AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (873.6 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Exotic parrots breeding in urban tree cavities: nesting requirements, geographic distribution, and potential impacts on cavity nesting birds in southeast Florida

Joshua M. Diamond ( )Michael S. Ross
Florida International University, Earth & Environment, Miami, FL 33199, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Exotic parrots have established breeding populations in southeast Florida,including several species that nest in tree cavities. We aimed to determine the species identity,nest site requirements,relative nest abundance,geographic distribution,and interactions of parrots with native cavity-nesting bird species.

Methods

We searched Miami-Dade County,Florida,and nearby areas for natural cavities and holes excavated by woodpeckers,recording attributes of potential nest trees. We inspected all cavities with an elevated video inspection system to determine occupancy by parrots or other birds. We mapped nearly 4000 citizen science observations of parrots in our study area corresponding to our study period,and used these to construct range maps,comparing them to our nesting observations.

Results

Not all parrots reported or observed in our study area were actively breeding. Some parrots were observed at tree cavities,which previous studies have suggested is evidence of reproduction,but our inspections with an elevated video inspection system suggest they never initiated nesting attempts. Several parrot species did successfully nest in tree cavities,Red-masked Parakeets (Psittacara erythrogenys) and Orange-winged Parrots (Amazona amazonica) being the most common (n = 7 and 6 nests,respectively). These two parrots had similar nesting requirements,but Orange-winged Parrots use nests with larger entrance holes,which they often enlarge. Geographic analysis of nests combined with citizen science data indicate that parrots are limited to developed areas. The most common parrots were less abundant cavity nesters than the native birds which persist in Miami's urban areas,and far less abundant than the invasive European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris).

Conclusions

Exotic parrots breeding elsewhere in the world have harmed native cavity-nesting birds through interference competition,but competitive interference in southeast Florida is minimized by the urban affinities of parrots in this region. The relative abundance and geographic distribution suggest that these parrots are unlikely to invade adjacent wilderness areas.

References

 

Alonso J, Heinen JT. Miami Dade County's environmentally endangered lands program: local efforts for a global cause. Nat Areas J. 2011;31:183-9.

 
Avery ML, Moulton MP. Florida's non-native avifauna. Manag Vertebr Invasive Species, USDA Natl Wildl Res Cent Symp. 2007. p. 365-77.
 

Berkunsky I, Daniele G, Kacoliris FP, Díaz-Luque JA, Silva Frias CP, Aramburu RM, et al. Reproductive parameters in the critically endangered blue-throated Macaw: limits to the recovery of a parrot under intensive management. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1-7.

 

Blackburn TM, Cassey P. Patterns of non-randomness in the exotic avifauna of Florida. Divers Distrib. 2007;13:519-26.

 
Blackburn TM, Lockwood JL, Cassey P. Avian invasions: the ecology & evolution of exotic birds. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232543.001.0001
 

Blanc LA, Walters JR. Cavity-nest webs in a longleaf pine ecosystem. Condor. 2008;110:80-92.

 

Blewett CM, Marzluff JM. Effects of urban sprawl on snags and the abundance and productivity of cavity-nesting birds. Condor. 2005;107:678-93.

 

Brightsmith DJ. Parrot nesting in southeastern Peru: seasonal patterns and keystone trees. Wilson Bull. 2005;117:296-305.

 
Cameron M. Parrots: the animal answer guide. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2012.
 
Clements SL, Catania SVL, Searcy CA. Non-native species dominate herpetofaunal community patterns in both native and non-native habitat patches in urban Miami-Dade County. Biol Invasions. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-01934-w.
 

Cornelius C, Cockle K, Politi N, Berkunsky I, Sandoval L, Ojeda V, et al. Cavity-nesting birds in neotropical forests: cavities as a potentially limiting resource. Ornitol Neotrop. 2008;19:253-68.

 

Czajka C, Braun MP, Wink M. Resource use by non-native Ring-Necked Parakeets (Psittacula krameri) and Native Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in Central Europe. Open Ornithol J. 2011;4:17-22.

 

Dahlin CR, Blake C, Rising J, Wright TF. Long-term monitoring of Yellow-naped Amazons (Amazona auropalliata) in Costa Rica: breeding biology, duetting, and the negative impact of poaching. J Field Ornithol. 2018;89:1-10.

 

Diamond JM, Heinen JT. Conserving rare plants in locally-protected urban forest fragments: a case study from Miami-Dade County, Florida. Urban For Urban Green. 2016;20:1-11.

 

Diamond JM, Ross MS. Tree selection and foraging height of wintering Yellow-bellied Sapsuckers (Sphyrapicus varius) in an urban environment. Wilson J Ornithol. 2018;130:932-9.

 

Dorcas ME, Willson JD, Reed RN, Snow RW, Rochford MR, Miller MA, et al. Severe mammal declines coincide with proliferation of invasive Burmese pythons in Everglades National Park. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:2418-22.

 
Doren RF, Jones DT. Management in Everglades National Park. In: Simberloff D, Schmitz DC, Brown TC, editors. Strangers in paradise: impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1997. p. 267-75.
 
Dudley J, Saab V. A field protocol to monitor cavity-nesting birds. Res Pap. RMRS-RP-44. US Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Rocky Mt. Res. Stn. Fort Collins, Colorado; 2003.https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-RP-44
 
Epps SA. Parrots of South Florida. Sarasota: Pineapple Press, Inc.; 2007.
 

Garrett KL. Population status and distribution of naturalized parrots in southern California. West Birds. 1997;28:181-95.

 

Giannini HC, Heinen JT. Miami-Dade County's Environmentally Endangered Lands Covenant Program: creating protected areas on private lands via financial incentives. Nat Areas J. 2014;34:338-45.

 

Gobster P. The urban savanna: reuniting ecological preference and function. Restor Manag. 1994;12:64-71.

 
Goodfellow P. Avian architecture: how birds design, engineer, and build. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2011.https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838318
 

Grandi G, Menchetti M, Mori E. Vertical segregation by breeding ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri in northern Italy. Urban Ecosyst. 2018;21:1-7.

 

Hernández-Brito D, Carrete M, Popa-Lisseanu AG, Ibáñez C, Tella JL. Crowding in the city: losing and winning competitors of an invasive bird. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100593.

 
Hernández-Brito D, Carrete M, Ibáñez C, Juste J, Tella JL. Nest-site competition and killing by invasive parakeets cause the decline of a threatened bat population. R Soc Open Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172477.
 
James FC. Nonindigenous birds. In: Simberloff D, Schmitz DC, Brown TC, editors. Strangers in paradise: impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1997. p. 139-56.
 

LaMontagne JM, Kilgour RJ, Anderson EC, Magle S. Tree cavity availability across forest, park, and residential habitats in a highly urban area. Urban Ecosyst. 2015;18:151-67.

 

Luneau MD, Noel BL. A wireless video camera for viewing tree cavities. J Field Ornithol. 2010;81:176-85.

 

Martin K, Eadie JM. Nest webs: a community-wide approach to the management and conservation of cavity-nesting forest birds. For Ecol Manag. 1999;115:243-57.

 

Menchetti M, Mori E. Worldwide impact of alien parrots (Aves Psittaciformes) on native biodiversity and environment: a review. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2014;26:172-94.

 

Mori E, Ancillotto L, Menchetti M, Romeo C, Ferrari N. Italian red squirrels and introduced parakeets: victims or perpetrators? Hystrix. 2013;24:195-6.

 

Mori E, Grandi G, Menchetti M, Tella JL, Jackson HA, Reino L, et al. Worldwide distribution of non-native Amazon parrots and temporal trends of their global trade. Anim Biodivers Conserv. 2017;40:49-62.

 

Mutascio HE, Pittman SE, Zollner PA, D'Acunto LE. Modeling relative habitat suitability of southern Florida for invasive Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus). Landsc Ecol. 2018;33:257-74.

 

Newson SE, Johnston A, Parrott D, Leech DI. Evaluating the population-level impact of an invasive species, Ring-necked Parakeet Psittacula krameri, on native avifauna. Ibis. 2011;153:509-16.

 

Orchan Y, Chiron F, Shwartz A, Kark S. The complex interaction network among multiple invasive bird species in a cavity-nesting community. Biol Invasions. 2012;15:429-45.

 

Ouellet-Lapointe U, Drapeau P, Cadieux P, Imbeau L. Woodpecker excavations suitability for and occupancy by cavity users in the boreal mixedwood forest of eastern Canada. Ecoscience. 2012;19:391-7.

 

Owre OT. A consideration of the exotic avifauna of southeastern Florida. Wilson Bull. 1973;85:491-500.

 

Peck HL, Pringle HE, Marshall HH, Owens IPF, Lord AM. Experimental evidence of impacts of an invasive parakeet on foraging behavior of native birds. Behav Ecol. 2014;25:582-90.

 

Pranty B. The budgerigar in Florida: the rise and fall of an exotic psittacid. N Am Birds. 2001;55:389-97.

 

Pranty B, Epps SA. Distribution, population status, and documentation of exotic parrots in Broward County, Florida. Florida Field Nat. 2002;30:111-50.

 

Pranty B, Lovell HW. Presumed or confirmed nesting attempts by Black-hooded parakeets (Nanadayus nenday) in Florida. Florida Field Nat. 2011;39:75-110.

 

Pranty B, Feinstein D, Lee K. Natural history of blue-and-yellow macaws (Ara ararauna) in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Florida Field Nat. 2010;38:55-62.

 

Renton K, Brightsmith DJ. Cavity use and reproductive success of nesting macaws in lowland forest of southeast Peru. J Field Ornithol. 2009;80:1-8.

 
Runde DE, Pitt WC, Foster JT. Population ecology and some potential impacts of emerging populations of exotic parrots. In: Witmer GW, Pitt WC, Fagerstone KA, editors. Managing vertebrate invasive species: proceedings of an international symposium. USDA/APHIS Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. 2007. p. 338-60.
 

Sementelli A, Smith HT, Meshaka WE, Engeman RM. Just green iguanas? The associated costs and policy implications of exotic invasive wildlife in South Florida. Public Work Manag Policy. 2008;12:599-606.

 
Simberloff D, Schmitz DC, Brown TC, editors. Strangers in paradise: Impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1997.
 

Strubbe D, Matthysen E. Invasive ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri in Belgium: habitat selection and impact on native birds. Ecography. 2007;30:578-88.

 

Strubbe D, Matthysen E. Experimental evidence for nest-site competition between invasive ring-necked parakeets (Psittacula krameri) and native nuthatches (Sitta europaea). Biol Conserv. 2009;142:1588-94.

 

Tilghman NG. Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Landsc Urban Plan. 1987;14:481-95.

 

Tomasevic JA, Marzluff JM. Use of suburban landscapes by the Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus). Condor. 2018;120:1-13.

 

White RL, Strubbe D, Dallimer M, Davies ZG, Davis AJS, Edelaar P, et al. Assessing the ecological and societal impacts of alien parrots in Europe using a transparent and inclusive evidence-mapping scheme. NeoBiota. 2019;48:45-69.

 

Wright TF, Toft CA, Enkerlin-Hoeflich E, Gonzalez-Elizondo J, Albornoz M, Rodríguez-Ferraro A, et al. Nest poaching in neotropical parrots. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:710-20.

 

Yosef R, Zduniak P, Żmihorski M. Invasive ring-necked parakeet negatively affects indigenous Eurasian hoopoe. Ann Zool Fennici. 2016;53:281-7.

Avian Research
Article number: 39
Cite this article:
Diamond JM, Ross MS. Exotic parrots breeding in urban tree cavities: nesting requirements, geographic distribution, and potential impacts on cavity nesting birds in southeast Florida. Avian Research, 2019, 10(1): 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-019-0176-3

664

Views

21

Downloads

10

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

12

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 08 May 2019
Accepted: 17 September 2019
Published: 14 October 2019
© The Author(s) 2019.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Return