PDF (494 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Figures (5)

Research paper | Open Access

Quality-time-complexity universal intelligence measurement

Wen Ji()Jing LiuZhiwen PanJingce XuBing LiangYiqiang Chen
Beijing Key Laboratory of Mobile Computing and Pervasive Device, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Purpose

With development of machine learning techniques, the artificial intelligence systems such as crowd networks are becoming more and more autonomous and smart. Therefore, there is a growing demand to develop a universal intelligence measurement so that the intelligence of artificial intelligence systems can be evaluated. This paper aims to propose a more formalized and accurate machine intelligence measurement method.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper proposes a quality–time–complexity universal intelligence measurement method to measure the intelligence of agents.

Findings

By observing the interaction process between the agent and the environment, we abstract three major factors for intelligence measure as quality, time and complexity of environment.

Practical implications

In a crowd network, a number of intelligent agents are able to collaborate with each other to finish a certain kind of sophisticated tasks. The proposed approach can be used to allocate the tasks to the agents within a crowd network in an optimized manner.

Originality/value

This paper proposes a calculable universal intelligent measure method through considering more than two factors and the correlations between factors which are involved in an intelligent measurement.

References

 
Alvarado, N., Adams, S.S., Burbeck, S. and Latta, C. (2001), “Project Joshua blue: design considerations for evolving an emotional mind in a simulated environment”, Proceedings of the 2001 AAAI Fall Symposium Emotional and Intelligent II: The Tangled Knot of Social Cognition.
 

Gibson, E. (1998), “Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies”, Cognition, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 1-76.

 
Hernndez-Orallo, J. (2014), “AI evaluation: past, present and future”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.6908.
 
Legg, S. and Hutter, M. (2006), “A formal measure of machine intelligence”, arXiv preprint cs/0605024.
 
Legg, S. and Veness, J. (2013), “An approximation of the universal intelligence measure”, Algorithmic Probability and Friends: Bayesian Prediction and Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 236-249.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44958-1_18
 

Levin, L.A. (1973), “Universal sequential search problems”, Problemy Peredachi Informatsii, Vol. 9, pp. 115-116.

 
Li, M. and Paul, M.B. (2008), An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, p. 3.
 
Longo, G. (2009), “Turing and the imitation game impossible geometry”, Parsing the Turing Test, Springer, Berlin, pp. 377-411.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_23
 
Mahoney, M.V. (1999), “Text compression as a test for artificial intelligence”, AAAI/IAAI: 970.
 
Masum, H., Christensen, S. and Oppacher, F. (2002), “The turing ratio: metrics for open-ended tasks”, Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 973-980.
 
Oppy, G. and Dowe, D. (2003), available at: https://seop.illc.uva.nl/entries/turing-test/
 
Prpic, J. and Shukla, P. (2016), “Crowd science: measurements, models, and methods”, 49th Hawaii International Conference on IEEE System Sciences (HICSS), 2016, pp. 4365-4374.https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.542
 
Smith, W.D. (2006), “Mathematical definition of intelligence (and consequences)”, Unpublished report.
 
Solomonoff, R.J. (2009), “Algorithmic probability: theory and applications”, Information Theory and Statistical Learning, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 1-23.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84816-7_1
 

Turing, A.M. (1950), “Computing machinery and intelligence”, Mind, Vol. 59 No. 236, pp. 433-460.

International Journal of Crowd Science
Pages 18-26
Cite this article:
Ji W, Liu J, Pan Z, et al. Quality-time-complexity universal intelligence measurement. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2018, 2(1): 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCS-01-2018-0003
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return