Home International Journal of Oral Science Article
PDF (3.4 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

ChatGPT for shaping the future of dentistry: the potential of multi-modal large language model

Hanyao Huang1 (), Ou Zheng2 (), Dongdong Wang2, Jiayi Yin1, Zijin Wang2, Shengxuan Ding3, Heng Yin1, Chuan Xu4,5, Renjie Yang6, Qian Zheng1, Bing Shi1
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
College of Transportation Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
C2SMART Center, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, USA
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Eastern Clinic, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

These authors contributed equally: Hanyao Huang, Ou Zheng

Show Author Information

Abstract

The ChatGPT, a lite and conversational variant of Generative Pretrained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) developed by OpenAI, is one of the milestone Large Language Models (LLMs) with billions of parameters. LLMs have stirred up much interest among researchers and practitioners in their impressive skills in natural language processing tasks, which profoundly impact various fields. This paper mainly discusses the future applications of LLMs in dentistry. We introduce two primary LLM deployment methods in dentistry, including automated dental diagnosis and cross-modal dental diagnosis, and examine their potential applications. Especially, equipped with a cross-modal encoder, a single LLM can manage multi-source data and conduct advanced natural language reasoning to perform complex clinical operations. We also present cases to demonstrate the potential of a fully automatic Multi-Modal LLM AI system for dentistry clinical application. While LLMs offer significant potential benefits, the challenges, such as data privacy, data quality, and model bias, need further study. Overall, LLMs have the potential to revolutionize dental diagnosis and treatment, which indicates a promising avenue for clinical application and research in dentistry.

References

1

Kurian, N., Cherian, J. M., Sudharson, N. A., Varghese, K. G. & Wadhwa, S. AI is now everywhere. Br. Dent. J. 234, 72–72 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
2

Johnson, S. B. et al. Using ChatGPT to evaluate cancer myths and misconceptions: artificial intelligence and cancer information. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 7, https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad015 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
3

Mohammad-Rahimi, H. et al. Deep learning for caries detection: a systematic review. J. Dent. 122, 104115 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
4

Urban, R. et al. AI-assisted CBCT data management in modern dental practice: benefits, limitations and innovations. Electronics 12, 1710 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
5

Revilla-León, M. et al. Artificial intelligence models for diagnosing gingivitis and periodontal disease: a systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.026 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
6

Mohammad-Rahimi, H. et al. Deep learning in periodontology and oral implantology: a scoping review. J. Periodontal Res. 57, 942–951 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
7

Minnema, J. et al. A review on the application of deep learning for CT reconstruction, bone segmentation and surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 51, 20210437 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
8

He, L. et al. Automatic initial and final segmentation in cleft palate speech of Mandarin speakers. PLoS ONE 12, e0184267 (2017).

Crossref Google Scholar
9

Fu, J., He, F., Yin, H. & He, L. Automatic detection of pharyngeal fricatives in cleft palate speech using acoustic features based on the vocal tract area spectrum. Comput. Speech Lang. 68, 101203 (2021).

Crossref Google Scholar
10

Thurzo, A., Strunga, M., Urban, R., Surovková, J. & Afrashtehfar, K. I. Impact of artificial intelligence on dental education: a review and guide for curriculum update. Educ. Sci. 13, 150 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
11
Zheng, O., Abdel-Aty, M., Wang, D., Wang, Z. & Ding, S. ChatGPT is on the horizon: could a large language model be all we need for Intelligent Transportation? Preprint at arXiv:2303.05382 (2023).
12

Schuppe, K. et al. Atypical Nelson syndrome following right partial and left total nephrectomy with incidental bilateral total adrenalectomy of renal cell carcinoma: a chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT)-assisted case report and literature review. Cureus 15, e36042 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
13

Şendur, H. N., Şendur, A. B. & Cerit, M. N. ChatGPT from radiologists’ perspective. Br. J. Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230203 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
14

Alhaidry, H., Fatani, B., Alrayes, J., Almana, A. & Alfhaed, N. ChatGPT in dentistry: a comprehensive review. Cureus https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38317 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
15

Eggmann, F., Weiger, R., Zitzmann, N. U. & Blatz, M. B. Implications of large language models such as ChatGPT for dental medicine. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13046 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
16

Fatani, B. ChatGPT for future medical and dental research. Cureus 15, e37285 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
17

Damashek, M. Gauging similarity with n-grams: language-independent categorization of text. Science 267, 843–848 (1995).

Crossref Google Scholar
18

Eichstaedt, J. C. et al. Facebook language predicts depression in medical records. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 11203–11208 (2018).

Crossref Google Scholar
19

Marafino, B. J., Davies, J. M., Bardach, N. S., Dean, M. L. & Dudley, R. A. N-gram support vector machines for scalable procedure and diagnosis classification, with applications to clinical free text data from the intensive care unit. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 21, 871–875 (2014).

Crossref Google Scholar
20
Romanov, A. & Shivade, C. Lessons from natural language inference in the clinical domain. Preprint at arXiv:1808.06752 (2018).
Crossref
21

Choi, E., Xiao, C., Stewart, W. & Sun, J. MiME: multilevel medical embedding of electronic health records for predictive healthcare. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 31, 19 (2018).

Google Scholar
22

Sarzynska-Wawer, J. et al. Detecting formal thought disorder by deep contextualized word representations. Psychiatry Res. 304, 114135 (2021).

Crossref Google Scholar
23
Peng, Y., Yan, S. & Lu, Z. Transfer learning in biomedical natural language processing: an evaluation of BERT and ELMo on ten benchmarking datasets. Preprint at arXiv:1906.05474 (2019).
Crossref
24
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Preprint at arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).
25
Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T. & Sutskever, I. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. (2018).
26
Michalopoulos, G., Wang, Y., Kaka, H., Chen, H. & Wong, A. Umlsbert: Clinical domain knowledge augmentation of contextual embeddings using the unified medical language system metathesaurus. Preprint at arXiv:2010.10391 (2020).
Crossref
27
Beltagy, I., Lo, K. & Cohan, A. SciBERT: a pretrained language model for scientific text. Preprint at arXiv:1903.10676 (2019).
Crossref
28

Rasmy, L., Xiang, Y., Xie, Z., Tao, C. & Zhi, D. Med-BERT: pretrained contextualized embeddings on large-scale structured electronic health records for disease prediction. NPJ Digit. Med. 4, 86 (2021).

Crossref Google Scholar
29
Liu, W., et al. K-bert: Enabling language representation with knowledge graph. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 34. No. 03 (2020).
Crossref
30

Gu, Y. et al. Domain-specific language model pretraining for biomedical natural language processing. ACM Trans. Comput. Healthc. 3, 1–23 (2021).

Crossref Google Scholar
31
Devaraj, A., Marshall, I., Wallace, B. C. & Li, J. J. Paragraph-level simplification of medical texts. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 4972–4984 (2021).
Crossref
32
Roy, A., & Pan, S. Incorporating medical knowledge in BERT for clinical relation extraction. In Proceedings of the 2021 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 5357–5366 (2021).
Crossref
33
Neumann, M., King, D., Beltagy, I. & Ammar, W. ScispaCy: fast and robust models for biomedical natural language processing. Preprint at arXiv:1902.07669 (2019).
Crossref
34
Rae, J. W. et al. Scaling language models: methods, analysis & insights from training gopher. Preprint at arXiv:2112.11446 (2021).
35

Raffel, C. et al. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21, 5485–5551 (2020).

Google Scholar
36
Ouyang, L. et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Preprint at arXiv:2203.02155 (2022).
37

Kung, T. H. et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS Digit. Health 2, e0000198 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
38

Gilson, A. et al. How does CHATGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Med. Educ. 9, e45312 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
39
Li, J., Li, D., Savarese, S., & Hoi, S. Blip-2: bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. Preprint at arXiv:2301.12597 (2023).
40
Saharia, C. et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Preprint at arXiv:2205.11487 (2022).
Crossref
41
Ramesh, A., Pavlov, M., Goh, G., Gray, S., Voss, C., Radford, A. & Sutskever, I. Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8821–8831 (PMLR, 2021).
42
Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P. & Ommer, B. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 10684–10695 (2022).
Crossref
43
He, Y., Zhu, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, Q. & Caverlee, J. Infusing disease knowledge into BERT for health question answering, medical inference and disease name recognition. Preprint at arXiv:2010.03746 (2020).
Crossref
44
Khare, Y., Bagal, V., Mathew, M., Devi, A., Priyakumar, U. D. & Jawahar, C. V. Mmbert: Multimodal bert pretraining for improved medical vqa. In 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 1033–1036 (IEEE, 2021).
Crossref
45
Manco, I., Benetos, E., Quinton, E. & Fazekas, G. Contrastive audio-language learning for music. Preprint at arXiv:2208.12208 (2022).
46
Li, H., Kang, Y., Liu, T., Ding, W. & Liu, Z. CTAL: Pre-training cross-modal transformer for audio-and-language representations. Preprint at arXiv:2109.00181 (2021).
Crossref
47
Wu, F. et al. Wav2Seq: Pre-training speech-to-text encoder-decoder models using pseudo languages, ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 1–5, Rhodes Island, Greece, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP49357.2023.10096988 (2022).
Crossref
48
Gurram, S., Chan, D., Fang, A., & Canny, J. LAVA: Language Audio Vision Alignment for Data-Efficient Video Pre-Training. In First Workshop on Pre-training: Perspectives, Pitfalls, and Paths Forward at ICML (2023).
49
Radford, Alec, et al. Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR, 2023).
50
Huh, J., Park, S., Lee, J. E. & Ye, J. C. Improving medical speech-to-text accuracy with vision-language pre-training model. Preprint at arXiv:2303.00091 (2023).
51
OpenAI. GPT-4 Technical Report. Preprint at arXiv:2303.08774 (2023).
52

Baumgartner, C. The potential impact of ChatGPT in clinical and translational medicine. Clin. Transl. Med. 13, e1206 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
53
Wang, D., Zhang, S. & Wang, L. Deep epidemiological modeling by black-box knowledge distillation: an accurate deep learning model for COVID-19. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vol. 35. No. 17 (2021).
Crossref
54
Wang, D., Gong, B. & Wang, L. On calibrating semantic segmentation models: analyses and an algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2023).
Crossref
55

Warin, K. et al. Maxillofacial fracture detection and classification in computed tomography images using convolutional neural network-based models. Sci. Rep. 13, 3434 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
56

Bui, R. et al. Artificial intelligence as a decision-making tool in forensic dentistry: a pilot study with I3M. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 4620 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
57

Cui, Z. et al. A fully automatic AI system for tooth and alveolar bone segmentation from cone-beam CT images. Nat. Commun. 13, 2096 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
58

Lee, J. et al. BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinformatics 36, 1234–1240 (2020).

Crossref Google Scholar
59
Alsentzer, E. et al. Publicly available clinical BERT embeddings. Preprint at arXiv:1904.03323 (2019).
Crossref
60
Huang, K., Altosaar, J. & Ranganath, R. Clinicalbert: modeling clinical notes and predicting hospital readmission. Preprint at arXiv:1904.05342 (2019).
61

Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

Crossref Google Scholar
62
Ahdritz, G. et al. OpenFold: retraining AlphaFold2 yields new insights into its learning mechanisms and capacity for generalization. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.20.517210 (2022).
Crossref
63

Carbajosa, G., Trigo, A., Valencia, A. & Cases, I. Bionemo: molecular information on biodegradation metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D598–D602 (2009).

Crossref Google Scholar
64
Sevgen, E. et al. ProT-VAE: protein transformer variational autoencoder for functional protein design. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.23.525232 (2023).
Crossref
65

Jensen, P. B., Jensen, L. J. & Brunak, S. Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 395–405 (2012).

Crossref Google Scholar
66

Kocbek, S. et al. Text mining electronic hospital records to automatically classify admissions against disease: measuring the impact of linking data sources. J. Biomed. Inform. 64, 158–167 (2016).

Crossref Google Scholar
67

Sun, W. et al. Data processing and text mining technologies on electronic medical records: a review. J. Healthc. Eng. 2018, 4302425 (2018).

Crossref Google Scholar
68

Rajkomar, A. et al. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records. NPJ Digit. Med. 1, 18 (2018).

Crossref Google Scholar
69

Huber, M. T., Highland, J. D., Krishnamoorthi, V. R. & Tang, J. W.-Y. Utilizing the electronic health record to improve advance care planning: a systematic review. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Med. 35, 532–541 (2018).

Crossref Google Scholar
70

Luo, Y. et al. Natural language processing for EHR-based pharmacovigilance: a structured review. Drug Saf. 40, 1075–1089 (2017).

Crossref Google Scholar
71

Hirschberg, J. & Manning, C. D. Advances in natural language processing. Science 349, 261–266 (2015).

Crossref Google Scholar
72
Natsiavas, P., Maglaveras, N., & Koutkias, V. A public health surveillance platform exploiting free-text sources via natural language processing and linked data: application in adverse drug reaction signal detection using PubMed and Twitter. In Knowledge Representation for Health Care: HEC 2016 International Joint Workshop, KR4HC/ProHealth 2016, 51–67, Munich, Germany (Springer International Publishing, 2017).
Crossref
73

Geng, W. et al. Model-based reasoning of clinical diagnosis in integrative medicine: real-world methodological study of electronic medical records and natural language processing methods. JMIR Med. Inform. 8, e23082 (2020).

Crossref Google Scholar
74

Lee, S. H. Natural language generation for electronic health records. NPJ Digit. Med. 1, 63 (2018).

Crossref Google Scholar
75

Hoogi, A., Mishra, A., Gimenez, F., Dong, J. & Rubin, D. Natural language generation model for mammography reports simulation. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 24, 2711–2717 (2020).

Crossref Google Scholar
76

Wongratwanich, P. et al. Do various imaging modalities provide potential early detection and diagnosis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw? A review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 50, 20200417 (2021).

Crossref Google Scholar
77

Alabi, R. O. et al. Machine learning in oral squamous cell carcinoma: current status, clinical concerns and prospects for future—a systematic review. Artif. Intell. Med. 115, 102060 (2021).

Crossref Google Scholar
78

Jha, N., Lee, K. S. & Kim, Y. J. Diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders using artificial intelligence technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 17, e0272715 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
79

Monill-González, A., Rovira-Calatayud, L., d’Oliveira, N. G. & Ustrell-Torrent, J. M. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: where are we now? a scoping review. Orthod. Craniofac Res. 24, 6–15 (2021).

Crossref Google Scholar
80

Revilla-León, M. et al. Artificial intelligence applications in restorative dentistry: a systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 128, 867–875 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
81

Schwendicke, F. A., Samek, W. & Krois, J. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J. Dent. Res. 99, 769–774 (2020).

Crossref Google Scholar
82

Amer, Y. Y. & Aqel, M. J. An efficient segmentation algorithm for panoramic dental images. Procedia Comput. Sci. 65, 718–725 (2015).

Crossref Google Scholar
83

Shi, B. & Huang, H. Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 12, 21 (2020).

Crossref Google Scholar
84

Huang, H., Cheng, X., Luo, X., Shi, B. & Li, J. Biomechanical analyses of common suspension sutures in primary cleft lip rhinoplasty. Head Face Med. 15, 20 (2019).

Crossref Google Scholar
85

Huang, H. et al. Mechanical analyses of critical surgical maneuvers in the correction of cleft lip nasal deformity. PLoS ONE 13, e0195583 (2018).

Crossref Google Scholar
86

Huang, H., Luo, X., Cheng, X., Shi, B. & Li, J. Biomechanical simulation of correcting primary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. PLoS ONE 13, e0199964 (2018).

Crossref Google Scholar
87

Huang, H. et al. Recapitulation of unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity on normal nasal structure: a finite element model analysis. J. Craniofac. Surg. 29(8), 2220–2225 (2018).

Crossref Google Scholar
88

Sakran, K. A. et al. Early cleft palate repair by a modified technique without relaxing incisions. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221135288 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
89

Sakran, K. A. et al. Evaluation of late cleft palate repair by a modified technique without relaxing incisions. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 124, 101403 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
90

Huang, H. et al. Validation of the Chinese velopharyngeal insufficiency effects on life outcomes instrument. Laryngoscope 129, E395–E401 (2019).

Crossref Google Scholar
91

Huang, H. et al. Analysis of velopharyngeal functions using computational fluid dynamics simulations. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 128, 742–748 (2019).

Crossref Google Scholar
92

Huang, H. et al. Computational fluid dynamic analysis of different velopharyngeal closure patterns. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 129, 157–163 (2019).

Crossref Google Scholar
93

Huang, H. et al. Airflow of the two-port velopharyngeal closure: study using computational fluid dynamics. J. Craniofac. Surg. 31, 2188–2192 (2020).

Crossref Google Scholar
94

Yang, C. et al. Inspiration after posterior pharyngeal flap palatoplasty: a preliminary study using computational fluid dynamic analysis. Front. Pediatr. 10, 823777 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
95

Ström, P. et al. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 21, 222–232 (2020).

Crossref Google Scholar
96

Girolami, I. et al. Artificial intelligence applications for pre-implantation kidney biopsy pathology practice: a systematic review. J. Nephrol. 35, 1801–1808 (2022).

Crossref Google Scholar
97

Wan, A. & Savage, N. Biopsy and diagnostic histopathology in dental practice in Brisbane: usage patterns and perceptions of usefulness. Aust. Dent. J. 55, 162–169 (2010).

Crossref Google Scholar
98

Ilhan, B., Lin, K., Guneri, P. & Wilder-Smith, P. Improving oral cancer outcomes with imaging and artificial intelligence. J. Dent. Res. 99, 241–248 (2020).

Crossref Google Scholar
99

Miller, C. S. & Westgate, P. M. Implications of medical screenings of patients arriving for dental treatment: the results of a comprehensive laboratory screening. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 145, 1027–1035 (2014).

Crossref Google Scholar
100
Yu, X. et al. GPT paternity test: GPT generated text detection with GPT genetic inheritance. Preprint at arXiv:2305.12519 (2023).
101
Zhang, N. et al. Ontoprotein: protein pretraining with gene ontology embedding. Preprint at arXiv:2201.11147 (2022).
102
Bubeck, S. et al. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: early experiments with GPT-4. Preprint at arXiv:2303.12712 (2023).
103
Caufield, J. H. et al. Structured prompt interrogation and recursive extraction of semantics (SPIRES): a method for populating knowledge bases using zero-shot learning. Preprint at arXiv:2304.02711 (2023).
Crossref
104

Sakran, K. A. et al. Evaluation of postoperative outcomes in two cleft palate repair techniques without relaxing incisions. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 152, 145–154 (2023).

Crossref Google Scholar
105
McNichols, H., Zhang, M. & Lan, A. Algebra error classification with large language models. Preprint at arXiv:2305.06163 (2023).
Crossref
106
Lamb, L. C. et al. Graph neural networks meet neural-symbolic computing: a survey and perspective. Preprint at arXiv:2003.00330 (2020).
Crossref
107

Al Omar, A., Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Basu, A., Kiyomoto, S. & Rahman, M. S. Privacy-friendly platform for healthcare data in cloud based on blockchain environment. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 95, 511–521 (2019).

Crossref Google Scholar
108
Sharma, S. et al. From occlusion to insight: object search in semantic shelves using large language models. Preprint at arXiv:2302.12915 (2023).
International Journal of Oral Science
Volume 15,
2023
Article number: 29
DOI: 10.1038/s41368-023-00239-y
Cite this article:
Huang H, Zheng O, Wang D, et al. ChatGPT for shaping the future of dentistry: the potential of multi-modal large language model. International Journal of Oral Science, 2023, 15: 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-023-00239-y
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return