AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Comparative phylogeography of two sister species of snowcock: impacts of species-specific altitude preference and life history

Bei An1( )Lixun Zhang2,3( )Yutao Wang4,5Sen Song2
School of Basic Medicine Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Gansu Key Laboratory of Biomonitoring and Bioremediation for Environmental Pollution, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
College of Life and Geographic Sciences, Kashi University, Kashi 844000, China
The Key Laboratory of Ecology and Biological Resources in Yarkand Oasis at Colleges & Universities under the Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Kashi University, Kashi 844000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Phylogeographical patterns and population dynamics are usually interpreted by environmental disturbances and geographic barriers of the past. However, sister species may exhibit disparate patterns of genetic structures and population dynamics due to their habitat preference and altitude segregation. In this study, we tested how species-specific altitude habitat affected phylogeographical patterns in two sister snowcock species, Tibetan (Tetraogallus tibetanus) and Himalayan Snowcocks (T. himalayensis).

Methods

A panel of seven microsatellite loci and a fragment of Mitochondrial DNA Control Region were used to investigate genetic structures and population dynamics in hope of revealing the underlying evolutionary processes through the identification of possible past demographic events.

Results

Our results suggest that T. himalayensis showed a significant phylogeographical signal in mtDNA (FST = 0.66, p < 0.001) and microsatellite (FST = 0.11, p < 0.001) data and is stable during the glacial-interglacial cycles in the Pleistocene and followed demographic contraction until 0.003 million years (Mys) ago. The phylogeographical signal of T. tibetanus is lower than the level of genetic difference among populations in mtDNA (FST = 0.41, p < 0.001) and microsatellite (FST = 0.09, p < 0.001) data, likely benefiting from stable habitats over a long period of time. T. tibetanus has been experiencing expansion since 0.09 Mys ago. However, an abnormally haplotype H9 from T. himalayensis clustering with T. tibetanus was spotted.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that differences in habitat preference and altitude specialities were reflected in the genetic structure patterns and population dynamics of these two species. These dissimilarities in life history traits might have affected the dispersal and survival abilities of these two species differently during environmental fluctuations. The results of this study also enriched our knowledge on population differentiation and connectivity in high altitude mountain ecosystems.

References

 

Adeli, Ma M, Hairoula, Wang Z. The ecological habits and characteristics of snowcock in the southern part of Bogeda, Tianshan Mountains. Arid Zone Res. 1997;14:84-7 (in Chinese).

 

An B, Zhang LX, Browne S, Liu NF, Ruan LZ, Song S. Phylogeography of tibetan snowcock (Tetraogallus tibetanus) in Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009;50:526-33.

 

An B, Zhang L, Liu N, Wang Y. Refugia persistence of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau by the cold-tolerant bird Tetraogallus tibetanus (Galliformes: phasianidae). PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0121118.

 

Ashcroft MB, Gollan JR, Warton DI, Ramp D. A novel approach to quantify and locate potential microrefugia using topoclimate, climate stability, and isolation from the matrix. Glob Change Biol. 2012;18:1866-79.

 

Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:37-48.

 
Benzécri JP. L'analyse Des Données: Tome 2, L'Analyse Des Correspondances. Paris, France: Dunod; 1973.
 

Bermingham E, Moritz C. Comparative phylogeography: concepts and applications. Mol Ecol. 1998;7:367-9.

 
Bianki VL. Review of the species of genus Tetraogallus Gray (1898). In: Proceedings of Museum Emperor's Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg. 2001;3:113-23. (in Russian).
 

Correa Ribeiro P, Lemos-Filho JP, Oliveira BRS, Lovato MB, Heuertz M. Species-specific phylogeographical patterns and pleistocene east-west divergence in annona (Annonaceae) in the Brazilian cerrado. Bot J Linn Soc. 2016;181:21-36.

 

Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. Jmodeltest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9:772.

 

Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. BEAST: bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:214.

 

Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Res. 2012;4:359-61.

 

Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. ARLEQUIN suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10:564-7.

 

Fang F, Chen J, Jiang LY, Chen R, Qiao GX. Biological traits yield divergent phylogeographical patterns between two aphids living on the same host plants. J Biogeogr. 2017;44:1-13.

 

Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997;147:915.

 
Goudet J. FSTAT, version 2.9.3. A program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. Lausanne: Lausanne University; 2001.
 

Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9:1322-32.

 

Janecka JE, Zhang Y, Li D, Munkhtsog B, Bayaraa M, Galsandorj N, et al. Range-wide Snow Leopard phylogeography supports three subspecies. J Hered. 2017;108:597-607.

 

Kennedy JD, Price TD. Ecological limits on diversification of the Himalayan core Corvoidea. Evolution. 2012;66:2599-613.

 

Lei F, Qu Y, Song G. Species diversification and phylogeographical patterns of birds in response to the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and Quaternary glaciations. Curr Zool. 2014;60:149-61.

 

Li J, Xiao L, Lu Z. Challenges of snow leopard conservation in China. Sci China Life Sci. 2016;59:637-9.

 

Librado PRJ. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451-2.

 
Liu N. Isolating mechanism between Tibetan snowcock (Tetraogallus tibetanus) and Himalayan snowcock (Tetraogallu himalayensis). The 65th anniversary meeting of the China Zoological Society, Beijing. 1999. p. 235-46.
 

Ma M, Xu F, Zhang T, Tuergan M, Ding P, Chen Y. The Tetraogallu himalayensis and Tetraogallus tibetanus mixed in the same area of the Altun-Kunlun Montains. Thesis volume in the channel-intercoastal science session. 2013.

 

McDonald JH, Kreitman M. Adaptive evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991;351:652-4.

 

Namgail T. Winter birds of the Gya-Miru Wildlife Sanctuary, Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Indian Birds. 2005;1:26-8.

 

Price TD, Hooper DM, Buchanan CD, Johansson US, Tietze DT, Alström P, et al. Niche filling slows the diversification of Himalayan songbirds. Nature. 2014;509:222-5.

 

Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945-59.

 

Prum RO, Berv JS, Dornburg A, Field DJ, Townsend JP, Lemmon EM, et al. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature. 2015;526:569-73.

 

Qu Y, Lei F, Zhang R, Lu X. Comparative phylogeography of five avian species: implications for pleistocene evolutionary history in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Mol Ecol. 2009;19:338-51.

 

Qu Y, Zhang R, Quan Q, Song G, Li S, Lei F. Incomplete lineage sorting or secondary admixture: disentangling historical divergence from recent gene flow in the Vinous-throated Parrotbill (Paradoxornis webbianus). Mol Ecol. 2012;21:6117-33.

 

Rogers AR, Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol. 1992;9:552-69.

 

Ruan L, Zhang L, Wen L, Sun Q, Liu N. Phylogeny and molecular evolution of Tetraogallus in China. Biochem Genet. 2005;43:507-18.

 

Shen X, Wang J. Systematics, geographical distribution, and ecology of Tetraogallus in China. Chin J Zool. 1963;5:186-92.

 

Tajima F. Statistical-method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123:585-95.

 

Wang X, Qu J, Liu N, Bao X, Song S. Limited gene flow and partial isolation phylogeography of Himalayan snowcock, Tetraogallus himalayensis, based on part mitochondrial D-loop sequences. Curr Zool. 2011;57:758-67.

 

Weir JT, Schluter D. Calibrating the avian molecular clock. Mol Ecol. 2008;17:2321-8.

 

Zhang R, Song G, Qu Y, Alström P, Ramos R, Xing X, et al. Comparative phylogeography of two widespread magpies: importance of habitat preference and breeding behavior on genetic structure in China. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;65:562-72.

 

Zhang H, Zhang ML, Sanderson SC. Retreating or standing: responses of forest species and steppe species to climate change in arid Eastern Central Asia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61954.

 

Zhang L, Shu M, Zhao C. The Tetraogallus tibetanus and T. himalayensis coexisted. China Nat. 2015;2:50-3.

 

Zhang M, Mei J, Zhang Z, Wang J, Xu X. Be exposure ages obtained from quaternary glacial landforms on the Tibetan Plateau and in the surrounding area. Acta Geol Sin-Engl. 2018;92:366-80.

 
Zheng Z. Fauna Sinica: Aves, vol. 4. Beijing: Science Press; 1978. p. 51-8.
Avian Research
Article number: 1
Cite this article:
An B, Zhang L, Wang Y, et al. Comparative phylogeography of two sister species of snowcock: impacts of species-specific altitude preference and life history. Avian Research, 2020, 11(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-019-0187-0

768

Views

33

Downloads

4

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

4

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 17 April 2019
Accepted: 27 December 2019
Published: 13 January 2020
© The Author(s) 2020.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return