AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (758.6 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Seasonal change in sexual differences in nestling size and survival: a framework to evaluate sex-dependent environmental sensitivity in the wild

Daisuke Nomi1( )Teru Yuta2Itsuro Koizumi3
Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Center for Toki and Ecological Restoration, Niigata University, Sado, Niigata, Japan
Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) occurs in a wide range of species in birds and other animals, but the magnitude of SSD often varies with environmental conditions. In general, in the developmental stages, the larger sex is more vulnerable to adverse environmental conditions because the larger sex requires more energy than the smaller sex. However, this may not hold true for birds with large brood sizes; the larger sex can acquire more food by suppressing the smaller sex. In addition, most previous studies have been experimental, such as by manipulating clutch size and ectoparasites, which may not reflect natural conditions.

Methods

In the present study, we propose a general framework to assess sexual differences in environmental sensitivity in natural populations. Because environmental conditions change throughout the breeding season, seasonal changes of nestling SSD and sex ratio should reflect sexual differences in environmental sensitivity. We applied this approach to a large dataset (1555 nestlings over 5 years) of Japanese Tits (Parus minor). In this population, the male nestling is generally larger than the female (5% SSD in body weight).

Results

We found that the magnitude of SSD (weight, tarsus, wing) and fledgling sex ratio increased both in the beginning and the end of the breeding season.

Conclusion

Our study suggested that female nestlings are more valuable to poor environmental conditions in the relatively fecund species. This study underscores the importance of brood size on sexual differences in environmental stochasticity and our framework encourages comparative analysis among different bird species.

References

 

Benito MM, Gonzalez-Solis J. Sex ratio, sex-specific chick mortality and sexual size dimorphism in birds. J Evol Biol. 2007;20:1522–30.

 

Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Berlin: Springer; 2002.

 

Caro SM, Griffin AS, Hinde CA, West SA. Unpredictable environments lead to the evolution of parental neglect in birds. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10985.

 

Chin EH, Love OP, Clark AM, Williams TD. Brood size and environmental conditions sex-specifically affect nestling immune response in the European starling Sturnus vulgaris. J Avian Biol. 2005;36:549–54.

 

Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE. Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals. Nature. 1985;313:131–3.

 

Dietrich-Bischoff V, Schmoll T, Winkel W, Lubjuhn T. Variation in the magnitude of sexual size dimorphism in nestling Coal tits (Periparus ater). J Ornithol. 2008;149:565–77.

 

Dhondt AA. The sex ratio of nestling great tits. Bird Study. 1970;17:282–6.

 

Dubiec A, Cichoń M, Deptuch K. Sex-specific development of cell-mediated immunity under experimentally altered rearing conditions in blue tit nestlings. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2006;273:1759–64.

 

Eeva T, Sillanpää S, Lehikoinen E. Metal pollution does not bias offspring sex ratio in great tit (Parus major). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2012;19:2870–8.

 

García-Navas V, Sanz JJ. The importance of a main dish: nestling diet and foraging behaviour in Mediterranean blue tits in relation to prey phenology. Oecologia. 2011;165:639–49.

 

Garnett MC. Body size, its heritability and influence on juvenile survival among Great Tits Parus major. Ibis. 1981;123:31–41.

 

Greenwood PJ. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav. 1980;28:1140–62.

 

Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol. 1998;7:1071–5.

 

Jones KS, Nakagawa S, Sheldon BC. Environmental sensitivity in relation to size and sex in birds: meta-regression analysis. Am Nat. 2009;174:122–33.

 
Kalmbach E, Benito MM. Sexual size dimorphism and offspring vulnerability in birds. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Szekely T, editors. Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 133–42.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.003.0015
 

Lindström J. Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999;14:343–8.

 

Murakami M. Foraging mode shifts of four insectivorous bird species under temporally varying resource distribution in a Japanese deciduous forest. Ornithol Sci. 2002;1:63–9.

 

Monaghan P. Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B. 2008;363:1635–45.

 

Naef-Daenzer B, Keller LF. The foraging performance of great and blue tits (Parus major and P. caeruleus) in relation to caterpillar development, and its consequences for nestling growth and fledging weight. J Anim Ecol. 1999;68:708–18.

 

Nicolaus M, Michler SP, Ubels R, Van Der Velde M, Komdeur J, Both C, Tinbergen JM. Sex-specific effects of altered competition on nestling growth and survival: an experimental manipulation of brood size and sex ratio. J Anim Ecol. 2009;78:414–26.

 

Nilsson JÅ, Gårdmark A. Sibling competition affects individual growth strategies in marsh tit, Parus palustris, nestlings. Anim Behav. 2001;61:357–65.

 

Nomi D, Yuta T, Koizumi I. Offspring sex ratio of Japanese tits Parus minor is related to laying date and clutch size only in the first clutches. Acta Ornithol. 2015;50:213–20.

 

O'Brien RM. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant. 2007;41:673–90.

 

Oddie KR. Size matters: competition between male and female great tit offspring. J Anim Ecol. 2000;69:903–12.

 

Poelman EH, Mateman AC, Cassey P. Consistent feeding positions of great tit parents. Anim Behav. 2006;72:1249–57.

 

Potti J, Dávila JA, Tella JL, Frías ó, Villar S. Gender and viability selection on morphology in fledgling pied flycatchers. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:1317–26.

 

Råberg L, Stjernman M, Nilsson JA. Sex and environmental sensitivity in blue tit nestlings. Oecologia. 2005;145:496–503.

 
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. http://www.R-project.org/.
 

Robinson C, Schumacker RE. Interaction effects: centering, variance inflation factor, and interpretation issues. Mult Linear Regres Viewp. 2009;35:6–11.

 

Royama T. Factors governing feeding rates, food requirement and brood size of nestling great tits Parus major. Ibis. 1966;108:313–47.

 

Sandell M, Smith HG. Dominance, prior occupancy, and winter residency in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1991;29:147–52.

 

Teather KL, Weatherhead PJ. Sex-specific mortality in nestling great-tailed grackles. Ecology. 1989;70:1485–93.

 

Theofanellis T, Galinou E, Akriotis T. The role of hatching asynchrony in brood size reduction of the great tit Parus major in a Mediterranean pine forest. J Nat Hist. 2008;42:375–80.

 

Trivers RL, Willard DE. Natural-selection of parental ability to vary sex-ratio of offspring. Science. 1973;179:90–2.

 

Tschirren B, Fitze PS, Richner H. Sexual dimorphism in susceptibility to parasites and cell-mediated immunity in great tit nestlings. J Anim Ecol. 2003;72:839–45.

 

Verboven N, Tinbergen JM, Verhulst S. Food, reproductive success and multiple breeding in the Great Tit, Parus major. Ardea. 2001;89:387–406.

 

Yoshida K. Seasonal population trends of macrolepidopterous larvae on oak trees in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Kontyu. 1985;53:125–33.

 

Yuta T, Koizumi I. Long breeding season and high frequency of multiple brooding in Great tits in northern Japan. Ardea. 2012;100:197–201.

 

Yuta T, Koizumi I. Does nest predation risk affect the frequency of extra-pair paternity in a socially monogamous passerine? J Avian Biol. 2016;47:153–8.

Avian Research
Article number: 10
Cite this article:
Nomi D, Yuta T, Koizumi I. Seasonal change in sexual differences in nestling size and survival: a framework to evaluate sex-dependent environmental sensitivity in the wild. Avian Research, 2018, 9(1): 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0102-0

546

Views

11

Downloads

3

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 23 September 2017
Accepted: 08 March 2018
Published: 19 March 2018
© The Author(s) 2018.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return