This research addresses the diverse characteristics of existing railway steel bridges in China, including variations in construction age, design standards, structural types, manufacturing processes, materials and service conditions. It also focuses on prominent defects and challenges related to heavy transportation conditions, particularly low live haul reserves and severe fatigue problems.
The study encompasses three key aspects: (1) Adaptability assessment: It begins with assessing the suitability of existing railway steel bridges for heavy-haul operations through comprehensive analyses, experiments and engineering applications. (2) Strengthening: To combat frequent crack defects in the vertical stiffener end structure of girder webs, fatigue performance tests and reinforcement scheme experiments were conducted. These experiments included the development of a hot-spot stress S-N curve for this structure, validating the effectiveness of methods like crack stop holes, ultrasonic hammering and flange angle steel. (3) Service life extension: Research on the cruciform welded joint structure (non-fusion transfer type) focused on fatigue performance over the long life cycle. This led to the establishment of a fatigue S-N curve, enhancing Chinese design codes.
The research achieved several significant outcomes: (1) Successful implementation of strengthening and retrofitting measures on a 64-m single-span double-track railway steel truss girder on an existing heavy-duty line. (2) Post-reinforcement, a substantial 26% to 32% reduction in live haul stress on bridge members was achieved. (3) The strengthening and retrofitting efforts met design expectations, enabling the bridge to accommodate vehicles with a 30-ton axle haul on the railway line.
This research systematically tackles challenges and defects associated with Chinese existing railway steel bridges, providing valuable insights into adaptability assessment, strengthening techniques and service life extension methods. Furthermore, the development of fatigue S-N curves and the successful implementation of bridge enhancements have practical implications for improving the resilience and operational capacity of railway steel bridges in China.
Al-Karawi, H. (2023). Fatigue design and assessment guidelines for high-frequency mechanical impact treatment applied on steel bridges. Weld World, 67, 1809–1821.
Bai, Y. (2018). Fatigue assessment of existing steel railway bridges under heavy traffic hauling. Engineering Structures, 169, 88–100.
Caglayan, O., Ozakgul, K., & Tezer, O. (2012). Assessment of existing steel railway bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 69(1), 54–63.
Cui, C., Zhang, Q., Bao, Y., Kang, J., & Bu, Y. (2018). Fatigue performance and evaluation of welded joints in steel truss bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 148, 450–456.
Guo, S., & Xu, L. (2017). Experimental study on the fatigue behavior of welded joints in railway steel bridges. Engineering Failure Analysis, 82, 524–534.
Han, N., Zhao, W., & Zhang, B. (2022). Performance assessment of railway multispan steel truss bridge bearing by thermal excitation. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 12, 163–178.
Li, H. (2020). Assessment and strengthening of railway steel truss bridges for heavy haul hauls. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16(11), 1550–1563.
Li, M., & Luo, X. (2013). Research on transverse vibration detection and reinforcement of overhauled railway bridges. Shenhua Science and Technology, 11(5), 80–83.
Li, J., & Zhang, C. (2019). Structural assessment and retrofitting of aging railway steel bridges: A case study. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(2), 04018137.
Liu, S. (2015). Research on standardization technology for deterioration assessment of overhauled railway bridges. Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (Natural Science Edition), 28(1), 22–27. doi: 10.13319/j.cnki.sjztddxxbzrb.2015.01.05.
Liu, X., & He, Y. (2020). Reinforcement and retrofitting strategies for steel railway bridges subjected to heavy axle haul traffic. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 34(6), 04020151.
Walbridge, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Fatigue design, assessment, and retrofit of bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 23(12), 02018001.
Wallin, J., Leander, J., & Karoumi, R. (2011). Strengthening of a steel railway bridge and its impact on the dynamic response to passing trains. Engineering Structures, 33(2), 635–646.
Wang, L. (2012). Operational performance and reinforcement evaluation of double-column railway bridge piers under overhaul. Defense Transportation Engineering and Technology, 10(5), 31–34, doi: 10.13219/j.gjgyat.2012.05.013.
Wang, L. (2016). Fatigue performance evaluation and strengthening of steel railway bridges with welded details. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(11), 04016118.
Wang, Q. (2018). Structural assessment and rehabilitation of railway steel bridges with fatigue-prone details. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 147, 101–113.
Wang, C., Wang, Q., & Xu, Y. (2018). Fatigue evaluation of a strengthened steel truss bridge. Structural Engineering International, 23(4), 443–449.
Wang, C., Wang, Y., Duan, L., Wang, S., & Zhai, M. (2019). Fatigue performance evaluation and cold reinforcement for old steel bridges. Structural Engineering International, 29(4), 563–569.
Xiao, Y., Luo, X., Liu, J., & Wang, K. (2020). Dynamic response of railway bridges under heavy-haul freight trains. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020(4), 1–14.
Yu, Z., Shan, Z., Yuan, J., & Li, X. (2018). Performance deterioration of heavy-haul railway bridges under fatigue loading monitored by a multisensor system. Journal of Sensors, 2018, 1–14.
Zhang, Z., & Li, W. (2017). Research on the strengthening technology of existing railway steel bridges. Procedia Engineering, 210, 239–245.
Zhang, Y., & Sun, X. (2019). Study on fatigue evaluation and reinforcement technology of existing railway steel bridges. Advances in Structural Engineering, 22(14), 3055–3069.
Zhang, Q., & Zhao, J. (2019). Retrofitting techniques for existing railway steel bridges in China: A comprehensive review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 6(6), 664–678.