PDF (3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Deep learning-based geological modeling driven by sedimentary process simulation

Yanfeng LIUTaizhong DUAN()Yuan HUANGWenbiao ZHANGMeng LI
Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 102206, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Problems including insufficient quantity and low resolution of data face exploration and development of deep and complex reservoir targets, and the traditional geological modeling methods have been inadequate in terms of technical needs. The intelligent geological modeling represented by deep learning capable of fully integrating multiscale and multi-dimensional data as well as expert knowledge, is a key research and development direction of geological modeling technology. The study discusses the deep learning-based geological modeling driven by sedimentary process simulation following the comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of stratigraphic forward modeling and deep learning-based geological modeling technology. First, forward modeling of sedimentation is carried out based on comprehensive geological analysis, parameter uncertainty is analyzed, and a large amount of geological models are established through parameter disturbance as a training dataset; Second, the geological patterns contained in the learning dataset are learned with the conditional Generative Adversarial Nets (cGAN), in which the Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) takes the conditional data such as well and seismic data as the input, and the geological model as the output; Finally, the trained GAN is applied to the real conditional data to obtain the geological model of the target block. The feasibility of this method is verified through testing on the typical geological profiles of the main block of Puguang gas reservoir, and the impact of the training dataset scale on simulation results is analyzed. The combination of sedimentary simulation and deep learning could make up for the shortage of training data and indirectly realize knowledge-driven deep learning-based geological modeling. The method is therefore of great significance to popularization.

CLC number: TE132.1 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-9985(2023)01-0226-12

References

[1]

WU Shenghe, LI Yupeng. Reservoir modeling: Current situation and development prospect[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2007, 12(3): 53-60.

[2]

ZHANG Wenbiao, DUAN Taizhong, LIU Yanfeng, et al. Application status and development trend of quantitative geological modeling[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(3): 264-275.

[3]

YIN Yanshu, ZHANG Changmin, LI Jiuyong, et al. Progress and prospect of multiple-point geostatistics[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2011, 13(2): 245-252.

[4]

WU Shenghe, LI Wenke. Multiple-point geostatistics: Theory, application and perspective[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2005, 7(1): 137-144.

[5]

YIN Yanshu, WU Shenghe. The progress of reservoir stochastic modeling[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2006, 17(2): 210-216.

[6]

HU Xiangyang, ZHENG Wenbo, YOU Yuchun, et al. Probability body-constrained geomodeling of reef-shoal reservoir in Changxing Formation, Yuanba area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(1): 157-163.

[7]

ZHANG Wenbiao, DUAN Taizhong, ZHENG Lei, et al. Generation and application of three-dimensional MPS training images based on shallow seismic data[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(6): 1030-1037.

[8]

SONG Suihong, SHI Yanqing, HOU Jiagen. Review of a generative adversarial networks (GANs)-based geomodelling method[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2022, 7(1): 34-49.

[9]
GOODFELLOW I J, POUGET-ABADIE J, MIRZA M, et al. Generative adversarial nets[C]//Ghahramani Z, Welling M, Cortes C, eds. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, 2014. Cambridge: MIT press, 2014: 2672-2680.
[10]

LIU Yanfeng, ZHANG Wenbiao, DUAN Taizhong, et al. Progress of deep learning in oil and gas reservoirgeological modeling[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(4): 235-241.

[11]

ZHENG Qiang, ZENG Lingzao, KARNIADAKIS G E. Physicsinformed semantic inpainting: Application to geostatistical modeling[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 419: 109676.

[12]
MOSSER L, DUBRULE O, BLUNT M J. Conditioning of threedimensional generative adversarial networks for pore and reservoirscale models[EB/OL]. (2018-02-15)[2022-01-03].https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05622.
[13]

SONG Suihong, MUKERJI T, HOU Jiagen. Geological facies modeling based on progressive growing of generative adversarial networks (GANs)[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2021, 25(3): 1251-1273.

[14]

SONG Suihong, MUKERJI T, HOU Jiagen. GANSim: conditional facies simulation using an improved progressive growing of generative adversarial networks (GANs)[J]. Mathematical Geosciences, 2021, 53(7): 1413-1444.

[15]
NESVOLD E, MUKERJI T. Geomodeling using generative adversarial networks and a database of satellite imagery of modern river deltas[C]//Petroleum Geostatistics 2019, Florence, 2019. Bunnik: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2019: 1-5.
[16]

RAISSI M, PERDIKARIS P, KARNIADAKIS G E. Physicsinformed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686-707.

[17]

KARNIADAKIS G E, KEVREKIDIS I G, LU Lu, et al. Physicsinformed machine learning[J]. Nature Reviews Physics, 2021, 3(6): 422-440.

[18]

SLOSS L L. Stratigraphic models in exploration[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1962, 46(7): 1050-1057.

[19]
HARBAUGH J W. Mathematical simulation of marine sedimentation with IBM 7090/7094 computers[M]//Merriam D F. Computer Contributions 1. Lawrence: Kansas Geological Survey, 1966: 1-52.
[20]

PAOLA C. Quantitative models of sedimentary basin filling[J]. Sedimentology, 2000, 47(S1): 121-178.

[21]
BURGESS P M. 14-A brief review of developments in stratigraphic forward modelling, 2000-2009[M]//Roberts D G, Bally A W. Regional Geology and Tectonics: Principles of Geologic Analysis. Boston: Elsevier Science, 2012: 378-404.
[22]

HUANG X, GRIFFITHS C M, LIU J. Recent development in stratigraphic forward modelling and its application in petroleum exploration[J]. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2015, 62(8): 903-919.

[23]

ROSLI R, POPPELREITER M C, JAMALUDIN S N F. A review of stratigraphic foward models (Sfm) for carbonate platform[J]. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2018, 7(4. 35): 143-147.

[24]

DUAN Taizhong. Similarity measure of sedimentary successions and its application in inverse stratigraphic modeling[J]. Petroleum Science, 2017, 14(3): 484-492.

[25]
LIU Yanfeng,DUAN Taizhong, GONG Wei, et al. Construction and application of a proxy model for stratigraphic forward modeling based on deep learning[J/OL]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica: 1-16[2022-01-03]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=CJXB20211217002&DbName=CAPJ2021. DOI:10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2021.152.
[26]

GOODFELLOW I, BENGIO Y, COURVILLE A. Deep learning[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016.

[27]

HARSHVARDHAN G M, GOURISARIA M K, PANDEY M, et al. A comprehensive survey and analysis of generative models in machine learning[J]. Computer Science Review, 2020, 38: 100285.

[28]

ZHANG Tuanfeng, TILKE P, DUPONT E, et al. Generating geologically realistic 3D reservoir facies models using deep learning of sedimentary architecture with generative adversarial networks[J]. Petroleum Science, 2019, 16(3): 541-549.

[29]

CHAN S, ELSHEIKH A H. Parametric generation of conditional geological realizations using generative neural networks[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2019, 23(5): 925-952.

[30]

GAO Xiaoyang, HE Wenxiang, HU Yong. Modeling of meandering river deltas based on the conditional generative adversarial network[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 193: 107352.

[31]
MIRZA M, OSINDERO S. Conditional generative adversarial nets[EB/OL]. (2014-11-06)[2022-01-03].https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1784.
[32]
HUANG Huimin, LIN Lanfen, TONG Ruofeng, et al. UNet 3+: A full-scale connected UNet for medical image segmentation[C]//ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, 2020. Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 1055-1059.
[33]

POMAR L. Ecological control of sedimentary accommodation: Evolution from a carbonate ramp to rimmed shelf, Upper Miocene, Balearic Islands[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2001, 175(1/4): 249-272.

[34]

POMAR L, HAQ B U. Decoding depositional sequences in carbonate systems: Concepts vs experience[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2016, 146: 190-225.

[35]
POMAR L. Chapter 12-Carbonate systems[M]//Scarselli N, Adam J, Chiarella D, et al. Regional Geology and Tectonics: Volume 1: Principles of Geologic Analysis. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020: 235-311.
[36]

DUAN Taizhong, WANG Guangfu, LIAN Peiqing, et al. Quantitative geological modeling method and application of oil and gas reservoir[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2019.

[37]

MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu. Exploration achievements and prospects of the Permian-Triassic natural gas in northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2006, 27(6): 741-750.

[38]

JIANG Yiwei, LIU Honglei, YANG Futao, et al. Seismicconstrained reservoir modeling and its application in the Puguang gas field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(3): 14-17, 106.

[39]

MA Yongsheng, CHU Zhaohong. Building-up process of carbonate platform and high-resolution sequence stratigraphy of reservoirs of reef and oolitic shoal facies in Puguang gas field[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008, 29(5): 548-556.

[40]

MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, GUO Xusheng, et al. The discovery of Puguang gas field[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2010, 12(10): 14-23.

Oil & Gas Geology
Pages 226-237
Cite this article:
LIU Y, DUAN T, HUANG Y, et al. Deep learning-based geological modeling driven by sedimentary process simulation. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(1): 226-237. https://doi.org/10.11743/ogg20230119
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Return