AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (948.3 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

The Grey-backed Shrike parents adopt brood survival strategy in both the egg and nestling phases

Liqing Fan1,2,Lifang Gao3,Zhenqin Zhu3Xiaodan Zhang3Wen Zhang3Haiyang Zhang3Jianchuan Li4Bo Du3( )
National Forest Ecosystem Observation & Research Station of Nyingchi Tibet, Institute of Plateau Ecology, Tibet Agriculture & Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi, 860000, China
Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau, Tibet Agriculture & Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi, 860000, China
School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
Tibet Plateau Institute of Biology, Lhasa, 850000, China

Liqing Fan and Lifang Gao: equal contribution to this paper

Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Great diversity exists in the parenting pattern of altricial birds, which has long been considered as an adaptive response to specific environmental conditions but not to their life-history style.

Methods

We examined the egg-laying and nestling-raising pattern of the Grey-backed Shrike (Lanius tephronotus) that breeds only once a year on the Tibetan Plateau. We compared the dietary composition to that of its sympatric competitor, the Brown-cheeked Laughing Thrush (Trochalopteron henrici) that breeds twice a year.

Results

Female Grey-backed Shrikes produced a fixed clutch size of five, with increasing egg size by their laying sequence. The last offspring in the brood is disadvantageous in the size hierarchy because it hatches later. However, they had the largest fledgling body mass. These findings indicate that Grey-backed Shrikes adopt the brood survival strategy in both the egg and nestling phases. Moreover, males and females exhibit no sexual division in providing parental care as they made an equal contribution to the total amount of food delivered to their brood. This parenting pattern of Grey-backed Shrikes, as well as their dietary items, differ significantly from those of the Brown-cheeked Laughing Thrush.

Conclusions

We suggest that the differentiation in life-history style between sympatric competitors, rather than a behavioral response to specific environmental conditions, plays a decisive role in driving avian parenting strategy diversification.

References

 

Camfield AF, Pearson SF, Martin K. Life history variation between high and low elevation subspecies of horned larks Eremophila spp. J Avian Biol. 2010;41: 273–81.

 

Caro SM, Griffin AS, Hinde CA, West SA. Unpredictable environments lead to the evolution of parental neglect in birds. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 10985.

 

Christians JK. Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals. Biol Rev. 2002;77: 1–26.

 

Da XW, Xian LL, Luo JJ, Gao LF, Du B. Azure-winged magpies Cyanopica cyanus trade off reproductive success and parental care by establishing a size hierarchy among nestlings. Ibis. 2018;160: 769–78.

 

Decker KL, Conway CJ, Fontaine JJ. Nest predation, food, and female age explain seasonal declines in clutch size. Evol Ecol. 2012;26: 683–99.

 

Du B, Zhao QS, Liu CJ, Guan MM, Liu NF. Giant babaxes mix brood reduction and brood survival strategies. J Ornithol. 2012;153: 611–9.

 

Du B, Liu CJ, Yang M, Bao SJ, Guan MM, Liu NF. Horned larks on the Tibetan Plateau adjust the breeding strategy according to the seasonal changes in the risk of nest predation and food availability. J Avian Biol. 2014;45: 466–74.

 

Eikenaar C, Berg ML, Komdeur J. Experimental evidence for the influence of food availability on incubation attendance and hatching asynchrony in the Australian reed warbler Acrocephalus australis. J Avian Biol. 2003;34: 419–27.

 

Fan LQ, Chen GL, Da XW, Luo JJ, Xian LL, Ren QM, et al. Seasonal variation in food availability influences the breeding strategy of White-collared Blackbirds Turdus albocinctus on the Tibetan Plateau. Ibis. 2017;159: 873–82.

 
Forbes LS. Avian brood reduction and parent-offspring "conflict. " Am Nat. 1993;142: 82–117.https://doi.org/10.1086/285530
 
Forbes S. Sibling symbiosis in nesting birds Auk. 2007;124: 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/124.1.1
 

Forbes S, Glassey B, Thornton S, Earle L. The secondary adjustment of clutch size in red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2001;50: 37–44.

 
Lack D. The natural regulation of animal numbers. London: Oxford University Press; 1954.
 
Li JC, Gao LF, Fan LQ, Wong SY, Wei C, Zhang HY, et al. Individual variation in parental tradeoffs between the number and size of offspring at the pre- and post-natal stages. Ibis. 2020a;162: 1186–97.https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12831
 
Li JC, Gao LF, Fan LQ, Zhang HY, Zhang W, Du B. Field study of the relationship between personality and reproductive strategy in the White-collared Blackbird Turdus albocinctus. Ibis. 2020b;162: 245–9.https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12776
 

Lu X, Wang C, Yu T. Nesting ecology of the grey-backed shrike (Lanius tephronotus) in south Tibet. Wilson J Ornithol. 2010;122: 395–8.

 

Mainwaring MC, Lucy D, Hartley IR. Hatching asynchrony decreases the magnitude of parental care in domesticated zebra finches: empirical support for the peak load reduction hypothesis. Ethology. 2014;120: 577–85.

 

Martin TE, Lloyd P, Bosque C, Barton DC, Biancucci AL, Cheng YR, et al. Growth rate variation among passerine species in tropical and temperate sites: an antagonistic interaction between parental food provisioning and nest predation risk. Evolution. 2011;65: 1607–22.

 

Martin TE. Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life-history perspective. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1987;18: 453–87.

 

Martin TE. Avian life-history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation and food. Ecol Monogr. 1995;65: 101–27.

 

Mock DW, Forbes LS. Life-history consequences of avian brood reduction. Auk. 1994;111: 115–23.

 

Palmer AG, Nordmeyer DL, Roby DD. Nestling provisioning rates of peregrine falcons in interior Alaska. J Reptor Res. 2004;38: 9–18.

 

Ren QM, Luo S, Du XJ, Chen GL, Song S, Du B. Helper effects in the azure-winged magpie Cyanopica cyana in relation to highly-clumped nesting pattern and high frequency of conspecific nest-raiding. J Avian Biol. 2016;47: 449–56.

 

Sæther BE, Bakke Ø. Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology. 2000;81: 642–53.

 

Shizuka D, Lyon BE. Family dynamics through time: brood reduction followed by parental compensation with aggression and favouritism. Ecol Lett. 2013;16: 315–22.

 

Silver R, Andrews H, Ball GF. Parental care in an ecological perspective: a quantitative analysis of avian subfamilies. Am Zool. 1985;25: 823–40.

 
Skutch AF. Do tropical birds rear as many young as they can nourish? Ibis. 1949;91: 430–55.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1949.tb02293.x
 

Slagsvold T, Sandvik J, Rofstad G, Lorentsen Ö, Husby M. On the adaptive value of intraclutch egg-size variation in birds. Auk. 1984;101: 685–97.

 

Slagsvold T. Brood division in birds in relation to offspring size: sibling rivalry and parental control. Anim Behav. 1997;54: 1357–68.

 

Tallamy DW, Wood TK. Convergence patterns in subsocial insects. Ann Rev Entomol. 1986;31: 369–90.

 
Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine; 1972. p. 136–79.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129266-7
 

Verhulst S, Nilsson JA. The timing of birds' breeding seasons: a review of experiments that manipulated timing of breeding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363: 399–410.

 

Winkler DW, Wallin K. Offspring size and number: a life history model linking effort per offspring and total effort. Am Nat. 1987;129: 708–20.

Avian Research
Article number: 11
Cite this article:
Fan L, Gao L, Zhu Z, et al. The Grey-backed Shrike parents adopt brood survival strategy in both the egg and nestling phases. Avian Research, 2021, 12(1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00244-x

715

Views

37

Downloads

3

Crossref

4

Web of Science

4

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 07 May 2020
Accepted: 23 February 2021
Published: 09 March 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return