AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (109.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Correction | Open Access

Correction to: Performance comparison of different microbial DNA extraction methods on bird feces

Xian Hou1,2,3Shengkai Pan2,3Zhenzhen Lin2,3Jiliang Xu1( )Xiangjiang Zhan2,3,4,( )
School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China
Key Lab of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
Cardiff University-Institute of Zoology Joint Laboratory for Biocomplexity Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
Center for Excellence in Animal Evolution and Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China

Jiliang Xu and Xiangjiang Zhan are joint senior authors

Show Author Information
The online version of the original article can be found at:

References

 

Hou X, Pan S, Lin Z, Xu J, Zhan X. Correction to: Performance comparison of different microbial DNA extraction methods on bird feces. Avian Res. 2021;12:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00254-9.

Avian Research
Article number: 26
Cite this article:
Hou X, Pan S, Lin Z, et al. Correction to: Performance comparison of different microbial DNA extraction methods on bird feces. Avian Research, 2021, 12(1): 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00262-9

443

Views

11

Downloads

0

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Published: 27 May 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return