AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

The phylogeny of francolins (Francolinus, Dendroperdix, Peliperdix and Scleroptila)and spurfowls (Pternistis) based on chick plumage (Galliformes: Phasianidae)

Johann H van Niekerk1( )Tshifhiwa G Mandiwana-Neudani2
Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of South Africa, PO Box 392, Pretoria 0003, South Africa
Department of Biodiversity, University of Limpopo, Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, South Africa
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

This paper describes the chick plumage of spurfowl (Pternistis) and francolin (Francolinus, Dendroperdix, Peliperdix and Scleroptila) chicks, tests its signifcance for phylogenetic relationships and also explores the patterns of character evolution in the francolin and spurfowl lineages. Previously regarded as monophyletic, the two evolutionarily distant clades are now divided into fve genera. Questions considered were whether chick plumage supports the dichotomy between spurfowls and francolins and what role habitat matching plays.

Methods

The study was based mainly on photographs of chick skins from the American Museum of Natural History and the Natural History Museum at Tring. Eight plumage characters were selected for comparative scoring, summarised in a matrix. These characters were subsequently analysed phylogenetically and their evolution was traced on the existing molecular phylogeny using a parsimony approach.

Results

Based on chick plumage the phylogeny of species groups among francolins and spurfowls, was largely unresolved possibly ascribed to a high degree of symplesiomorphy inherent among the Phasianids. This possibly could have resulted in a high degree of polytomy particularly among the spurfowls and francolins. Furthermore, the ancestral state reconstructions revealed high prevalence of symplesiomorphic states and reversals which do not help in the classifcation of groups. Although the dierences are described that separate some African francolins from spurfowls, other francolins (in Asia and Africa) share remarkably similar characteristics with spurfowls. Plain dark dorsal plumage is probably advantageous for avoiding detection by predators in forests, while facial stripes optimise the breaking of body shapes in dense grass cover (as in Scleroptila spp.) and semistriped faces are advantageous for stationary camouage under tree and bush cover (as in Pternistis spp.).

Conclusions

Although symplesiomorphy is a hereditary explanation for downy colours and patterns, the traits relevant for habitat matching are combined in a manner which is determined (adaptation) by natural selection.

References

 

Berruti A. The AGRED guide to gamebird management in South Africa. Houghton: AGRED; 2011.

 

Bertelli S, Norberto PG, Golobof PA. A phylogeny of the tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathiformes) based on integumentary characters. Syst Biol. 2002;51:959-79.

 

Bloomer P, Crowe TM. Francolin phylogenetics: molecular, morphobehavioral, and combined evidence. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998;9:236-54.

 

Caro T. Antipredator deception in terrestrial vertebrates. Curr Zool. 2014;60:16-25.

 

Crowe TM, Little RM. Francolins, partridges and spurfowls: what's in a name? Ostrich. 2004;75:199-203.

 

Crowe TM, Keith GS, Brown LH. Galliformes in birds of Africa, vol. ii. London: Academic Press; 1986.

 

Crowe TM, Harley EH, Jakutowicz MB, Komen J, Crowe AA. Phylogenetic, taxonomic and biogeographical implications of genetic, morphological, and behavioural variation in francolins (Phasianidae: Francolinus). Auk. 1992;109:24-42.

 

Crowe TM, Bowie RCK, Bloomer P, Mandiwana TG, Hedderson TAJ, Randi E, Pereira SL, Wakeling J. Phylogenetics, biogeography and classification of, and character evolution in, gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes): Effects of character exclusion, data partitioning and missing data. Cladistics. 2006;22:1-38.

 

Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the Bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783-91.

 

Frost PGH. The systematic position of the Madagascan Partridge Magaroperdix madagascariensis (Scopoli). Bull Br Ornithol Club. 1975;95:64-8.

 
Gill F, Donsker D, editors. IOC world bird list (v 7.2); 2017. https://doi.org/10.14344/ioc.ml.7.2.
 

Hall BP. The francolins, a study in speciation. Bull Br Mus. 1963;10:107-204.

 

Jehl JR. The colour patterns of downy young ratites and tinamous. Trans Soc Nat Hist San Diego. 1971;16:291-302.

 
Johnsgard PA. Molts and plumages. Grouse and quails of North America. Papers in the Biological Sciences. Lincoln: University of Nebraska; 2008.
 

Komen J. Preliminary observations of the social patterns, behaviour and vocalisation of Hartlaub's Francolin. S Afr J Wildl Res Suppl. 1987;1:82-6.

 

Lewis PO. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst Biol. 2001;50:913-25.

 

Little R. Terrestrial gamebirds & snipes of Africa. Johannesburg: Jacana Media; 2016.

 

Little RM, Crowe TM. The use of morphometrics and development of plumage in estimating the growth patterns and age of greywing francolin Francolinus africanus. Ostrich. 1992;63:172-9.

 

Little R, Crowe T. Gamebirds of Southern Africa. Cape Town: Struik; 2011.

 

Livezey BC. A phylogenetic analysis and classification of recent dabbling ducks (tribe Anatini) based on comparative morphology. Auk. 1991;108:471-507.

 

Maddison DR. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most parsimonious trees. Syst Biol. 1991;40:315-28.

 
Maddison WP and Maddison DR. Mesquite: a modular system for 3.2. http://mesquiteproject.org. 2017. Accessed 11 Sept 2017.
 

Madge S, McGowan P. Pheasants, partridges and grouse. London: Christopher Helm; 2002.

 

Mandiwana-Neudani TG, Kopuchian C, Louw G, Crowe TM. A study of gross morphological and histological syringeal features of true francolins (Galliformes: Francolinus, Scleroptila, Peliperdix and Dendroperdix spp.) and spurfowls (Pternistis spp.) in a phylogenetic context. Ostrich. 2011;82:115-27.

 

Mandiwana-Neudani TG, Bowie RCK, Hausberger M, Henry LM, Crowe TM. Taxonomic and phylogenetic utility of variation in advertising calls of francolins and spurfowls (Galliformes: Phasianidae). Afr Zool. 2014;49:54-82.

 

Merilaita S, Lind J. Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration. Proc R Soc B. 2005;2005(272):665-70.

 

Mills MG, Patterson LB. Not just white and black: pigment pattern development and evolution in vertebrate. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20:72-81.

 

Milstein P le S, Wolff SW. The oversimplification of our francolins. S Afr J Wildl Res. 1987;1:58-65.

 

Paxton EH. The utility of plumage coloration for taxonomic and ecological studies. Open Ornithol J. 2009;2:17-23.

 

Peichel CL. Genetics of phenotypic evolution. In: Losos J, editor. Guide to evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014. p. 452-7.

 

Short LL Jr. A review of the genera of grouse (Aves, Tetraoninae). American Museum novitates; No. 2289. New York: American Museum of Natural History; 1967.

 

Stevens M, Merilaita S. Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2008;364:423-7.

 

Swofford DL. PAUP*: analysis using parsimony. Version 4. Sunderland: Sinaeur Associates; 2002.

 

Van Niekerk JH. Vocal structure behaviour and partitioning of all 23 Pternistis spp. into homologous sound (and monophyletic) groups. Chin Birds. 2013;4:210-31.

 

Vázquez DP, Gittleman JL. Biodiversity conservation: does phylogeny matter? Curr Biol. 1998;8:379-81.

 

Whetherbee DK. Natal plumages and downy pteryloses of passerine birds of North America. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 1957;113:343-436.

Avian Research
Article number: 2
Cite this article:
van Niekerk JH, Mandiwana-Neudani TG. The phylogeny of francolins (Francolinus, Dendroperdix, Peliperdix and Scleroptila)and spurfowls (Pternistis) based on chick plumage (Galliformes: Phasianidae). Avian Research, 2018, 9(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-017-0093-2

556

Views

12

Downloads

4

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

3

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 22 May 2017
Accepted: 11 December 2017
Published: 08 January 2018
© The Author(s) 2018.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return