AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Avian-power line interactions in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia: are mitigation actions effective?

Adrian Orihuela-Torres1,2 ( )Juan M. Pérez-García1Zebensui Morales-Reyes1Lara Naves-Alegre1José A. Sánchez-Zapata1Esther Sebastián-González2
Área de Ecología, Departamento de Biología Aplicada, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Avda. Universidad s/n, 03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain
Departamento de Ecología, Universidad de Alicante, Ctra. San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Electrocution and collisions on power lines are among the leading causes of non-natural mortality for birds. Power lines are exponentially increasing, particularly in developing countries, but mitigation strategies to prevent bird mortality are questionable. Mongolia combines a recently increased power line network, an abundant raptor population, a dangerous crossarm configuration and a habitat with no natural perches, producing many bird-power line interactions. Our aim is to assess the bird mortality caused by power lines in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia, to determine the factors increasing the risk of bird electrocution, and to evaluate the effectiveness of used retrofitting measures.

Methods

In July 2019 we covered 132.9 km of 15 kV power lines checking 1092 poles. We also conducted bird transects to record raptor and corvid richness and abundance, to assess species vulnerability to electrocution.

Results

We recorded 76 electrocuted birds of 7 species. Electrocution rate was 6.96 birds/100 poles. The most affected species were Common Raven (Corvus corax) and Upland Buzzard (Buteo hemilasius), highlighting the electrocution of 5 endangered Saker Falcons (Falco cherrug). By contrast, we only recorded 8 individuals of 5 species colliding with wires, the most affected being Pallas's Sandgrouse (Syrrhaptes paradoxus). About 76.1% of sampled poles had some mitigation measure. Of these, 96.6% were brush perch deflectors and 3.4% rotating-mirrors perch deterrents. We found differences in electrocution rates among crossarm configurations, with the strain insulator with one jumper being the most lethal. Additionally, we found no correlation between bird abundance and electrocution rates, suggesting that some species are more sensitive to electrocution. Although no differences in total bird electrocution rates were detected between poles with and without perch deterrents, when bird size is considered, deterrents reduced the mortality rate of small birds, while they were ineffective for medium-sized birds.

Conclusions

Despite the widespread use of perch deterrents in the Mongolian power line network, there is still an alarming electrocution rate. This strategy is ineffective and some mechanisms, such as brush perch deflectors, may increase the electrocution rate for some medium-sized birds. Finally, we propose strategies to minimize the avian electrocution rate in the Gobi Desert.

References

 

Alonso JC, Alonso JA, Muñoz-Pulido R. Mitigation of bird collisions with transmission lines through groundwire marking. Biol Conserv. 1994;67: 129–34.

 

Amartuvshin P, Gombobaatar S. The assessment of high risk utility lines and conservation of globally threatened pole nesting steppe raptors in Mongolia. Ornis Mongolica. 2012;1: 2–12.

 

Angelov I, Hashim I, Oppel S. Persistent electrocution mortality of Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus over 28 years in East Africa. Bird Conserv Int. 2013;23: 1–6.

 

Antal M. Policy measures to address bird interactions with power lines—a comparative case study of four countries. Ostrich. 2010;81: 217–23.

 
Avian Power Line Interaction Committee (APLIC). Suggested practices for avian protection on power lines: the state of the art in 2006. Washington and Sacramento: Edison Electric Institute and the California Energy Commission; 2006.
 

Barrientos R, Alonso JC, Ponce C, Palacín C. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of marked wire in reducing avian collisions with power lines. Conserv Biol. 2011;25: 893–903.

 

Begzsuren S, Ellis JE, Ojima DS, Coughenour MB, Chuluun T. Livestock responses to droughts and severe winter weather in the Gobi Three Beauty National Park. Mongolia J Arid Environ. 2004;59: 785–96.

 

Bernardino J, Bevanger K, Barrientos R, Dwyer JF, Marques AT, Martins RC, et al. Bird collisions with power lines: state of the art and priority areas for research. Biol Conserv. 2018;222: 1–13.

 

Bevanger K. Biological and conservation aspects of bird mortality caused by electricity power lines: a review. Biol Conserv. 1998;86: 67–76.

 
BirdLife International. BirdLife Species Factsheet: Saker falcon (Falco cherrug). 2021. http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/saker-falcon-falco-cherrug.
 

Chaurey A, Ranganathan M, Mohanty P. Electricity access for geographically disadvantaged rural communities—technology and policy insights. Energy Policy. 2004;32: 1693–705.

 
del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J. Handbook of the birds of the world. Volume 2: New World vultures to guineafowl. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions; 1994.
 

Dixon A, Maming R, Gunga A, Purev-Ochir G, Batbayar N. The problem of raptor electrocution in Asia: case studies from Mongolia and China. Bird Conserv Int. 2013a;23: 520–9.

 

Dixon A, Purev-Ochir G, Galtbalt B, Batbayar N. The use of power lines by breeding raptors and corvids in Mongolia: nest-site characteristics and management using artificial nests. J Raptor Res. 2013b;47: 282–91.

 

Dixon A, Rahman ML, Galtbalt B, Gunga A, Sugarsaikhan B, Batbayar N. Avian electrocution rates associated with density of active small mammal holes and power-pole mitigation: implications for the conservation of threatened raptors in Mongolia. J Nat Conserv. 2017a;36: 14–9.

 

Dixon A, Li X, Rahman ML, Batbayar N, Zhan XJ. Characteristics of home range areas used by Saker Falcons (Falco cherrug) wintering on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Bird Conserv Int. 2017b;27: 525–36.

 

Dixon A, Bold B, Tsolmonjav P, Galtbalt B, Batbayar N. Efficacy of a mitigation method to reduce raptor electrocution at an electricity distribution line in Mongolia. Conserv Evid. 2018;15: 50–3.

 

Dixon A, Rahman ML, Galtbalt B, Bold B, Davaasuren B, Batbayar N, et al. Mitigation techniques to reduce avian electrocution rates. Wildlife Soc Bull. 2019;43: 476–83.

 

Dixon A, Batbayar N, Bold B, Davaasuren B, Erdenechimeg T, Galtbalt B, et al. Variation in electrocution rate and demographic composition of Saker Falcons electrocuted at power lines in Mongolia. J Raptor Res. 2020;54: 136–46.

 

Dwyer JF, Taylor RC, French GA. Failure of utility pole perch deterrents modified during installation. J Raptor Res. 2020;54: 172–6.

 
Eccleston DT, Harness RE. Raptor electrocutions and power line collisions. In: Sarasola J, Grande J, Negro J, editors. Birds of prey: biology and conservation in the XXI century. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 273–302.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73745-4_12
 

Ganbold O, Bing GC, Purevee E, Munkhbayar M, Choi WS, Jargalsaikhan A, et al. Bird accidents in southern Mongolia: a case study of bird electrocution. Kor J Ornithol. 2018;25: 94–100.

 

García-del-Rey E, Rodríguez-Lorenzo JA. Avian mortality due to power lines in the Canary Islands with special reference to the steppe-land birds. J Nat Hist. 2011;45: 2159–69.

 

Gombobaatar S, Sumiya D, Shagdarsuren O, Potapov E, Fox N. Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug milvipes Jerdon) mortality in Central Mongolia and population threats. Mong J Biol Sci. 2004;2: 13–21.

 

Gómez-Catasús J, Carrascal LM, Moraleda V, Colsa J, Garcés F, Schuster C. Factors affecting differential underestimates of bird collision fatalities at electric lines: a case study in the Canary Islands. Ardeola. 2020;68: 71–94.

 

Guil F, Àngels Colomer M, Moreno-Opo R, Margalida A. Space-time trends in Spanish bird electrocution rates from alternative information sources. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2015;3: 379–88.

 

Guil F, Fernández-Olalla M, Moreno-Opo R, Mosqueda I, Gómez ME, Aranda A, et al. Minimising mortality in endangered raptors due to power lines: the importance of spatial aggregation to optimize the application of mitigation measures. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e28212.

 
Haas D. Protecting birds from powerlines (Nature and Environment No. 140). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing; 2005.
 
Hammons TJ. Electricity infrastructure in Asian region and energy security problems. In: Hammons TJ, editor. Electricity infrastructures in the global marketplace. InTech; 2011. p. 415–50.
 
Harness R, Gombobaatar S, Yosef R. Mongolian distribution power lines and raptor electrocutions. In: IEEE Rural Electric Power Conference (REPC). 2008.https://doi.org/10.1109/REPCON.2008.4520137
 
IUCN. IUCN red list of threatened species. 2020. https://www.iucnredlist.org/.
 

Janss GFE. Avian mortality from power lines: a morphologic approach of a species-specific mortality. Biol Conserv. 2000;95: 353–9.

 

Janss GFE, Ferrer M. Mitigation of raptor electrocution on steel power poles. Wildlife Soc b. 1999;27: 263–73.

 

Lehman RN, Kennedy PL, Savidge JA. The state of the art in raptor electrocution research: a global review. Biol Conserv. 2007;136: 159–74.

 

López-López P, Ferrer M, Madero A, Casado E, McGrady M. Solving man-induced large-scale conservation problems: the Spanish imperial eagle and power lines. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e17196.

 
Martin GR, Shaw JM. Bird collisions with power lines: failing to see the way ahead? Biol Conserv. 2010;143: 2695–702.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.014
 

Meretsky VJ, Snyder NFR, Beissinger SR, Clendenen DA, Wiley JW. Demography of the California condor: implications for reestablishment. Conserv Biol. 2000;14: 957–67.

 

Orihuela-Torres A, Morales-Reyes Z, Pérez-García JM, Naves-Alegre L, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Sebastián-González E. Unravelling the vertebrate scavenger assemblage in the Gobi Desert, Mongolia. J Arid Environ. 2021;190: 104509.

 

Pfeiffer M, Chimedregzen L, Ulykpan K. Community organization and species richness of ants (Hymenoptera/Formicidae) in Mongolia along an ecological gradient from steppe to Gobi desert. J Biogeogr. 2003;30: 1921–35.

 

Prather PR, Messmer TA. Raptor and corvid response to power distribution line perch deterrents in Utah. J Wildl Manage. 2010;74: 796–800.

 
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. R version 3.6.0. 2019.
 

Reading RP, Azua J, Garrett T, Kenny D, Lee H, Paek WK, et al. Differential movement of adult and juvenile Cinereous Vultures (Aegypius monachus) (Accipitriformes: Accipitridae) in Northeast Asia. J Asia Pac Biodivers. 2020;13: 156–61.

 

Real J, Grande JM, Mañosa S, Sánchez-Zapata JA. Causes of death in different areas for Bonelli's Eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus in Spain. Bird Study. 2001;48: 221–8.

 
Sánchez-Zapata JA, Clavero M, Carrete M, DeVault TL, Hermoso V, Losada MA, et al. Effects of renewable energy production and infrastructure on wildlife. In: Mateo R, Arroyo B, García JT, et al. editors. Current trends in wildlife research. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 97–123.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27912-1_5
 
Schürenberg B, Schneider R, Jerrentrup H. Implementation of recommendation No. 110/2004 on minimising adverse effects of above ground electricity transmission facilities (power lines) on birds. In: Report to the Council of Europe, Convention on the conservation of the European Wildlife and natural habitats. 2010. https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.
 

Slater SJ, Dwyer JF, Murgatroyd M. Conservation letter: raptors and overhead electrical systems. J Raptor Res. 2020;54: 198–203.

 

Stevens BS, Reese KP, Connelly JW. Survival and detectability bias of avian fence collision surveys in sagebrush steppe. J Wildlife Manag. 2011;75: 437–49.

 

Tintó A, Real J, Mañosa S. Predicting and correcting electrocution of birds in Mediterranean areas. J Wildlife Manage. 2010;74: 1852–62.

 

Viñuela J. Road Transects as a large-scale census method for raptors: the case of the Red Kite Milvus milvus in Spain. Bird Study. 1997;44: 155–65.

 
Walter H. Deserts of Central Asia. In: West NE, editor. Ecosystems of the world: temperate deserts and semi-deserts. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co; 1993. p. 193–236.
Avian Research
Article number: 41
Cite this article:
Orihuela-Torres A, Pérez-García JM, Morales-Reyes Z, et al. Avian-power line interactions in the Gobi Desert of Mongolia: are mitigation actions effective?. Avian Research, 2021, 12(1): 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00277-2

532

Views

14

Downloads

2

Crossref

2

Web of Science

3

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 02 March 2021
Accepted: 12 August 2021
Published: 21 August 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return