Single-cell RNA sequencing in orthopedic research

Johnson, V. L. & Hunter, D. J. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Best. Pr. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 28, 5–15 (2014).

Konstantinou, K. & Dunn, K. M. Sciatica: review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates. Spine 33, 2464–2472 (2008).

Myasoedova, E., Crowson, C. S., Kremers, H. M., Therneau, T. M. & Gabriel, S. E. Is the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis rising?: results from Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1955-2007. Arthritis Rheum. 62, 1576–1582 (2010).

Chen, W. et al. National incidence of traumatic fractures in China: a retrospective survey of 512 187 individuals. Lancet Glob. Health 5, e807–e817 (2017).

Bavin, E. P. et al. Equine induced pluripotent stem cells have a reduced tendon differentiation capacity compared to embryonic stem cells. Front. Vet. Sci. 2, 55 (2015).

Cripps, R. A. et al. A global map for traumatic spinal cord injury epidemiology: towards a living data repository for injury prevention. Spinal Cord. 49, 493–501 (2011).

Dey, D. et al. The traumatic bone: trauma-induced heterotopic ossification. Transl. Res. 186, 95–111 (2017).

Cho, W. H. et al. Differential presentations, clinical courses, and survivals of osteosarcomas of the proximal humerus over other extremity locations. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 17, 702–708 (2010).

Wilhelm, B. T. et al. Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution. Nature 453, 1239–1243 (2008).

Olsen, T. K. & Baryawno, N. Introduction to Single-Cell RNA Sequencing. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 122, e57 (2018).

Hedlund, E. & Deng, Q. Single-cell RNA sequencing: Technical advancements and biological applications. Mol. Asp. Med. 59, 36–46 (2018).

Shapiro, E., Biezuner, T. & Linnarsson, S. Single-cell sequencing-based technologies will revolutionize whole-organism science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 618–630 (2013).

Saliba, A. E., Westermann, A. J., Gorski, S. A. & Vogel, J. Single-cell RNA-seq: advances and future challenges. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 8845–8860 (2014).

Suvà, M. L. & Tirosh, I. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in Cancer: Lessons Learned and Emerging Challenges. Mol. Cell 75, 7–12 (2019).

Rao, D. A., Arazi, A., Wofsy, D. & Diamond, B. Design and application of single-cell RNA sequencing to study kidney immune cells in lupus nephritis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 16, 238–250 (2020).

Yamada, S. & Nomura, S. Review of single-cell rNA sequencing in the heart. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 8345 (2020).

Cuevas-Diaz Duran, R., Wei, H. & Wu, J. Q. Single-cell RNA-sequencing of the brain. Clin. Transl. Med. 6, 20 (2017).

Edwards, J. J. et al. Quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 74, 490–498 (2015).

Jin, X. et al. Circulating C reactive protein in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 74, 703–710 (2015).

Jiang, Y. & Tuan, R. S. Origin and function of cartilage stem/progenitor cells in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11, 206–212 (2015).

Decker, R. S., Koyama, E. & Pacifici, M. Genesis and morphogenesis of limb synovial joints and articular cartilage. Matrix Biol. 39, 5–10 (2014).

Jeon, O. H. et al. Local clearance of senescent cells attenuates the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and creates a pro-regenerative environment. Nat. Med. 23, 775–781 (2017).

Childs, B. G. et al. Senescent cells: an emerging target for diseases of ageing. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 718–735 (2017).

Ji, Q. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals the progression of human osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1, 100–110 (2019).

Chou, C. H. et al. Synovial cell cross-talk with cartilage plays a major role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Sci. Rep. 10, 10868 (2020).

Sebastian, A. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals transcriptomic heterogeneity and post-traumatic osteoarthritis-associated early molecular changes in mouse articular chondrocytes. Cells 10, 1462 (2021).

Lv, Z. et al. Single cell RNA-seq analysis identifies ferroptotic chondrocyte cluster and reveals TRPV1 as an anti-ferroptotic target in osteoarthritis. EBioMedicine 84, 104258 (2022).

Nanus, D. E. et al. Synovial tissue from sites of joint pain in knee osteoarthritis patients exhibits a differential phenotype with distinct fibroblast subsets. EBioMedicine 72, 103618 (2021).

Liu, W. et al. Single-Cell Profiles of Age-Related Osteoarthritis Uncover Underlying Heterogeneity Associated with Disease Progression. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 748360 (2022).

Sebastian, A. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals changes in immune landscape in post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Front. Immunol. 13, 938075 (2022).

Huang, Z. Y. et al. Single cell transcriptomics in human osteoarthritis synovium and in silico deconvoluted bulk RNA sequencing. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 30, 475–480 (2022).

Bian, Q. et al. A single cell transcriptional atlas of early synovial joint development. Development 147, dev185777 (2020).

Rickers, K. W., Pedersen, P. H., Tvedebrink, T. & Eiskjær, S. P. Comparison of interventions for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review with network meta-analysis. Spine J. 21, 1750–1762 (2021).

Dowdell, J. et al. Intervertebral disk degeneration and repair. Neurosurgery 80, s46–s54 (2017).

Feng, Y., Egan, B. & Wang, J. Genetic factors in intervertebral disc degeneration. Genes Dis. 3, 178–185 (2016).

Riester, S. M. et al. RNA sequencing identifes gene regulatory networks controlling extracellular matrix synthesis in intervertebral disk tissues. J. Orthop. Res. 36, 1356–1369 (2018).

Hunter, C. J., Matyas, J. R. & Duncan, N. A. Cytomorphology of notochordal and chondrocytic cells from the nucleus pulposus: a species comparison. J. Anat. 205, 357–362 (2004).

Bagnall, K. M., Higgins, S. J. & Sanders, E. J. The contribution made by cells from a single somite to tissues within a body segment and assessment of their integration with similar cells from adjacent segments. Development 107, 931–943 (1989).

Cherif, H. et al. Single-Cell RNA-seq analysis of cells from degenerating and non-degenerating intervertebral discs from the same individual reveals new biomarkers for intervertebral disc degeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 3993 (2022).

Wang, J. et al. Novel biomarkers of intervertebral disc cells and evidence of stem cells in the intervertebral disc. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 29, 389–401 (2021).

Panebianco, C. J., Dave, A., Charytonowicz, D., Sebra, R. & Iatridis, J. C. Single-cell RNA-sequencing atlas of bovine caudal intervertebral discs: Discovery of heterogeneous cell populations with distinct roles in homeostasis. FASEB J. 35, e21919 (2021).

Calió, M., Gantenbein, B., Egli, M., Poveda, L. & Ille, F. The cellular composition of bovine coccygeal intervertebral discs: a comprehensive single-cell RNAseq analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 4917 (2021).

Gao, B. et al. Discovery and application of postnatal nucleus pulposus progenitors essential for intervertebral disc homeostasis and degeneration. Adv. Sci. 9, e2104888 (2022).

Ling, Z. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals macrophage involved in the progression of human intervertebral disc degeneration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 833420 (2022).

Tu, J. et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals multicellular ecosystem of nucleus pulposus during degeneration progression. Adv. Sci. 9, e2103631 (2022).

Sakai, D. & Andersson, G. B. Stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc regeneration: obstacles and solutions. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11, 243–256 (2015).

Lyu, F. J. et al. IVD progenitor cells: a new horizon for understanding disc homeostasis and repair. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 15, 102–112 (2019).

Gan, Y. et al. Spatially defined single-cell transcriptional profiling characterizes diverse chondrocyte subtypes and nucleus pulposus progenitors in human intervertebral discs. Bone Res. 9, 37 (2021).

Sakai, D. et al. Exhaustion of nucleus pulposus progenitor cells with ageing and degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Nat. Commun. 3, 1264 (2012).

Mizrahi, O. et al. Nucleus pulposus degeneration alters properties of resident progenitor cells. Spine J. 13, 803–814 (2013).

Zhang, Y. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis identifies unique chondrocyte subsets and reveals involvement of ferroptosis in human intervertebral disc degeneration. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 29, 1324–1334 (2021).

Han, S. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of the nucleus pulposus reveals chondrocyte differentiation and regulation in intervertebral disc degeneration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 824771 (2022).

Fernandes, L. M. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq identifies unique transcriptional landscapes of human nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus cells. Sci. Rep. 10, 15263 (2020).

Ellman, M. B. et al. Fibroblast growth factor control of cartilage homeostasis. J. Cell. Biochem. 114, 735–742 (2013).

Brown, E. A. et al. FGF4 retrogene on CFA12 is responsible for chondrodystrophy and intervertebral disc disease in dogs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11476–11481 (2017).

Zhang, J. et al. TGF-β1 suppresses CCL3/4 expression through the ERK signaling pathway and inhibits intervertebral disc degeneration and inflammation-related pain in a rat model. Exp. Mol. Med. 49, e379 (2017).

Chen, S. et al. TGF-β signaling in intervertebral disc health and disease. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 27, 1109–1117 (2019).

Hiyama, A. et al. The relationship between the Wnt/β-catenin and TGF-β/BMP signals in the intervertebral disc cell. J. Cell. Physiol. 226, 1139–1148 (2011).

Wang, Z., Weitzmann, M. N., Sangadala, S., Hutton, W. C. & Yoon, S. T. Link protein N-terminal peptide binds to bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type II receptor and drives matrix protein expression in rabbit intervertebral disc cells. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 28243–28253 (2013).

Paglia, D. N., Singh, H., Karukonda, T., Drissi, H. & Moss, I. L. PDGF-BB delays degeneration of the intervertebral discs in a rabbit preclinical model. Spine 41, E449–E458 (2016).

McInnes, I. B. & Schett, G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 2205–2219 (2011).

Rana, A. K., Li, Y., Dang, Q. & Yang, F. Monocytes in rheumatoid arthritis: Circulating precursors of macrophages and osteoclasts and, their heterogeneity and plasticity role in RA pathogenesis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 65, 348–359 (2018).

Guo, Q. et al. Rheumatoid arthritis: pathological mechanisms and modern pharmacologic therapies. Bone Res. 6, 15 (2018).

Aletaha, D. & Smolen, J. S. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis: a review. JAMA 320, 1360–1372 (2018).

Ten, Brinck, R. M. et al. The risk of individual autoantibodies, autoantibody combinations and levels for arthritis development in clinically suspect arthralgia. Rheumatology 56, 2145–2153 (2017).

Verheul, M. K. et al. Mass-spectrometric identification of carbamylated proteins present in the joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 39, 570–577 (2021).

Sahlström, P. et al. Different hierarchies of anti-modified protein autoantibody reactivities in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 72, 1643–1657 (2020).

Bader, L. et al. Candidate markers for stratification and classification in rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Immunol. 10, 1488 (2019).

Saevarsdottir, S. et al. Multiomics analysis of rheumatoid arthritis yields sequence variants that have large effects on risk of the seropositive subset. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 81, 1085–1095 (2022).

Zhang, F. et al. Defining inflammatory cell states in rheumatoid arthritis joint synovial tissues by integrating single-cell transcriptomics and mass cytometry. Nat. Immunol. 20, 928–942 (2019).

Liao, L., Liang, K., Lan, L., Wang, J. & Guo, J. Marker genes change of synovial fibroblasts in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 5544264 (2021).

Culemann, S. et al. Locally renewing resident synovial macrophages provide a protective barrier for the joint. Nature 572, 670–675 (2019).

Kuo, D. et al. HBEGF+ macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis induce fibroblast invasiveness. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaau8587 (2019).

Alivernini, S. et al. Distinct synovial tissue macrophage subsets regulate inflammation and remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Med. 26, 1295–1306 (2020).

Stephenson, W. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq of rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue using low-cost microflfluidic instrumentation. Nat. Commun. 9, 791 (2018).

Mizoguchi, F. et al. Functionally distinct disease-associated fibroblast subsets in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Commun. 9, 789 (2018).

Croft, A. P. et al. Distinct fibroblast subsets drive inflammation and damage in arthritis. Nature 570, 246–251 (2019).

Wei, K. et al. Notch signaling drives synovial fibroblast identity and arthritis pathology. Nature 582, 259–264 (2020).

Kelkka, T. et al. Adult-onset anti-citrullinated peptide antibody-negative destructive rheumatoid arthritis is characterized by a disease-specific CD8+ T lymphocyte signature. Front. Immunol. 11, 578848 (2020).

Rao, D. A. et al. Pathologically expanded peripheral T helper cell subset drives B cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature 542, 110–114 (2017).

Fonseka, C. Y. et al. Mixed-effects association of single cells identifies an expanded effector CD4+ T cell subset in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaaq0305 (2018).

Han, L. et al. A comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of alternate interferon signaling pathways in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Aging 13, 20511–20533 (2021).

Andreev, D. et al. Regulatory eosinophils induce the resolution of experimental arthritis and appear in remission state of human rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020, 218902 (2020).

Meednu, N. et al. Dynamic spectrum of ectopic lymphoid B cell activation and hypermutation in the RA synovium characterized by NR4A nuclear receptor expression. Cell Rep. 39, 110766 (2022).

Wu, X. et al. Single-cell sequencing of immune cells from anticitrullinated peptide antibody positive and negative rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Commun. 12, 4977 (2021).

Cai, S. et al. Similar transition processes in synovial fibroblasts from rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: a single-cell study. J. Immunol. Res. 2019, 4080735 (2019).

Einhorn, T. A. & Gerstenfeld, L. C. Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11, 45–54 (2015).

Burge, R. et al. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–25. J. Bone Miner. Res. 22, 465–475 (2007).

Mills, L. A., Aitken, S. A. & Simpson, A. The risk of non-union per fracture: current myths and revised figures from a population of over 4 million adults. Acta Orthop. 88, 434–439 (2017).

Gruber, R. et al. Fracture healing in the elderly patient. Exp. Gerontol. 41, 1080–1093 (2006).

Xu, R. et al. Targeting skeletal endothelium to ameliorate bone loss. Nat. Med. 24, 823–833 (2018).

Wang, R. et al. miR-143 promotes angiogenesis and osteoblast differentiation by targeting HDAC7. Cell Death Dis. 11, 179 (2020).

Julien, A. et al. FGFR3 in periosteal cells drives cartilage-to-bone transformation in bone repair. Stem Cell Rep. 15, 955–967 (2020).

Hu, D. P. et al. Cartilage to bone transformation during fracture healing is coordinated by the invading vasculature and induction of the core pluripotency genes. Development 144, 221–234 (2017).

Baccin, C. et al. Combined single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal the molecular, cellular and spatial bone marrow niche organization. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 38–48 (2020).

Baryawno, N. et al. A Cellular taxonomy of the bone marrow stroma in homeostasis and leukemia. Cell 177, 1915–.e16 (2019).

Sivaraj, K. K. et al. Regional specialization and fate specification of bone stromal cells in skeletal development. Cell Rep. 36, 109352 (2021).

Abou-Khalil, R. et al. Role of muscle stem cells during skeletal regeneration. Stem Cells 33, 1501–1511 (2015).

Glass, G. E. et al. TNF-α promotes fracture repair by augmenting the recruitment and differentiation of muscle-derived stromal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 1585–1590 (2011).

Harry, L. E. et al. Comparison of the healing of open tibial fractures covered with either muscle or fasciocutaneous tissue in a murine model. J. Orthop. Res. 26, 1238–1244 (2008).

Liu, R. et al. Myogenic progenitors contribute to open but not closed fracture repair. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 12, 288 (2011).

Byrd, H. S., Cierny, G. & Tebbetts, J. B. The management of open tibial fractures with associated soft–tissue loss: external pin fifixation with early flap coverage. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 68, 73–79 (1981).

Richards, R. R., McKee, M. D., Paitich, C. B., Anderson, G. I. & Bertoia, J. T. A comparison of the effects of skin coverage and muscle flap coverage on the early strength of union at the site of osteotomy after devascularization of a segment of canine tibia. J. Bone Jt. Surg. -Ser. A 73, 1323–1330 (1991).

Willett, K., Al-Khateeb, H., Kotnis, R., Bouamra, O. & Lecky, F. Risk of mortality: the relationship with associated injuries and fracture treatment methods in patients with unilateral or bilateral femoral shaft fractures. J. Trauma - Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 69, 405–410 (2010).

Chan, J. K. K., Harry, L., Williams, G. & Nanchahal, J. Soft-tissue reconstruction of open fractures of the lower limb: muscle versus fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 130, 284e–295e (2012).

Julien, A. et al. Direct contribution of skeletal muscle mesenchymal progenitors to bone repair. Nat. Commun. 12, 2860 (2021).

Al-Sebaei, M. O. et al. Role of Fas and Treg cells in fracture healing as characterized in the fas-deficient (lpr) mouse model of lupus. J. Bone Min. Res. 29, 1478–1491 (2014).

Bragdon, B. et al. Earliest phases of chondrogenesis are dependent upon angiogenesis during ectopic bone formation in mice. Bone 101, 49–61 (2017).

Zhang, H. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals B Cells are important regulators in fracture healing. Front. Endocrinol. 8, 666140 (2021).

Gumucio, J. P., Sugg, K. B. & Mendias, C. L. TGF-β superfamily signaling in muscle and tendon adaptation to resistance exercise. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 43, 93–99 (2015).

Kjaer, M. et al. Extracellular matrix adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to exercise. J. Anat. 208, 445–450 (2006).

Magnusson, S. P. & Kjaer, M. The impact of loading, unloading, ageing and injury on the human tendon. J. Physiol. 597, 1283–1298 (2019).

Mendias, C. L., Gumucio, J. P., Bakhurin, K. I., Lynch, E. B. & Brooks, S. V. Physiological loading of tendons induces scleraxis expression in epitenon fibroblasts. J. Orthop. Res. 30, 606–612 (2012).

Paolillo, C., Londin, E. & Fortina, P. Single-cell genomics. Clin. Chem. 65, 972–985 (2019).

De Micheli, A. J. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis identifies extensive heterogeneity in the cellular composition of mouse Achilles tendons. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 319, C885–C894 (2020).

Still, C. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling reveals distinct mechanical responses between normal and diseased tendon progenitor cells. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100343 (2021).

Fan, C. et al. A Cd9+Cd271+ stem/progenitor population and the SHP2 pathway contribute to neonatal-to-adult switching that regulates tendon maturation. Cell Rep. 39, 110762 (2022).

Nakajima, T. et al. Grafting of iPS cell-derived tenocytes promotes motor function recovery after Achilles tendon rupture. Nat. Commun. 12, 5012 (2021).

Yoshimoto, Y. et al. Tenogenic induction from induced pluripotent stem cells unveils the trajectory towards tenocyte differentiation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 780038 (2022).

Kaji, D. A., Montero, A. M., Patel, R. & Huang, A. H. Transcriptional profiling of mESC-derived tendon and fibrocartilage cell fate switch. Nat. Commun. 12, 4208 (2021).

Kult, S. et al. Bi-fated tendon-to-bone attachment cells are regulated by shared enhancers and KLF transcription factors. Elife 10, e55361 (2021).

Garcia-Melchor, E. et al. Novel self-amplificatory loop between T cells and tenocytes as a driver of chronicity in tendon disease. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 80, 1075–1085 (2021).

Jiang, Y. et al. Enhanced tenogenic differentiation and tendon-like tissue formation by tenomodulin overexpression in murine mesenchymal stem cells. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 11, 2525–2536 (2017).

Jo, C. H., Lim, H.-J. & Yoon, K. S. Characterization of tendon-specific markers in various human tissues, tenocytes and mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 16, 151–159 (2019).

Tran, A. P., Warren, P. M. & Silver, J. The biology of regeneration failure and success after spinal cord injury. Physiol. Rev. 98, 881–917 (2018).

Guimarães-Camboa, N. et al. Pericytes of multiple organs do not behave as mesenchymal stem cells in vivo. Cell Stem Cell 20, 345–359 (2017).

Riew, T. R., Jin, X., Kim, S., Kim, H. L. & Lee, M. Y. Temporal dynamics of cells expressing NG2 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β in the fibrotic scar formation after 3-nitropropionic acid-induced acute brain injury. Cell Tissue Res. 385, 539–555 (2021).

Li, Y. et al. Microglia organized scar-free spinal cord repair in neonatal mice. Nature 587, 613–618 (2020b).

Ramotowski, C., Qu, X. & Villa-Diaz, L. G. Progress in the use of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural cells for traumatic spinal cord injuries in animal populations: meta-analysis and review. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 8, 681–693 (2019).

Nori, S. et al. Grafted human-induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived neurospheres promote motor functional recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16825–16830 (2011).

Zengeler, K. E. & Lukens, J. R. Innate immunity at the crossroads of healthy brain maturation and neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 454–468 (2021).

Wahane, S. et al. Diversified transcriptional responses of myeloid and glial cells in spinal cord injury shaped by HDAC3 activity. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd8811 (2021).

Wang, J. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals the immune heterogeneity and the repopulation of microglia by Hif1α in mice after spinal cord injury. Cell Death Dis. 13, 432 (2022).

Hakim, R. et al. Spinal cord injury induces permanent reprogramming of microglia into a disease-associated state which contributes to functional recovery. J. Neurosci. 41, 8441–8459 (2021).

Milich, L. M. et al. Single-cell analysis of the cellular heterogeneity and interactions in the injured mouse spinal cord. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20210040 (2021).

Hugnot, J. P. & Franzen, R. The spinal cord ependymal region: a stem cell niche in the caudal central nervous system. Front. Biosci. 16, 1044–1059 (2011).

Shu, M. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals Nestin+ active neural stem cells outside the central canal after spinal cord injury. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 295–308 (2022).

Stenudd, M. et al. Identification of a discrete subpopulation of spinal cord ependymal cells with neural stem cell properties. Cell Rep. 38, 110440 (2022).

Shimono, K. et al. Potent inhibition of heterotopic ossification by nuclear retinoic acid receptor-γ agonists. Nat. Med. 17, 454–460 (2011).

Regard, J. B. et al. Activation of hedgehog signaling by loss of GNAS causes heterotopic ossification. Nat. Med. 19, 1505–1512 (2013).

Ranganathan, K. et al. Heterotopic ossification: basic-science principles and clinical correlates. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 97, 1101–1111 (2015).

Wang, G., Kang, Y., Chen, F. & Wang, B. Cervical intervertebral disc calcification combined with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in an-11-year old girl: case report and review of literature. Childs Nerv. Syst. 32, 381–386 (2016).

Xu, Y. et al. Heterotopic ossification: clinical features, basic researches, and mechanical stimulations. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 770931 (2022).

C. Meyers, J. et al. Heterotopic ossification: A comprehensive review. JBMR. 3, e10172 (2019).

Agarwal, S. et al. Scleraxis-lineage cells contribute to ectopic bone formation in muscle and tendon. Stem Cells 35, 705–710 (2017).

Agarwal, S. et al. Inhibition of Hif1 prevents both trauma-induced and genetic heterotopic ossification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E338–E347 (2015).

Chen, Y. et al. Single-cell integration analysis of heterotopic ossification and fibrocartilage developmental lineage: endoplasmic reticulum stress effector Xbp1 transcriptionally regulates the notch signaling pathway to mediate fibrocartilage differentiation. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 7663366 (2021).

J.Sahlman, R. et al. Premature vertebral endplate ossification and mild disc degeneration in mice after inactivation of one allele belonging to the Col2a1 gene for type II collagen. Spine 26, 2558–2565 (2001).

Mutsuzaki, H. & Nakajima, H. Development of fibrocartilage layers in Achilles tendon enthesis in rabbits. J. Rural Med. 16, 160–164 (2021).

De Kretser, D. M., O’Hehir, R. E., Hardy, C. L. & Hedger, M. P. The roles of activin A and its binding protein, follistatin, in inflammation and tissue repair. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 359, 101–106 (2012).

Xia, Y. & Schneyer, A. L. The biology of activin: Recent advances in structure, regulation and function. J. Endocrinol. 202, 1–12 (2009).

Hwang, C. et al. Activin A does not drive post-traumatic heterotopic ossification. Bone 138, 115473 (2020).

Mundy, C. et al. Activin A promotes the development of acquired heterotopic ossification and is an effective target for disease attenuation in mice. Sci. Signal. 14, eabd0536 (2021).

Barruet, E. et al. Modeling the ACVR1R206H mutation in human skeletal muscle stem cells. Elife 10, e66107 (2021).

Hsu, G. C. et al. Endogenous CCN family member WISP1 inhibits trauma-induced heterotopic ossification. JCI Insight 5, e135432 (2020).

Tan, L. et al. Discovery of type II inhibitors of TGFβ-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 2 (MAP4K2). J. Med. Chem. 58, 183–196 (2015).

Kim, S. I. et al. TGF-beta-activated kinase 1 and TAK1-binding protein 1 cooperate to mediate TGF-beta1-induced MKK3-p38 MAPK activation and stimulation of type I collagen. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 292, F1471–F1478 (2007).

Lee, K. S., Hong, S. H. & Bae, S. C. Both the Smad and p38 MAPK pathways play a crucial role in Runx2 expression following induction by transforming growth factor-beta and bone morphogenetic protein. Oncogene 21, 7156–7163 (2002).

Strong, A. L. et al. Small molecule inhibition of non-canonical (TAK1-mediated) BMP signaling results in reduced chondrogenic ossification and heterotopic ossification in a rat model of blast-associated combat-related lower limb trauma. Bone 139, 115517 (2020).

Lin, J. et al. Single cell analysis reveals inhibition of angiogenesis attenuates the progression of heterotopic ossification in Mkx-/- mice. Bone Res. 10, 4 (2022).

Qin, Q. et al. Neuron-to-vessel signaling is a required feature of aberrant stem cell commitment after soft tissue trauma. Bone Res. 10, 43 (2022).

Sorkin, M. et al. Regulation of heterotopic ossification by monocytes in a mouse model of aberrant wound healing. Nat. Commun. 11, 722 (2020).

Mujtaba, B. et al. Heterotopic ossifification: radiological and pathological review. Radio. Oncol. 53, 275–284 (2019).

Shehab, D., Elgazzar, A. H. & Collier, D. Heterotopic ossification. J. Nucl. Med. 43, 346–353 (2002).

Zagarella, A., Impellizzeri, E., Maiolino, R., Attolini, R. & Castoldi, M. C. Pelvic heterotopic ossifification: when CT comes to the aid of MR imaging. Insights Imaging 4, 595–603 (2013).

Edwards, N. J. et al. High frequency spectral ultrasound imaging detects early heterotopic ossification in rodents. Stem Cells Dev. 30, 473–484 (2021).

Pingping, B. et al. Incidence and mortality of sarcomas in Shanghai, China, during 2002–14. Front. Oncol. 9, 662 (2019).

Kyle, R. A. et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined signifcance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia 24, 1121–1127 (2010).

Kansara, M., Teng, M. W., Smyth, M. J. & Thomas, D. M. Translational biology of osteosarcoma. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 722–735 (2014).

Zhou, Y. et al. Single-cell RNA landscape of intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment in advanced osteosarcoma. Nat. Commun. 11, 6322 (2020).

Liu, Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the complexity of the tumor microenvironment of treatment-naive osteosarcoma. Front. Oncol. 11, 709210 (2021).

Akiyama, T. et al. Novel therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma targeting osteoclast differentiation, bone-resorbing activity, and apoptosis pathway. Mol. Cancer Ther. 7, 3461–3469 (2008).

Pelon, F. et al. Cancer-associated fifibroblast heterogeneity in axillary lymphnodes drives metastases in breast cancer through complementary mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 11, 404 (2020).

Smeland, S. et al. Survival and prognosis with osteosarcoma: outcomes in more than 2000 patients in the EURAMOS-1 (European and American Osteosarcoma Study) cohort. Eur. J. Cancer 109, 36–50 (2019).

Chiu, D. K. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma cells up-regulate PVRL1, stabilizing PVR and inhibiting the cytotoxic T-cell response via TIGIT to mediate tumor resistance to PD1 inhibitors in mice. Gastroenterology 159, 609–623 (2020).

Hoogi, S. et al. A TIGIT-based chimeric co-stimulatory switch receptor improves T-cell anti-tumor function. J. Immunother. Cancer 7, 243 (2019).

Zhang, Q. et al. Blockade of the checkpoint receptor TIGIT prevents NK cell exhaustion and elicits potent anti-tumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 19, 723–732 (2018).

Stamm, H. et al. Targeting the TIGIT-PVR immune checkpoint axis as novel therapeutic option in breast cancer. Oncoimmunology 8, e1674605 (2019).

Qin, Z. et al. ATG16L1 is a potential prognostic biomarker and immune signature for osteosarcoma: a study based on bulk rna and single-cell RNA-sequencing. Int. J. Gen. Med. 15, 1033–1045 (2022).

Manoharan, M. et al. A computational approach identifies immunogenic features of prognosis in human cancers. Front. Immunol. 9, 3017 (2018).

Gharibi, A. et al. ITGA1 is a pre-malignant biomarker that promotes therapy resistance and metastatic potential in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Rep. 7, 10060 (2017).

Yim, D. H. et al. ITGA1 polymorphisms and haplotypes are associated with gastric cancer risk in a Korean population. World J. Gastroenterol. 19, 5870–5876 (2013).

Li, H. et al. Integrin alpha1 promotes tumorigenicity and progressive capacity of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 16, 815–826 (2020).

Liu, L. et al. Novel genetic variants of SYK and ITGA1 related lymphangiogenesis signaling pathway predict non-small cell lung cancer survival. Am. J. Cancer Res. 10, 2603–2616 (2020).

Rao, A., Barkley, D., França, G. S. & Yanai, I. Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics. Nature 596, 211–220 (2021).

Rai, M. F. et al. Single cell omics for musculoskeletal research. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 19, 131–140 (2021).

Sarmiento, P. & Little, D. Tendon and multiomics: advantages, advances, and opportunities. NPJ Regen. Med. 6, 61 (2021).

Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 109, 2191–2199 (2015).

Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleo some position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).

Llorens-Bobadilla, E. et al. A latent lineage potential in resident neural stem cells enables spinal cord repair. Science 370, 6512 (2020).

Ståhl, P. et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353, 78–82 (2016).

Stephenson, E., Webb, S. & Haniffa, M. Multiomics uncovers developing immunological lineages in human. Eur. J. Immunol. 51, 764–772 (2021).

Ballantyne, K. N. et al. Decreasing amplification bias associated with multiple displacement amplification and short tandem repeat genotyping. Anal. Biochem. 368, 222–229 (2007).

Buttner, M., Miao, Z., Wolf, F. A., Teichmann, S. A. & Theis, F. J. A test metric for assessing single-cell RNA-seq batch correction. Nat. Methods 16, 43–49 (2019).

Hicks, S. C., Townes, F. W., Teng, M. & Irizarry, R. A. Missing data and technical variability in single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Biostatistics 19, 562–578 (2018).

Shaham, U. et al. Removal of batch effects using distribution-matching residual networks. Bioinformatics 33, 2539–2546 (2017).