PDF (36.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Status quo and development trends of research on shale gas adsorption and seepage in shale gas reservoirs

Yi ZHANG1,2()Bin ZHANG1,2Banghua LIU3Jie LIU4Qiansheng WEI4Qi ZHANG5Hongjun LU6Pengyu ZHU1,2Rui WANG1,2,7
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Well Stability & Rock Mechanics in Oil and Gas Reservoirs, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710065, China
School of Petroleum Engineering, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710065, China
Production & Operation Management Department, CNPC, Beijing 100083, China
No. 3 Gas Production Plant, Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Ordos, Inner Mongolia 017300, China
Gas Field Development Division, Changqing Oilfield Branch, PetroChina, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710018, China
Oil and Gas Technology Research Institute, Changqing Oilfield Branch, PetroChina, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710018, China
National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Shale gas reservoirs are characterized by large amounts of adsorbed gas within nano- to micron-scale organic pores and the mosaic form of organic matter in the inorganic matter. To understand these unique features, we initially review current methodologies used to characterize shale gas adsorption and seepage. Afterward, we summarize the mathematical representations of critical factors influencing these processes, including changes in the gas adsorption layer thickness, changes in the thickness of water film in inorganic pores, and changes in gas desorption-induced pores. Subsequently, we point out major problems in the current models of calculating the apparent permeability of shale gas reservoirs: (1) inaccurate characterization of reservoir pore structures; (2) a lack of methods to characterize the effects of the desorption of gas molecules dissolved into the solid organic matter on the adsorption of seepage flux; (3) inadequate characterization of the discrete distribution of organic matter in shale gas reservoirs; and (4) the unreasonability in direct application of parameters obtained from laboratory isothermal adsorption experiments, which neglects the differences between adsorbed shale gas and that dissolved into the solid organic matter in adsorption and desorption. Then, we analyze the advantages of the molecular simulation technique over physical experiments in examining shale gas adsorption and seepage. Accordingly, we summarize molecular simulation technique-based methods for modeling and simulating shale gas adsorption and seepage, as well as the simulation results. Finally, suggestions for further advancement in the molecular simulation of shale gas adsorption and seepage are put forward, including the improvement of multi-medium and multi-scale modeling methods based on conventional molecular models of inorganic and organic pores to be in line with the actual situation of shale gas reservoirs, as well as the necessity to develop methods for shale gas adsorption and seepage simulation that are more suitable for actual conditions.

CLC number: TE122.2 Document code: A Article ID: 0253-9985(2024)01-0256-25

References

[1]

XIAO Shuyue. China’s shale industry faces many challenges[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2021, 44(2): 43.

[2]

GUO Tonglou, XIONG Liang, LEI Wei, et al. Deep shale gas exploration and development in the Weirong and Yongchuan areas, South Sichuan Basin: Progress, challenges and prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(8): 45-59.

[3]

ZHAO Quanmin, ZHANG Jincheng, LIU Jinge. Status of Chinese shale gas revolution and development proposal[J]. Exploration Engineering (Rock & Soil Drilling and Tunneling), 2019, 46(8): 1-9.

[4]

ZHOU Lihong, CHEN Changwei, HAN Guomeng, et al. Enrichment conditions and exploration potential of shale gas in continental lake basins in Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(5): 1-10.

[5]

WANG Peng, XIE Dan, LUO Naifei. Geological characteristics of shale gas and prospects for exploration and development in Changning area[J]. Journal of Yibin University, 2020, 20(12): 10-15, 99.

[6]

ZHANG Yi, LIU Banghua, HU Junzhi, et al. Study on development mode of multi-stage superimposed sandstone reservoir of He 8 member of the Permian Lower Shihezi Formation in Su 14 well block of Sulige Gasfield[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(6): 165-174.

[7]

ZHANG Yi, BAI Baojun, SHEN Lei, et al. Research and application on simulation of oilfield 3D in-situ stress field by multi-information co-processing[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12(2): 67.

[8]

CHEN Weikun, TENGER, ZHANG Chunhe, et al. A review of research progress on characterization technology of nano organic pore structure in shale[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(6): 906-919.

[9]

ZHANG Yi, ZHU Pengyu, WEI Feng, et al. Study on damage mechanism of waterflooding development in Weizhou 11-4N low-permeability oilfield[J]. Geofluids, 2023, 2023: 4981874.

[10]

ZHANG Yi, LIU Banghua, GAN Qingmin, et al. Study on the methods of layer adjustment in gas dynamic reserve measurement[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 671/674: 142-145.

[11]

WANG Rui, ZHANG Ningsheng, LIU Xiaojuan, et al. Research progress of mechanism of adsorption and desorption of gas in shale[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2013, 13(19): 5561-5567.

[12]

CURTIS J B. Fractured shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 1921-1938.

[13]

CHEN Guohui, LU Shuangfang, ZHANG Junfang, et al. Keys to linking GCMC simulations and shale gas adsorption experiments[J]. Fuel, 2017, 199: 14-21.

[14]
HUANG Liang. Molecular simulation study on competitive adsorption mechanism of multi-components in shale gas reservoir[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2020.
[15]
SUN Jingyue. Molecular simulation of adsorption characteristics of CO2 and CH4 in nanopores[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2020.
[16]
DEVEGOWDA D, PEREZ F. Chapter 12-Application of molecular dynamics simulations for shale gas systems[M]//MOGHANLOO R G. Unconventional Shale Gas Development. Cambridge: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2022: 323-343.
[17]

BRACE W F, WALSH J B, FRANGOS W T. Permeability of granite under high pressure[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1968, 73(6): 2225-2236.

[18]

ZHANG Kaihong, CHEN Yijian, XU Haiying. A pressure pulse technique to test liquid permeability of core with low permeability[J]. Petroleum Instruments, 1998, 12(3): 12-14, 52.

[19]

CUI X, BUSTIN A M M, BUSTIN R M. Measurements of gas permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different approaches and their applications[J]. Geofluids, 2009, 9(3): 208-223.

[20]

SANDER R, PAN Zhejun, CONNELL L D. Laboratory measurement of low permeability unconventional gas reservoir rocks: A review of experimental methods[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 37: 248-279.

[21]

WANG Yong, SUN Yeheng, LIANG Dong, et al. Spontaneous imbibition simulation of tight sandstone based on digital rock and Lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2020, 5(4): 458-466.

[22]

WANG Han, SU Yuliang, WANG Wendong, et al. Simulation on liquid flow in shale nanoporous media based on lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(3): 534-544.

[23]
FENG Yiqin. Reservoir characteristics and accumulation model of mud shale of Wulalik Formation in northwestern margin of Ordos Basin[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2020.
[24]

ZHANG Jinchuan, JIANG Shengling, TANG Xuan, et al. Accumulation types and resources characteristics of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(12): 109-114.

[25]

YANG Weichao. Research progress and prospects of shale gas in my country[J]. Modern Salt and Chemical Industry, 2021, 48(5): 96-97.

[26]

CAI Xiao, JIN Yaxi, YE Jianguo, et al. A quantitative characterization method for organic and inorganic pores in shale[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(1): 30-36, 63.

[27]
ZHAO Difei. Quantitative characterization of pore structure of shale reservoirs in the Lower Paleozoic Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of the East Sichuan area[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2020.
[28]

DUAN Xianggang, HU Zhiming, SHAO Nan, et al. Establishment of a new slip permeability model of gas flow in shale nanopores based on experimental and molecular dynamics simulations studies[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 193: 107365.

[29]

WANG ZI Han, GAO Ping, FENG Yue, et al. Pore structure characteristics and main controlling factors of the ultra-deep shales of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2023, 47(1): 57-69.

[30]

KUILA U, MCCARTY D K, DERKOWSKI A, et al. Nano-scale texture and porosity of organic matter and clay minerals in organic-rich mudrocks[J]. Fuel, 2014, 135: 359-373.

[31]

ZHANG Zheng, SHANG Shaoshi, ZHANG Zhibing, et al. Characterization of shale organic-pore structure using the nitrogen adsorption method[J]. Geology and Exploration, 2021, 57(6): 1408-1415.

[32]

LI Jing, LI Xiangfang, WANG Xiangzeng, et al. A quantitative model to determine water-saturation distribution characteristics inside shale inorganic pores[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(7): 903-913.

[33]

NARAGHI M E, JAVADPOUR F. A stochastic permeability model for the shale-gas systems[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015, 140: 111-124.

[34]

YASSIN M R, DEHGHANPOUR H, WOOD J, et al. A theory for relative permeability of unconventional rocks with dual-wettability pore network[J]. SPE Journal, 2016, 21(6): 1970-1980.

[35]

ZHANG Tao, LI Xiangfang, SUN Zheng, et al. An analytical model for relative permeability in water-wet nanoporous media[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2017, 174: 1-12.

[36]

WANG Shan, SHI Juntai, WANG Ke, et al. New coupled apparent permeability models for gas transport in inorganic nanopores of shale reservoirs considering multiple effects[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(12): 13545-13557.

[37]

WANG Shan, SHI Juntai, WANG Ke, et al. Apparent permeability model for gas transport in shale reservoirs with nano-scale porous media[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 55: 508-519.

[38]

LI Yudan, DONG Pingchuan, ZHANG He, et al. Analysis on apparent permeability of shale matrix based on fractal theory[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017, 24(1): 92-99, 105.

[39]

WANG Fuyong, ZENG Fanchao, ZHAO Jiuyu. A mathematical model of displacement and imbibition of low-permeability/tight reservoirs and its application[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(11): 1396-1405.

[40]

SHENG Guanglong, JAVADPOUR F, SU Yuliang. Dynamic porosity and apparent permeability in porous organic matter of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Fuel, 2019, 251: 341-351.

[41]

LI Danlong, FU Meiyan, DENG Hucheng, et al. Analysis of lithofacies and sedimentary environment of shale deposited in shelf facies: A case study of the Wenshuicun section in Guizhou Province, South China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(3): 445-459.

[42]

ZHU Kuanliang, WU Xiaohong, JIA Shanpo, et al. Progressive failure evolution analysis of mudstone wellbore under chemo-mechanical coupling[J]. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 44(4): 1052-1061.

[43]

TIAN Yuanyuan, YAN Changhui, JIN Zhehui. Characterization of methane excess and absolute adsorption in various clay nanopores from molecular simulation[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 12040.

[44]

ONAWOLE A T, NASSER M S, HUSSEIN I A, et al. Theoretical studies of methane adsorption on silica-kaolinite interface for shale reservoir application[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2021, 546: 149164.

[45]

YOU Lijun, KANG Yili, ZHOU Yang, et al. Concept, mechanism and significance of oxidation sensitivity of oil and gas reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(2): 186-197.

[46]
XIONG Jian. Investigation of the influences of the methane adsorption capacity on the shales[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[47]

XIONG Jian, LIN Haiyu, LI Yuanjie, et al. The desorption laws of different minerals in the organic-rich shale[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 989-997.

[48]

LI Wei, ZHANG Haijie, LUO Tongtong, et al. Influence of micro pore structure of shale reservoir on shale gas occurrence in western Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(6): 873-885.

[49]

CHEN Guohui, LU Shuangfang, LIU Keyu, et al. Occurrence state and micro mechanisms of shale gas on pore walls[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(5): 1782-1790.

[50]

SUN Zheng, LI Xiangfang, LIU Wenyuan, et al. Molecular dynamics of methane flow behavior through realistic organic nanopores under geologic shale condition: Pore size and kerogen types[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 398: 124341.

[51]

LI Yaxiong, HU Zhiming, LIU Xiangui, et al. Insights into interactions and microscopic behavior of shale gas in organic-rich nano-slits by molecular simulation[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 59: 309-325.

[52]

HE Jiawei, XIE Yuan, LIU Jianqing, et al. Geological characteristics of ultra-deep Longmaxi Formation shale reservoirs in the southwest margin of Sichuan Basin: Case study of Leibo Block in Zhaotong National Shale Gas Demonstration area[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(7): 1260-1273.

[53]

LIU Xiangyu, ZHANG Liehui, LI Shuxin, et al. Supercritical methane isothermal adsorption model considering multiple adsorption mechanisms in shale[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(10): 1487-1499.

[54]

WANG Rui, LIU Hua, DOU Liangbin, et al. Effect of adsorption phase and matrix deformation on methane adsorption isotherm of Fuling shale[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 95: 104018.

[55]

CHEN Junbin, XIONG Penghui, SUO Genxi, et al. Effects of the adsorbed gas on the deformation and permeability of the coal matrix[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2021, 40(1): 146-153.

[56]

WANG Rui, LEI Hulin, WU Fanhua, et al. Change of void volume in shale gas adsorption experiment and its influence on adsorption[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 37(2): 39-44, 58.

[57]

WANG Rui, YANG Chenxi, RU Hanyu, et al. Comparison of error in methane isotherm adsorption by volumetric method for shale and coal[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2021, 8(3): 43-48, 57.

[58]

LI Zheng, YAO Jun, FIROOZABADI A. Kerogen swelling in light hydrocarbon gases and liquids and validity of Schroeder’s paradox[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2021, 125(15): 8137-8147.

[59]

ZHANG Decheng, TANG Hao, ZHANG Xiaogang, et al. Molecular simulation of methane adsorption in nanoscale rough slits[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2022, 102: 104608.

[60]

JAVADPOUR F. Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in mudrocks (shales and siltstone)[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2009, 48(8): 16-21.

[61]
LI Yudan. Multi-scale flow mechanism analysis and productivity evaluation of shale gas[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum, (Beijing), 2020.
[62]

LI Jinghui, HAN Xin, HUANG Sijing, et al. Molecular simulation of adsorption law for shale kerogen[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 455-461.

[63]

ZENG Kecheng, JIANG Peixue, XU Ruina. Restricted CO2/CH4 diffusion in nanopores: A quantitative framework to characterize nanoconfinement effect of shale organic pore[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2023, 210: 124178.

[64]

WU Keliu, LI Xiangfang, CHEN Zhangxing. A model for gas transport through nanopores of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(7): 837-848, 889.

[65]

WANG Rui, ZHANG Ningsheng, LIU Xiaojuan, et al. The calculation and analysis of diffusion coefficient and apparent permeability of shale gas[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 43(1): 75-80, 88.

[66]
LI Zhifeng. Research of shale pore-permeability characteristic and microscopic gas slippage mechanism in shale gas reservoir[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2013.
[67]

SONG Wenhui, YAO Jun, LI Yang, et al. Apparent gas permeability in an organic-rich shale reservoir[J]. Fuel, 2016, 181: 973-984.

[68]

WU Keliu, CHEN Zhangxing. Review of gas transport in nanopores in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2016, 1(1): 91-127.

[69]

KLINKENBERG L J. The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases[J]. Drilling and Production Practice, 1941(2): 200-213.

[70]

BESKOK A, KARNIADAKIS G E. Report: A model for flows in channels, pipes, and ducts at micro and nano scales[J]. Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, 1999, 3(1): 43-77.

[71]

NAZARI MOGHADDAM R, JAMIOLAHMADY M. Study of slip flow in unconventional shale rocks using lattice Boltzmann method: Effects of boundary conditions and TMAC[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2017, 120(1): 115-139.

[72]
WU Keliu, LI Xiangfang, WANG Chenchen, et al. A model for gas transport in micro fractures of shale and tight gas reservoirs[C]//SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 2015. Houston: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2015: SPE-175906-MS.
[73]

WU Keliu, CHEN Zhangxin, LI Xiangfang. Real gas transport through nanopores of varying cross-section type and shape in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 281: 813-825.

[74]
SHI Juntai, ZHANG Lei, LI Yuansheng, et al. Diffusion and flow mechanisms of shale gas through matrix pores and gas production forecasting[C]//SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, Calgary, 2013. Houston: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013: SPE-167226-MS.
[75]

WANG Rui, YUAN Chenyu, LIU Wenbo, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of methane desorption and diffusion in shale of Chang 7 member in Ordos Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2022, 9(6): 67-74.

[76]

ZOU Yu, WANG Guojian, LU Li, et al. Simulation experiment and mathematical model analysis for shale gas diffusion in nano-scale pores[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 844-854.

[77]

ZHONG Ying, SHE Jiping, ZHANG Hao, et al. Experimental and numerical analyses of apparent gas diffusion coefficient in gas shales[J]. Fuel, 2019, 258: 116123.

[78]

HU Shiwang, ZHANG Sai, WANG Zhenyi. Fractal model of micro-nano pore seepage in shale considering the multi-layer adsorption induced flow[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(1): 139-146.

[79]
XIONG X, DEVEGOWDA D, MICHEL G G, et al. A fully-coupled free and adsorptive phase transport model for shale gas reservoirs including non-Darcy flow effects[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, 2012. Houston: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012: SPE-159758-MS.
[80]
ABOLGHASEMI E, ØSTEBØ ANDERSEN P. Influence of adsorption layer thickness and pore geometry in tight compressible shales subject to gas production[C]//SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Virtual, 2020. Houston: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2020: SPE-202309-MS.
[81]

WEI Mingyao, LIU Jishan, FENG Xiating, et al. Evolution of shale apparent permeability from stress-controlled to displacement-controlled conditions[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 34: 1453-1460.

[82]
HE Jian. Study on the displacement and transportation mechanism of CO2/CH4 in organic nanopores of shale[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2019.
[83]

MU Zhongqi, NING Zhengfu, LYU Fangtao, et al. Molecular simulation and theoretical model of shale gas multilayer adsorption[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 38(1): 69-76, 84.

[84]

SHEN Yinghao, PANG Yu, SHEN Ziqi, et al. Multiparameter analysis of gas transport phenomena in shale gas reservoirs: Apparent permeability characterization[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 2601.

[85]

WANG Dengke, LI Wenrui, PU Hai, et al. A surface diffusion transport model considering multilayer adsorption behavior of gas[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2020, 44(1): 115-123.

[86]
WANG Shan. Gas adsorption/desorption and flow mechanism in shale matrix pores[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2019.
[87]

ZHANG Tao, LI Xiangfang, WANG Xiangzeng, et al. A discrete model for apparent gas permeability in nanoporous shale coupling initial water distribution[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 59: 80-96.

[88]

WU Yu, LIU Jishan, ELSWORTH D, et al. Evolution of coal permeability: Contribution of heterogeneous swelling processes[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 88(2/3): 152-162.

[89]

TANG Jiren, WANG Xiangcheng, LU Yiyu, et al. Experimental study on time effect and deformation anisotropy of shale and coal under CO2[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(8): 2288-2295.

[90]

CHEN Tianyu, FENG Xiating, PAN Zhejun. Experimental study of swelling of organic rich shale in methane[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015, 150/151: 64-73.

[91]

SHOVKUN I, ESPINOZA D N. Coupled fluid flow-geomechanics simulation in stress-sensitive coal and shale reservoirs: Impact of desorption-induced stresses, shear failure, and fines migration[J]. Fuel, 2017, 195: 260-272.

[92]

WU Keliu, CHEN Zhangxin, LI Xiangfang, et al. A model for multiple transport mechanisms through nanopores of shale gas reservoirs with real gas effect-adsorption-mechanic coupling[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 93: 408-426.

[93]

TAN Muhua, HUANG Yunyuan. Surface physical chemistry[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 1985.

[94]
SEIDLE J P, HUITT L G. Experimental measurement of coal matrix shrinkage due to gas desorption and implications for cleat permeability increases[C]//International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Beijing, 1995. Houston: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1995: SPE-30010-MS.
[95]

CAO Cheng, GUO Hao, ZHANG Liang. Calculating model of shale permeability with multi-factor coupling considering difference between organic matter and inorganic matter[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2022, 41(5): 160-167.

[96]

ZHAO Qianping, WANG Botao, JIANG Lei, et al. Computational model for multi-field coupling permeability of shale gas[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2017, 24(2): 125-130.

[97]

ZHANG Rui, NING Zhengfu, YANG Feng, et al. A laboratory study of the porosity-permeability relationships of shale and sandstone under effective stress[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2016, 81: 19-27.

[98]

LI Xiaoping, LIU Shudong, LI Ji, et al. Apparent gas permeability model of shale matrix coupling stress sensitivity and water saturation[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(6): 861-870.

[99]

FU Yonghong, JIANG Yuqiang, DONG Dazhong, et al. Microscopic pore-fracture configuration and gas-filled mechanism of shale reservoirs in the western Chongqing area, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(5): 916-927.

[100]

SONG Wenhui, YAO Jun, ZHANG Kai. Study on gas adsorption and transport behavior in shale organic nanopore[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(8): 2179-2192.

[101]

AFSHARPOOR A, JAVADPOUR F. Liquid slip flow in a network of shale noncircular nanopores[J]. Fuel, 2016, 180: 580-590.

[102]

SUI Hongguang, ZHANG Fengyun, WANG Ziqiang, et al. Effect of kerogen maturity, water content for carbon dioxide, methane, and their mixture adsorption and diffusion in kerogen: A computational investigation[J]. Langmuir, 2020, 36(33): 9756-9769.

[103]
SUI Hongguang. Molecular simulation studies of shale gas adsorption behavior in reservoir[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2016.
[104]

ZHANG Yi, WANG Rui, ZHANG Bin, et al. Numerical simulation of coalbed methane under the mining conditions based on dynamic virtual well and variable permeability field[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2023, 41(1): 170-186.

[105]
YANG Shugang. Comparative investigation on flow characteristics of water, NaCl solution and liquid CO2 in shale[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2021.
[106]

LIN Kui, YUAN Quanzi, ZHAO Yapu. Using graphene to simplify the adsorption of methane on shale in MD simulations[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2017, 133: 99-107.

[107]

CHEN Zhenglong, XU Weiren, TANG Lida. Theory and practice of molecular simulation[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007.

[108]

LIU Feng, YANG Fei, LU Hongjun, et al. Application progress and prospect of molecular dynamics in shale gas adsorption[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2023, 52(1): 181-185, 192.

[109]

CHEN Minbo. Computational chemistry-From theoretical chemistry to molecular simulations[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.

[110]
ZHANG Bo. The quantitative evaluation of shale gas adsorption capacity based on molecular simulation[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2018.
[111]
LIN Xuan. Simulation study on the occurrence state of methane in different matrix pores[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2022.
[112]

FANG Sidong, SUN Jing, HUANG Tao. Simulation of methane and water diffusion in the process of fluid flowback of shale reservoir[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2021, 16(9): 1004-1009.

[113]

WANG Shimeng, ZHOU Guanggang, MA Yue, et al. Molecular dynamics investigation on the adsorption behaviors of H2O, CO2, CH4 and N2 gases on calcite (1 1 0) surface[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 385: 616-621.

[114]

LIU Bing, QI Chao, ZHAO Xiangbin, et al. Nanoscale two-phase flow of methane and water in shale inorganic matrix[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(46): 26671-26679.

[115]

WANG Zhouhua, ZHAO Jianfei, BAI Yin, et al. Simulation of methane adsorption of quartz with different wettability[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2019, 41(6): 28-34.

[116]

XIONG Jian, LIU Xiangjun, LIANG Lixi. Molecular simulation for methane adsorption in surface functionalized graphite[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(12): 1528-1536.

[117]

WANG Xiaoqi, ZHAI Zengqiang, JIN Xu, et al. Progress in adsorption and diffusion of shale gas[J]. CIESC Journal, 2015, 66(8): 2838-2845.

[118]

RAMÍREZ M M, CASTEZ M F, SÁNCHEZ V M, et al. Methane transport through distorted nanochannels: Surface roughness beats tortuosity[J]. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2019, 2(3): 1325-1332.

[119]

UNGERER P, COLLELL J, YIANNOURAKOU M. Molecular modeling of the volumetric and thermodynamic properties of kerogen: Influence of organic type and maturity[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(1): 91-105.

[120]

LIU Xiangjun, LUO Danxu, XIONG Jian, et al. Construction of the average molecular modeling of the kerogen from the Longmaxi Formation[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(2): 530-537.

[121]
LUO Danxu. Molecular simulation of methane adsorption performance of kerogen extracted from shale in Longmaxi Formation[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.
[122]

GAO Kai, GUO Guangjun, ZHANG Mingmin, et al. Nanopore surfaces control the shale gas adsorption via roughness and layer-accumulated adsorption potential: A molecular dynamics study[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35(6): 4893-4900.

[123]

WANG Lu, LYU Weifeng, JI Zemin, et al. Molecular dynamics insight into the CO2 flooding mechanism in wedge-shaped pores[J]. Molecules, 2022, 28(1): 188.

[124]

CHEN Jiale, MA Niping, GUO Jianhua, et al. Molecular simulation of shale gas adsorption and transport in rough nanopores[J]. Journal of Atomic and Molecular Physics, 2024, 41(5): 67-74.

[125]

HE Yingjie, YANG Yang, ZHANG Tingshan, et al. Molecular simulation of shale gas adsorption in graphite slit-pores[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(6): 88-94.

[126]

HE Jian, JU Yang, LAMMERS L, et al. Tortuosity of kerogen pore structure to gas diffusion at molecular- and nano-scales: A molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 215: 115460.

[127]

PATHAK M, HUANG Hai, MEAKIN P, et al. Molecular investigation of the interactions of carbon dioxide and methane with kerogen: Application in enhanced shale gas recovery[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 51: 1-8.

[128]

TESSON S, FIROOZABADI A. Methane adsorption and self-diffusion in shale kerogen and slit nanopores by molecular simulations[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(41): 23528-23542.

[129]
LI Tiantian. Simulation study on the adsorption-diffusion behavior of shale gas in nanopores[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2023.
[130]

RANALLO S, AMODIO A, IDILI A, et al. Electronic control of DNA-based nanoswitches and nanodevices[J]. Chemical Science, 2016, 7(1): 66-71.

[131]

DENG Jia, ZHANG Qi, HE Jiujiu, et al. Effects of competitive adsorption on production capacity during CO2 displacement of CH4 in shale[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(11): 116104.

[132]

JIN Zhehui, FIROOZABADI A. Flow of methane in shale nanopores at low and high pressure by molecular dynamics simulations[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2015, 143(10): 104315.

[133]

CHEN Jie, YU Hao, FAN Jingcun, et al. Channel-width dependent pressure-driven flow characteristics of shale gas in nanopores[J]. AIP Advances, 2017, 7(4): 045217.

[134]

HE Shuai, PALMER J C, QIN Guan. A non-equilibrium molecular dynamics study of methane transport in clay nano-pores[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2017, 249: 88-96.

[135]

OKAMOTO N, KOBAYASHI K, LIANG Yunfeng, et al. Slip velocity of methane flow in nanopores with kerogen and quartz surfaces[J]. SPE Journal, 2017, 23(1): 102-116.

[136]
SUN Jingjing. Molecular simulation of the behavior of shale gas in nanopores of shale[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2019.
[137]

YU Hao, ZHU Yinbo, JIN Xu, et al. Multiscale simulations of shale gas transport in micro/nano-porous shale matrix considering pore structure influence[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2019, 64: 28-40.

[138]

WANG Dongbo, ZHANG Li, CAI Changhong, et al. Molecular modeling on the pressure-driven methane desorption in illite nanoslits[J]. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 2021, 27(3): 83.

[139]

ZHAN Shiyuan, SU Yuliang, LU Mingjing, et al. Effect of surface type on the flow characteristics in shale nanopores[J]. Geofluids, 2021, 2021: 6641922.

[140]

ZHANG Lu, LI Qibin, LIU Chao, et al. Molecular insight of flow property for gas-water mixture (CO2/CH4-H2O) in shale organic matrix[J]. Fuel, 2021, 288: 119720.

[141]

GUAN Qingshan, SHAN Baochao, WANG Runxi, et al. Evaluation of different particle-actuation modes in molecular dynamics and their impact on nanoscale flow behaviors[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(7): 072006.

[142]

HUANG Pengyu, SHEN Luming, MAGGI F, et al. Influence of surface roughness on methane flow in shale kerogen nano-slits[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2022, 103: 104650.

[143]

LI Yang, LU Lize, ZHU Jingyi, et al. Molecular simulation of CH4 nanoscale behavior and enhanced gas recovery in organic-rich shale[J]. Geofluids, 2022, 2022: 2420869.

[144]

SANG Qian, ZHAO Xinyi, DONG Mingzhe. Effects of water on gas flow in quartz and kerogen nano-slits in shale gas formations[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2022, 107: 104770.

[145]

SUN Zheng, HUANG Bingxiang, LI Yaohui, et al. Nanoconfined methane flow behavior through realistic organic shale matrix under displacement pressure: A molecular simulation investigation[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2022, 12(4): 1193-1201.

[146]

WU Jian, HUANG Pengyu, MAGGI F, et al. Effect of sorption-induced deformation on methane flow in kerogen slit pores[J]. Fuel, 2022, 325: 124886.

[147]

YONG Wei, ZHOU Yingfang. A molecular dynamics investigation on methane flow and water droplets sliding in organic shale pores with nano-structured roughness[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2022, 144(1): 69-87.

[148]

ZHANG Lu, LIU Chao, LI Qibin, et al. Shale gas transport through the inorganic cylindrical and conical nanopores: A density gradient driven molecular dynamics[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 183(Part B): 122126.

[149]

ZHAO Yulong, LUO Mingyao, LIU Lingfu, et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of shale gas transport in rough nanopores[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 217: 110884.

[150]

BONNAUD P A, OULEBSIR F, GALLIERO G, et al. Modeling competitive adsorption and diffusion of CH4/CO2 mixtures confined in mature type-Ⅱ kerogen: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations[J]. Fuel, 2023, 352: 129020.

[151]

CUI Chunming, WANG Dongbo, ZHANG Li, et al. Molecular simulation on the desorption and extraction of methane in the slits with varying surface activity[J]. Chemical Physics, 2023, 572: 111975.

[152]

DENG Jia, ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Lan, et al. Investigation on the adsorption properties and adsorption layer thickness during CH4 flow driven by pressure gradient in nano-slits[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(1): 016104.

[153]

LYU Fangtao, NING Zhengfu, JIA Zejiang, et al. Investigation on gas/water two-phase flow in quartz nanopores from molecular perspectives[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2023, 371: 121145.

[154]

SUN Jingyue, CHEN Zherui, WANG Xi, et al. Displacement characteristics of CO2 to CH4 in heterogeneous surface slit pores[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2023, 37(4): 2926-2944.

[155]

WU Jian, SHEN Luming, HUANG Pengyu, et al. Selective adsorption and transport of CO2-CH4 mixture under nano-confinement[J]. Energy, 2023, 273: 127224.

[156]

ZHOU Jun, ZHANG Chengpeng, RANJITH P G. Behaviours of methane and water in heterogeneous shale nanopores: Effect of water saturation and pore size[J]. Fuel, 2023, 335: 126675.

[157]
GUAN Qingshan. Molecular dynamics simulation of adsorption and flow driving methods and apparent permeability of shale gas[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2022.
[158]

SONG Haosheng, LI Bobo, LI Jianhua, et al. An apparent permeability model in organic shales: Coupling multiple flow mechanisms and factors[J]. Langmuir, 2023, 39(11): 3951-3966.

[159]

LI Ran, CHEN Zhangxin, WU Keliu, et al. Shale gas transport in nanopores with mobile water films and water bridge[J]. Petroleum Science, 2023, 20(2): 1068-1076.

[160]

CHEN Siyuan, LIU Jiangfeng, ZHANG Qi, et al. A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 167: 112537.

[161]

DENG Jia, LYU Zijian, ZHANG Qi, et al. Review on CO2/CH4 adsorption and displacement characteristics of micro-nano pores in shale reservoir[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(10): 2880-2890.

[162]

DUAN Shuo, GU Min, DU Xidong, et al. Adsorption equilibrium of CO2 and CH4 and their mixture on Sichuan Basin shale[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2016, 30(3): 2248-2256.

[163]

HE Jian, JU Yang, HOU Peng. Thermal diffusion and flow property of CO2/CH4 in organic nanopores with fractal rough surface[J]. Thermal Science, 2019, 23(3 Part A): 1577-1583.

[164]

LIU Jian, XIE Hui, WANG Qin, et al. Influence of pore structure on shale gas recovery with CO2 sequestration: Insight into molecular mechanisms[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(2): 1240-1250.

[165]

MU Zhongqi, NING Zhengfu, LYU Fangtao, et al. Molecular simulation and theoretical Model of shale gas multilaver adsorption[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 38(1): 69-76+84.

[166]

WANG Min, YU Changqi, FEI Junsheng, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of shale oil adsorption in kerogen and its implications[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1442-1452.

Oil & Gas Geology
Pages 256-280
Cite this article:
ZHANG Y, ZHANG B, LIU B, et al. Status quo and development trends of research on shale gas adsorption and seepage in shale gas reservoirs. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 256-280. https://doi.org/10.11743/ogg20240118
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Return