Cuttings transport: Back reaming analysis based on a coupled layering-sliding mesh method via CFD
Abstract
Inadequate hole cleaning is one of the main reasons for inefficient operations in extended-reach drilling. The mechanism of cuttings transport under the back reaming operation, which is frequently adopted to remove the cuttings, has been investigated in this study. To this end, a coupled layering-sliding mesh method with the Eulerian-Granular approach has been established innovatively. The dynamic layering method has been employed to simulate the axial motion of the pipe, whereas the sliding mesh method has been used to simulate the pipe rotation. The back reaming operation of a connector-furnished pipe has been simulated, and the sensitive parameter analysis has been conducted. The results thus obtained demonstrate that the increase in the initial bed height, inclination, and the diameter and length of the connector causes a significant increase in the cuttings concentration. In addition, the cuttings concentration is observed to decrease significantly with the pipe rotation speed. Furthermore, two main factors contribute towards the cuttings accumulation around the connector, namely, the difference in the cross-sectional area and the pushing effect of the connector—like a “bulldozer”. The “bulldozer” effect of the connector dominates when the tripping velocity is significant compared to the velocity of the cuttings. Conversely, the effect of the difference in the cross-sectional area becomes the leading factor for cuttings accumulation. The “bulldozer” effect of the connector causes a more severe impact on hole cleaning. In both cases, increasing the tripping velocity only mildly affects the cuttings concentration. It is therefore suggested that the tripping velocity should be slower than that of the sand during the back reaming operation. Furthermore, increased fluid velocity might lead to a higher accumulated cuttings concentration around the connector when the cuttings bed has not entirely passed through the connector. A significant flow rate can be safely applied after the cuttings have passed through the connector furnished with a large diameter, such as the bottom hole assembly. This exploration serves as an essential guide to predicting and controlling tight spots while back reaming.
Electronic Supplementary Material
References
Akhshik, S., Behzad, M., Rajabi, M., 2015. CFD-DEM approach to investigate the effect of drill pipe rotation on cuttings transport behavior. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 127, 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.01.017.
Bicalho, I.C., Dos Santos, D.B.L., Ataíde, C.H., et al., 2016. Fluid-dynamic behavior of flow in partially obstructed concentric and eccentric annuli with orbital motion. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 137, 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.11.029.
Bonamy, D., Chavanis, P.H., Cortet, P.P., et al., 2009. Euler-like modelling of dense granular flows: application to a rotating drum. Eur. Phys. J. B. 68, 619-627. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2009-00123-6.
Capecelatro, J., Desjardins, O., 2013. An Euler-Lagrange strategy for simulating particle-laden flows. J. Comput. Phys. 238, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.015.
Cayeux, E., Mesagan, T., Tanripada, S., et al., 2014. Real-time evaluation of hole-cleaning conditions with a transient cuttings-transport model. SPE Drill. Complet. 29 (1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2118/163492-PA.
Cho, H., Shan, S.N., Osisanya, S.O., 2002. A three-segment hydraulic model for cuttings transport in coiled tubing horizontal and deviated drilling. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 42, 32-39. https://doi.org/10.2118/02-06-03.
Duan, M., Miska, S., Yu, M., et al., 2008. Transport of small cuttings in extended-reach drilling. SPE Drill. Complet. 23 (3), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.2118/104192-PA.
Epelle, E.I., Gerogiorgis, D.I., 2019. Drill cuttings transport and deposition in complex annular geometries of deviated oil and gas wells: a multiphase flow analysis of positional variability. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 151, 214-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.09.013.
Gavignet, A., Sobey, I., 1989. Model aids cuttings transport prediction. J. Petrol. Technol. 41 (9), 916-921. https://doi.org/10.2118/15417-PA.
Guo, X.-l., Wang, Z.-m., Long, Z.-h., 2010. Study on three-layer unsteady model of cuttings transport for extended-reach well. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 73 (1–2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.05.020.
Han, S., Hwang, Y., Woo, N., Kim, Y., 2010. Solid–liquid hydrodynamics in a slim hole drilling annulus. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 70 (3–4), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.12.002.
Heydari, O., Sahraei, E., Skalle, P., 2017. Investigating the impact of drillpipe's rotation and eccentricity on cuttings transport phenomenon in various horizontal annuluses using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 156, 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.059.
Li, W., Zhao, X., Ji, Y., Peng, H., et al., 2016. Investigation of biodiesel-based drilling fluid, Part 2: formulation design, rheological study, and laboratory evaluation. SPE J. 21 (5), 1767-1781.
Livescu, S., 2012. Mathematical modeling of thixotropic drilling mud and crude oil flow in wells and pipelines—a review. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 98, 174-184.
Mahmoud, H., Ahmed, H., Nasser, M.S., et al., 2020. Hole cleaning and drilling fluid sweeps in horizontal and deviated wells: comprehensive review. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 186, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106748.
Nguyen, D., Rahman, S.S., 1998. A three-layer hydraulic program for effective cuttings transport and hole cleaning in highly deviated and horizontal wells. SPE Drill. Complet. 13 (3), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.2118/51186-PA.
Pang, B., Wang, S., Lu, C., Cai, W., Jiang, X., Lu, H., 2019. Investigation of cuttings transport in directional and horizontal drilling wellbores injected with pulsed drilling fluid using CFD approach. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 90, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.05.001.
Paranhos Sobrinho, E.S., Escarpini Filho, R.S., Lages, E.N., et al., 2021. Consideration of backreaming in vertical wells closure modeling in salt rock. SPE J. 26 (3), 1092-1109. https://doi.org/10.2118/204209-PA.
Ramírez, L., Foulquié, C., Nogueira, X., et al., 2015. New high-resolution-preserving sliding mesh techniques for higher-order finite volume schemes. Comput. Fluids 118, 114-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.06.008.
Song, X., Xu, Z., Wang, M., et al., 2017. Experimental study on the wellbore-cleaning efficiency of microhole-horizontal-well drilling. SPE J. 22 (4), 1189-1200. https://doi.org/10.2118/185965-PA.
Yarim, G., Ritchie, G.M., May, R.B.J.S.D., 2010. A guide to successful backreaming: real-time case histories. SPE Drill. Complet. 25 (1), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.2118/116555-PA.
Zhang, B., Liang, C.J.J.o., 2015. A simple, efficient, and high-order accurate curved sliding-mesh interface approach to spectral difference method on coupled rotating and stationary domains. J. Comput. Phys. 295, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.04.006.
Zhang, F., Miska, S., Yu, M., et al., 2018. A unified transient solid-liquid two-phase flow model for cuttings transport-modelling part. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 166, 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.027.
Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., et al., 2020. Modeling of dynamic cuttings transportation during drilling of oil and gas wells by combining 2D CFD and 1D discretization approach. SPE J. 25 (3), 1220-1240. https://doi.org/10.2118/199902-PA.
Zhu, N., Huang, W., Gao, D., 2022. Numerical analysis of the stuck pipe mechanism related to the cutting bed under various drilling operations. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 208, 109783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109783.
京公网安备11010802044758号