AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (639.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Food preferences by birds using bird-feeders in winter: a large-scale experiment

Piotr Tryjanowski1( )Anders Pape Møller2Federico Morelli3Piotr Indykiewicz4Piotr Zduniak5Łukasz Myczko1
Institute of Zoology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71C, 60-625 Poznan, Poland
Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
Department of Applied Geoinformatics and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycká 129, 165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic
Department of Zoology and Landscaping, University of Technology and Life Sciences, Ks. A. Kordeckiego 20, 85-225 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Department of Avian Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Intentional winter bird feeding in gardens is one of the most common interactions between birds and humans. Because feeding may have both desired effects (provisioning of nutritious food for under-nourished birds) and undesired effects (favouritism of competitively superior species, transmission of disease), management of supplementary sites should be optimized from an ecological and conservation perspective. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to experimentally test winter food preferences of birds, with underlying potential influence of habitat (rural vs. urban) on realised food preferences pattern.

Methods

We conducted an experimental analysis of food preferences of wintering birds by provided bird-feeders in urban and rural environments across Poland. Data were collected twice during winter 2013–2014 across Poland, in total with 80 experimental trials.

Results

Sunflower seeds were the most preferred food supplement both in urban and rural habitats, significantly more exploited than any other food simultaneously available in feeders (animal fat, millet seed and dry fruits of rowanberry). However, no significant differences were recorded between urban and rural habitats in use of food.

Conclusions

The degree of use of a particular type of food at bird-feeders depended on the overall use of food in a bird-feeder-consumption of each of the four types of food was significantly positively correlated with that of the others, and it was positively correlated with the number of birds observed at the feeders.

References

 

Buczacki S. Garden natural history. London: Collins; 2007.

 

Carney SE, Gardner KA, Rieseberg LH. Evolutionary changes over the fifty-year history of a hybrid population of sunflowers (Helianthus). Evolution. 2000;54:462–74.

 

Cox DTC, Gaston KJ. Likeability of garden birds: importance of species knowledge and richness in connecting people to nature. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0141505.

 

Cowie RJ, Hinsley SA. The provision of food and the use of bird feeders in suburban gardens. Bird Study. 1988;35:163–8.

 

Dunn EH, Tessaglia-Hymes DL. Birds at your feeder: a guide to feeding habits, behavior, distribution and abundance. New York: WW Norton & Company; 2001.

 

Galbraith JA, Beggs JR, Jones DN, Stanley MC. Supplementary feeding restructures urban bird communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:2648–57.

 

Galbraith JA, Beggs JR, Jones DN, McNaughton EJ, Krull CR, Stanley MC. Risks and drivers of wild bird feeding in urban areas of New Zealand. Biol Conserv. 2014;180:64–74.

 

Gavett A, Wakeley JS. Diets of house sparrows in urban and rural habitats. Wilson Bull. 1986;98:137–44.

 

Goławski A, Polakowski M, Filimowski P, Stępniewska K, Stępniewski K, Kiljan G, Kilon K. Factors influencing the fat load variation in three wintering bird species under the stable food. J Ethol. 2015;33:205–11.

 

Jones DN, Reynolds SJ. Feeding birds in our towns and cities: a global research opportunity. J Avian Biol. 2008;39:265–71.

 

Krystofková M, Fousová P, Exnerová A. Nestling diet of the Common Magpie (Pica pica) in urban and agricultural habitats. Ornis Fennica. 2011;88:138–46.

 

Lott DF. Feeding wild animals: the urge, the interaction, and the consequences. Anthrozoös. 1988;1:255–7.

 

Ockendon N, Davis SE, Miyar T, Toms MP. Urbanization and time of arrival of common birds at garden feeding stations. Bird Study. 2009;56:405–10.

 

Orros ME, Fellowes MDE. Wild bird feeding in an urban area: intensity, economics and numbers of individuals supported. Acta Ornithol. 2015;50:43–58.

 

Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B, Sowden PT. Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. J Environ Psychol. 2013;36:221–8.

 

Robb GN, McDonald RA, Chamberlain DE, Bearhop S. Food for thought: supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian populations. Front Ecol Environ. 2008;6:476–84.

 

Tryjanowski P, Skórka P, Sparks TH, Biaduń W, Brauze T, Hetmański T, Martyka R, Indykiewicz P, Myczko Ł, Kunysz P, Kawa P, Czyż S, Czechowski P, Polakowski M, Zduniak P, Jerzak L, Janiszewski T, Goławski A, Duduś L, Nowakowski JJ, Wuczyński A, Wysocki D. Urban and rural habitats differ in number and type of bird feeders and in bird species consuming supplementary food. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015a;22:15097–103.

 

Tryjanowski P, Sparks TH, Biaduń W, Brauze T, Hetmański T, Martyka R, Skórka P, Indykiewicz P, Myczko Ł, Kunysz P, Kawa P, Czyż S, Czechowski P, Polakowski M, Zduniak P, Jerzak L, Janiszewski T, Goławski A, Duduś L, Nowakowski JJ, Wuczyński A, Wysocki D. Winter bird assemblages in rural and urban environments: a national survey. PLoS ONE. 2015b;10:e0130299.

 

Tryjanowski P, Morelli F, Skórka P, Goławski A, Indykiewicz P, Møller AP, Mitrus C, Wysocki D, Zduniak P. Who started first? Bird species visiting novel birdfeeders. Sci Rep. 2015c;5:11858.

 

Tvardíková K, Fuchs R. Tits recognize the potential dangers of predators and harmless birds in feeder experiments. J Ethol. 2012;30:157–65.

 

Von Post M, Stjernman M, Smith HG. Effects of supplemental winter feeding on house sparrows (Passer domesticus) in relation to landscape structure and farming systems in southern Sweden. Bird Study. 2013;60:238–46.

 

Whelan CJ, Brown JS, Hank AE. Diet preference in the House Sparrow Passer domesticus: hooked on millet? Bird Study. 2015;62:569–73.

 

Wilcoxen TE, Horn DJ, Hogan BM, Hubble CN, Huber SJ, Flamm J, Knott M, Lundstrom L, Salik F, Wassenhove SJ, Wrobel ER. Effects of bird-feeding activities on the health of wild birds. Conserv Physiol. 2015;3(1):cov058.

 

Wojczulanis-Jakubas K, Kulpińska M, Minias P. Who bullies whom at a garden feeder? Interspecific agonistic interactions of small passerines during a cold winter. J Ethol. 2015;33:159–63.

Avian Research
Article number: 16
Cite this article:
Tryjanowski P, Møller AP, Morelli F, et al. Food preferences by birds using bird-feeders in winter: a large-scale experiment. Avian Research, 2018, 9(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0111-z

813

Views

39

Downloads

18

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

18

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 13 November 2017
Accepted: 16 May 2018
Published: 18 May 2015
© The Author(s) 2018.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return