AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (359.1 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Role conflict and ambivalence in the aged-parent-adult-child relationship

Xinjia Yu1( )Chunyan Miao1Cyril Leung2Charles Thomas Salmon3
Joint NTU-UBC Research Centre of Excellence in Active Living for the Elderly LILY Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Show Author Information

Abstract

Purpose

The parent-child relationship is important to the solidarity of families and the emotional well-being of family members. Since people are more dependent on their close social relationships as they age, understanding the quality of relationships between aged parents and their adult children is a critical topic. Previous research shows that this relationship is complicated with both kinship and ambivalence. However, there is little research on the causes of this complexity. This paper proposes a role model to explain this complexity by studying the leadership transition within a family as the child grows.

Design/methodology/approach

In this paper, we proposed a novel perception to understand this transition process and explain related problems based on the analysis of the leader-follower relationship between the parents and their children.

Findings

When a child is born, his/her parents become the leader of this family because of their abilities, responsibilities and the requirements of the infant. This leader-follower role structure will last a long time in this family. Decades later, when the parents become old and the child grows up, the inter-generational contracts within the family and the requirement of each members change. This transition weakens the foundation of the traditional leader-follower role structure within the family. If either the parent or the child does not want to accept their new roles, both of them will suffer and struggle in this relationship. This role conflict will cause ambivalence in the relationship between aged parents and their adult children.

Originality/value

Based on the quantitative study model provided in this paper, we can moderate the relationships between aged parents and their adult children. This effort is meaningful in enhancing the quality of life and emotional wellbeing for senior citizens.

References

 
Aarons, G.A., Ehrhart, M.G. and Farahnak, L.R. (2014), The Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS): Development of a Brief Measure of Unit Level Implementation Leadership, Implementation Science.https://doi.org/10.1037/t66101-000
 

Aquilino, W.S. (1997), “From adolescent to young adult: a prospective study of parent-child relations during the transition to adulthood”, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 59 No. 3, pp. 670-686.

 

Aronson, J. (1992), “Women’s sense of responsibility for the care of old people: “but who else is going to do it?”, Gender and Society, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 8-29.

 

Bengtson, V.L., Giarrusso, R., Mabry, J.B. and Silverstein, M. (2002), “Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships?”, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 64 No. 3, pp. 568-576.

 
Biddle, B.J. (1979), Role Theory: Expectations, Identities, and Behaviors, Academic, New York, NY.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-095950-1.50008-1
 

Birditt, K.S., Miller, L.M., Fingerman, K.L. and Lefkowitz, E.S. (2009), “Tensions in the parent and adult child relationship: links to solidarity and ambivalence”, Psychology and Aging, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 287-295.

 
Burt, R.S. (1982), Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action, Academic, New York, NY.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-147150-7.50014-4
 

Clarke, E., Preston, M., Raksin, J. and Bengtson, V.L. (1999), “Types of conflict and tensions between older parents and adult children”, The Gerontologist, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 261-270.

 

Connidis, I.A. and McMullin, J.A. (2002a), “Sociological ambivalence and family ties: a critical perspective”, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 64 No. 3, pp. 558-567.

 
DeVault, M.L. (1991), Feeding the Family, University Press of Chicago, Chicago.
 
Freud, S. (1913), Totem and Taboo: Some Points of Agreement between the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics, in Brill, A.A., Trans., New Republic, New York, NY.
 

Fung, H.H. and Carstensen, L.L. (2004), “Motivational changes in response to blocked goals and foreshortened time: testing alternatives to socioemotional selectivity theory”, Psychology and Aging, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 68-78.

 
Gordon, C. and Gordon, P. (1982), “Changing roles, goals, and self-conceptions: process and results in a program for women’s employment”, Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior, in Ickes W. and Knowles E.S. (Eds), Springer, New York, NY, pp. 243-283.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9469-3_9
 
Heiss, J. (1981), “Social roles”, Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives, in Rosenberg, M. and Turner, R.H. (Eds), Transaction Publishers, New York City, NY, p. 95.
 

Lendon, J.P., Silverstein, M. and Giarrusso, R. (2014), “Ambivalence in older parent-adult child repathionships: mixed feelings, mixed measures”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 272-284.

 

Lowenstein, A. (2007), “Solidarity-conflict and ambivalence: testing two conceptual frameworks and their impact on quality of life for older family members”, Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol. 62, pp. 100-107.

 

Luescher, K. and Pillemer, K. (1998), “Intergenerational ambivalence: a new approach to the study of parent- child relations in later life”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 413-425.

 

Pillemer, K. and Suitor, J.J. (2002), “Explaining mother’s ambivalence toward their adult children”, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 64 No. 3, pp. 602-613.

 
Thompson, M.M., Zanna, M.P. and Griffin, D.W. (1995), “Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence”, in Petty, R.E. and Krosnick, J.A. (Eds), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, Erlbaun, Hillsdale, NJ, Vol. 4, pp. 361-386.
 
Walker, A.J. (1994), “You can’t be a woman in your mother’s house: adult daughters and their mothers”, in Sollie, D.L. and Leslie L.A. (Eds), Gender, Families and Close Relationships: Feminist Research Journeys, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 74-96.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326825.n4
 

Whitbeck, L., Hoyt, D.R. and Huck, S.M. (1994), “Early family relationships, intergenerational solidarity, and support provided to parents by their adult children”, Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. S85-S94.

 

Willson, A.E., Shuey, K.M. and Glen, H. (2003), “Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parents and in-law”, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 65 No. 4, pp. 1055-1072.

International Journal of Crowd Science
Pages 161-170
Cite this article:
Yu X, Miao C, Leung C, et al. Role conflict and ambivalence in the aged-parent-adult-child relationship. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2017, 1(2): 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCS-08-2017-0012

621

Views

15

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 11 August 2017
Revised: 04 September 2017
Accepted: 04 September 2017
Published: 12 June 2017
© The author(s)

Xinjia Yu, Chunyan Miao, Cyril Leung and Charles Thomas Salmon. Published in International Journal of Crowd Science. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Return