AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Autumn migration of Ospreys from two distinct populations in Poland reveals partial migratory divide

Dariusz Anderwald1,2Łukasz Czajka2Sławomir Rubacha2Michał Zygmunt2Paweł Mirski2,3 ( )
Forest Experimental Station in Rogów, Akademicka 20, 95-063, Rogów, Poland
Eagle Conservation Committee, Niepodległości 53/55, 10-044, Olsztyn, Poland
Faculty of Biology, University of Białystok, Ciołkowskiego 1J, 15-245, Białystok, Poland
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Long-term ringing and telemetry studies show that the Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) is a broad-front migrant following different migratory flyways, depending on the geographical location of their breeding populations. We have investigated two distinct and declining populations of Osprey in Poland, separated by only a few hundred kilometres, and hypothesised they may exhibit two different migration routes. We followed mortality causes, comparing them between migration and stationary phases of annual cycle, as well as between two distinct populations.

Methods

Nineteen Ospreys, both juveniles and adults, were equipped with GPS loggers in 2017–2020 in two populations in western and eastern Poland and followed on their autumn migration. We calculated the distance they covered on the migration, number of stopover days, migration duration, daily distances covered and departure dates to compare them between age and sex classes and between the eastern and western populations.

Results

Ospreys from the western and eastern populations showed a partial migratory divide. While the first migrated through a western flyway, the second followed a central flyway, resulting in crossing the Mediterranean Sea in distant passes that affected the distance covered. Annual mortality reached at least 67% in juveniles and at least 57% in adults.

Conclusions

We showed that two distinct Osprey populations in Poland revealed a partial migratory divide, with one covering greater distances over sea and deserts over the central flyway. This might affect individual survival rates and contribute to a steeper decline in one of the populations. In order for this to be confirmed, more individuals still have to be followed.

References

 

Alerstam T, Hake M, Kjellén N. Temporal and spatial patterns of repeated migratory journeys by ospreys. Anim Behav. 2006;71: 555–66.

 

Anderwald D. The Osprey Pandion haliaetus in Poland—situation of the species (in Polish). Studia Mat CEPL. 2017;19: 8–30.

 

Babushkin M, Kuznetsov A, del Mar DM. Autumn migratory patterns of north-west Russian Ospreys Pandion haliaetus. Ardeola. 2019;66: 119–28.

 

Bai ML, Schmidt D. Differential migration by age and sex in central European Ospreys Pandion haliaetus. J Ornithol. 2012;153: 75–84.

 
Bartoń K. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package ver. 1.43.17. 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html.
 

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Soft. 2015;67: 1–48.

 

Bierregaard RO, Poole AF, Washburn BE. Ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in the 21st century: populations, migration, management, and research priorities. J Raptor Res. 2014;48: 301–8.

 

Buehler DA, Fraser JD, Fuller MR, McAllister LS, Seegar JKD. Captive and field-tested radio transmitter attachments for bald eagles. J Field Ornithol. 1995;66: 173–80.

 
Dennis R. Plan for the recovery and conservation of Ospreys in Europe and the Mediterranean region in particular. In: Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats. Standing Committee, 36th meeting, Strasbourg. 2016
 

de Pascalis F, Panuccio M, Bacaro G, Monti F. Shift in proximate causes of mortality for six large migratory raptors over a century. Biol Conserv. 2020;251: 108793.

 

Helbig A. Genetic basis, mode of inheritance and evolutionary changes of migratory directions in palaearctic warblers (Aves: Sylviidae). J Exp Biol. 1996;199: 49–55.

 

Henny CJ, Wight HM. An endangered Osprey population: estimates of mortality and production. Auk. 1969;86: 188–98.

 

Hewson CM, Thorup K, Pearce-Higgins JW, Atkinson PW. Population decline is linked to migration route in the Common Cuckoo. Nat Commun. 2016;7: 12296.

 
Kinkead TP. Age structure and dispersal of Chesapeake bay Ospreys. Master's Thesis. Virginia: College of William and Mary; 1985.
 

Klaassen RHG, Hake M, Strandberg R, Alerstam T. Geographical and temporal flexibility in the response to crosswinds by migrating raptors. Proc R Soc B. 2011;278: 1339–46.

 

Klaassen RHG, Hake M, Strandberg R, Koks BJ, Trierweiler C, Exo K-M, et al. When and where does mortality occur in migratory birds? Direct evidence from long-term satellite tracking of raptors. J Anim Ecol. 2014;83: 176–84.

 
LUOMUS. Finnish satellite Ospreys. 2020. https://www.luomus.fi/en/finnish-satellite-ospreys. Accessed 20 Dec 2020.
 
Mackrill TR. Migratory behaviour and ecology of a trans-Saharan migrant raptor, the Osprey Pandion haliaetus. Doctoral Thesis. Leicester: University of Leicester; 2017.
 

Martell MS, Henny CJ, Nye PE, Solensky MJ. Fall migration routes, timing, and wintering sites of North American Ospreys as determined by satellite telemetry. Condor. 2011;103: 715–24.

 
Meyburg B-U, Roepke D, Meyburg C, van Wijk RE. Sex-specific migration strategies of ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) from Germany. bioRxiv. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1101/398735
 

Michelot T, Langrock R, Patterson TA. moveHMM: an R package for the statistical modelling of animal movement data using hidden Markov models. Method Ecol Evol. 2016;7: 1308–15.

 

Monti F, Dominici JM, Choquet R, Duriez O, Sammuri G, Sforzi A. The Osprey reintroduction in Central Italy: dispersal, survival and first breeding data. Bird Study. 2014;61: 465–73.

 

Monti F, Grémillet D, Sforzi A, Sammuri G, Dominici JM, Triay R, et al. Migration and wintering strategies in vulnerable Mediterranean Osprey populations. Ibis. 2018a;160: 554–67.

 

Monti F, Delfour F, Arnal V, Zenboudji S, Duriez O, Montgelard C. Genetic connectivity among osprey populations and consequences for conservation: philopatry versus dispersal as key factors. Conserv Genetics. 2018b;19: 839–51.

 

Østnes JE, Kroglund RT, Kleven O, Nygård T. Migratory patterns of Ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) from central Norway. Ornis Fennica. 2019;96: 101–11.

 

Poole A. Brood reduction in temperate and subtropical Ospreys. Oecologia. 1982;53: 111–9.

 
Rutkowski R. Report on genetic analyses carried out on Ospreys from Poland. Warsaw: Museum and Institute of Zoology; 2019.
 

Ryttman H. Estimates of survival and population development of the Osprey Pandion haliaetus, Common Buzzard Buteo buteo, and Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus in Sweden. Ornis Svec. 1994;4: 159–72.

 

Väli Ü, Sellis U. Migration patterns of the Osprey Pandion haliaetus on the Eastern European–East African flyway. Ostrich. 2015;87: 23–8.

 

Väli Ü, Mirski P, Sellis U, Dagys M, Maciorowski G. Genetic determination of migration strategies in large soaring birds: evidence from hybrid eagles. P Roy Soc Lond B Biol. 2018;285: 20180855.

 
Väli Ü, Kalvāns A, Tuvi J. Apparent survival and dispersal in a recovered Osprey population: effects of age, sex and social status. J Ornithol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-021-01908-7
 

Wahl R, Barbraud C. The demography of a newly established Osprey Pandion haliaetus population in France. Ibis. 2014;156: 84–96.

Avian Research
Article number: 46
Cite this article:
Anderwald D, Czajka Ł, Rubacha S, et al. Autumn migration of Ospreys from two distinct populations in Poland reveals partial migratory divide. Avian Research, 2021, 12(1): 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00281-6

523

Views

17

Downloads

6

Crossref

4

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 31 December 2020
Accepted: 06 September 2021
Published: 15 September 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return