AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

A Low-Cost Dual Energy CT System with Sparse Data

Yuanyuan LiuJianping Cheng( )Li ZhangYuxiang XingZhiqiang ChenPeng Zheng
Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Beijing 100082, China
Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Dual Energy CT (DECT) has recently gained significant research interest owing to its ability to discriminate materials, and hence is widely applied in the field of nuclear safety and security inspection. With the current technological developments, DECT can be typically realized by using two sets of detectors, one for detecting lower energy X-rays and another for detecting higher energy X-rays. This makes the imaging system expensive, limiting its practical implementation. In 2009, our group performed a preliminary study on a new low-cost system design, using only a complete data set for lower energy level and a sparse data set for the higher energy level. This could significantly reduce the cost of the system, as it contained much smaller number of detector elements. Reconstruction method is the key point of this system. In the present study, we further validated this system and proposed a robust method, involving three main steps: (1) estimation of the missing data iteratively with TV constraints; (2) use the reconstruction from the complete lower energy CT data set to form an initial estimation of the projection data for higher energy level; (3) use ordered views to accelerate the computation. Numerical simulations with different number of detector elements have also been examined. The results obtained in this study demonstrate that 1 + 14% CT data is sufficient enough to provide a rather good reconstruction of both the effective atomic number and electron density distributions of the scanned object, instead of 2 sets CT data.

References

[1]
P. Englerand W. D. Friedman, Review of dual-energy computed tomography techniques, Mater. Eval., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 623-629, 1990.
[2]
R. E. Alvarez, J. A. Seibert, and S. K. Thompson, Comparison of dual energy detector system performance, Med. Phys., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 556-565, 2004.
[3]
G. U. Rao, I. Yaghmai, A. O. Wist, and G. Arora, Systematic errors in bone-mineral measurements by quantitative computed tomography, Med. Phys., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 62-69, 1987.
[4]
S. Oelckersand W. Graeff, In situ measurement of iron overload in liver tissue by dual-energy methods, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1149-1165, 1996.
[5]
A. J. Colemanand M. Sinclair, A beam-hardening correction using dual-energy computed tomography, Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1251-1256, 1996.
[6]
Z. R. Ying, R. Naidu, and C. R. Crawford, Dual energy computed tomography for explosive detection, J. X-ray Sci. Technol., vol. 14, pp. 235-256, 2006.
[7]
Z. R. Ying, R. Naidu, K. Guilbert, D. Schafer, and C. R. Crawford, Dual energy volumetric x-ray tomographic sensor for luggage screening, in Proc. of IEEE Sens. Appl. Symp., 2007, pp. 1-6.
[8]
Y. Liu, J. Cheng, Z. Chen, and Y. Xing, Feasibility study: Low-cost dual energy CT for security inspection, in IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec., 2009, pp. 879-882.
[9]
R. E. Alvarezand A. Macovski, Energy selective reconstructions in x-ray computerized tomography, Phys. Med. Biol. ,vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 733-744, 1976.
[10]
W. A. Kalender, W. H. Perman, J. R. Vetter, and E. Klotz, Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomography apparatus. I. Phantom stududies, Med. Phys., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 334-339, 1986.
[11]
G. Zhang, J. Cheng, L. Zhang, Z. Chen, and Y. Xing, A practical reconstruction method for dual energy computed tomography, J. X-ray Sci. Technol.,vol. 16, pp. 67-88, 2008.
[12]
B. J. Heismann, Noise transfer analysis of base material decomposition methods, in Proc. of SPIE, 2007.
[13]
and J. Fessler, Statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic x-ray computed tomography, IEEE Trans. on Med. Imag., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 89-99, 2002.
[14]
C. Kak and M. Slaney, Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging. IEEE Press, New York, USA, 1988.
[15]
W. Bi, Z. Chen, L. Zhang, and Y. Xing, A volumetric object detection framework with dual-energy CT, in IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec., Dresden, Germany, 2008, pp. 19-25.
[16]
E. Candes, J. Romberg, and T. Tao, Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 489-509, 2006.
[17]
E. Y. Sidky, C. M. Kao, and X. Pan, Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT, J. X-ray Sci. Technol., vol. 14, pp. 119-139, 2006.
Tsinghua Science and Technology
Pages 184-194
Cite this article:
Liu Y, Cheng J, Zhang L, et al. A Low-Cost Dual Energy CT System with Sparse Data. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2014, 19(2): 184-194. https://doi.org/10.1109/TST.2014.6787372

545

Views

25

Downloads

4

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

6

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 18 January 2013
Revised: 30 May 2013
Accepted: 30 August 2013
Published: 15 April 2014
© The author(s) 2014
Return