AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (715.1 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Vineyards, but not cities, are associated with lower presence of a generalist bird, the Common Blackbird (Turdus merula), in Western France

Bertille Mohring1,2 ( )François Brischoux1Frédéric Angelier1
Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, UMR 7372, CNRS – La Rochelle Université, 79360, Villiers en Bois, France
Environmental and Marine Biology, Åbo Akademi University, 20520, Turku, Finland
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Land-use change is one of the main drivers of the global erosion of biodiversity. In that context, it is crucial to understand how landscape characteristics drive the presence of rare endangered species. Nevertheless, it is also important to study common species in multiple habitats, because they represent a large proportion of biodiversity and are essential to maintain ecological functions. Interestingly, some habitats, as farmlands with permanent crops (e.g. vineyards), have been overlooked in the literature.

Methods

In this study, we investigated the distribution of a widespread and common bird species, the Common Blackbird (Turdus merula), within and between the three main habitats of our study area (rural Western France). We specifically focused on (1) woodlands, (2) farmlands with a high vineyard coverage, and (3) moderately urbanized areas. Specifically, we aimed to assess the beneficial and detrimental effects of these habitats and their fine-scale composition on the presence of a common bird species, relying on a survey by point counts (nearly 100 locations). We studied the effects of habitats and gradients of fine-scale habitat composition on blackbird presence using logistic regression analyses.

Results

Blackbirds were present in all studied habitats. However, their presence varied between habitats, being lower in vineyards than in woodlands and cities. In woodlands and cities, fine-scale analyses did not reveal any component driving the species' presence. However, we found that shrub and tree vegetation cover had a significant positive effect on blackbird presence in vineyards.

Conclusions

Our results are in agreement with the definition of a generalist species. Interestingly, species distribution varied between habitats. The high presence of blackbirds in urban areas suggests that medium-sized cities, despite their artificialization, do not constrain the settlement of this former forest specialist and that green spaces may allow blackbirds to thrive in medium-sized cities. On the contrary, we found an impoverished presence of blackbirds in vineyards and a positive effect of vegetation on their presence in these landscapes. This suggests that permanent crops, and more generally farmlands, may impose important constraints to common species. Future studies should examine how to enhance biodiversity through agricultural management policies, especially in vineyards.

References

 
Abs M, Bergen F. A long term survey of the avifauna in an urban park. In: Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Endlicher W, Alberti M, Bradley G, Ryan C, et al., editors. Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Boston: Springer; 2008. p. 373–6.
 
Assandri G, Bogliani G, Pedrini P, Brambilla M. Insectivorous birds as 'non-traditional' flagship species in vineyards: applying a neglected conservation paradigm to agricultural systems. Ecol Indic. 2017a;80: 275–85.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.012
 
Assandri G, Giacomazzo M, Brambilla M, Griggio M, Pedrini P. Nest density, nest-site selection, and breeding success of birds in vineyards: management implications for conservation in a highly intensive farming system. Biol Conserv. 2017b;205: 23–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.020
 
Baillie J, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN. IUCN red list of threatened species: a global species assessment. Gland: IUCN–The World Conservation Union; 2004.
 
Barton K. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.43.17. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.
 
Beaugeard E, Brischoux F, Angelier F. Green infrastructures and ecological corridors shape avian biodiversity in a small French city. Urban Ecosyst. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-01062-7.
 

Betts MG, Diamond AW, Forbes GJ, Villard M-A, Gunn JS. The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence. Ecol Model. 2006;191: 197–224.

 

Bivand RS, Wong DWS. Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. TEST. 2018;27: 716–48.

 

Brédif H, Simon L. Ordinary biodiversity, local stakeholders and forest management as a driver for regional sustainable development. J Forest. 2014;04: 249–58.

 

Brouat C, Chevallier H, Meusnier S, Noblecourt T, Rasplus J-Y. Specialization and habitat: spatial and environmental effects on abundance and genetic diversity of forest generalist and specialist Carabus species. Mol Ecol. 2004;13: 1815–26.

 
Buckley NJ. The new atlas of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland: 1988–1991. In: Gibbons DW, Reid JB, Chapman RA, editors. The Auk. London: T & AD Poyser; 1995. p. 812–3.
 
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
 

Butler RW. Population regulation of wading Ciconiiform birds. Colon Waterbird. 1994;17: 189–99.

 

Carrara E, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Vega-Rivera JH, Schondube JE, de Freitas SM, Fahrig L. Impact of landscape composition and configuration on forest specialist and generalist bird species in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico. Biol Conserv. 2015;184: 117–26.

 
Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ. 2011;9: 222–8.https://doi.org/10.1890/080216
 

Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L, Dinetti M. Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv. 2006;127: 336–44.

 

Cockle KL, Martin K, Drever MC. Supply of tree-holes limits nest density of cavity-nesting birds in primary and logged subtropical Atlantic forest. Biol Conserv. 2010;143: 2851–7.

 

Dabelsteen T. Variation in the response of freeliving Blackbirds Turdus merula to playback of song: I. Effect of continuous stimulation and predictability of the response. Z Tierpsychol. 1982;58: 311–28.

 

Dabelsteen T. Variation in the response of freeliving Blackbirds Turdus merula to playback of song: II. Effect of time of day, reproductive status and number of experiments. Z Tierpsychol. 1984;65: 215–27.

 
Dabelsteen T. Interactive playback: a finely tuned response. In: McGregor PK, editor. Playback and studies of animal communication. Boston: Springer; 1992. p. 97–109.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6203-7_7
 

Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB. Song and information about aggressive responses of blackbirds, Turdus merula: evidence from interactive playback experiments with territory owners. Anim Behav. 1990;40: 1158–68.

 

Davis BNK. Soil animals as vectors of organochlorine insecticides for ground-feeding birds. J Appl Ecol. 1966;3: 133–9.

 

Devictor V, Julliard R, Jiguet F. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos. 2008;117: 507–14.

 

Diehl P, Helb H-W. Radiotelemetric monitoring of heart-rate responses to song playback in blackbirds (Turdus merula). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1986;18: 213–9.

 

Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proc Biol Sci. 2001;268: 25–9.

 

Ellis EC, Ramankutty N. Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ. 2008;6: 439–47.

 

Eötvös CB, Magura T, Lövei GL. A meta-analysis indicates reduced predation pressure with increasing urbanization. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;180: 54–9.

 

Evans KL, Hatchwell BJ, Parnell M, Gaston KJ. A conceptual framework for the colonisation of urban areas: the blackbird Turdus merula as a case study. Biol Rev. 2010;85: 643–67.

 
Fernández-Juricic E, Jimenez MD, Lucas E. Bird tolerance to human disturbance in urban parks of Madrid (Spain): management implications. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R, editors. Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Boston: Springer; 2001. p. 259–73.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_12
 

Foley JA, Defries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, et al. Global consequences of land use. Science. 2005;309: 570–4.

 

Fritsch C, Coeurdassier M, Faivre B, Baurand P-E, Giraudoux P, van den Brink NW, et al. Influence of landscape composition and diversity on contaminant flux in terrestrial food webs: a case study of trace metal transfer to European blackbirds Turdus merula. Sci Total Environ. 2012;432: 275–87.

 

Futuyma DJ, Moreno G. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1988;19: 207–33.

 

Gaston KJ, Fuller RA. Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23: 14–9.

 
Guittet M, Sibe V, Gaudin J-C. Les vignobles: de nouveaux réservoirs de biodiversité. Faune sauvage. 2011: 9.
 

Godet L. La « nature ordinaire » dans le monde occidental. L'Espace géographique. 2010;39: 295–308.

 

Gregory RD, Noble DG, Custance J. The state of play of farmland birds: population trends and conservation status of lowland farmland birds in the United Kingdom. Ibis. 2004;146: 1–13.

 

Hanowski JM, Niemi GJ, Blake JG. Statistical perspectives and experimental design when counting birds on line transects. Condor. 1990;92: 326–35.

 
Hatchwell BJ, Chamberlain DE, Perrins CM. The demography of Blackbirds Turdus merula in rural habitats: is farmland a sub-optimal habitat? J Appl Ecol. 1996;33: 1114.https://doi.org/10.2307/2404691
 

Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Newton I, Sparks TH. Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments. J Avian Biol. 1995;26: 94–104.

 

Hiron M, Berg Å, Eggers S, Josefsson J, Pärt T. Bird diversity relates to agri-environment schemes at local and landscape level in intensive farmland. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2013;176: 9–16.

 

Hobday AJ, Chambers LE, Arnould JPY. Prioritizing climate change adaptation options for iconic marine species. Biodivers Conserv. 2015;24: 3449–68.

 

Hole DG, Whittingham MJ, Bradbury RB, Anderson GQA, Lee PLM, Wilson JD, et al. Widespread local house-sparrow extinctions — Agricultural intensification is blamed for the plummeting populations of these birds. Nature. 2002;418: 931–2.

 

Jankowiak Ł, Pietruszewska H, Wysocki D. Weather conditions and breeding season length in blackbird (Turdus merula). Folia Zool. 2014;63: 245–50.

 

Jokimäki J, Suhonen J. Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landsc Urban Plan. 1998;39: 253–63.

 

Julliard R, Jiguet F. Un suivi intégré des populations d'oiseaux communs en France. Alauda. 2002;70: 137–47.

 

Julliard R, Clavel J, Devictor V, Jiguet F, Couvet D. Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecol Lett. 2006;9: 1237–44.

 

Kassen R. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity: experimental evolution in variable environments. J Evol Biol. 2002;15: 173–90.

 

Kubel JE, Yahner RH. Detection probability of Golden-winged Warblers during point counts with and without playback recordings. J Field Ornithol. 2007;78: 195–205.

 

Larsen AE, Noack F. Identifying the landscape drivers of agricultural insecticide use leveraging evidence from 100, 000 fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114: 5473–8.

 

Lê S, Josse J, Husson F. FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw. 2008;25: 1–18.

 

Lee DC, Marsden SJ. Adjusting count period strategies to improve the accuracy of forest bird abundance estimates from point transect distance sampling surveys: count period strategies for distance sampling surveys. Ibis. 2008;150: 315–25.

 
Lennon JJ, Beale CM, Reid CL, Kent M, Pakeman RJ. Are richness patterns of common and rare species equally well explained by environmental variables? Ecography. 2011;34: 529–39.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06669.x
 
Luck GW, Smallbone LT. Species diversity and urbanisation: patterns, drivers and implications. In: Gaston KJ, editor. Urban Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 88–119.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778483.006
 
Luniak M. Synurbization — adaptation of animal wildlife to urban development. In: Shaw WW, Harris LK, Vandruff L, editors. Proceedings 4th international urban wildlife symposium. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona; 2004. p. 50–5.
 

Luniak M, Kozlowki P, Nowicki W. Magpie Pica pica in Warsaw — abundance, distribution and changes in its population. Acta Orn. 1997;32: 77–86.

 

Mac Nally RC. The relationship between habitat breadth, habitat position, and abundance in forest and woodland birds along a continental gradient. Oikos. 1989;54: 44–54.

 

Melles S, Glenn SM, Martin K. Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol. 2003;7: 5.

 
Mennechez G, Clergeau P. Effect of urbanisation on habitat generalists: starlings not so flexible? Acta Oecol. 2006;30: 182–91.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2006.03.002
 

Najmanová L, Adamík P. Effect of climatic change on the duration of the breeding season in three European thrushes. Bird Study. 2009;56: 349–56.

 

Newbold T, Hudson LN, Arnell AP, Contu S, De Palma A, Ferrier S, et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science. 2016;353: 288–91.

 

Newton I. Population limitation in birds: the last 100 years. Br Birds. 2007;100: 518–39.

 

Olden JD. Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. J Biogeogr. 2006;33: 2027–39.

 

Paquet M, Arlt D, Knape J, Low M, Forslund P, Pärt T. Quantifying the links between land use and population growth rate in a declining farmland bird. Ecol Evol. 2019;9: 868–79.

 
Pithon JA, Beaujouan V, Daniel H, Pain G, Vallet J. Are vineyards important habitats for birds at local or landscape scales? Basic Appl Ecol. 2016;17: 240–51.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.12.004
 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.
 
Ralph CJ, Droege S, Sauer JR. Managing and monitoring birds using point counts: standards and applications. In: Ralph CJ, Droege S, Sauer JR, editors. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. Albany: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station; 1995. p. 161–8.https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-149
 

Reif J, Voříšek P, Šťastnyˇ K, Bejček V, Petr J. Population increase of forest birds in the Czech Republic between 1982 and 2003. Bird Study. 2007;54: 248–55.

 
Rotenberry JT, Wiens JA. A synthetic approach to principal component analysis of bird/habitat relationships. In: Capen DE, editor. The use of multivariate statistics in studies of wildlife habitat. Fort-Collins: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station; 1981. p. 197–208.
 

Sandström UG, Angelstam P, Mikusiński G. Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc Urban Plan. 2006;77: 39–53.

 

Shultz SB, Bradbury RL, Evans KD, Gregory RM, Blackburn T. Brain size and resource specialization predict long-term population trends in British birds. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 2005;272: 2305–11.

 

Sierro A, Arlettaz R. L'avifaune du vignoble en Valais central: évaluation de la diversité à l'aide de transects. Nos Oiseaux. 2003;50: 89–100.

 

Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Buckland ST, Fewster RM, Marchant JH, Wilson JD. Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: a quantitative comparison of smoothed Common Birds Census indices. J Appl Ecol. 1998;35: 24–43.

 

Snow DW. Territory in the Blackbird Turdus Merula. Ibis. 1956;98: 438–47.

 

Sol D, González-Lagos C, Moreira D, Maspons J, Lapiedra O. Urbanisation tolerance and the loss of avian diversity. Ecol Lett. 2014;17: 942–50.

 

Stanton RL, Morrissey CA, Clark RG. Analysis of trends and agricultural drivers of farmland bird declines in North America: a review. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2018;254: 244–54.

 

Steel ZL, Steel AE, Williams JN, Viers JH, Marquet PA, Barbosa O. Patterns of bird diversity and habitat use in mixed vineyard-matorral landscapes of Central Chile. Ecol Indic. 2017;73: 345–57.

 

Wretenberg J, Lindström Å, Svensson S, Thierfelder T, Pärt T. Population trends of farmland birds in Sweden and England: similar trends but different patterns of agricultural intensification. J Appl Ecol. 2006;43: 1110–20.

Avian Research
Article number: 3
Cite this article:
Mohring B, Brischoux F, Angelier F. Vineyards, but not cities, are associated with lower presence of a generalist bird, the Common Blackbird (Turdus merula), in Western France. Avian Research, 2021, 12(1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-020-00239-0

684

Views

29

Downloads

5

Crossref

4

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 23 July 2020
Accepted: 14 December 2020
Published: 05 January 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return