AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

The real-time dynamic liquid level calculation method of the sucker rod well based on multi-view features fusion

Cheng-Zhe YinaKai Zhanga,b( )Jia-Yuan LiucXin-Yan WangaMin LiaLi-Ming ZhangaWen-Sheng Zhoud,e
School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, 266580, Shandong, China
School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, 266580, Shandong, China
Tarim Oilfield Company, China National Petroleum Corporation, Kuerle, 841000, Xinjiang, China
State Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil Exploitation, Beijing, 100028, China
CNOOC Research Institute Ltd., Beijing, 100028, China

Edited by Jie Hao and Meng-Jiao Zhou

Show Author Information

Abstract

In the production of the sucker rod well, the dynamic liquid level is important for the production efficiency and safety in the lifting process. It is influenced by multi-source data which need to be combined for the dynamic liquid level real-time calculation. In this paper, the multi-source data are regarded as the different views including the load of the sucker rod and liquid in the wellbore, the image of the dynamometer card and production dynamics parameters. These views can be fused by the multi-branch neural network with special fusion layer. With this method, the features of different views can be extracted by considering the difference of the modality and physical meaning between them. Then, the extraction results which are selected by multinomial sampling can be the input of the fusion layer. During the fusion process, the availability under different views determines whether the views are fused in the fusion layer or not. In this way, not only the correlation between the views can be considered, but also the missing data can be processed automatically. The results have shown that the load and production features fusion (the method proposed in this paper) performs best with the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) 39.63 m, followed by the features concatenation with MAE 42.47 m. They both performed better than only a single view and the lower MAE of the features fusion indicates that its generalization ability is stronger. In contrast, the image feature as a single view contributes little to the accuracy improvement after fused with other views with the highest MAE. When there is data missing in some view, compared with the features concatenation, the multi-view features fusion will not result in the unavailability of a large number of samples. When the missing rate is 10%, 30%, 50% and 80%, the method proposed in this paper can reduce MAE by 5.8, 7, 9.3 and 20.3 m respectively. In general, the multi-view features fusion method proposed in this paper can improve the accuracy obviously and process the missing data effectively, which helps provide technical support for real-time monitoring of the dynamic liquid level in oil fields.

References

 

Baltrusaitis, T., Ahuja, C., Morency, L.P., 2018. Multimodal machine learning: a survey and taxonomy. IEEE. T. Pattern. Anal. 41 (2), 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2798607.

 

Chavarriaga, R., Sagha, H., Calatroni, A., et al., 2013. The opportunity challenge: a benchmark database for on-body sensor-based activity recognition. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 34 (15), 2033-2042.

 

Chen, D.C., Zhang, R.C., Meng, H.X., et al., 2015. The study and application of dynamic liquid level calculation model based on dynamometer card of oil wells. Sci. Technol. Eng. 15 (32), 32-35. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.32.006 (in Chinese).

 

Chen, D.F., Han, X.L., Yang, J., 2008. Discuss on survey method for liquid level of oil well. Well Test. 17 (2), 60-61. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4388.2008.02.024 (in Chinese).

 

Choi, J.H., Lee, J.S., 2019. EmbraceNet: a robust deep learning architecture for multimodal classification. Inf. Fusion 51, 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.02.010.

 
Eitel, A., Springenberg, J.T., Spinello, L., et al., 2015. Multimodal deep learning for robust RGB-D object recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2015), September 28-October 2, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 681-687. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7353446.
 

Gibbs, S.G., 1963. Predicting the behavior of sucker-rod pumping systems. JPT 15 (7), 769-778. https://doi.org/10.2118/588-PA.

 
Gu, Z.P., Lang, Bo, Yue, T.Y., et al., 2017. Learning joint multimodal representation based on multi-fusion deep neural networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2017), November 14-18, Guangzhou, China, pp. 276-285.
 

Han, Y., Song, X.P., Li, K., et al., 2022. Hybrid modeling for submergence depth of the pumping well using stochastic configuration networks with random sampling. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 208, 109423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109423.

 

Hou, J.L., Jiang, H.C., Wan, C.F., et al., 2022. Deep learning and data augmentation based data imputation for structural health monitoring system in multi-sensor damaged state. Measurement 196, 111206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111206.

 

Hou, Y.B., Gao, X.W., Li, X.Y., 2019. Prediction for dynamic liquid level of sucker rod pumping using generation of multi-scale state characteristics in oil field production. CIESC J. 70 (S2), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.11949/0438-1157.20190352 (in Chinese).

 
Jaques, N., Taylor, S., Sano, A., et al., 2017. Multimodal autoencoder: a deep learning approach to filling in missing sensor data and enabling better mood prediction. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII 2017), October 23-26, San Antonio, Texas, USA, pp. 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2017.8273601.
 

LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., et al., 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86 (11), 2278-2324.

 

Li, X.Y., Gao, X.W., Hou, Y.B., 2015. Online dynamic Gaussian process regression for dynamic liquid level soft sensing of sucker-rod pumping well. CIESC J. 66 (6), 2150-2158. https://doi.org/10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20141791 (in Chinese).

 

Li, X.Y., Gao, X.W., Li, K., et al., 2016. Ensemble soft sensor modeling for dynamic liquid level of oil well based on multi-source information feature fusion. CIESC J. 67 (6), 2469-2479. https://doi.org/10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20151673 (in Chinese).

 

Li, Z.C., Tian, L., Jiang, Q.C., et al., 2020b. Fault diagnostic method based on deep learning and multimodel feature fusion for complex industrial processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59 (40), 18061-18069. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c03082.

 

Li, S., Wan, H.Q., Song, L.Y., 2020a. An adaptive data fusion strategy for fault diagnosis based on the convolutional neural network. Measurement 165, 108122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108122.

 

Liang, X., Zhang, Z.H., 2021. Research on depth of oil well moving liquid surface based on short-term energy and LSTM. Comput. Mod. 308, 15-19+26. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2475.2021.04.003 (in Chinese).

 

Liguori, A., Markovic, R., Ferrando, M., et al., 2023. Augmenting energy time-series for data-efficient imputation of missing values. Appl. Energy 334, 120701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120701.

 
Lu, C., 2017. A Real-time Forecasting Method of Dynamic Liquid Level Calculation Based on the Indicator Diagram of Pumping Unit Well. Master Thesis. China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, China (in Chinese).
 

Mohammadpoor, M., Torabi, F., 2018. Big data analytics in oil and gas industry: An emerging trend. Petroleum 7 (2), 241-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2018.11.001.

 

Nguyen, T., Gosine, R.G., Warrian, P., 2020. A systematic review of big data analytics for oil and gas industry 4.0. IEEE Access 8, 61183-61201. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979678.

 

Ordóñez, F.J., Roggen, D., 2016. Deep convolutional and LSTM recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors 16 (1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010115.

 
Srivastava, N., Salakhutdinov, R., 2012. Multimodal learning with deep Boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2012), December 3-6, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United States, pp. 2222-2230.
 

Tian, Z.D., 2021. Kernel principal component analysis-based least squares support vector machine optimized by improved grey wolf optimization algorithm and application in dynamic liquid level forecasting of beam pump. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control 42 (6), 1135-1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142331219885273.

 

Vergara, A., Fonollosa, J., Mahiques, J., et al., 2013. On the performance of gas sensor arrays in open sampling systems using Inhibitory Support Vector Machines. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 185, 462-477.

 

Wang, T., Duan, Z.W., Li, K., 2017. Adaptive ensemble modeling for dynamic liquid level of oil well based on improved AdaBoost method. J. Electron. Meas. Instrum. 31 (8), 1342-1348. https://doi.org/10.13382/j.jemi.2017.08.025 (in Chinese).

 

Xu, X.W., Tao, Z.R., Ming, W.W., 2020. Intelligent monitoring and diagnostics using a novel integrated model based on deep learning and multi-sensor feature fusion. Measurement 165, 108086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108086.

 

Yang, L.P., 2010. The dynamic liquid level calculation of the sucker rod well by dynamometer cards. Petrol. Geol. Eng. 24 (5), 101-103. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2011.06.030 (in Chinese).

 

Yu, D.L., Qi, W.G., Ding, B., et al., 2018. Study of forecasting producing fluid level of submersible reciprocating pump on the basis of chaotic time series. Comput. Sci. Appl. 8 (6), 1034-1044. https://doi.org/10.12677/CSA.2018.86115 (in Chinese).

 
Yu, L., 2020. Research on the Liquid Level Prediction and the Optimization Frequency of Stroke of Submersible Plunger Pump. Master Thesis. Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, China (in Chinese).
 

Zhang, H., 2003. Discussion of detecting fluid level by pressure gauge. Well Test. 12 (5), 49-50. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4388.2003.05.018 (in Chinese).

 

Zhang, H.L., Li, P., Xie, Q., et al., 2007. Preliminary study and application of the method for calculating dynamic liquid level by dynamometer cards. Qinghai Shiyou 25 (2), 31-35 (in Chinese).

 

Zhang, Q., Wu, X.D., 1984. Pumping well diagnostic technique and its application. Journal of east China Petroleum Institute 2, 145-159 (in Chinese).

 

Zhang, S.L., Luo, Y., Wu, Z.M., et al., 2011. Corrected algorithm for calculating dynamic fluid level with indicator diagram for rob-pumped well. Oil Drill. Prod. Technol. 33 (6), 122-124. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2011.06.030 (in Chinese).

 

Zhou, W., Liu, J., Gan, L.Q., 2018. Dynamic liquid level detection method based on resonant frequency difference for oil wells. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Co. 26 (6), 2968-2976. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1805-68.

Petroleum Science
Pages 3575-3586
Cite this article:
Yin C-Z, Zhang K, Liu J-Y, et al. The real-time dynamic liquid level calculation method of the sucker rod well based on multi-view features fusion. Petroleum Science, 2024, 21(5): 3575-3586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2024.05.005

49

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 30 July 2023
Revised: 12 March 2024
Accepted: 08 May 2024
Published: 09 May 2024
© 2024 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return