AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.1 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Using classification assignment rules to assess land-use change impacts on forest biodiversity at local-to-national scales

Kathrin Affeld1,2Susan K. Wiser1( )Ian J. Payton1Miquel DeCáceres3
Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand
Lincoln University, PO Box 85084, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
Forest Science Centre of Catalonia, Ctra. Sant Llorenç km.2, E-25280 Solsona, Spain
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Ecosystem representation is one key component in assessing the biodiversity impacts of land-use changes that will irrevocably alter natural ecosystems. We show how detailed vegetation plot data can be used to assess the potential impact of inundation by a proposed hydroelectricity dam in the Mokihinui gorge, New Zealand, on representation of natural forests. Specifically we ask: 1) How well are the types of forest represented locally, regionally, and nationally; and 2) How does the number of distinct communities (i.e. beta diversity) in the target catchment compare with other catchments nationally?

Methods

For local and regional comparisons plant species composition was recorded on 45 objectively located 400 m2 vegetation plots established in each of three gorges, with one being the proposed inundation area of the Mokihinui lower gorge. The fuzzy classification framework of noise clustering was used to assign these plots to a specific alliance and association of a pre-existing national-scale classification. Nationally, we examined the relationship between the number of alliances and associations in a catchment and either catchment size or the number of plots per catchment by fitting Generalised Additive Models.

Results

The four alliances and five associations that were observed in the Mokihinui lower gorge arepresent in the region but limited locally. One association was narrowly distributed nationally, but is the mostfrequent association in the Mokihinui lower gorge; inundation may have consequences of national importance to its long-term persistence. That the Mokihinui lower gorge area had nearly twice as many plots that could not be assigned to pre-existing alliances and associations than either the Mokihinui upper or the Karamea lower gorges and proportionally more than the national dataset emphasises the compositional distinctiveness of this gorge. These outlier plots in the Mokihinui lower gorge may be unsorted assemblages of species or reflect sampling bias or that native-dominated woody riparian vegetation is rare on the landscape. At a national scale, the Mokihinui catchment has a higher diversity of forest alliances and associations (i.e. beta-diversity) than predicted based on catchment size and sampling intensity.

Conclusions

Our analytical approach demonstrates one transparent solution to a common conservation planning problem: assessing how well ecosystems that will be destroyed by a proposed land-use change are represented using a multi-scale spatial and compositional framework. We provide a useful tool for assessing potential consequences of land-use change that can help guide decision making.

References

 
Anon (2000) The New Zealand biodiversity strategy. Our chance to turn the tide Whakakahukihukitia te Tai Roroku ki te Tai Oranga. Department of Conservation and Ministry for the Environment, Wellington
 
Austin MP, Margules CR (1986) Assessing representativeness. In: Usher MB (ed) Wildlife conservation evaluation. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 45-67https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4091-8_2
 

Awimbo JA, Norton DA, Overmars FB (1996) An evaluation of representativeness for nature conservation, Hokitika Ecological District, New Zealand. Biol Conserv 75:177-186. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00058-5

 

Bendix J, Hupp CR (2000) Hydrological and geomorphological impacts on riparian plant communities. Hydrol Proc 14:2977-2990. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14:16/17<2977::aid-hyp130>3.0.co;2-4

 

Bonn A, Gaston KJ (2005) Capturing biodiversity: selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria. Biodivers Conserv 14:1083-1100

 
Braun-Blanquet J (1928) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde-Biol. Studienbücher 7. Julius Springer Verlag, Berlin
 
Chytrý M, Tíchý L (2018) National vegetation classification of the Czech Republic: a summary of the approach. Phytocoenologia In press.https://doi.org/10.1127/phyto/2017/0184
 

Crist PJ, Kohley TW, Oakleaf J (2000) Assessing land-use impacts on biodiversity using an expert systems tool. Landsc Ecol 15:47-62

 

Dave RN (1991) Characterization and detection of noise in clustering. Patt Recog Lett 12:657-664

 

De Cáceres M, Font X, Oliva F (2010) The management of numerical vegetation classification with fuzzy clustering methods. J Veg Sci 21:1138-1151

 

de Lange PJ, Norton DA, Courtney SP, Heenan PB, Barkla JW, Cameron EK, Hitchmough R, Townsend AJ (2009) Threatened and uncommon plants of New Zealand (2008 revision). NZ J Bot 47:61-96

 

Dengler J, Jansen F, Glöckler F, Peet RK, De Cáceres M, Chytrý M, Ewald J, Oldeland J, Finckh M, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Mucina L, Rodwell JS, Schaminée JHJ, Spencer N (2011) The Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science. J Veg Sci 22:582-597

 

DeVelice R, DeVelice J, Park GN (1988) Gradient analysis in nature reserve design: a New Zealand example. Conserv Biol 2:206-217

 

Ewers RM, Kliskey AD, Walker S, Rutledge D, Harding JS, Didham RK (2006) Past and future trajectories of forest loss in New Zealand. Biol Conserv 133:312-325

 
Given R (1995) North-west Nelson. In: Davis SD, Heywood VH, Hamilton AC (eds) Centres of plant diversity volume 2 Asia, Australasia, and the Pacific. WWF/IUCN, IUCN Publications Unit, Cambridge
 
Grossman D, Faber-Langendoen D, Weakley A, Anderson M, Bourgeron P, Crawford R, Goodin K, Landaal S, Metzler K, Patterson K, Pyne M, Reid M, Sneddon L (1998) International classification of ecological communities: terrestrial vegetation of the United States, vol 1. The National Vegetation Classification System: development, status, and applications, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington
 

Groves CR, Jensen DB, Valutis LL, Redford KH, Shaffer ML, Scott JM, Baumgartner JV, Higgins JV, Beck MW, Anderson MG (2002) Planning for biodiversity conservation: putting conservation science into practice. Bioscience 52:499-512

 

Haenn N, Schmook B, Reyes Y, Calmé S (2014) Improving conservation outcomes with insights from local experts and bureaucracies. Conserv Biol 28:951-958

 

Heads M (1997) Regional patterns of biodiversity in New Zealand: one degree grid analysis of plant and animal distributions. J Roy Soc NZ 27:337-354

 

Hilty J, Merenlender AM (2003) Studying biodiversity on private lands. Conserv Biol 17:132-137

 

Hortal J, Lobo JM (2006) Towards a synecological framework for systematic conservation planning. Biodiv Inform 3:16-45

 
Howell C (2008) Consolidated list of environmental weeds in New Zealand. DOC Research & Development Series 292, Wellington
 
Hurst JM, Allen RB (2007) A permanent plot method for monitoring indigenous forests - field protocols. Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Lincoln
 

Jennings MD (2000) Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landsc Ecol 15:5-20

 

Jennings MD, Faber-Langendoen D, Loucks OL, Peet RK, Roberts D (2009) Standards for associations and alliances of the US National Vegetation Classification. Ecol Monogr 79:173-199

 

Keith DA (2009) The interpretation, assessment and conservation of ecological communities. Ecol Manag Restor 10:S3-S15. doi:10.1111/j.1442-8903.2009.00453.x

 

Kessler M, Abrahamczyk S, Bos M, Buchori D, Putra DD, Gradstein SR, Höhn P, Kluge J, Orend F, Pitopang R (2009) Alpha and beta diversity of plants and animals along a tropical land-use gradient. Ecol Appl 19:2142-2156

 
Lloyd KM (2008) Evidence of Dr Kelvin Michael Lloyd in the matter of the resource management act 1991 and in the matter of an application by Meridian Energy limited for resource consents for the Mokihinui hydro project. Department of Conservation, Hokitika
 
Macara GR (2016) The climate and weather of west coast. NIWA science and technology series 72
 
Magurran AE, McGill BJ (2011) Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, UK
 

Mallik AU, Richardson JS (2009) Riparian vegetation change in upstream and downstream reaches of three temperate rivers dammed for hydroelectric generation in British Columbia, Canada. Ecol Eng 35:810-819

 

Margules CR, Nicholls AO, Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol Conserv 43:63-76. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(88)90078-X

 

Margules CR, Pressey R, Williams P (2002) Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J Biosci 27:309-326

 

Martin TG, Burgman MA, Fidler F, Kuhnert PM, Low-Choy S, McBride M, Mengersen K (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv Biol 26:29-38

 
McCaskill M (1960) Historical geography of Westland before 1914 (Vol. 1-3), dissertation. University of Canterbury
 
McCully P (1996) Silenced rivers. The ecology and politics of large dams. Zed Books, London
 

McGlone M (1985) Plant biogeography and the late Cenozoic history of New Zealand. NZ J Bot 23:723-749

 
McGlone M (1989) The Polynesian settlement of New Zealand in relation to environmental and biotic changes. NZ J Ecol 12(supplement): 115-129
 

McKinney ML (2004) Do exotics homogenize or differentiate communities? Roles of sampling and exotic species richness. Biol Inv 6:495-504

 

McSweeney GD (1982) Matai/totara floodplain forests in south Westland. NZ J Ecol 5:121-128

 
Miller CJ (2002) Conservation ecology of riparian forest within the agricultural landscape: West Coast, New Zealand. dissertation. University of Canterbury
 
Mitchell Partnerships (2007a) Mokihinui Hydro proposal: Baseline ecological surveys. Prepared for Meridian Energy Limited
 
Mitchell Partnerships (2007b) Mokihinui hydro proposal: terrestrial ecology assessment. Prepared for Meridian Energy
 

Monavari SM, Momen Bellah Fard S (2010) A GIS based assessment tool for biodiversity conservation. Intl J Environ Res 4:701-712

 
Moore LB (1976) The changing vegetation of Molesworth station, New Zealand 1944 to 1971. DSIR Bulletin 217
 

Naiman RJ, Decamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. A Review Ecol Syst 28:621-658

 
Nathan S, Rattenbury M, Suggate R (2002) Geology of the Greymouth area: scale 1: 250, 000. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences 1: 250, 000 geological map. Lower Hutt
 
Newsome PFJ (1987) The vegetation cover of New Zealand. Water and soil miscellaneous publication 112. Water and Soil Directorate, Ministry of Works and Development, Wellington
 
Ng&#257; Tipu o Aotearoa-New Zealand Plants (2011) http://nzflora.landcareresearch.co.nz/. Accessed 2 June 2011
 

Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355-364

 
Noss RF, Cooperrider A (1994) Saving nature's legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity. Washington, D.C.
 
O'Connor KF, Overmars F, Ralston MM (1990) Land evaluation for nature conservation: a scientific review compiled for application in New Zealand, Department of Conservation, Wellington
 

Orlóci, L (1967) An agglomerative method for classification of plant communities. Journal of Ecology 55:193-206.

 
Park GN (1983) The patterns, diversity and conservation status of New Zealand's lowland forests. In: Thompson K, APH H, Edmonds AS (eds) Lowland forests in New Zealand-proceedings of a symposium held at the University of Waikato, Hamilton, 27-28 may 1980
 
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (2013) Investigating the future of conservation: the case of stewardship land. Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, Wellington
 

Patterson PL, Coulston JW, Roesch FA, Westfall JA, Hill AD (2012) A primer for nonresponse in the US forest inventory and analysis program. Environm Monitor Assess 184:1423-1433. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2051-5

 
Peat N (1987) Forever the forest. Hodder & Stoughton, Auckland
 
Petts GE (1984) Impounded rivers. Wiley, Chichester
 

Pullin AS, Knight TM (2009) Doing more good than harm-building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Biol Conserv 142:931-934

 
Schaminée JHJ, Stortelder AHF, Westhoff V (1995) De vegetatie van Nederland. Deel 1. Inleiding tot de plantensociologie - grondslagen, methoden en toepassingen. Opulus Press, Uppsala
 

Scott JM, Davis F, Csuti B, Noss RF, Butterfield B, Groves C, Anderson H, Caicco S, D'Erchia F, Edwards TC, Ulliman J, Wright RG (1993) Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monogr 123:1-41

 
Snelder T, Biggs B, Weatherhead M (2010) New Zealand river environment classification user guide. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington
 

Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, Edwards DP (2016) How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trend Ecol Evol 31:67-80

 

Spector S (2002) Biogeographic crossroads as priority areas for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 16:1480-1487

 

Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW, Kalkhan MA, Schell LD (1997) Multiscale sampling of plant diversity: effects of minimum mapping unit size. Ecol Appl 7:1064-1074

 
Thompson S, Grűner I, Gapare N (2004) New Zealand land cover database, version 2-illustrated guide to target classes. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington
 
Townsend AJ, de Lange PJ, Norton DA, Molloy J, Miskelly C, Duffy C (2008) The New Zealand Threat Classification System manual. Department of Conservation, Wellington.
 

Walker S, Price R, Rutledge D, Stephens RTT, Lee WG (2006) Recent loss of indigenous cover in New Zealand. NZ J Ecol 30:169-177

 

Williams PA, Wiser S, Clarkson B, Stanley MC (2007) New Zealand's historically rare terrestrial ecosystems set in a physical and physiognomic framework. NZ J Ecol 31:119-128

 

Wiser SK, Bellingham PJ, Burrows LE (2001) Managing biodiversity information: development of New Zealand's National Vegetation Survey databank. NZ J Ecol 25:1-17

 

Wiser SK, De Cáceres M (2013) Updating vegetation classifications: an example with New Zealand's woody vegetation. J Veg Sci 24:80-93. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01450.x

 

Wiser SK, Hurst JM, Wright EF, Allen RB (2011) New Zealand's forest and shrubland communities: a quantitative classification based on a nationally representative plot network. Appl Veg Sci 14:506-523. doi:10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01146.x

 

Wiser SK, Thomson FJ, De Cáceres M (2016) Expanding an existing classification of New Zealand vegetation to include non-forested vegetation. NZ J Ecol 40:1-19

 

Wood S (2017) Mixed GAM computation vehicle with automatic smoothness estimation. R Package Version 1:8-22

 

Zellweger F, Roth T, Bugmann H, Bollmann K (2017) Beta diversity of plants, birds and butterflies is closely associated with climate and habitat structure. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:898-906. doi:10.1111/geb.12598

Forest Ecosystems
Article number: 13
Cite this article:
Affeld K, Wiser SK, Payton IJ, et al. Using classification assignment rules to assess land-use change impacts on forest biodiversity at local-to-national scales. Forest Ecosystems, 2018, 5(2): 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-017-0121-z

932

Views

27

Downloads

2

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

3

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 01 August 2017
Accepted: 14 December 2017
Published: 22 January 2018
© The Author(s) 2018.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Return