AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

EEG predicts the attention level of elderly measured by RBANS

Fatemeh Fahimi1( )Wooi Boon Goh1Tih-Shih Lee2Cuntai Guan1
Nanyang Technological University, Nanyang, Singapore
Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
Show Author Information

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the correlation between neural indexes of attention and behavioral indexes of attention and detect the most informative period of brain activity in which the strongest correlation with attentive performance (behavioral index) exists. Finally, to further validate the findings, this paper aims at the prediction of different levels of attention function based on the attention score obtained from repeatable battery for the assessment of neurophysiological status (RBANS).

Design/methodology/approach

The present paper analyzes electroencephalogram (EEG) signals recorded by a single prefrontal channel from 105 elderly subjects while they were responding to Stroop color test which is an attention-demanded task. Beside Stroop test, subjects also performed RBANS which provides their level of functionality in different domains including attention. After data acquisition (EEG during Stroop test and RBANS attention score), the authors extract the spectral features of EEG as neural indexes of attention and subjects’ reaction time in response to Stroop test as behavioral index of attention. Then, they explore the correlation between these post-cue frequency band oscillations of EEG with elderly response time (RT). Next, the authors exploit these findings to classify RBANS attention score.

Findings

The observations of this study suggest that there is significant negative correlation between alpha gamma ratio (AGR) and RT (p < 0.0001), theta beta ratio (TBR) is positively correlated with subjects’ RT ( p < 0.0001), these correlations are stronger in a 500ms period right after triggering the cue (question onset in Stroop test), and 4) TBR and AGR can be effectively used to predict RBANS attention score.

Research limitations/implications

Because of the experiment design, the pre-cue EEG of the next trail was very much overlapped with the post-cue EEG of the current trail. Therefore, the authors could analyze only post-cue EEG. In future study, it would be interesting to investigate the predictability of subject’s future performance from pre-cue EEG and mental preparation.

Practical implications

This study provides an insight into the research on detection of human attention level from EEG instead of conventional neurophysiological tests. It has also potential to be used in implementation of feasible and efficient EEG-based brain computer interface training systems for elderly.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is among very few attempts for early prediction of cognitive decline in the domain of attention from brain activity (EEG) instead of conventional tests which are prone to human errors.

References

 

Donohue, S.E., Liotti, M., Perez, R. and Woldorff, M.G. (2012), “Is conflict monitoring supramodal? Spatiotemporal dynamics of cognitive control processes in an auditory stroop task”, Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 1-15.

 

Dyer, F.N. (1973), “The stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes”, Memory & Cognition, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 106-120.

 
Fahimi, F., Guan, C., Ang, K.K., Goh, W.B. and Lee, T.S. (2017), “Personalized features for attention detection in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder”,Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, pp. 414-417.https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2017.8036850
 

Hanslmayr, S., Aslan, A., Staudigl, T., Klimesch, W., Herrmann, C.S. and Bauml, K.H. (2007), “Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects”, Neuroimage, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 1465-1473.

 

Hanslmayr, S., Gross, J., Klimesch, W. and Shapiro, K.L. (2011), “The role of alpha oscillations in temporal attention”, Brain Research Reviews, Vol. 67 Nos. 1/2, pp. 331-343.

 

Jin, Y.I., O’halloran, J.P., Plon, L., Sandman, C.A. and Potkin, S.G. (2006), “alpha EEG predicts visual reaction time”, The International Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 116 No. 9, pp. 1035-1044.

 

Kamiński, J., Brzezicka, A., Gola, M. and Wróbel, A. (2012), “Beta band oscillations engagement in human alertness process”, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 85 No. 1, pp. 125-128.

 

Klimesch, W. (2012), “alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 16 No. 12, pp. 606-617.

 

Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P. and Hanslmayr, S. (2007), “EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis”, Brain Research Reviews, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 63-88.

 

Lee, T.S., Goh, S.J.A., Quek, S.Y., Phillips, R., Guan, C., Cheung, Y.B., Feng, L., Teng, S.S.W., Wang, C.C., Chin, Z.Y., Zhang, H.N.G.T.P., Lee, J., Keefe, R. and Krishnan, K.R.R. (2013), “A brain-computer interface based cognitive training system for healthy elderly: a randomized control pilot study for usability and preliminary efficacy”, Plos One, Vol. 8 No. 11, p. e79419.

 

Lim, C.G., Lee, T.S., Guan, C., Fung, D.S.S., Zhao, Y., Teng, S.S.W., Zhang, H. and Krishnan, K.R.R. (2012), “A brain-computer interface based attention training program for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder”, Plos One, Vol. 7 No. 10, p. e46692.

 

Liotti, M., Woldorff, M.G., Perez, R. and Mayberg, H.S. (2000), “An ERP study of the temporal course of the stroop color-word interference effect”, Neuropsychologia, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 701-711.

 

Maclean, M.H., Arnell, K.M. and Cote, K.A. (2012), “Resting EEG in alpha and beta bands predicts individual differences in attentional blink magnitude”, Brain and Cognition, Vol. 78 No. 3, pp. 218-229.

 

Macleod, C.M. (1991), “Half a century of research on the stroop effect: an integrative review”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 109 No. 2, pp. 163-203.

 

Macleod, C.M. and Macdonald, P.A. (2000), “Interdimensional interference in the stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 10, pp. 383-391.

 

Marie, T.B. (2009), “Executive function: the search for an integrated Account”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 89-94.

 

Markela-Lerenc, J., Ille, N., Kaiser, S., Fiedler, P., Mundt, C. and Weisbrod, M. (2004), “Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first?”, Cognitive Brain Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 278-287.

 

Patton, D.E., Duff, K., Schoenberg, M.R., Mold, J., Scott, J.G. and Adams, R.L. (2006), “RBANS index discrepancies: Base rates for older adults”,Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 151-160.

 

Randolph, C., Tierney, M.C., Mohr, E. and Chase, T.N. (1998), “The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity”, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 310-319.

 
Sharma, A. and Singh, M. (2015), “Assessing alpha activity in attention and relaxed state: an EEG analysis”, 2015 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT), 4-5 Sept. 2015, pp. 508-513.https://doi.org/10.1109/NGCT.2015.7375171
 

Stroop, J.R. (1935), “Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 643-662.

International Journal of Crowd Science
Pages 272-282
Cite this article:
Fahimi F, Goh WB, Lee T-S, et al. EEG predicts the attention level of elderly measured by RBANS. International Journal of Crowd Science, 2018, 2(3): 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCS-09-2018-0022

612

Views

19

Downloads

7

Crossref

8

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 09 September 2018
Revised: 19 October 2018
Accepted: 22 October 2018
Published: 29 November 2018
© The author(s)

Fatemeh Fahimi, Wooi Boon Goh, Tih-Shih Lee and Cuntai Guan. Published in International Journal of Crowd Science. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Return