AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (366.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Egg investment strategies adopted by a desertic passerine, the Saxaul Sparrow (Passer ammodendri)

Xinkang Bao1 ( )Wei Zhao1Fangqing Liu2Jianliang Li1Donghui Ma1
Gansu Key Laboratory of Biomonitoring and Bioremediation for Environmental Pollution, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Key Laboratory of Sichuan Institute for Protecting Endangered Birds in the Southwest Mountains, College of Life Sciences, Leshan Normal University, Leshan 614000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

As one of the reproductive strategies adopted by bird species, variation in investment in egg production and its influencing factors are important and well-studied subjects. Intraclutch changes in egg size associated with laying order may reflect a strategy of "brood survival" or "brood reduction" adopted by female birds in different situations.

Methods

We conducted field studies on the breeding parameters of the Saxaul Sparrow (Passer ammodendri) in Gansu Province, China from 2010 to 2017, to clarify the factors affecting the egg investment and reproductive performance of this passerine species.

Results

Our results revealed significant differences in clutch size, egg size and the fledging rate between the first and second brood of Saxaul Sparrows and suggested that this typical desert species allocates more breeding resources to the more favourable second brood period, leading to greater reproductive output. Female body size presented a positive relationship with egg size, and male body size presented positive relationships with clutch size and hatchability. The females that started their clutches later laid more eggs, and hatchability and the fledging rate also increased with a later laying date in the first brood period. With successive eggs laid within the 5-egg clutches (the most frequent clutch size), egg size increased for the first three eggs and then significantly decreased.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that female Saxaul Sparrows increased egg investment because of good quality of paired males and good environmental conditions. The intraclutch variation of egg size suggests that this species inhabiting an arid environment adopts a "brood reduction" strategy.

References

 

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2014;67:1–48.

 

Christians JK. Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol Rev. 2002;77:1–26.

 

Christians JK, Evanson M, Aiken JJ. Seasonal decline in clutch size in European starlings: a novel randomization test to distinguish between the timing and quality hypotheses. J Anim Ecol. 2001;70:1080–7.

 

Coe SJ, Rotenberry JT. Water availability affects clutch size in a desert sparrow. Ecology. 2003;84:3240–9.

 

Crick HQP, Gibbons DW, Magrath RD. Seasonal changes in clutch size in British birds. J Anim Ecol. 1993;62:262–73.

 

Cunningham EJA, Russell AF. Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the Mallard. Nature. 2000;404:74–7.

 

Dolenec P, Kocijan I, Dolenec Z. Intra-seasonal changes in reproductive strategy of a multi-brooded passerine: the tree sparrow Passer montanus. Ethol Ecol Evol. 2011;23:368–74.

 

Enemar A, Arheimer O. Egg sizes of nine passerine bird species in a subalpine birch forest, Swedish Lapland. Ornis Svecica. 1999;9:1–10.

 

Gil-Delgado JA, Marco E, Paredes M, Vives-Ferrándiz C. Seasonal clutch size variation of multi-brooded bird species: comparisons between breeding season and latitudes. Ibis. 2005;147:206–12.

 

Goodenough AE, Elliot SL, Maitland DP, Hart AG. Variation in the relationship between lay date and clutch size in three cavity-nesting woodland passerines. Acta Ornit. 2009;44:27–36.

 

Haftorn S. Clutch size, intraclutch egg size variation, and breeding strategy in the Goldcrest Regulus regulus. J Ornit. 1986;127:291–301.

 

Hargitai R, Torok J, Toth L, Hegyi G, Rosivall B, Szigeti B, et al. Effects of environmental conditions and parental quality on inter- and intraclutch egg-size variation in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). Auk. 2005;122:509–22.

 

Hegner RE, Wingfield JC. Gonadal development during autumn and winter in house sparrows. Condor. 1986;88:269–78.

 

Hochachka W. Seasonal decline in reproductive performance of song sparrows. Ecology. 1990;71:1279–88.

 

Hoyt D. Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs. Auk. 1979;96:73–7.

 

Järvinen A. A meta-analytic study of the effects of female age on laying-date and clutch-size in the Great Tit Parus major and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Ibis. 1991;133:62–6.

 

Järvinen A, Väisänen RA. Reproduction of pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in good and bad breeding seasons in a northern marginal area. Auk. 1984;101:429–50.

 

Krist M. Egg size and offspring quality: a meta-analysis in birds. Biol Rev. 2011;86:692–716.

 

Kvalnes T, Ringsby TH, Jensen H, Sæther BE. Correlates of egg size variation in a population of house sparrow Passer domesticus. Oecologia. 2013;171:391–402.

 

Lack D. The natural regulation of animal numbers. Oxford: Clarendon; 1954.

 

Lindén M, Møller AP. Cost of reproduction and covariation of life history traits in birds. Trends Ecol Evol. 1989;4:367–71.

 
Liu NF, Yang ZW. Report on second scientific investigation of Anxi Desert National Reserve in Gansu. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University Press; 2006 (in Chinese).
 

Magrath RD. Seasonal changes in egg-mass within and among clutches of birds: general explanations and a field study of the Blackbird Turdus merula. Ibis. 1992;134:171–9.

 

Møller AP. Male ornament size as a reliable cue to enhanced offspring viability in the Barn Swallow. Proc Nat Aca Sci USA. 1994;91:6929–32.

 

Mousseau TA, Fox CW. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998;13:403–7.

 

Murphy ED. Seasonal variation in reproductive output of house sparrow: the determination of clutch size. Ecology. 1978;59:1189–99.

 

Nager RG, Noordwijk AJV. Energetic limitation in the egg-laying period of Great Tits. Proc R Soc Lond (B). 1992;249:259–63.

 

Perrins CM. Eggs, egg formation and the timing of breeding. Ibis. 1996;138:2–15.

 

Reed WL, Clark ME, Vleck CM. Maternal effects increase within-family variation in offspring survival. Am Nat. 2009;174:685–95.

 

Rising JD, Somers KM. The measurement of overall body size in birds. Auk. 1989;106:666–74.

 

Siikamäki P. Limitation of reproductive success by food availability and breeding time in pied flycatchers. Ecology. 1998;79:1789–96.

 

Slagsvold T, Sandvik J, Rofstad G, Lorentsen O, Husby M. On the adaptive value of intraclutch egg-size variation in birds. Auk. 1984;101:685–97.

 

Smith CC, Fretwell SD. Optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat. 1974;108:499–506.

 
Summers-Smith JD. The sparrows: a study of the genus Passer. Calton: T & AD Poyser; 1988.
 

Williams TD. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: effects on offspring fitness. Biol Rev. 1994;69:35–59.

 

Yampolsky LY, Scheiner SM. Why larger offspring at lower temperatures? A demographic approach. Am Nat. 1996;147:86–100.

 

Yosef R, Zduniak P. Within-clutch variation in egg dimensions of Loggerhead Shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus) in south-central Florida. Biol Lett. 2004;41:155–62.

Avian Research
Article number: 15
Cite this article:
Bao X, Zhao W, Liu F, et al. Egg investment strategies adopted by a desertic passerine, the Saxaul Sparrow (Passer ammodendri). Avian Research, 2020, 11(1): 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-020-00201-0

506

Views

18

Downloads

1

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

3

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 09 January 2020
Accepted: 08 May 2020
Published: 18 May 2020
© The Author(s) 2020.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return