AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (238.2 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Male parent birds exert more effort to reproduce in two desert passerines

Donghui MaMengjie LuZhichang ChengXingnan DuXiaoyu ZouXingxing YaoXinkang Bao ( )
School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Parental investment by birds is limited by the habitat environment, and a male parent increases its effort to reproduce in birds that live in high-altitude areas.

Methods

A study of the reproductive behaviour of the Saxaul Sparrow (Passer ammodendri) and the Isabelline Shrike (Lanius isabellinus) was carried out at the Gansu An'xi Extremely Arid Desert National Nature Reserve in northwest China to determine the reproductive input of passerine species in desert habitats.

Results

In Saxaul Sparrows, compared to the female parent, the male parent exhibited a significantly higher frequency of nest-defense behaviour (chirping and warning) during nesting, hatching and feeding periods. In addition, in comparison to the female parent, the male parent exhibited almost equal frequencies of nesting and incubation but fed nestlings significantly more times. Similar to the male sparrows, the feeding rates of the male Isabelline Shrikes were significantly higher than those of the females. The hatching rate and fledging rate of the Saxaul Sparrow on average in this study were 81.99 and 91.92%, respectively, while those of the shrike were 69.00 and 96.53%, respectively.

Conclusions

These two different passerine species living in the same desert environment exhibited the same trend in their reproductive investments. Adapting to desert environments is a strategy that may have evolved in passerines where male parent birds put more effort than females into reproduction to ensure high reproductive output.

References

 

Aho T, Kuitunen M, Hakkari T, Suhonen J, Jäntti A. Effects of male removal on reproductive success and provisioning in the Eurasian Treecreeper (Certhia familiaris). Ornis Fennica. 2009;86: 1-10.

 

Badyaev AV. Altitudinal variation in sexual dimorphism: a new pattern and alternative hypotheses. Behav Ecol. 1997;8: 675-90.

 

Bédard J, Meunier M. Parental care in the Savannah sparrow. Can J Zool. 1983;61: 2836-43.

 

Bengtsson H, Rydén O. Parental feeding rate in relation to begging behavior in asynchronously hatched broods of the great tit Parus major. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1983;12: 243-51.

 

Freeman-Gallant CR. Fitness consequences of male parental care in Savannah sparrows. Behav Ecol. 1998;9: 486-92.

 

Gavrilov EI. The biology of the Eastern Spanish Sparrow, Passer hispaniolensis transcaspicus tschusi, in Kazakhstan. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc. 1963;60: 301-17.

 

Gawlik DE, Papp J, Bildstein KL. Nestling diet and prey-delivery rates of Loggerhead Shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus) in north-central South Carolina. Chat. 1991;55: 1-5.

 

Ghalambor BCK. Evolution of life histories along elevational gradients: trade-off between parental care and fecundity. Ecology. 2001;82: 2948-60.

 

Gross MR. The evolution of parental care. Q Rev Biol. 2005;80: 37-46.

 

Hegner RE, Wingfield JC. Effects of brood-size manipulations on parental investment, breeding success, and reproductive endocrinology of House Sparrows. Auk. 1987;104: 470-80.

 

Horváthová T, Nakagawa S, Uller T. Strategic female reproductive investment in response to male attractiveness in birds. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci. 2012;279: 163-70.

 

Houston AI, Székely T, McNamara JM. Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20: 33-8.

 
Liu NF, Yang ZW. Report on second scientific investigation of Anxi Desert National Reserve in Gansu. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University Press; 2006.
 

Lyon BE, Montgomerie RD, Hamilton LD. Male parental care and monogamy in snow buntings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1987;20: 377-82.

 

McGillivray WB. Intraseasonal reproductive costs for the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus). Auk. 1983;100: 25-32.

 

Miller AH. Systematic revision and natural history of the American shrikes (Lanius). Univ California Publ Zool. 1931;38: 11-242.

 

O'Connor RJ. Differential growth and body composition in altricial passerines. Ibis. 2008;119: 147-66.

 

Parish DM, Coulson JC. Parental investment, reproductive success and polygyny in the lapwing, Vanellus vanellus. Anim Behav. 1998;56: 1161-7.

 

Sanz JJ, Kranenbarg S, Tinbergen JM. Differential response by males and females to manipulation of partner contribution in the great tit (Parus major). J Anim Ecol. 2000;69: 74-84.

 

Sopyev O. The desert sparrow in the Kara Kum. Ornitolgiya. 1965;7: 134-41.

 
Summers-Smith JD. The sparrows: a study of the genus Passer. Calton: T & AD Poyser; 1989.
 
Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. Venice: Aldine; 1972.
 

Trivers RL. Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zool. 1974;14: 249-64.

 

van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat. 1986;128: 137-42.

 

Wright J, Cuthill I. Manipulation of sex differences in parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1989;25: 171-81.

 

Wynne-Edwards KE. Evolution of parental care in Phodopus: conflict between adaptations for survival and adaptations for rapid reproduction. Am Zool. 1998;38: 238-50.

 

Xu Q. The magpie nestling's growth development and thermoregulatory capacity. J Northeast Forest Univ. 2002;30: 38-41.

 

Yom-Tov Y, Ar A. On the breeding ecology of the Dead Sea sparrow, Passer moabiticus. Zoology. 1980;29: 171-87.

 
Zhang JW. The nestling growth of Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). Master's Thesis. Changchun: Northeast Normal University; 2009.
Avian Research
Article number: 37
Cite this article:
Ma D, Lu M, Cheng Z, et al. Male parent birds exert more effort to reproduce in two desert passerines. Avian Research, 2021, 12(1): 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00273-6

602

Views

18

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 04 November 2020
Accepted: 28 June 2021
Published: 06 July 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return