in irradiated stainless steel. Nature 1967;216:575-6.

[2]

Ackland G. Controlling radiation damage. Science 2010;327:1587-8.

[3]

Hartmann M, Trinkaus H. Evolution of gas-filled nanocracks in crystalline solids. Phys Rev Lett 2002;88:4.

[4]

Odette GR, Alinger MJ, Wirth BD. Recent developments in irradiation-resistant steels. Annu Rev Mater Res 2008;38:471-503.

[5]

Trinkaus H, Singh BN. Helium accumulation in metals during irradiation - where do we stand? J Nucl Mater 2003;323:229-42.

[6]

Wirth BD. How does radiation damage materials. Science 2007;143:923-4.

[7]

Krsjak V, Shen T, Degmova J, Sojak S, Korpas E, Noga P, et al. On the helium bubble swelling in nano-oxide dispersion-strengthened steels. J Mater Sci Technol 2022;105:172-81.

[8]

Han Q, Li YP, Ran G, Liu XY, Wu L, Chen Y, et al. In-situ TEM observation of the evolution of helium bubbles & dislocation loops and their interaction in Pd during He+ irradiation. J Mater Sci Technol 2021;87:108-19.

[9]

Li D, Jia N, Huang H, Chen S, Dou Y, He X, et al. Helium ion irradiation enhanced precipitation and the impact on cavity formation in a HfNbZrTi refractory high entropy alloy. J Nucl Mater 2021:552.

[10]

Mattas RF, Garner FA, Grossbeck ML, Maziasz PJ, Odette GR, Stoller RE. The impact of swelling on fusion reactor first wall lifetime. J Nucl Mater 1984;122:230-5.

[11]

Xu WZ, Zhang YF, Cheng GM, Jian WW, Millett PC, Koch CC, et al. In-situ atomic-scale observation of irradiation-induced void formation. Nat Commun 2013;4.

[12]

Brailsford AD, Bullough R. The rate theory of swelling due to void growth in irradiated metals. J Nucl Mater 1972;44:121-35.

[13]

Ge W, Zhao SJ, Wang CX, Liu HC, Su Y, Huang J, et al. A model for dose dependence of the void swelling in electron-irradiated alloys. Metals 2022;12:1-11.

[14]

Xie HX, Gao N, Xu K, Lu GH, Yu T, Yin FX. A new loop-punching mechanism for helium bubble growth in tungsten. Acta Mater 2017;141:10-7.

[15]

Liu HC, Huang J, Wang CX, Xia SQ, Ge W, Liu QY, et al. Effects of grain boundaries and nano-precipitates on helium bubble behaviors in lanthanum-doped nanocrystalline steel. Scripta Mater 2021;200:113900.

[16]

Huang J, Liu HC, Gao ZY, Su Y, Liu QY, Ge W, et al. Helium-hydrogen synergistic effects in structural materials under fusion neutron irradiation. Front Mater 2022;9:1-12.

[17]

Clowers LN, Jiao Z, Was GS. Synergies between H, He and radiation damage in dual and triple ion irradiation of candidate fusion blanket materials. J Nucl Mater 2022;565:153722.

[18]

Stoller RE. The influence of helium on microstructural evolution: implications for DT fusion reactors. J Nucl Mater 1990;174:289-310.

[19]

Zhang PB, Zhang C, Li RH, Zhao JJ. He-induced vacancy formation in bcc Fe solid from first-principles simulation. J Nucl Mater 2014;444:147-52.

[20]

Zhang PB, Zou TT, Zhao JJ. He-He and He-metal interactions in transition metals from first-principles. J Nucl Mater 2015;467:465-71.

[21]

Zhou HB, Wang JL, Jiang W, Lu GH, Aguiar JA, Liu F. Electrophobic interaction induced impurity clustering in metals. Acta Mater 2016;119:1-8.

[22]

Fu CC, Willaime F. Ab initio study of helium in α-Fe: dissolution, migration, and clustering with vacancies. Phys Rev B 2005;72:1-6.

[23]

Kim BK, Tan L, Sakasegawa H, Parish CM, Zhong W, Tanigawa H, et al. Effects of helium on irradiation response of reduced-activation ferritic-martensitic steels: using nickel isotopes to simulate fusion neutron response. J Nucl Mater 2021;545:152634.

[24]

Gilbert MR, Arakawa K, Bergstrom Z, Caturla MJ, Dudarev SL, Gao F, et al. Perspectives on multiscale modelling and experiments to accelerate materials development for fusion. J Nucl Mater 2021:554.

[25]

Malerba L, Anento N, Balbuena JP, Becquart CS, Castin N, Caturla MJ, et al. Physical mechanisms and parameters for models of microstructure evolution under irradiation in Fe alloys – Part Ⅰ: pure Fe. Nucl Mater Energy 2021;29:101069.

[26]

Fu CC, Torre JD, Willaime F, Bocquet JL, Barbu A. Multiscale modelling of defect kinetics in irradiated iron. Nat Mater 2005;4:68-74.

[27]

Hou J, Kong XS, Wu XB, Song J, Liu CS. Predictive model of hydrogen trapping and bubbling in nanovoids in bcc metals. Nat Mater 2019;18:833-9.

[28]

Samaras M. Multiscale modelling: the role of helium in iron. Mater Today 2009;12:46-53.

[29]

Yang L, Gao F, Kurtz RJ, Zu XT, Peng SM, Long XG, et al. Effects of local structure on helium bubble growth in bulk and at grain boundaries of bcc iron: a molecular dynamics study. Acta Mater 2015;97:86-93.

[30]

Sandoval L, Perez D, Uberuaga BP, Voter AF. Formation of helium-bubble networks in tungsten. Acta Mater 2018;159:46-50.

[31]

Martínez E, Fu CC. Cr interactions with He and vacancies in dilute Fe-Cr alloys from first principles. Phys Rev B 2011;84:1-10.

[32]

Lin YR, Bhattacharya A, Chen D, Zhao Y, Kai JJ, Henry J, et al. The role of Cr concentration and temperature on cavity swelling with co-injected helium in dual-ion irradiated Fe and Fe-Cr alloys. Mater Des 2022;223:111134.

[33]

Clowers LN, Jiao Z, Was GS. Synergies between H, He and radiation damage in dual and triple ion irradiation of candidate fusion blanket materials. J Nucl Mater 2022;565:153722.

[34]

Ding FY, Zhou L Sen, Zhao L, Dou XL, Xiao K La, Song JF, et al. Theoretical study on the influence of Cr, Mo, and W alloying additions on the helium behavior in nickel. J Nucl Mater 2022;565:153720.

[35]

You YW, Kong XS, Wu X bang, Liu CS, Chen JL, Luo GN. Bubble growth from clustered hydrogen and helium atoms in tungsten under a fusion environment. Nucl Fusion 2017;57.

[36]

Jourdan T, Crocombette JP. A variable-gap model for calculating free energies of helium bubbles in metals. J Nucl Mater 2011;418:98-105.

[37]

Terentyev D, Juslin N, Nordlund K, Sandberg N. Fast three dimensional migration of He clusters in bcc Fe and Fe-Cr alloys. J Appl Phys 2009;105.

[38]

Lucas G, Schäublin R. Stability of helium bubbles in alpha-iron: a molecular dynamics study. J Nucl Mater 2009;386–388:360-2.

[39]

Sekimura N, Iwai T, Arai Y, Yonamine S, Naito A, Miwa Y, et al. Synergistic effects of hydrogen and helium on microstructural evolution in vanadium alloys by triple ion beam irradiation. J Nucl Mater 2000;283–287:224-8.

[40]

Jiang L, Peng Q, Xiu PY, Yan Y, Jiao ZJ, Lu CY, et al. Elucidating He-H assisted cavity evolution in alpha Cr under multiple ion beam irradiation. Scripta Mater 2020;187:291-5.

[41]

Jiang C, Zhang YF, Aagesen LK, Jokisaari AM, Sun C, Gan J. Noble gas bubbles in bcc metals: ab initio-based theory and kinetic Monte Carlo modeling. Acta Mater 2021;213:116961.

[42]

Puska MJ, Nieminen RM, Manninen M. Atoms embedded in an electron gas: immersion energies. Phys Rev B 1981;24:3037-47.

[43]

Wilson WD, Bisson CL, Baskes MI. Self-trapping of helium in metals. Phys Rev B 1981;24:5616-24.

[44]

Becquart CS, Domain C. Migration energy of He in W revisited by Ab initio calculations. Phys Rev Lett 2006;97:1-4.

[45]

Hohenberg P, Kohn K. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys Rev B 1964;136:B864-71.

[46]

Kohn W, Sham LJ. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev B 1965;140:A1133-8.

[47]

Kresse G, Furthmüller J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 1996;54:11169-86.

[48]

Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 1999;59:1758-75.

[49]

Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 1996;77:3865-8.

[50]

Hayward E, Fu CC. Interplay between hydrogen and vacancies in α-Fe. Phys Rev B 2013;87:1-14.

[51]

Yang KJ, Liu YL, Li HH, Shao P, Zhang X, Han QF, et al. The early growth process of helium blistering in tungsten and molybdenum: first-principles and statistical model calculations. J Nucl Mater 2021;550:152938.

[52]

Pack JD, Monkhorst HJ. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys Rev B 1976;13:5188-92.

[53]

Umrigar C, Puska MJ, Norskov JK, Manninn M. Repulsive interaction of the helium atom with a metal surface. Phys Rev B 1984;29:2314-6.

[54]

Hou J, You YW, Kong XS, Song J, Liu CS. Accurate prediction of vacancy cluster structures and energetics in bcc transition metals. Acta Mater 2021:211.

[55]

Shi JM, Hashimoto N. Study on synergistic effects of H and He in α-Fe. Nucl Mater Energy 2018;16:212-6.

[56]

Zu XT, Yang L, Gao F, Peng SM, Heinisch HL, Long XG, et al. Properties of helium defects in bcc and fcc metals investigated with density functional theory. Phys Rev B 2009;80:1-6.

[57]

Yu WF, Lin ZZ, Ning XJ. Mass dependence of the Soret coefficient for atomic diffusion in condensed matter. Phys Rev E 2013;87:2-6.

[58]

Luo FP, Liu QY, Huang J, Xiao H, Gao ZY, Ge W, et al. Effects of lattice strain on hydrogen diffusion, trapping and escape in bcc iron from ab-initio calculations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:8198-215.

[59]

Luo FP, Huang J, Liu QY, Gao ZY, Ge W, Gao F, et al. Dynamic investigations on hydrogen-helium interaction around the vacancy in BCC iron from ab-initio calculations. Nucl Fusion 2023:63.

[60]

Ventelon L, Willaime F, Fu CC, Heran M, Ginoux I. Ab initio investigation of radiation defects in tungsten: structure of self-interstitials and specificity of di-vacancies compared to other bcc transition metals. J Nucl Mater 2012;425:16-21.

[61]

Mason DR, Nguyen-Manh D, Marinica MC, Alexander R, Sand AE, Dudarev SL. Relaxation volumes of microscopic and mesoscopic irradiation-induced defects in tungsten. J Appl Phys 2019;126.

[62]

Chen J, Jung P, Hoffelner W, Ullmaier H. Dislocation loops and bubbles in oxide dispersion strengthened ferritic steel after helium implantation under stress. Acta Mater 2008;56:250-8.

[63]

Bai XM, Voter AF, Hoagland RG, Nastasi M, Uberuaga BP. Efficient annealing of radiation damage near grain boundaries via interstitial emission. Science 2010;327:1631-4.

[64]

Sandoval L, Perez D, Uberuaga BP, Voter AF. Competing kinetics and he bubble morphology in W. Phys Rev Lett 2015;114:1-5.

[65]

Fu CC, Willaime F, Ordejón P. Stability and mobility of mono- and Di-interstitials in α-Fe. Phys Rev Lett 2004;92:1-4.

[66]

Liu QY, Xia SQ, Su Y, Huang J, Zhao SJ, Luo FP, et al. Enhanced recombination suppresses the void swelling in bcc multi-component alloys. Materialia 2021:20.

[67]

Geng WT, Wan L, Du JP, Ishii A, Ishikawa N, Kimizuka H, et al. Hydrogen bubble nucleation in α-iron. Scripta Mater 2017;134:105-9.

[68]

Först CJ, Slycke J, Van Vliet KJ, Yip S. Point defect concentrations in metastable Fe-C alloys. Phys Rev Lett 2006;96:1-4.

[69]

Caro A, Schwen D, Martinez E. Structure of nanoscale gas bubbles in metals. Appl Phys Lett 2013;103.

[70]

Jelea A. Molecular dynamics modeling of helium bubbles in austenitic steels. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 2018;425:50-4.

[71]

Ortiz CJ, Caturla MJ. Simulation of defect evolution in irradiated materials: role of intracascade clustering and correlated recombination. Phys Rev B 2007;75:1-11.

[72]

Shi JY, Li LL, Peng L, Gao F, Huang JJ. Atomistic study on helium-to-vacancy ratio of neutron irradiation induced helium bubbles during nucleation and growth in α-Fe. Nucl Mater Energy 2021;26:100940.

[73]

Morishita K, Sugano R, Wirth BD. MD and KMC modeling of the growth and shrinkage mechanisms of helium-vacancy clusters in Fe. J Nucl Mater 2003;323:243-50.

[74]

Zettlemoyer A. Nucleation. first ed. New York: Elsevier; 1969.

[75]

Taller S, VanCoevering G, Wirth BD, Was GS. Predicting structural material degradation in advanced nuclear reactors with ion irradiation. Sci Rep 2021;11:1-14.

[76]

Taller S, Was GS. Understanding bubble and void nucleation in dual ion irradiated T91 steel using single parameter experiments. Acta Mater 2020;198:47-60.

[77]

Kashinath A, Misra A, Demkowicz MJ. Stable storage of helium in nanoscale platelets at semicoherent interfaces. Phys Rev Lett 2013;110:1-5.

[78]

Kohnert AA, Cusentino MA, Wirth BD. Molecular statics calculations of the biases and point defect capture volumes of small cavities. J Nucl Mater 2018;499:480-9.

[79]

Wang YH, Gao F, Wirth BD. Atomic modeling assessment of the interaction distance and effective bias for small defect clusters absorption at a void in BCC Fe. J Nucl Mater 2022;568:153882.

[80]

Borodin OV, Bryk VV, Kalchenko AS, Melnichenko VV, Voyevodin VN, Garner FA. Synergistic effects of helium and hydrogen on self-ion-induced swelling of austenitic 18Cr10NiTi stainless steel. J Nucl Mater 2013;442:S817-20.

[81]

Taverna D, Kociak M, Stéphan O, Fabre A, Finot E, Décamps B, et al. Probing physical properties of confined fluids within individual nanobubbles. Phys Rev Lett 2008;100:1-4.

[82]

Fréchard S, Walls M, Kociak M, Chevalier JP, Henry J, Gorse D. Study by EELS of helium bubbles in a martensitic steel. J Nucl Mater 2009;393:102-7.

[83]

Granberg F, Wang X, Chen D, Jin K, Wang Y, Bei H, et al. Origin of increased helium density inside bubbles in Ni(1−x)Fex alloys. Scripta Mater 2021;191:1-6.

[84]

Hammond KD, Blondel S, Hu L, Maroudas D, Wirth BD. Large-scale atomistic simulations of low-energy helium implantation into tungsten single crystals. Acta Mater 2018;144:561-78.

[85]

Caro A, Schwen D, Hetherly J, Martinez E. The capillarity equation at the nanoscale: gas bubbles in metals. Acta Mater 2015;89:14-21.

[86]

Tanaka T, Oka K, Ohnuki S, Yamashita S, Suda T, Watanabe S, et al. Synergistic effect of helium and hydrogen for defect evolution under multi-ion irradiation of Fe-Cr ferritic alloys. J Nucl Mater 2004;329–333:294-8.

[87]

Li ZZ, Li YH, Terentyev D, Castin N, Bakaev A, Bonny G, et al. Investigating the formation mechanism of void lattice in tungsten under neutron irradiation: from collision cascades to ordered nanovoids. Acta Mater 2021;219:117239.

[88]

Fan Y, Kushima A, Yip S, Yildiz B. Mechanism of void nucleation and growth in bcc Fe: atomistic simulations at experimental time scales. Phys Rev Lett 2011;106:1-4.

[89]

Hou J, Kong XS, Sun J, You YW, Wu X, Liu CS, et al. Hydrogen bubble nucleation by self-clustering: density functional theory and statistical model studies using tungsten as a model system. Nucl Fusion 2018;58.

[90]

Uline MJ, Corti DS. Activated instability of homogeneous bubble nucleation and growth. Phys Rev Lett 2007;99:1-4.

[91]

Ding JH, Zhang PB, Sun D, Wang YY, Huang SS, Zhao JJ. Energetics of helium-vacancy complexes in Fe-9Cr alloys from first-principles calculations. J Nucl Mater 2019;513:143-151.

[92]

Hepburn DJ, Ferguson D, Gardner S, Ackland GJ. First-principles study of helium, carbon, and nitrogen in austenite, dilute austenitic iron alloys, and nickel. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 2013;88:1-26.

[93]

Huang GY, Juslin N, Wirth BD. First-principles study of vacancy, interstitial, noble gas atom interstitial and vacancy clusters in bcc-W. Comput Mater Sci 2016;123:121-30.

[94]

Li XC, Liu YN, Yu Y, Luo GN, Shu XL, Lu GH. Helium defects interactions and mechanism of helium bubble growth in tungsten: a molecular dynamics simulation. J Nucl Mater 2014;451:356-60.

[95]

Li XC, Wan C Bin, Li H in, Zhao RX, Ju X. Towards understanding the trapping, migration and clustering of He atoms in W–Ta alloy. J Nucl Mater 2021;554:153095.

[96]

Fokt M, Adjanor G, Jourdan T. A variable-gap model for helium bubbles in nickel. Comput Mater Sci 2022;202:110921.

[97]

Yang L, Zu XT, Gao F. Ab initio study of formation, migration and binding properties of helium-vacancy clusters in aluminum. Phys B Condens Matter 2008;403:2719-24.

[98]

Runevall O, Sandberg N. Helium cluster dissolution in molybdenum. J Phys Condens Matter 2009;21:335401.

[99]

Unn-Toc W, Marinica MC, Jourdan T. Helium–vacancy interactions in vanadium and tantalum. Comput Mater Sci 2018;145:197-207.

Journal of Materiomics
Pages 725-737
Cite this article:
Luo F, Zhang B, Gao Z, et al. Quantitative method to predict the energetics of helium-nanocavities interactions in metal systems based on electrophobic interaction. Journal of Materiomics, 2024, 10(3): 725-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2023.11.015

224

Views

0

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 02 September 2023
Revised: 02 November 2023
Accepted: 10 November 2023
Published: 22 December 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return