AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration

Hongpu Wei1,Jinjie Cui1,Kaili Lin1 ( )Jing Xie2 ( )Xudong Wang1( )
Department of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

These authors contributed equally: Hongpu Wei, Jinjie Cui.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Bone defects combined with tumors, infections, or other bone diseases are challenging in clinical practice. Autologous and allogeneic grafts are two main traditional remedies, but they can cause a series of complications. To address this problem, researchers have constructed various implantable biomaterials. However, the original pathological microenvironment of bone defects, such as residual tumors, severe infection, or other bone diseases, could further affect bone regeneration. Thus, the rational design of versatile biomaterials with integrated bone therapy and regeneration functions is in great demand. Many strategies have been applied to fabricate smart stimuli-responsive materials for bone therapy and regeneration, with stimuli related to external physical triggers or endogenous disease microenvironments or involving multiple integrated strategies. Typical external physical triggers include light irradiation, electric and magnetic fields, ultrasound, and mechanical stimuli. These stimuli can transform the internal atomic packing arrangements of materials and affect cell fate, thus enhancing bone tissue therapy and regeneration. In addition to the external stimuli-responsive strategy, some specific pathological microenvironments, such as excess reactive oxygen species and mild acidity in tumors, specific pH reduction and enzymes secreted by bacteria in severe infection, and electronegative potential in bone defect sites, could be used as biochemical triggers to activate bone disease therapy and bone regeneration. Herein, we summarize and discuss the rational construction of versatile biomaterials with bone therapeutic and regenerative functions. The specific mechanisms, clinical applications, and existing limitations of the newly designed biomaterials are also clarified.

References

1

Zhang, Y. et al. Advancements in hydrogel-based drug sustained release systems for bone tissue engineering. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 622 (2020).

2

Wang, P. et al. Bone tissue engineering via nanostructured calcium phosphate biomaterials and stem cells. Bone Res. 2, 14017 (2014).

3

Zhang, K. et al. Advanced smart biomaterials and constructs for hard tissue engineering and regeneration. Bone Res. 6, 31 (2018).

4

Dang, M., Saunders, L., Niu, X., Fan, Y. & Ma, P. X. Biomimetic delivery of signals for bone tissue engineering. Bone Res. 6, 25 (2018).

5

Sun, W. et al. Injectable nano-structured silicon-containing hydroxyapatite microspheres with enhanced osteogenic differentiation and angiogenic factor expression. Ceram. Int. 44, 20457–20464 (2018).

6

Shang, F. et al. Advancing application of mesenchymal stem cell-based bone tissue regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 6, 666–683 (2021).

7

Turnbull, G. et al. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 3, 278–314 (2018).

8

Leppik, L. et al. Combining electrical stimulation and tissue engineering to treat large bone defects in a rat model. Sci. Rep. 8, 6307 (2018).

9

Mallick, S. et al. Strategies towards orthopaedic tissue engineered graft generation: current scenario and application. Biotechnol. Bioproc. E. 24, 854–869 (2019).

10

Eivazzadeh‐Keihan, R. et al. Metal‐based nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. M. 14, 1687–1714 (2020).

11

Nikolova, M. P. & Chavali, M. S. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: a review. Bioact. Mater. 4, 271–292 (2019).

12

Islam, M. M., Shahruzzaman, M., Biswas, S., Nurus Sakib, M. & Rashid, T. U. Chitosan based bioactive materials in tissue engineering applications–a review. Bioact. Mater. 5, 164–183 (2020).

13

Wang, C. et al. 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioact. Mater. 5, 82–91 (2020).

14

Sadowska, J. M. & Ginebra, M. P. Inflammation and biomaterials: role of the immune response in bone regeneration by synthetic bone grafts. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 9404–9427 (2020).

15

Lin, K. et al. Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics. Biomaterials 34, 10028–10042 (2013).

16

Wang, C. et al. Strontium released bi-lineage scaffolds with immunomodulatory properties induce a pro-regenerative environment for osteochondral regeneration. Mat. Sci. Eng. C. 103, 109833 (2019).

17

Marsh, A. C. et al. Fabrication and multiscale characterization of 3D silver containing bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds. Bioact. Mater. 4, 215–223 (2019).

18

Yi, H., Ur Rehman, F., Zhao, C., Liu, B. & He, N. Recent advances in nano scaffolds for bone repair. Bone Res. 4, 16050 (2016).

19

Xuzhu, W. et al. Near-infrared light-triggered drug delivery system based on black phosphorus for invivo bone regeneration. Biomaterials 179, 164–174 (2018).

20

Jiang, W. et al. Bioinspired tissue-compliant hydrogels with multifunctions for synergistic surgery–photothermal therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 10117–10125 (2020).

21

Liu, Y., Yu, Q., Chang, J. & Wu, C. Nanobiomaterials: from 0D to 3D for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration. Nanoscale 11, 13678–13708 (2019).

22

Chen, B. et al. Advanced theragenerative biomaterials with therapeutic and regeneration multifunctionality. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2002621 (2020).

23

Chen, J. et al. Palladium nanocrystals-engineered metal–organic frameworks for enhanced tumor inhibition by synergistic hydrogen/photodynamic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2006853 (2021).

24

Dong, S., Chen, Y., Yu, L., Lin, K. & Wang, X. Magnetic hyperthermia–synergistic H2O2 self-sufficient catalytic suppression of osteosarcoma with enhanced bone-regeneration bioactivity by 3D-printing composite scaffolds. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1907071 (2020).

25

Jin, X. et al. Self-adaptive antibacterial porous implants with sustainable responses for infected bone defect therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1807915 (2019).

26

Deng, Y., Shi, X., Chen, Y., Yang, W. & Chen, Z. G. Bacteria-triggered pH-responsive osteopotentiating coating on 3D-printed polyetheretherketone scaffolds for infective bone defect repair. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59, 12123–12135 (2020).

27

Pourhajibagher, M., Rokn, A. R., Barikani, H. R. & Bahador, A. Photo-sonodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy via chitosan nanoparticles-indocyanine green against polymicrobial periopathogenic biofilms: ex vivo study on dental implants. Photodiagn. Photodyn. 31, 101834 (2020).

28

Liu, Y. et al. Built‐in electric fields dramatically induce enhancement of osseointegration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 173771 (2017).

29

Lui, Y. S., Sow, W. T., Tan, L. P., Wu, Y. & Li, H. 4D printing and stimuli-responsive materials in biomedical aspects. Acta Biomater. 92, 19–36 (2019).

30

Du, Y., Guo, J. L., Wang, J., Mikos, A. G. & Zhang, S. Hierarchically designed bone scaffolds: from internal cues to external stimuli. Biomaterials 218, 119334 (2019).

31

Su, K., Tan, L., Liu, X., Cui, Z. & Wu, S. Rapid photo-sonotherapy for clinical treatment of bacterial infected bone implants by creating oxygen deficiency using sulfur doping. ACS Nano 14, 2077–2089 (2020).

32

Jain, A. K. & Jain, S. Instrumented stabilization in spinal tuberculosis. Int. Orthop. 36, 285–292 (2012).

33

Hu, J., Zhang, G. & Liu, S. Enzyme-responsive polymeric assemblies, nanoparticles and hydrogels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 5933 (2012).

34

Chen, J. et al. Biodegradable hollow mesoporous organosilica-based nanosystems with dual stimuli-responsive drug delivery for efficient tumor inhibition by synergistic chemo- and photothermal therapy. Appl. Mater. Today 19, 100655 (2020).

35

Safari, J. & Zarnegar, Z. Advanced drug delivery systems: nanotechnology of health design—a review. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 18, 85–99 (2014).

36

Zeng, Y., Hoque, J. & Varghese, S. Biomaterial-assisted local and systemic delivery of bioactive agents for bone repair. Acta Biomater. 93, 152–168 (2019).

37

Montoya, C. et al. On the road to smart biomaterials for bone research: definitions, concepts, advances, and outlook. Bone Res. 9, 12 (2021).

38

Kumar, S. et al. Nanotechnology-based biomaterials for orthopaedic applications: recent advances and future prospects. Mat. Sci. Eng. C. 106, 110154 (2020).

39

Fu, Q. et al. Stimuli-responsive plasmonic assemblies and their biomedical applications. Nano Today 36, 101014 (2021).

40

Jin, A., Wang, Y., Lin, K. & Jiang, L. Nanoparticles modified by polydopamine: working as “drug” carriers. Bioact. Mater. 5, 522–541 (2020).

41

Dong, S., Wang, X., Shen, G., Wang, X. & Kai, L. Research progress on functional modifications and applications of bioceramic scaffolds. J. Inorg. Mater. 35, 867–881 (2020).

42

Zhang, H., Fan, T., Chen, W., Li, Y. & Wang, B. Recent advances of two-dimensional materials in smart drug delivery nano-systems. Bioact. Mater. 5, 1071–1086 (2020).

43

Escudero, J. S. B., Perez, M. G. B., Rosso, M. P. D. O., Buchaim, D. V. & Buchaim, R. L. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in bone repair: a systematic review. Injury 50, 1853–1867 (2019).

44

Liao, J., Han, R., Wu, Y. & Qian, Z. Review of a new bone tumor therapy strategy based on bifunctional biomaterials. Bone Res. 9, 18 (2021).

45

Dang, W. et al. LaB6 surface chemistry-reinforced scaffolds for treating bone tumors and bone defects. Appl. Mater. Today 16, 42–55 (2019).

46

Shen, A. et al. Adhesive graphene grown on bioceramics with photothermal property. Mater. Today Chem. 17, 100322 (2020).

47

Yang, B. et al. 2D-black-phosphorus-reinforced 3D-printed scaffolds: a stepwise countermeasure for osteosarcoma. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705611 (2018).

48

Zhao, P. P. et al. Ordered arrangement of hydrated GdPO4 nanorods in magnetic chitosan matrix promotes tumor photothermal therapy and bone regeneration against breast cancer bone metastases. Chem. Eng. J. 381, 122694 (2020).

49

Dong, S. et al. A novel multifunctional carbon aerogel-coated platform for osteosarcoma therapy and enhanced bone regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 368–379 (2020).

50

Zhao, C., Shen, A., Zhang, L., Lin, K. & Wang, X. Borocarbonitrides nanosheets engineered 3D-printed scaffolds for integrated strategy of osteosarcoma therapy and bone regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 401, 125989 (2020).

51

An, D. et al. Progress in the therapeutic applications of polymer-decorated black phosphorus and black phosphorus analog nanomaterials in biomedicine. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 7076–7120 (2020).

52

Lin, C., Hao, H., Mei, L. & Wu, M. Metal-free two-dimensional nanomaterial-mediated photothermal tumor therapy. Smart Mater. Med. 1, 150–167 (2020).

53

Fu, S., Hu, H., Chen, J., Zhu, Y. & Zhao, S. Silicone resin derived larnite/C scaffolds via 3D printing for potential tumor therapy and bone regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 382, 122928 (2020).

54

Tonga, L., Liaoa, Q., Zhaoa, Y., Huanga, H. & Gaoa, A. Near-infrared light control of bone regeneration with biodegradable photothermal osteoimplant. Biomaterials 193, 1–11 (2019).

55

Ma, L. et al. A novel photothermally controlled multifunctional scaffold for clinical treatment of osteosarcoma and tissue regeneration. Mater. Today 36, 48–62 (2020).

56

Zeng, J. et al. A novel biocompatible PDA/IR820/DAP coating for antibiotic/photodynamic/photothermal triple therapy to inhibit and eliminate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm. Chem. Eng. J. 394, 125017 (2020).

57

Cao, Z. et al. Effect of nanoheat stimulation mediated by magnetic nanocomposite hydrogel on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Sci. China Life Sci. 61, 448–456 (2018).

58

Zhu, Y. et al. Magnetic mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds: preparation, physicochemistry and biological properties. J. Mater. Chem. B. 1, 1279–1288 (2013).

59

Zhang, J. et al. 3D-printed magnetic Fe3O4/MBG/PCL composite scaffolds with multifunctionality of bone regeneration, local anticancer drug delivery and hyperthermia. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2, 7583–7595 (2014).

60

Wu, C. et al. Multifunctional magnetic mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with a hierarchical pore structure. Acta Biomat. 7, 3563–3572 (2011).

61

Yan, F. et al. Biphasic injectable bone cement with Fe3O4/GO nanocomposites for the minimally invasive treatment of tumor-induced bone destruction. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5, 5833–5843 (2019).

62

Sun, D., Zhang, Z., Chen, M., Zhang, Y. & Chen, M. Co-immobilization of Ce6 sono/photosensitizer and protonated graphitic-carbon nitride on PCL/gelation fibrous scaffolds for combined sono-photodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 12, 40728–40739 (2020).

63

Fan, B. et al. Electroactive barium titanate coated titanium scaffold improves osteogenesis and osseointegration with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for large segmental bone defects. Bioact. Mater. 5, 1087–1101 (2020).

64

Moonga, S. S. & Qin, Y. X. MC3T3 infiltration and proliferation in bovine trabecular scaffold regulated by dynamic flow bioreactor and augmented by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J. Orthop. Transl. 14, 16–22 (2018).

65

Ouyang, L. et al. Graphene-oxide-decorated microporous polyetheretherketone with superior antibacterial capability and in vitro osteogenesis for orthopedic Iimplant. Macromol. Biosci. 18, 1800036 (2018).

66

Crasto, G. J. et al. Controlled bone formation using ultrasound-triggered release of BMP-2 from liposomes. J. Control. Release 10, 99–108 (2016).

67

Leppik, L., Oliveira, K. M. C., Bhavsar, M. B. & Barker, J. H. Electrical stimulation in bone tissue engineering treatments. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. S. 46, 231–244 (2020).

68

Aleem, I. S. et al. Efficacy of electrical stimulators for bone healing: a meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials. Sci. Rep. 6, 31724 (2016).

69

Zhao, C., Lin, K. & Wang, X. Maintenance and modulation of stem cells stemness based on biomaterial designing via chemical and physical signals. Appl. Mater. Today 19, 100614 (2020).

70

Ferrigno, B. et al. Bioactive polymeric materials and electrical stimulation strategies for musculoskeletal tissue repair and regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 5, 468–485 (2020).

71

Balint, R., Cassidy, N. J. & Cartmell, S. H. Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 10, 2341–2353 (2014).

72

Wang, K., Parekh, U., Ting, J. K., Yamamoto, N. A. D. & Ng, T. N. A platform to study the effects of electrical stimulation on immune cell activation during wound healing. Adv. Biosyst. 3, 1900106 (2019).

73

Yan, H. et al. An electrically and magnetically responsive nanocomposite of GdPO4·H2O/P3HT/PLGA with electrical stimulation for synergistically enhancing the proliferation and differentiation of pre-osteoblasts. N. J. Chem. 43, 17315–17326 (2019).

74

Deng, Z. et al. Stimuli-responsive conductive nanocomposite hydrogels with high stretchability, self-healing, adhesiveness, and 3D printability for human motion sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 11, 6796–6808 (2019).

75

Kapat, K., Shubhra, Q. T. H., Zhou, M. & Leeuwenburgh, S. Piezoelectric nano‐biomaterials for biomedicine and tissue regeneration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1909045 (2020).

76

Zhu, B. et al. Promotion of the osteogenic activity of an antibacterial polyaniline coating by electrical stimulation. Biomater. Sci. 7, 4730–4737 (2019).

77

Zhou, T. et al. A mussel-inspired persistent ROS-scavenging, electroactive, and osteoinductive scaffold based on electrochemical-driven in situ nanoassembly. Small 15, 1805440 (2019).

78

Kim, D. et al. Biomolecular piezoelectric materials: from amino acids to living tissues. Adv. Mater. 32, 1906989 (2020).

79

Ribeiro, C. et al. In vivo demonstration of the suitability of piezoelectric stimuli for bone reparation. Mater. Lett. 209, 118–121 (2017).

80

Przekora, A. Current trends in fabrication of biomaterials for bone and cartilage regeneration: materials modifications and biophysical stimulations. Inter. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 435 (2019).

81

Kohata, K. et al. Enhancement of fracture healing by electrical stimulation in the comminuted intraarticular fracture of distal radius. Bio-med. Mater. Eng. 23, 485–493 (2013).

82

Reis, J. et al. A new piezoelectric actuator induces bone formation in vivo: a preliminary study. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 613403 (2012).

83

Jacob, J., More, N., Kalia, K. & Kapusetti, G. Piezoelectric smart biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Inflamm. Regen. 38, 2 (2018).

84

Khare, D., Basu, B. & Dubey, A. K. Electrical stimulation and piezoelectric biomaterials for bone tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 258, 120280 (2020).

85

Tang, Y. et al. Fabrication and in vitro biological properties of piezoelectric bioceramics for bone regeneration. Sci. Rep. 7, 43360 (2017).

86

Bai, Y. et al. Biomimetic piezoelectric nanocomposite membranes synergistically enhance osteogenesis of deproteinized bovine bone grafts. Int. J. Nanomed. 14, 3015–3026 (2019).

87

Zhao, F. et al. Periosteum structure/function-mimicking bioactive scaffolds with piezoelectric/chem/nano signals for critical-sized bone regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 402, 126203 (2020).

88

Frith, J. E. et al. Mechanically-sensitive miRNAs bias human mesenchymal stem cell fate via mTOR signalling. Nat. Commun. 9, 257 (2018).

89

Tschumperlin, D. J., Liu, F. & Tager, A. M. Biomechanical regulation of mesenchymal cell function. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 25, 92–100 (2013).

90

Weyts, F. A. A., Bosmans, B., Niesing, R., Leeuwen, J. P. T. M. & Weinans, H. Mechanical control of human osteoblast apoptosis and proliferation in relation to differentiation. Calcif. Tissue Int. 72, 505–512 (2003).

91

Ahdjoudj, S., Lasmoles, F., Holy, X., Zerath, E. & Marie, P. J. Transforming growth factor beta2 inhibits adipocyte differentiation induced by skeletal unloading in rat bone marrow stroma. J. Bone Miner. Res. 17, 668–677 (2010).

92

Duncan, R. L. & Turner, C. H. Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcif. Tissue Int. 57, 344–358 (1995).

93

Panciera, T., Azzolin, L., Cordenonsi, M. & Piccolo, S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 18, 758–770 (2017).

94

Ouyang, N. et al. Mechanical strain promotes osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells from ovariectomized rats via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 17, 1855–1862 (2018).

95

Eichholz, K. F. et al. Human bone marrow stem/stromal cell osteogenesis is regulated via mechanically activated osteocyte-derived extracellular vesicles. Stem Cell. Transl. Med. 9, 1431–1447 (2020).

96

Puwanun, S. et al. A simple rocker-induced mechanical stimulus upregulates mineralization by human osteoprogenitor cells in fibrous scaffolds. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 12, 370–381 (2018).

97

Mohanraj, B. et al. Mechanically-activated microcapsules for ‘on-demand’ drug delivery in dynamically loaded musculoskeletal tissues. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1807909 (2019).

98

Hung, B. P., Hutton, D. L. & Grayson, W. L. Mechanical control of tissue-engineered bone. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 4, 1–7 (2013).

99

Tuan, H. S., & Hutmacher, D. W. Application of micro CT and computation modeling in bone tissue engineering. Comput. Aided Des. 37, 1151–1161 (2005).

100

Hayyan, M., Hashim, M. A. & Alnashef, I. M. Superoxide ion: generation and chemical implications. Chem. Rev. 116, 3029–3085 (2017).

101

Jiang, S., Lin, K. & Cai, M. ZnO nanomaterials: current advancements in antibacterial mechanisms and applications. Front. Chem. 8, 580 (2020).

102

Sun, C. et al. ROS-initiated chemiluminescence-driven payload release from macrocycle-based Azo-containing polymer nanocapsules. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 8878–8883 (2020).

103

Wang, X. et al. Polydopamine nanoparticles as dual-task platform for osteoarthritis therapy: a scavenger for reactive oxygen species and regulator for cellular powerhouses. Chem. Eng. J. 417, 129284 (2021).

104

Wang, D. et al. Butyrate-inserted Ni–Ti layered double hydroxide film for H2O2-mediated tumor and bacteria killing. Mater. Today 20, 238–257 (2017).

105

Ma, H. et al. 3D printing of high-strength bioscaffolds for the synergistic treatment of bone cancer. Npg Asia Mater. 10, 31 (2018).

106

Zhang, J., Liu, L., Wang, L., Zhu, W. & Wang, H. pH responsive zwitterionic-to-cationic transition for safe self-defensive antibacterial application. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 8908–8913 (2020).

107

Li, K. et al. Calcium-mineralized polypeptide nanoparticle for intracellular drug delivery in osteosarcoma chemotherapy. Bioact. Mater. 5, 721–731 (2020).

108

Gisbert-Garzarán, M. & Vallet-Regí Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for the treatment of complex bone diseases: bone cancer, bone infection and osteoporosis. Pharmaceutics 12, 83 (2020).

109

Chen, H. et al. Cartilage-targeting and dual MMP-13/pH responsive theranostic nanoprobes for osteoarthritis imaging and precision therapy. Biomaterials 225, 119520 (2019).

110

Jin, T. et al. Intra-articular delivery of celastrol by hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for pH-sensitive anti-inflammatory therapy against knee osteoarthritis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 18, 94 (2020).

111

Lin, X. et al. Smart nanosacrificial layer on the bone surface prevents osteoporosis through acid-base neutralization regulated biocascade effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 17543–17556 (2020).

112

Zhang, X. et al. Nanocomposite membranes enhance bone regeneration through restoring physiological electric microenvironment. ACS Nano 10, 7279–7286 (2016).

113

Lu, Y., Aimetti, A. A., Langer, R. & Gu, Z. Bioresponsive materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16075 (2016).

114

Krishna, A. S., Radhakumary, C. & Sreenivasan, K. Calcium ion modulates protein release from chitosan-hyaluronic acid poly electrolyte gel. Polym. Eng. Sci. 55, 2089–2097 (2015).

115

Tan, L. L. et al. Ca2+, pH and thermo triple-responsive mechanized Zr-based MOFs for on-command drug release in bone diseases. J. Mater. Chem. B 4, 135–140 (2015).

116

Galuska, S. P., Geyer, R., Gerardy-Schahn, R., Mühlenhoff, M. & Geyer, H. Enzyme-dependent variations in the polysialylation of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 17–28 (2008).

117

Qu, M. et al. Stimuli-responsive delivery of growth factors for tissue engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, e1901714 (2020).

118

Paiva, K. B. S. & Granjeiro, J. M. Bone tissue remodeling and development: focus on matrix metalloproteinase functions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 561, 74–87 (2014).

119

Zhang, W., Ouyang, H., Dass, C. R. & Xu, J. Current research on pharmacologic and regenerative therapies for osteoarthritis. Bone Res. 4, 15040 (2016).

120

Hu, Q., Katti, P. S. & Gu, Z. Enzyme-responsive nanomaterials for controlled drug delivery. Nanoscale 6, 12273–12286 (2014).

121

Arrighi, I. et al. Bone healing induced by local delivery of an engineered parathyroid hormone prodrug. Biomaterials 30, 1763–1771 (2009).

122

Patterson, J. & Hubbell, J. A. Enhanced proteolytic degradation of molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels in response to MMP-1 and MMP-2. Biomaterials 31, 7836–7845 (2010).

123

Li, N. et al. An enzyme-responsive membrane for antibiotic drug release and local periodontal treatment. Colloid Surf. B 183, 110454 (2019).

124

Holloway, J. L., Ma, H., Rai, R. & Burdick, J. A. Modulating hydrogel crosslink density and degradation to control bone morphogenetic protein delivery and in vivo bone formation. J. Control. Release 191, 63–70 (2014).

125

Anjum, F. et al. Enzyme responsive GAG-based natural-synthetic hybrid hydrogel for tunable growth factor delivery and stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials 87, 104–117 (2016).

126

Ding, Y. et al. A dual-functional implant with an enzyme-responsive effect for bacterial infection therapy and tissue regeneration. Biomater. Sci. 8, 1840–1854 (2020).

127

Qi, H. et al. Systemic administration of enzyme-responsive growth factor nanocapsules for promoting bone repair. Biomater. Sci. 7, 1675–1685 (2019).

128

Lee, J., Byun, H., Madhurakkat Perikamana, S. K., Lee, S. & Shin, H. Current advances in immunomodulatory biomaterials for bone regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, 1801106 (2019).

129

Liu, L. et al. The synergistic promotion of osseointegration by nanostructure design and silicon substitution of hydroxyapatite coatings in a diabetic model. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 2754 (2020).

130

Zhang, X., Cui, J., Cheng, L. & Lin, K. Enhancement of osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted 45S5 bioglass via time-dependent modulation of autophagy and the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. J. Mater. Chem. B 9, 3489 (2021).

131

Yin, X., Zhou, C., Li, J., Liu, R. & Shi, B. Autophagy in bone homeostasis and the onset of osteoporosis. Bone Res. 7, 16–31 (2019).

132

Sang, W., Zhang, Z., Dai, Y. & Chen, X. Recent advances in nanomaterial-based synergistic combination cancer immunotherapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 3771–3810 (2019).

133

Chen, Z. et al. Osteoimmunomodulation for the development of advanced bone biomaterials. Mater. Today 19, 304–321 (2016).

134

Loi, F. et al. Inflammation, fracture and bone repair. Bone 86, 119–130 (2016).

135

Schmidt-Bleek, K. et al. Initial immune reaction and angiogenesis in bone healing. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. M. 8, 120–130 (2014).

136

Niu, Y., Wang, Z., Shi, Y., Dong, L. & Wang, C. Modulating macrophage activities to promote endogenous bone regeneration: biological mechanisms and engineering approaches. Bioact. Mater. 6, 244–261 (2021).

137

Liu, R. et al. Immunomodulation-based strategy for improving soft tissue and metal implant integration and its implications in the development of metal soft tissue materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1910672 (2020).

138

Freytes, D. O., Kang, J. W., Marcos-Campos, I. & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. Macrophages modulate the viability and growth of human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 114, 220–229 (2013).

139

Koh, T. J. & DiPietro, L. A. Inflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 13, e23 (2011).

140

Bastidas-Coral, A. P. et al. IL-6 counteracts the inhibitory effect of IL-4 on osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 234, 20520–20532 (2019).

141

Giorgio, M., Patrizia, D., Roberta, F. & Giacomina, B. The interplay between the bone and the immune system. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013, 720504 (2013).

142

Chen, L. et al. Multi-faceted effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) determined by immune microenvironment and their implications on MSC/biomaterial-based inflammatory disease therapy. Appl. Mater. Today 18, 100485 (2020).

143

Xie, Y. et al. Osteoimmunomodulatory effects of biomaterial modification strategies on macrophage polarization and bone regeneration. Regen. Biomater. 7, 233–245 (2020).

144

Ou, Q. et al. Nanosilver-incorporated halloysite nanotubes/gelatin methacrylate hybrid hydrogel with osteoimmunomodulatory and antibacterial activity for bone regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 382, 123019 (2020).

145

Sadowska, J. M. & Ginebra, M. P. Inflammation and biomaterials: role of the immune response in bone regeneration by inorganic scaffolds. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 9404–9427 (2020).

146

Lourenco, A. H. et al. Osteogenic, anti-osteoclastogenic and immunomodulatory properties of a strontium-releasing hybrid scaffold for bone repair. Mat. Sci. Eng. C. 99, 1289–1303 (2019).

147

Tsukasaki, M. & Takayanagi, H. Osteoimmunology: evolving concepts in bone-immune interactions in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 626–642 (2019).

148

Ota, Y. et al. Generation mechanism of RANKL+ effector memory B cells: relevance to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 18, 67 (2016).

149

Garash, R., Bajpai, A., Marcinkiewicz, B. M. & Spiller, K. L. Drug delivery strategies to control macrophages for tissue repair and regeneration. Exp. Biol. Med. 241, 1054–1063 (2016).

150

Zhou, P. et al. Calcium silicate bioactive ceramics induce osteogenesis through oncostatin M. Bioact. Mater. 6, 810–822 (2021).

151

Chen, Z. et al. Osteoimmunomodulatory properties of magnesium scaffolds coated with beta-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials 35, 8553–8565 (2014).

152

Lin, J. et al. Gd@C82(OH)22 harnesses inflammatory regeneration for osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells through JNK/STAT3 signaling pathway. J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 5802–5811 (2018).

153

Yang, C. et al. Stimulation of osteogenesis and angiogenesis by micro/nano hierarchical hydroxyapatite via macrophage immunomodulation. Nanoscale 11, 17699–17708 (2019).

154

Jia, X. et al. EZH1 is associated with TCP-induced bone regeneration through macrophage polarization. Stem. Cells Int. 2018, 6310560 (2018).

155

Hu, Z., Ma, C., Rong, X., Zou, S. & Liu, X. Immunomodulatory ECM-like microspheres for accelerated bone regeneration in diabetes mellitus. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 10, 2377–2390 (2018).

156

Li, M. et al. Controllable release of interleukin-4 in double-layer sol–gel coatings on TiO2 nanotubes for modulating macrophage polarization. Biomed. Mater. 13, 045008 (2018).

157

He, C., Yu, L., Yao, H., Chen, Y. & Hao, Y. Combinatorial photothermal 3D-printing scaffold and checkpoint blockade inhibits growth/metastasis of breast cancer to bone and accelerates osteogenesis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2006214 (2021).

158

Kim, J., Kim, J., Jeong, C. & Kim, W. J. Synergistic nanomedicine by combined gene and photothermal therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 98, 99–112 (2016).

159

Lu, J. W., Yang, F., Ke, Q. F., Xie, X. T. & Guo, Y. P. Magnetic nanoparticles modified-porous scaffolds for bone regeneration and photothermal therapy against tumors. Nanomed-nanotechnol. 14, 811–822 (2018).

160

Rodrigues, A. F. M. et al. Effective production of multifunctional magnetic-sensitive biomaterial by an extrusion-based additive manufacturing technique. Biomed. Mater. 16, 015011 (2021).

161

Mushtaq, A. et al. Magnetic hydroxyapatite nanocomposites: the advances from synthesis to biomedical applications. Mater. Des. 197, 109269 (2021).

162

Ribeiro, C., Correia, D. M., Ribeiro, S., Fernandes, M. M. & Lanceros-Mendez, S. Piezo- and magnetoelectric polymers as biomaterials for novel tissue engineering strategies. MRS Adv. 3, 1–6 (2018).

Bone Research
Article number: 17
Cite this article:
Wei H, Cui J, Lin K, et al. Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration. Bone Research, 2022, 10: 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-021-00180-y

148

Views

2

Downloads

194

Crossref

181

Web of Science

199

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 07 February 2021
Revised: 26 July 2021
Accepted: 17 September 2021
Published: 23 February 2022
© The Author(s) 2022

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return