PDF (3.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Hole cleaning evaluation and installation spacing optimization of cuttings bed remover in extended-reach drilling

Shuo Penga,bWen-Jun Huanga,b()De-Li Gaoa,b()
MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing, 102249, China
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing, 102249, China

Edited by Jia-Jia Fei

Show Author Information

Abstract

In extended-reach or long-horizontal drilling, cuttings usually deposit at the bottom of the annulus. Once cuttings accumulate to a certain thickness, complex problems such as excessive torque and drag, tubing buckling, and pipe stuck probably occur, which results in a lot of non-productive time and remedial operations. Cuttings bed remover can efficiently destroy deposited cuttings in time through hydraulic and mechanical stirring effects. This paper aims to build a method for hole cleaning evaluation and installation spacing optimization of cuttings bed remover to improve the wellbore cleaning effect. Firstly, a Computational Fluid Dynamics approach with Eulerian–Eulerian multiphase model was utilized to investigate the mechanism of cuttings transportation, and a new type of cuttings bed remover was designed. Next, an evaluation method of hole cleaning effect of remover was established. After that, the effects of several drilling parameters on hole cleaning including flow rate of drilling fluid, rotational speed of drillpipe, rate of penetration, wellbore size, rheological property of drilling fluid, and remover eccentricity on the performance of cuttings bed remover were investigated. The results demonstrate that the new type of remover with streamline blade performs better than conventional removers. The efficiency of hole cleaning is greatly improved by increasing the rotational speed of drillpipe, flow rate of drilling fluid, remover eccentricity, and 6 rpm Fann dial reading for drilling fluid. While higher rate of penetration and large wellbore size result in worse hole cleaning. These findings can serve as an important guide for the structure optimization design of cuttings bed remover and installation spacing of removers.

References

 

Amanna, B., Movaghar, M.R.K., 2016. Cuttings transport behavior in directional drilling using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 34, 670-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.07.029.

 

Araoye, A.A., Badr, H.M., Ahmed, W.H., 2017. Investigation of flow through multi-stage restricting orifices. Ann. Nucl. Energy 104, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.02.002.

 

Awad, A.M., Hussein, I.A., Nasser, M.S., et al., 2022. A CFD-RSM study of cuttings transport in non-Newtonian drilling fluids: impact of operational parameters. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 208, 109613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109613.

 
Bilgesu, H.I., Mishra, N., Ameri, S., 2007. Understanding the effects of drilling parameters on hole cleaning in horizontal and deviated wellbores using computational fluid dynamics. In: Eastern Regional Meeting. https://doi.org/10.2118/111208-MS.
 
Boulet, J.G., Shepherd, J.A., Batham, J., et al., 2000. Improved hole cleaning and reduced rotary torque by new external profile on drilling equipment. In: IADC/SPE Drilling Conference. https://doi.org/10.2118/59143-MS.
 

Brett, J.F., Beckett, A.D., Holt, C.A., et al., 1989. Uses and limitations of drillstring tension and torque models for monitoring hole conditions. SPE Drill. Eng. 4 (3), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.2118/16664-PA.

 

Busch, A., Johansen, S.T., 2020. Cuttings transport: on the effect of drill pipe rotation and lateral motion on the cuttings bed. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 191, 107136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107136.

 
Cao, T., Yu, K., Chen, X.Y., et al., 2019. Numerical investigations on the effect of a cuttings bed remover on the cuttings carrying capacity in horizontal drilling. In: Proceedings of ASME 2019 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2019-93809.
 

Chen, X.Y., Gao, D.L., Guo, B.Y., 2016. A method for optimizing jet-mill-bit hydraulics in horizontal drilling. SPE J. 21 (2), 416-422. https://doi.org/10.2118/178436-PA.

 

Cho, H., Shah, S.N., Osisanya, S.O., 2002. A three-segment hydraulic model for cuttings transport in coiled tubing horizontal and deviated drilling. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 41 (6). https://doi.org/10.2118/02-06-03.

 

Duan, M.Q., Miska, S., Yu, M.J., et al., 2008. Transport of small cuttings in extended reach drilling. SPE Drill. Complet. 23 (3), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.2118/104192-MS.

 
Ford, J.T., Peden, J.M., Oyeneyin, M.B., et al., 1990. Experimental investigation of drilled cuttings transport in inclined boreholes. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/20421-MS.
 

Gulraiz, S., Gray, K.E., 2020. Investigating the effects of plug viscosity on annular pressure drop and cuttings transport in a concentric annulus. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 76, 103210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103210.

 

Heydari, O., Sahraei, E., Skalle, P., 2017. Investigating the impact of drillpipe's rotation and eccentricity on cuttings transport phenomenon in various horizontal annuluses using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 156, 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.059.

 

Hovda, S., 2019. Optimal procedures for lowering and applying weight on the bit when starting to drill. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 174, 872-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.034.

 

Huque, M.M., Butt, S., Zendehboudi, S., et al., 2020. Systematic sensitivity analysis of cuttings transport in drilling operation using computational fluid dynamics approach. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 81, 103386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103386.

 
Li, H.Q., Liu, X.S., 1994. Determination method of reasonable annular velocity in horizontal well drilling. J. China Univ. Pet., Ed. Nat. Sci. 18 (5), 27-31. CNKI: SUN: SYDX.0.1994-05-004 (in Chinese).
 

Li, J., Walker, S., 2001. Sensitivity analysis of hole cleaning parameters in directional wells. SPE J. 6 (4), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.2118/74710-PA.

 
Lockett, T.J., Richardson, S.M., Worraker, W.J., 1993. The importance of rotation effects for efficient cuttings removal during drilling. In: SPE/IADC Drilling Conference. https://doi.org/10.2118/25768-MS.
 

Mahmoud, H., Hamza, A., Nasser, M.S., et al., 2020. Hole cleaning and drilling fluid sweeps in horizontal and deviated wells: comprehensive review. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 186, 106748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106748.

 

Miao, H., Qiu, Z., Dokhani, V., et al., 2023. Numerical modeling of transient cuttings transport in deviated wellbores. Geoenergy Sci. Eng., 211875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211875.

 
Nguyen, D., Rahman, S.S., 1996. A three-layer hydraulic program for effective cuttings transport and hole cleaning in highly deviated and horizontal wells. In: SPE/IADC Asia Pacific Drilling Technology. https://doi.org/10.2118/36383-MS.
 

Ofei, T.N., Irawan, S., Pao, W., 2015. Drilling parameter effects on cuttings transport in horizontal wellbores: a review. ICIPEG 2014, 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-368-2_18.

 

Pang, B.X., Wang, S.Y., Lu, C.L., et al., 2019. Investigation of cuttings transport in directional and horizontal drilling wellbores injected with pulsed drilling fluid using CFD approach. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 90, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.05.001.

 

Ramadan, Ahmed, Munawar, et al., 2011. Experimental studies on the effect of mechanical cleaning devices on annular-cuttings concentration. J. Petrol. Technol. 63 (2), 45-46. https://doi.org/10.2118/134269-MS.

 
Ramsey, M.S., 2019. Practical Wellbore Hydraulics and Hole Cleaning: Unlock Faster, More Efficient, and Trouble-free Drilling Operations. Gulf Professional Publishing.
 
Rishi, B.A., Stefan, M., Ergun, K., et al., 2000. Selecting drilling fluid properties and flow rates for effective hole cleaning in high-angle and horizontal wells. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/63050-MS.
 

Rooki, R., Ardejani, F.D., Moradzadeh, et al., 2015. CFD simulation of rheological model effect on cuttings transport. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 36 (3), 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2014.896219.

 
Saasen, A., 1998. Hole cleaning during deviated drilling-The effects of pump rate and rheology. In: SPE Europec Featured at EAGE Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/50582-MS.
 
Siruvuri, C., Nagarakanti, S., Samuel, R., 2006. Stuck pipe prediction and avoidance: a convolutional neural network approach. In: IADC/SPE Drilling Conference. https://doi.org/10.2118/98378-MS.
 

Sun, B.J., Xiang, H.F., Li, H., et al., 2017. Modeling of the critical deposition velocity of cuttings in an inclined-slimhole annulus. SPE J. 22 (4), 1213-1224. https://doi.org/10.2118/185168-PA.

 

Sun, X., Wang, K., Yan, T., et al., 2014. Effect of drillpipe rotation on cuttings transport using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in complex structure wells. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 4, 255-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-014-0118-x.

 
Van Puymbroeck, L., 2013. Increasing drilling performance using hydro-mechanical hole cleaning devices. In: SPE Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/164005-MS.
 
Van Puymbroeck, L., El Bachiri, K., 2013. New generation drill pipe to increase drilling performance in ERD wells. In: SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference & Exhibition. https://doi.org/10.2118/166775-MS.
 
Van Puymbroeck, L., Williams, H., 2013. Increasing drilling performance in ERD wells with new generation drill pipe. In: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, pp. 1060-1070. https://doi.org/10.1190/urtec2013-108.
 

Van Wachem, B.G.M., Almstedt, A.E., 2003. Methods for multiphase computational fluid dynamics. Chem. Eng. J. 96 (1–3), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2003.08.025.

 

Wang, G., Dong, M., Wang, Z., et al., 2022. Removing cuttings from inclined and horizontal wells: numerical analysis of the required drilling fluid rheology and flow rate. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 102, 104544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104544.

 

Wang, H.G., Liu, X.S., Li, H.Q., et al., 1995. An experimental study of transport of drilling cutting in a horizontal well. Acta Petrol. Sin. 16 (4), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.7623/syxb199504018.

 

Wang, Z.M., Long, Z.H., 2010. Study on three-layer unsteady model of cuttings transport for extended-reach well. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 73 (1–2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.05.020.

 

Yan, T., Qu, J.Y., Sun, X.F., et al., 2020. Numerical investigation on horizontal wellbore hole cleaning with a four-lobed drill pipe using CFD-DEM method. Powder Technol. 375, 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.07.103.

 

Yan, T., Qu, J.Y., Sun, X.F., et al., 2019. Investigation on horizontal and deviated wellbore cleanout by hole cleaning device using CFD approach. Enegry Sci. Eng. 7 (4), 1292-1305. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.346.

 

Yan, T., Wang, K., Sun, X.F., et al., 2014. State-of-the-art hole-cleaning techniques in complex structure wells. Recent Pat. Eng. 8 (1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.047.

 

Zhou, J.W., Du, C.L., Ma, Z.L., 2018. Influence of swirling intensity on lump coal particle pickup velocity in pneumatic conveying. Powder Technol. 339, 470-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.08.043.

Petroleum Science
Pages 2005-2022
Cite this article:
Peng S, Huang W-J, Gao D-L. Hole cleaning evaluation and installation spacing optimization of cuttings bed remover in extended-reach drilling. Petroleum Science, 2024, 21(3): 2005-2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.03.006
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return