AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (579.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Waterbird use of farm dams in south-eastern Australia: abundance and influence of biophysical and landscape characteristics

Andrew J. Hamilton1,2,3( )Chloé Conort4Aurore Bueno4Christopher G. Murray5James R. Grove6
Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Dookie Campus, Currawa, VIC 3647, Australia
Office of the Deputy ViceChancellor (Research and Innovation), Federation University Australia, Ballarat, VIC 3353, Australia
Department of Rural Health, Melbourne Medical School, 49 Graham Street, PO Box 6500, Shepparton, VIC 3632, Australia
École Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Toulouse, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

While agriculture has taken much environmental water in Australia's Murray-Darling Basin, agricultural expansion has resulted in a vast number of farm dams, almost three-quarters of a million in the Murray-Darling Basin alone.

Methods

Over a summer we studied (1) waterbird abundance and species richness and (2) the influence of biophysical and landscape characteristics across 49 farm dams at a large mixed-enterprise farm in northern Victoria on the southern reach of the Murray-Darling Basin.

Results

On average, dams were found to host 27.1 ± 71.1 individuals/ha and 1.8 ± 2.9 species per pond. Such densities are comparable to those on natural wetlands. Dam surface area and perimeter and amount of vegetation were positively and strongly correlated with the Rallidae density (birds/ha), but no other parameters were strongly correlated with any other functional group. The landscape in which the dams were embedded had a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) on the number of birds found on a dam.

Conclusions

Our research needs to be complemented with further studies in other parts of the Basin and on other taxa, but given at our site they supported similar densities of individuals and species to natural wetlands, and given the fact that there are 710, 539 farm dams in the Murray-Darling Basin, which hosts much of Australia's waterbird fauna, it is reasonable to suggest that farm dams are overlooked, and possibly very important, avian biodiversity hotspots. It also highlights the importance of a landscape setting, in which dams are situated, on the number of birds using the dams.

References

 
APHA (American Public Health Association), AWWA (American Water Works Association), WEF (Water Environment Federation). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. Washington DC: American Public Health Association. 2005; 10-167.
 

Arthur AD, Reid JRW, Kingsford RT, McGinness HM, Ward KA, Harper MJ. Breeding flow thresholds of colonial breeding waterbirds in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Wetlands. 2012;32:257-65.

 

Blaker D. An outbreak of botulinus poisoning among waterbirds. Ostrich. 1967;38:144-7.

 

Brainwood M, Burgin S. An exploration of the relationships between macroinvertebrate community composition and physical and chemical habitat characteristics in farm dams. Environ Monit Assess. 2006;119:459-80.

 

Brainwood M, Burgin S. Hotspots of biodiversity or homogeneous landscapes? Farm dams as biodiversity reserves in Australia. Biodiv Conserv. 2009;18:3043-52.

 

Brandis KJ, Kingsford RT, Ren S, Ramp D. Crisis water management and ibis breeding at Narran Lakes in arid Australia. Environ Manag. 2011;48:489-98.

 

Buse A. The likelihood ratio, Wald, and Lagrange multiplier tests: an expository note. Amer Statist. 1982;36:153-7.

 
CSIRO. Water availability in the Murray-Darling Basin. A report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray-Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. CSIRO, Australia. 2008.
 
Geddes MC. Understanding zooplankton communities in farm dams: The importance of predation. In: De Decker P, Williams WD, editors. Limnology in Australia. Dordrecht: Dr. W. Junk Publishers; 1986. p. 387-401.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4820-4_24
 

Goodman SN. P values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:485-96.

 

Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics: the P-value fallacy. Ann Int Med. 1999;130:995-1004.

 

Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR. Seasonal patterns in abundance of waterfowl (Anatidae) at a waste-stabilisation pond. Victoria. Corella. 2004;28:38-40.

 

Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR. Distribution of foraging waterbirds throughout the Lake Borrie ponds at the Western Treatment Plant, Victoria (Australia). Vict Nat. 2005;122:68-78.

 

Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR. Notes on diving behaviour of hardhead Aythya australis in a sewage pond. Vict Nat. 2006;123:230-2.

 

Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR, Hepworth G. Activity budgets of waterfowl (Anatidae) on a waste stabilisation pond. Emu. 2002;102:171-9.

 

Hamilton AJ, Taylor IR, Rogers PM. Seasonal and diurnal patterns in abundance of waterbirds at a waste-stabilisation pond in Victoria. Corella. 2004;28:43-54.

 

Hamilton AJ, Robinson W, Taylor IR, Wilson BP. The ecology of sewage treatment gradients in relation to their use by waterbirds. Hydrobiologia. 2005;534:91-108.

 

Hazell D, Cunnningham R, Lindenmayer D, Mackey B, Osborne W. Use of farm dams as frog habitat in an Australian agricultural landscape: factors affecting species richness and distribution. Biol Conserv. 2001;102:155-69.

 
Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC. Multiple comparison procedures. New York: Wiley; 1987.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316672
 
Jordan PW, Wiesenfeld CR, Hill PI, Morden RA, Chiew FHS. An assessment of the future impact of farm dams on runoff in the Murray-Darling Basin. In: Lambert M, Daniell TM, Leonard M, editors. Proceedings of water down under 2008. Modbury: Engineers Australia; 2008. p. 1618-29.
 

Kingsford RT. Maned ducks and farm dams: a success story. Emu. 1992;92:163-9.

 

Kingsford RT. Review: ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecol. 2000;25:109-27.

 

Kingsford RT, Johnson W. Impact of water diversions on colonially nesting waterbirds in the Macquarie Marshes in arid Australia. Colon Waterbirds. 1998;21:159-70.

 
Kingsford RT, Norman FI. Australian waterbirds—products of the continent's ecology. Emu. 2002;102: 47-69.https://doi.org/10.1071/MU01030
 

Kingsford RT, Thomas RF. Destruction of wetlands and waterbird populations by dams and irrigation on the Murrumbidgee River in arid Australia. Environ Manage. 2004;34:383-96.

 
Kingsford RT, Porter JL. Waterbirds and wetlands across Eastern Australia. Technical report prepared for the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia; 2006.
 

Kingsford RT, Jenkins KM, Porter JL. Imposed hydrological stability on lakes in arid Australia and effect on waterbirds. Ecology. 2004;85:2478-92.

 

Kingsford RT, Porter JL, Halse SA. National Waterbird Assessment. Canberra: National Water Commission; 2012.

 

Lake PS, Thomson JR, Lada H, Nally RM, Reid D, Stanaway J, Taylor AC. Diversity and distribution of macroinvertebrates in lentic habitats in massively altered landscapes in south-eastern Australia. Divers Distrib. 2010;16:713-24.

 

Leslie DJ. Effect of river management on colonially-nesting waterbirds in the Barmah-Millewa forest, South-Eastern Australia. River Res Appl. 2001;17:21-36.

 

Lowe L, Nathan R, Morden R. Assessing the impact of farm dams on streamflows, Part Ⅱ: regional characterisation. Aust J Water Res. 2005;9:13-26.

 
Marchant S, Higgins PJ. Handbook of Australian, New Zealand & Antarctic Birds. Ratites to Ducks, vol. 1. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1990.
 
MDBA (Murray-Darling Basin Authority). Guide to the proposed Basin Plan: Technical background. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Authority; 2010.
 
MDBC (Murray-Darling Basin Commission). Shared water resources: mapping the growth, location, surface area and age of man made water bodies, including farm dams, in the Murray-Darling Basin. Canberra: Australian Capital Territory; 2008.
 

Merendino MT, Ankney CD. Habitat use by mallards and American black ducks breeding in central Ontario. Condor. 1994;96:411-21.

 

Murray CG, Hamilton AJ. Perspectives on wastewater treatment wetlands and waterbird conservation. J Appl Ecol. 2010;47:976-85.

 

Murray CG, Loyn RH, Kasel S, Hepworth G, Stamation K, Hamilton AJ. What can a database compiled over 22 years tell us about the use of different types of wetlands by waterfowl in south-eastern Australian summers? Emu. 2012;112:209-17.

 

Murray CG, Kasel S, Loyn RH, Hepworth G, Hamilton AJ. Waterbird use of artificial wetlands in an Australian urban landscape. Hydrobiologia. 2013;76:131-46.

 

Murray CG, Kasel S, Szantyr E, Barratt R, Hamilton AJ. Waterbird use of different treatment stages in waste-stabilisation pond systems. Emu. 2014;114:30-40.

 

Nathan R, Jorden P, Morden R. Assessing the impact of farm dams on streamflows, Part Ⅰ: development of simulation tools. Aust J Water Res. 2005;9:1-12.

 

Patterson HD, Thompson R. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika. 1971;58:545-54.

 

Patton DR. A diversity index for quantifying habitat "edge". Wildlife Soc Bull. 1975;3:171-3.

 

Powell GVN. Habitat use by wading birds in a subtropical estuary: implications of hydrography. Auk. 1987;104:740-9.

 

Ren S, Kingsford RT. Statistically integrated flow and flood modelling compared to hydrologically integrated quantity and quality model for annual flows in the regulated Macquarie River in arid Australia. Environ Manag. 2011;48:177-88.

 

Rocke TE, Samuel MD. Water and sediment characteristics associated with avian botulism outbreaks in wetlands. J Wildl Manag. 1999;63:1249-60.

 

Rocke TE, Euliss NH Jr, Samuel MD. Environmental characteristics associated with the occurrence of avian botulism in wetlands of a northern California refuge. J Wildl Manag. 1999;63:358-68.

 

Schreider SY, Jakeman AJ, Letcher RA, Nathan RJ, Neal BP, Beavis SG. Detecting changes in streamflow response to changes in non-climatic catchment conditions: farm dam development in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia. J Hydrol. 2002;262:84-98.

 
SKM (Sinclair Knight Merz). Background report: Farm dam interception in the Campaspe Basin under climate change. A working paper for the Draft Northern Region Sustainable Water Strategy. Malvern, Australia: Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd.; 2008.
 

Ury HK. A comparison of four procedures for multiple comparisons among means (pairwise contrasts) for arbitrary sample sizes. Technometrics. 1976;18:89-97.

 
Williams B. Water bird numbers take off as wetlands fill Lake Eyre and Murray-Darling river basin after floods. The Courier Mail. 2011. http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/national/bird-numbers-take-off-as-wetlands-fill/story-e6freooo-1226225288284.
Avian Research
Article number: 2
Cite this article:
J. Hamilton A, Conort C, Bueno A, et al. Waterbird use of farm dams in south-eastern Australia: abundance and influence of biophysical and landscape characteristics. Avian Research, 2017, 8(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-016-0058-x

806

Views

15

Downloads

9

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

10

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 28 September 2016
Accepted: 06 December 2016
Published: 19 January 2017
© The Author(s) 2017.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return