AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Comparing post-release survival and habitat use by captive-bred Cabot's Tragopan (Tragopan caboti) in an experimental test of soft-release reintroduction strategies

Boye Liu1Li Li2Huw Lloyd3Canwei Xia1Yanyun Zhang1( )Guangmei Zheng1
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Hunan Wildlife Rescue and Breeding Center, Changsha, China
School of Science and Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Restoring a viable population by reintroduction is the ultimate goal of a large number of ex situ conservation projects for endangered animals. However, many reintroductions fail to establish a population in the wild, partly because released animals cannot acclimate to the native environment of the release site, resulting in very low survival rates. Acclimation training is a technique to resolve this problem, although it does not have positive results in all species. We tested whether acclimation training and soft-release could improve the reintroduction success for captive-bred Cabot's Tragopan (Tragopan caboti), an endangered pheasant in southern China.

Methods

Reintroduction of captive-bred Cabot's Tragopan was carried out in the Taoyuandong National Nature Reserve, China from 2010 to 2011. We built a soft-release enclosure for acclimation training in the typical montane habitat of this pheasant. Nine birds were acclimated to the environment of this release site in this cage for more than 50 days before release ("trained birds"), while 11 birds remained only in the cage for 3 days prior to release ("untrained birds"). Released birds were tagged with a collar radio-transmitter.

Results

Post-release monitoring revealed that the survival rate of trained birds was higher than that of untrained birds after 50 days (trained: 85.7%; untrained: 20.0%). Cox regression analysis showed that there was a significant difference in the mortality rates between the trained and untrained birds. In addition, a survey of the habitat of the experimental and the control groups showed significant differences in habitat selection between the groups.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that pre-release acclimatization training is an important factor that can lead to improved survival and habitat selection of captive-bred reintroduced tragopans.

References

 

Bernardo CSS, Lloyd H, Bayly N, Galetti M. Modelling post-release survival of reintroduced Red-billed Curassows Crax blumenbachii. Ibis. 2011a;153:562-72.

 

Bernardo CSS, Lloyd H, Olmos F, Cancian LF, Galetti M. Using post-release monitoring data to optimize avian reintroduction programs: a 2-year case study from the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Anim Conserv. 2011b;14:676-86.

 

Biggins DE, Vargas A, Godbey JL, Anderson SH. Influence of prerelease experience on reintroduced black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes). Biol Conserv. 1999;89:121-9.

 
BirdLife International. Tragopan caboti. In: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012. IUCN. 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T22679172A37923610.en. Accessed 19 Jun 2016.https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T22679172A37923610.en
 

Blythe RM, Smyser TJ, Johnson SA, Swihart RK. Post-release survival of captive-reared Allegheny woodrats. Anim Conserv. 2015;18:186-95.

 

Bradley DW, Molles LE, Valderrama SV, King S, Waas JR. Factors affecting post-release dispersal, mortality, and territory settlement of endangered kokako translocated from two distinct song neighborhoods. Biol Conserv. 2012;147:79-86.

 

Bright PW, Morris PA. Animal translocation for conservation: performance of dormice in relation to release methods, origin and season. J Appl Ecol. 1994;31:699-708.

 
Campbell L, Croft D. Comparison of hard and soft release of hand reared eastern grey kangaroos. In: Veterinary conservation biology, wildlife health and management in Australasia, proceedings of international joint conference. Sydney: Taronga Zoo; 2001.
 
Castro I, Alley J, Empson R, Minot E. Translocation of hihi or stitchbird Notiomystis cincta to Kapiti Island, New Zealand: transfer techniques and comparison of release strategies. In: Serena M, editor. Reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand fauna. Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty & Sons; 1994. p. 113-21.
 

Cheng SL, Wu SY, Zheng YQ. Feed behavior of Cabot's Tragopan (Tragopan caboti) in Wuyishan, Jiangxi province. Sichuan J Zool. 2008;27:432-5.

 

Clarke RH, Boulton RL, Clarke MF. Translocation of the socially complex Black-eared Miner Manorina melanotis: a trial using hard and soft release techniques. Pac Conserv Biol. 2002;8:223-34.

 

Davis JM, Stamps JA. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004;19:411-6.

 

Deng WH, Zheng GM, Zhang ZW, Garson PJ, McGowan PJ. Providing artificial nest platforms for Cabot's tragopan Tragopan caboti (Aves: Galliformes): a useful conservation tool? Oryx. 2005;39:158-63.

 

Ding CQ, Zheng GM. A primary study on the reintroduction of Cabot's Tragopan. Acta Zool Sin. 1996;S1:42.

 

Ding CQ, Zheng GM. The nest site selection of the Yellow-bellied Tragopan (Tragopan caboti). Acta Zool Sin. 1997;43:27-33.

 

Dong L, Zhang J, Sun Y, Liu Y, Zhang YY, Zheng GM. Phylogeographic patterns and conservation units of a vulnerable species, Cabot's tragopan (Tragopan caboti), endemic to southeast China. Conserv Genet. 2010;11:2231-42.

 

Ellis DH, Gee GF, Hereford SG, Olsen GH, Chisolm TD, Nicolich JM, Sullivan KA, Thomas NJ, Nagendran M, Hatfield JS. Post-release survival of hand-reared and parent-reared Mississippi Sandhill Cranes. Condor. 2000;102:104-12.

 

Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol Conserv. 2000;96:1-11.

 
Franzreb KE. The effect of using a "soft" release on translocation success of red-cockaded woodpeckers. In: Costa R, Daniels SJ, editors. Red-cockaded woodpecker: road to recovery. Washington: Hancock House Publishers; 2004. p. 301-6.
 

Gatti RC. A comparison of two hand-reared mallard release methods. Wildl Soc Bull. 1981;9:37-43.

 

Hardman B, Moro D. Optimising reintroduction success by delayed dispersal: is the release protocol important for hare-wallabies? Biol Conserv. 2006;128:403-11.

 
Hou BQ. The comprehensive investigation reports of natural resource in Taoyuandong, Ling Country, Hunan Province. Changsha: Press of National University of Defense Technology; 1993 (in Chinese).
 

Islam MZ, Singh A, Basheer MP, Judas J, Boug A. Differences in space use and habitat selection between captive-bred and wild-born houbara bustards in Saudi Arabia: results from a long-term reintroduction program. J Zool. 2013;289:251-61.

 
IUCN/SSC. Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. Version 1.0. Gland: IUCN Species Survival Commission; 2013.
 
Johnson MK, Wofford H, Pearson HA. Microhistological techniques for food habits analyses. Res. Pap. SO-199. New Orleans: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station; 1983.https://doi.org/10.2737/SO-RP-199
 

Jones CG, Merton DV. A tale of two islands: the rescue and recovery of endemic birds in New Zealand and Mauritius. In: Ewen JG, Armstrong DP, Parker KA, Seddon PJ, editors. Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 33-72.

 

Kauhala K, Tiilikainen T. Radio location error and the estimates of home-range size, movements, and habitat use: a simple field test. Ann Zool Fenn. 2002;39:317-24.

 

Kenward RE. A manual for wildlife radio tagging. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001.

 

Li FS, Nie H, Ye CH. Microscopic analysis on herbivorous diets of wintering black-necked cranes at Caohai, China. Zool Res. 1997;18:51-7.

 

Lockwood MA, Griffin CR, Morrow ME, Randel CJ, Silvy NJ. Survival, movements, and reproduction of released captive-reared Attwater's prairie-chicken. J Wildl Manag. 2005;69:1251-8.

 

Lovegrove TG. Island releases of saddlebacks Philesturnus carunculatus in New Zealand. Biol Conserv. 1996;77:151-7.

 

Meyers JM, Miller DL. Post-release activity of captive-and wild-reared bald eagles. J Wildl Manag. 1992;56:744-9.

 

Mitchell AM, Wellicome TI, Brodie D, Cheng KM. Captive-reared burrowing owls show higher site-affinity, survival, and reproductive performance when reintroduced using a soft-release. Biol Conserv. 2011;144:1382-91.

 
Parker KA, Dickens MJ, Clarke RH, Lovegrove TG. The theory and practice of catching, holding, moving and releasing animals. In: Ewen JG, Armstrong DP, Parker KA, Seddon PJ, editors. Reintroduction biology: integrating science and management. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 105-37.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444355833.ch4
 

Pinter-Wollman N, Isbell LA, Hart LA. Assessing translocation outcome: comparing behavioral and physiological aspects of translocated and resident African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Biol Conserv. 2009;142:1116-24.

 

Poulin RG, Todd LD, Wellicome TI, Brigham RM. Assessing the feasibility of release techniques for captive-bred burrowing owls. J Raptor Res. 2006;40:142-50.

 

Qian FW, Zheng GM. The study of habitat used by Cabot's tragopan. J Beijing Normal Univ (Nat Sci). 1993;29:256-64.

 
R Core Development Team. R: a Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014. https://www.R-project.org.
 

Roe JH, Frank MR, Gibson SE, Attum O, Kingsbury BA. No place like home: an experimental comparison of reintroduction strategies using snakes. J Appl Ecol. 2010;47:1253-61.

 

Rouco C, Ferreras P, Castro F, Villafuerte R. A longer confinement period favors European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) survival during soft releases in low-cover habitats. Eur J Wildl Res. 2010;56:215-9.

 

Ryckman MJ, Rosatte RC, McIntosh T, Hamr J, Jenkins D. Postrelease dispersal of reintroduced elk (Cervus elaphus) in Ontario, Canada. Restor Ecol. 2010;18:173-80.

 

Sarrazin F, Bagnolini C, Pinna JL, Danchin E, Clobert J. High survival estimates of griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus fulvus) in a reintroduced population. Auk. 1994;111:853-62.

 

Scott JM, Carpenter JW. Release of captive-reared or translocated endangered birds: what do we need to know? Auk. 1987;104:544-5.

 
Soderquist T. The importance of hypothesis testing in reintroduction biology: examples from the reintroduction of the carnivorous marsupial Phascogale tapoatafa. In: Serena M, editor. Reintroduction biology of Australian and New Zealand fauna. Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty & Sons; 1994. p. 156-64.
 

Stamps JA, Swaisgood RR. Someplace like home: experience, habitat selection and conservation biology. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2007;102:392-409.

 

Sutherland WJ, Armstrong D, Butchart SHM, Earnhardt JM, Ewen J, Jamieson I, Jones CG, Lee R, Newbery P, Nichols JD, Parker KA, Sarrazin F, Seddon PJ, Shah N, Tatayah V. Standards for documenting and monitoring bird reintroduction projects. Conserv Lett. 2010;3:229-35.

 

Tan YM, Wu ZW. Ecological status of taoyuandong national nature reserve. Sci Silva Sin. 2009;45:52-8.

 

Teixeira CP, De Azevedo CS, Mendl M, Cipreste CF, Young RJ. Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programmes: the importance of considering stress. Anim Behav. 2007;73:1-13.

 
Therneau TM, Lumley T. survival: survival analysis, including penalised likelihood. R package version 2.35-8. In: The comprehensive R archive network. 2009. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package%3dsurvival. Accessed 20 Nov 2015.
 

Tordoff HB, Redig PT. Role of genetic background in the success of reintroduced Peregrine Falcons. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:528-32.

 

Wanless RM, Cunningham J, Hockey PAR, Wanless J, White RW, Wiseman R. The success of a soft-release reintroduction of the flightless Aldabra rail (Dryolimnas cuvieri aldabranus) on Aldabra Atoll, Seychelles. Biol Conserv. 2002;107:203-10.

 

Wen ZQ, Zheng GM. Artificial raising and breeding of Cabot's tragopan (Tragopan caboti). Chin J Zool. 1998;33:22-7.

 

Wolf CM, Griffith B, Reed C, Temple SA. Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Conserv Biol. 1996;10:1142-54.

 
WPA, IUCN/SSC RSG. Guidelines for the re-introduction of galliformes for conservation purposes. Gland, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: IUCN, World Pheasant Association; 2009.https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2009.SSC-OP.41.en
 

Young L, Zheng GM, Zhang ZW. Winter movements and habitat use by Cabot's Tragopans Tragopan caboti in southeastern China. Ibis. 1991;133:121-6.

 

Zhang YY, Zheng GM. A population viability analysis (PVA) for Cabot's Tragopan (Tragopan caboti) in Wuyanling, south-east China. Bird Conserv Int. 2007;17:151-61.

 

Zhang YY, Zheng GM, Chang CY, Chen XD, Hao R, Wang Y. A study on the artificial insemination of Cabot's tragopan (Tragopan caboti). J Beijing Normal Univ (Nat Sci). 2002;38:117-22.

 

Zhang YY, Zheng GM, Li Y, Yang M. Preserve the semen of Cabot's tragopan at low temperature. J Beijing Norm Univ (Nat Sci). 2003;39:819-22.

 

Zhang YY. Semen characterization and sperm storage in Cabot's Tragopan. Poult Sci. 2006;85:892-8.

 

Zheng GM, Zhao XR, Song J, Liu ZX, Zhou HQ. Feeding ecology of Cabot's Tragopan. Acta Ecol Sin. 1986;6:283-8.

 

Zheng GM, Wang QS. China Red Data Book of endangered animals: Aves. Beijing: Science Press; 1998.

Avian Research
Article number: 19
Cite this article:
Liu B, Li L, Lloyd H, et al. Comparing post-release survival and habitat use by captive-bred Cabot's Tragopan (Tragopan caboti) in an experimental test of soft-release reintroduction strategies. Avian Research, 2016, 7(1): 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-016-0053-2

549

Views

19

Downloads

12

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

14

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 21 June 2016
Accepted: 12 October 2016
Published: 25 October 2016
© The Author(s) 2016.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return