AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (780 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Park size and prey density limit occurrence of Eurasian Sparrowhawks in urban parks during winter

Claudia Schütz( )Christian H. Schulze
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Eurasian Sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) increasingly represent successful city-dwellers. Thereby, a rich food supply indicated by high numbers of small birds is to be the key driver for this bird-eating raptor species to settle in urban environments. However, as small passerine birds show particularly strong antipredator responses, sparrowhawks may not simply focus on patches of highest prey densities, but rather respond strategically to prey behavior, raising the importance of other parameters in determining the occurrence within urban landscapes.

Methods

To deepen our knowledge on habitat requirements of urban sparrowhawks, bird surveys were carried out during winter between December 2005 and January 2017 in 36 city parks in Vienna, Austria. Besides food supply also park size, canopy heterogeneity and the connectivity with other green spaces were considered.

Results

Occurrence of sparrowhawks was positively affected by increasing park size, prey density and the interaction between both. Bird feeder density and park connectivity with other green spaces were of minor importance in explaining the presence of this species. Canopy heterogeneity didn't affect city park occupancy by Eurasian Sparrowhawks.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that large city parks, particularly when characterized by high prey densities, substantially contribute to protect and preserve ecologically important bird species such as raptors within the urban environment—a landscape already struggling with biodiversity losses and functional homogenization.

References

 

Abe F, Hasegawa O, Kudo T, Higashi S. Nest-site selection of Northern Goshawks and Eurasian Sparrowhawks in a fragmented landscape in Northern Japan. J Raptor Res. 2007;41:299-306.

 
Barton K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference R package version 1.13.4. 2016. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn. Accessed 16 April 2018.
 

Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65:23-35.

 
Calcagno V. Glmulti: Model selection and multimodel inference made easy R package version 1.0.7. 2013. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=glmulti. Accessed 16 April 2018.
 

Chace JF, Walsh JJ. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan. 2006;74:46-69.

 
City of Vienna. Vienna GIS. 2018. http://www.wien.gv.at/viennagis. Accessed 16 April 2018.
 

Cresswell W. Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, Peregrines Falco peregrinus and Merlins F. columbarius. Ibis. 1996;138:684-92.

 

Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D, Lee A, Jiguet F. Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conserv Biol. 2007;21:741-51.

 
Dunning JB. CRC handbook of avian body masses. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2008.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420064452
 

Fernández-Juricic E. Local and regional effects of pedestrians on forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Condor. 2000;102:247-55.

 

Fernández-Juricic E. Avian spatial segregation at edges and interiors of urban parks in Madrid, Spain. Biodivers Conserv. 2001;10:1303-16.

 

Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M. Responses by breeding birds to heterospecific song and mobbing call playbacks under varying predation risk. Anim Behav. 2001;62:1067-73.

 

Fuller RA, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Barbosa O, Gaston KJ. Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban assemblages. Divers Distrib. 2008;14:131-7.

 

Gahbauer MA, Bird DM, Clark KE, French T, Brauning DW, McMorris FA. Productivity, mortality, and management of urban Peregrine Falcons in northeastern North America. J Wildl Manag. 2015;79:10-9.

 
Gartland L. Heat islands. Understanding and mitigating heat in urban areas. London: Earthscan; 2011.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849771559
 

Götmark F, Post P. Prey selection by Sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus: relative predation risk for breeding passerine birds in relation to their size, ecology and behavior. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1996;351:1559-77.

 

Hogstad O. Alarm calling by willow tits, Parus montanus, as mate investment. Anim Behav. 1995;49:221-5.

 

Jokimäki J, Suhonen J. Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landsc Urban Plan. 1998;39:253-63.

 

Kang W, Minor ES, Park C-R, Lee D. Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities. Urban Ecosyst. 2015;18:857-70.

 

Kettel EF, Gentle LK, Quinn JL, Yarnell RW. The breeding performance of raptors in urban landscapes: a review and meta-analysis. J Ornithol. 2018;159:1-18.

 

Kunca T, Yosef R. Differential nest-defense to perceived danger in urban and rural areas by female Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus). PeerJ. 2016;4:e2070.

 

Lima SL. Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:70-5.

 

Lin W, Lin A, Lin J, Wang Y, Tseng H. Breeding performance of Crested Goshawk Accipiter trivirgatus in urban and rural environments of Taiwan. Bird Study. 2015;62:177-84.

 
McGrady MJ. Ecology and breeding behaviours of urban Sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) in Edinburgh, Scotland. Ph.D. thesis. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh; 1991.
 

McKinney ML. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv. 2006;127:247-60.

 

Møller AP. Urban areas as refuges from predators and flight distance of prey. Behav Ecol. 2012;23:1030-5.

 

Moudrá L, Zasadil P, Moudrý V, Šálek M. What makes new housing development unsuitable for house sparrows (Passer domesticus)? Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;169:124-30.

 
Newton I. The Sparrowhawk. London: A & C Black; 2010.
 

Nielsen AB, van den Bosch M, Maruthaveeran S, van den Bosch CK. Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review. Urban Ecosyst. 2014;17:305-27.

 
Ortlieb R. Die Sperber: Accipitridae. 4th ed. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akad. Verl; 1995.
 

Papp S. Breeding of Eurasian Sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) in two Hungarian towns. Aquila. 2011;18:49-54.

 

Pulliam HR. On the advantages of flocking. J Theor Biol. 1973;38:419-22.

 
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2014. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 16 April 2018.
 

Roth TC II, Lima SL. Use of prey hotspots by an avian predator: purposeful unpredictability? Am Nat. 2007;169:264-73.

 

Roth TC II, Lima SL, Vetter WE. Determinants of predation risk in small wintering birds: the hawk's perspective. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2006;60:195-204.

 

Roth TC II, Vetter WE, Lima SL. Spatial ecology of wintering Accipiter hawks: home range, habitat use, and the influence of bird feeders. Condor. 2008;110:260-8.

 

Rutz C. Post-fledging dispersal of Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis in an urban environment. Vogelwelt. 2003;124:93-101.

 

Rutz C. Home range, habitat use, activity patterns and hunting behavior of urban-breeding Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis. Ardea. 2006;94:185-202.

 

Rutz C. The establishment of an urban bird population. J Anim Ecol. 2008;77:1008-19.

 

Schielzeth H. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol Evol. 2010;1:103-13.

 

Schütz C, Schulze CH. Functional diversity of urban bird communities: effects of landscape composition, green space area and vegetation cover. Ecol Evol. 2015;5:5230-9.

 

Sekercioglu CH. Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21:464-71.

 

Selås V. Selection of avian prey by breeding Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus in southern Norway: the importance of size and foraging behavior of prey. Ornis Fennica. 1993;70:144-54.

 

Sridhar H, Beauchamp G, Shanker K. Why do birds participate in mixed-species foraging flocks? A large-scale synthesis. Anim Behav. 2009;78:337-47.

 
Statistics Austria. The federal provinces. 2017. http://www.statistik.at/web_en/classifications/regional_breakdown/federal_provinces_laender/index.html. Accessed 16 April 2018.
 

Sumasgutner P, Schulze CH, Krenn HW, Gamauf A. Conservation related conflicts in nest-site selection of the Eurasian Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) and the distribution of its avian prey. Landsc Urban Plan. 2014;127:94-103.

 

Suri J, Sumasgutner P, Hellard E, Koeslag A, Amar A. Stability in prey abundance may buffer Black Sparrowhawks Accipiter melanoleucus from health impacts of urbanization. Ibis. 2017;159:38-54.

 

Symonds MRE, Moussalli A. A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike´s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65:13-21.

 
Tella JL, Hiraldo F, Donázar-Sancho JA, Negro JJ. Costs and benefits of urban nesting in the Lesser Kestrel. In: Bird DM, Varland DE, Negro JJ, editors. Raptors in human landscapes: adaptations to built and cultivated environments. London: Academic Press; 1996. p. 53-60.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012100130-8/50009-2
 

Templeton CN, Zollinger SA, Brumm H. Traffic noise drowns out great tit alarm calls. Curr Biol. 2016;26:R1173-4.

 

Thornton M, Todd I, Roos S. Breeding success and productivity of urban and rural Eurasian Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus in Scotland. Écoscience. 2017;24:115-26.

Avian Research
Article number: 30
Cite this article:
Schütz C, Schulze CH. Park size and prey density limit occurrence of Eurasian Sparrowhawks in urban parks during winter. Avian Research, 2018, 9(1): 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0122-9

853

Views

23

Downloads

12

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

14

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 10 January 2018
Accepted: 10 September 2018
Published: 20 September 2018
© The Author(s) 2018.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return