AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.9 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Assessing above-ground biomass-functional diversity relationships in temperate forests in northern Mexico

Benedicto Vargas-Larreta1Jorge Omar López-Martínez2,3 ( )Edgar J. González4José Javier Corral-Rivas5Francisco Javier Hernández1
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de El Salto, 34942 El Salto, Durango, Mexico
Cátedras, CONACYT, 1582, Av.Insurgentes Sur, Ciudad de México, Mexico
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, 77014, Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico
Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Río Papaloapan y Blvd.Durango s/n, Col.Valle del Sur, 34120 Durango, Mexico
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

Studies on the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem productivity have suggested that species richness and functional diversity are the main drivers of ecosystem processes. Several patterns on this relationship have been found, including positive, unimodal, negative, and neutral trends, keeping the issue controversial. In this study, taxonomic diversity and functional diversity as drivers of above-ground biomass (AGB) were compared, and the mechanisms that influence biomass production were investigated by testing the complementarity and the mass-ratio hypotheses.

Methods

Using data from 414 permanent sample plots, covering 23% of temperate forest in the Sierra Madre Oriental (México), we estimated the above-gound biomass (AGB), taxonomic and functional diversity indices, as well as community weighted mean values (CWM) for three functional traits (maximum height, leaf size and wood density) for trees ≥7.5 cm DBH, in managed and unmanaged stands. To compare taxonomic diversity differences between managed and unmanaged stands we carried out a rarefaction analysis. Furthermore, we evaluated the relationship between AGB and taxonomic and functional diversity metrics, as well as CWM traits throught spatial autoregressive models.

Results

We found a hump-shaped relationship between AGB and species richness in managed and unmanaged forests. CMW of maximum height was the most important predictor of AGB in both stands, which suggested that the mechanism underlaying the AGB-diversity relationship is the dominance of some highly productive species, supporting the mass-ratio hypothesis. Above-ground biomass was significantly correlated with three of the five functional diversity metrics, CWM maximum height and species richness. Our results show the importance of taking into account spatial autocorrelation in the construction of predictive models to avoid spurious patterns in the AGB-diversity relationship.

Conclusion

Species richness, maximum height, functional richness, functional dispersion and RaoQ indices relate with above-ground biomass production in temperate mixed-species and uneven-aged forests of northern Mexico. These forests show a hump-shaped AGB-species richness relationship. Functional diversity explains better AGB production than classical taxonomic diversity. Community weighted mean traits provide key information to explain stand biomass in these forests, where maximum tree height seems to be a more suitable trait for understanding the biomass accumulation process in these ecosystems. Although the impact of forest management on biodiversity is still debated, it has not changed the AGB-diversity relationships in the forests of the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico.

References

 

Adler PB, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Hillebrand H, Hautier Y, Hector A, Harpole WS, O'Halloran LR, Grace JB, Anderson TM, Bakker JD, Biederman LA, Brown CS, Buckley YM, Calabrese LB, Chu CJ, Cleland EE, Collins SL, Cottingham KL, Crawley MJ, Damschen EI, Davies KF, DeCrappeo NM, Fay PA, Firn J, Frater P, Gasarch EI, Gruner DS, Hagenah N, Hille Ris Lambers J, Humphries H, Jin VL, Kay AD, Kirkman KP, Klein JA, Knops JMH, La Pierre KJ, Lambrinos JG, Li W, MacDougall AS, McCulley RL, Melbourne BA, Mitchell CE, Moore JL, Morgan JW, Mortensen B, Orrock JL, Prober SM, Pyke DA, Risch AC, Schuetz M, Smith MD, Stevens CJ, Sullivan LL, Wang G, Wragg PD, Wright JP, Yang LH (2011) Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. Science 333: 1750-1753

 

Ammer C (2019) Diversity and forest productivity in a changing climate. New Phytol 221: 50-66

 

Barrufol M, Schmid B, Bruelheide H, Chi X, Hector A, Ma K, Michalski S, Tang Z, Niklaus PA (2013) Biodiversity promotes tree growth during succession in subtropical forest. PLoS One 8: e81246

 

Becknell JM, Powers JS (2014) Stand age and soils as drivers of plant functional traits and aboveground biomass in secondary tropical dry forest. Can J For Res 44: 604-613

 

Binkley D (2004) A hypothesis about the interaction of tree dominance and stand production through stand development. For Ecol Manag 190: 265-271

 

Cavanaugh KC, Gosnell JS, Davis SL, Ahumada J, Boundja P, Clark DB, Mugerwa B, Jansen PA, O'Brien TG, Rovero F, Sheil D, Vasquez R, Andelman S (2014) Carbon storage in tropical forests correlates with taxonomic diversity and functional dominance on a global scale: biodiversity and aboveground carbon storage. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23: 563-573

 

Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12: 693-715

 

Challenger A (1998) Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México: pasado presente y futuro. CONABIO, IUCN

 

Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sanders EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, Ellison AM (2014) Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol Monogr 84: 45-67

 

Cheng Y, Zhang C, Zhao X, von Gadow K (2018) Biomass-dominant species shape the productivity-diversity relationship in two temperate forests. Ann For Sci 75: 97

 

Cianciaruso MV, Batalha MA, Gaston KJ, Petchey OL (2009) Including intraspecific variability in functional diversity. Ecology 90: 81-89

 

Colwell RK, Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Lin S-Y, Mao CX, Chazdon RL, Longino JT (2012) Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. J Plant Ecol 5: 3-21

 

Conti G, Díaz S (2013) Plant functional diversity and carbon storage - an empirical test in semi-arid forest ecosystems. J Ecol 101(1): 18-28

 

Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51: 335-380

 

Cornwell WK, Schwilk LDW, Ackerly DD (2006) A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87: 1465-1471

 

Corral-Rivas JJ, González-Elizondo MS, Lujan-Soto JE, von Gadow K (2019) Effects of density and structure on production in the communal forests of the Mexican Sierra Madre Occidental. South For 81: 1-10

 

Crecente-Campo F, Corral-Rivas JJ, Vargas-Larreta B, Wehenkel C (2014) Can random components explain differences in the height-diameter relationship in mixed uneven-aged stands? Ann For Sci 71: 51-70

 

Díaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 646-655

 

Díaz S, Lavorel S, de Bello F, Quétier F, Grigulis K, Robson TM (2007) Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 20684-20689

 

Ding Y, Zang R, Lu X, Huang J, Xu Y (2019) The effect of environmental filtering on variation in functional diversity along a tropical elevational gradient. J Veg Sci 30: 973-983

 

Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling WD, Kühn I, Ohlemüller R, Peres-Neto PR, Reineking B, Schröder B, Schurr M, Wilson R (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30(5): 609-628

 

Duarte LS, Hofmann GS, Dos Santos MMG, Hartz SM, Pillar VD (2010) Testing for the influence of niche and neutral factors on sapling community assembly beneath isolated woody plants in grasslands. J Veg Sci 21: 462-471

 

Duguid MC, Ashton MS (2013) A meta-analysis of the effect of forest management for timber on understory plant species diversity in temperate forests. For Ecol Manag 303: 81-90

 

Farjon A, Filer D (2013) An atlas of the World's conifers: an analysis of their distribution, biogeography, diversity and conservation status. Brill

 

Finegan B, Peña-Claros M, de Oliveira A, Ascarrunz N, Bret-Harte MS, Carreño-Rocabado G, Casanoves F, Díaz S, Eguiguren-Velepucha P, Fernandez F, Licona JC, Lorenzo L, Salgado-Negret B, Vaz M, Poorter L (2015) Does functional trait diversity predict above-ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses. J Ecol 103: 191-201

 

Flynn DFB, Mirotchnick N, Jain M, Palmer MI, Naeem S (2011) Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity-ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology 92: 1573-1581

 

Forrester DI, Bauhus J (2016) A Review of Processes Behind Diversity-Productivity Relationships in Forests. Current Forestry Reports 2: 45-61

 

Fortin M-J, Dale MRT (2009) Spatial autocorrelation in ecological studies: A legacy of solutions and myths: Spatial autocorrelation in ecological studies. Geogr Anal 41: 392-397

 

Gamfeldt L, Snäll T, Bagchi R, Jonsson M, Gustafsson L, Kjellander P, Ruiz-Jaen MC, Fröberg J, Philipson CD, Mikusińsky Andersson E, Westerlund B, Andrén H, Morberg F, Moen J, Bengtsson J (2013) Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat Commun 4: 1340

 

García AA, González MS (2003) Pináceas de Durango. Instituto de Ecología AC Comisión Nacional Forestal México

 

Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, Navas ML, Roumet C, Debussche M, Laurent G, Blanchard A, Aubry D, Bellmann A, Neill C, Toussaint JP (2004) Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85: 2630-2637

 

González-Elizondo MS, González-Elizondo M, Tena-Flores JA, Ruacho-González L, López-Enríquez IL (2012) Vegetación de la sierra madre occidental, México: Una síntesis. Acta Bot Mex: 351-403

 

Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4: 379-391

 

Götzenberger L, de Bello F, Bråthen KA, Davison J, Dubuis A, Guisan A, Lepš J, Lindborg R, Moora M, Pärtel M, Pellissier L, Pottier J, Vittoz P, Zobel K, Zobel M (2012) Ecological assembly rules in plant communities-approaches, patterns and prospects. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 87: 111-127

 

Grace JB, Anderson TM, Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Hautier Y, Hillebrand H, Lind EM, Pärtel M, Bakker JD, Buckley YM, Crawley MJ, Damschen EI, Davies KF, Fay PA, Firn J, Gruner DS, Hector A, Knops JMH, MacDougall AS, Melbourne B, Morgan JW, Orrock J, Prober S, Smith MD (2016) Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness. Nature 529: 390-393

 
Grime JP (1988) The CSR model of primary plant strategies-origins, implications and tests. In: Plant evolutionary biology. Springer, Dordrechthttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1207-6_14
 

Guo Q (2007) The diversity-biomass-productivity relationships in grassland management and restoration. Basic Appl Ecol 8: 199-208

 
Hagglund B (1981) Evaluation of forest site productivity
 

HilleRisLambers J, Adler PB, Harpole WS, Levine JM, Mayfield MM (2012) Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43: 227-248

 

Hooper DU, Chapin FS Ⅲ, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystems functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75: 3-35

 

Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2016) iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol Evol 7: 1451-1456

 

Isbell F, Tilman D, Polasky S, Loreau M (2015) The biodiversity-dependent ecosystem service debt. Ecol Lett 18: 119-134

 

Juodvalkis A, Kairiukstis L, Vasiliauskas R (2005) Effects of thinning on growth of six tree species in north-temperate forests of Lithuania. Eur J For Res 124: 187-192

 

Kenkel NC, Peltzer DA, Baluta D, Pirie D (2001) Increasing plant diversity does not influence productivity: empirical evidence and potential mechanisms. Community Ecol 1: 165-170

 

Kirby KR, Potvin C (2007) Variation in carbon storage among tree species: implications for the management of a small-scale carbon sink project. For Ecol Manag 246(2-3): 208-221

 

Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91: 299-305

 

Lawton JH, Brown VK (1994) Redundancy in ecosystems. Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ecology 85: 1534-1540

 

Lehman CL, Tilman D (2000) Biodiversity, stability, and productivity in competitive communities. Am Nat 156: 534-552

 

Leps J, de Bello F, Lavorel S, Berman S (2006) Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter. Preslia 78: 481-501

 

Li S, Lang X, Liu W, Ou G, Xu H, Su J (2018) The relationship between species richness and aboveground biomass in a primary Pinus kesiya forest of Yunnan, southwestern China. PLoS One 13: e0191140

 

Liang J, Crowther TW, Picard N, Wiser S, Zhou M, Alberti G, Schulze ED, McGuire AD, Bozzato F, Pretzsch H, de-Miguel S, Paquette A, Hérault B, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Barrett CB, Glick HB, Hengeveld GM, Nabuurs GJ, Pfautsch S, Viana H, Vibrans AC, Ammer C, Schall P, Verbyla D, Tchebakova N, Fischer M, Watson JV, HYH C, Lei X, Schelhaas MJ, Lu H, Gianelle D, Parfenova EI, Salas C, Lee E, Lee B, Kim HS, Bruelheide H, Coomes DA, Piotto D, Sunderland T, Schmid B, Gourlet-Fleury S, Sonké B, Tavani R, Zhu J, Brandl S, Vayreda J, Kitahara F, Searle EB, Neldner VJ, Ngugi MR, Baraloto C, Frizzera L, Bałazy R, Oleksyn J, Zawiła-Niedźwiecki T, Bouriaud O, Bussotti F, Finér L, Jaroszewicz B, Jucker T, Valladares F, Jagodzinski AM, Peri PL, Gonmadje C, Marthy W, O'Brien T, Martin EH, Marshall AR, Rovero F, Bitariho R, Niklaus PA, Alvarez-Loayza P, Chamuya N, Valencia R, Mortier F, Wortel V, Engone-Obiang NL, Ferreira LV, Odeke DE, Vasquez RM, Lewis SL, Reich PB (2016) Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354(6309): aaf8957

 

Madrid L, Núñez JM, Quiroz G, Rodríguez Y (2009) La propiedad forestal social en México. Investigaciones Ambientales 1: 179-196

 

Mason NWH, MacGillivray K, Steel JB, Wilson JB (2003) An index of functional diversity. J Veg Sci 14: 571-578

 

Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111: 112-118

 

McGill BJ, Maurer BA, Weiser MD (2006) Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology 87: 1411-1423

 

Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM, Gross KL, Reynolds HL, Waide RB, Willig MR, Dodson SI, Gough L (2001) What is the observed relationship between productivity and species richness. Ecology 82: 2381-2396

 

Ordoñez Díaz JAB, Galicia Naranjo A, Venegas-Mancera NJ, Hernández-Tejeda T, Ordoñez-Díaz MJ, Davalos-Sotelo R (2015) Density of Mexican woods by vegetation type based on J. Rzedowski's classification: compilation. Madera Bosques 21: 77-126

 

Padilla-Martínez JR, Corral-Rivas JJ, Briseño-Reyes J, Paul C, López-Serrano PM, v. Gadow K, (2020) Patterns of Density and Production in the Community Forests of the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico. Trees Livelihoods 11: 307

 

Paillet Y, Bergès L, Hjältén J, Ódor P, Avon C, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Bijlsma RJ, De Bruyn LUC, Fuhr M, Grandin ULF et al (2010) Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv Biol 24: 101-112

 

Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, Bret-Harte MS, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Gurvich DE, Urcelay C, Veneklaas EJ, Reich PB, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Ray P, Enrico L, Pausas LG, Buchmann AC, Funes G, Quétier F, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Morgan HD, ter Steege H, van der Heijden MGA, Sack L, Blonder B, Poschlod P, Vaieretti MV, Conti G, Staver AC, Aquino S, Cornelissen JHC (2013) New handbook for standardized measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 61: 167-234

 

Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5: 402-411

 
Petchey OL, O'Gorman EJ, Flynn DFB (2009) A functional guide to functional diversity measures. In: Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (eds) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing. Oxford University Press, Oxfordhttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0004
 
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2020) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3, pp 1-149 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme>. Accessed 26 Oct 2020
 

Poorter L, Wright SJ, Paz H, Ackerly DD, Condit R, Ibarra-Manríquez G, Harms KE, Licona JC, Martínez-Ramos M, Mazer SJ, Muller-Landau HC, Peña-Claros M, Webb CO, Wright IJ (2008) Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests. Ecology 89: 1908-1920

 

Potter KM, Woodall CW (2014) Does biodiversity make a difference? Relationships between species richness, evolutionary diversity, and aboveground live tree biomass across U.S. forests. For Ecol Manag 321: 117-129

 

Pretzsch H (2005) Stand density and growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L. ) Karst. ) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L. ): evidence from long-term experimental plots. Eur J For Res 124: 193-205

 
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 26 Oct 2020
 

Rao CR (1982) Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach. Theor Popul Biol 21: 24-43

 

Reich PB, Tilman D, Naeem S, Ellsworth DS, Knops J, Craine J, Wedin D, Trost J (2004) Species and functional group diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its response to CO2 and N. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 10101-10106

 

Rojas-García F, De Jong BHJ, Martínez-Zurimendí P, Paz-Pellat F (2015) Database of 478 allometric equations to estimate biomass for Mexican trees and forests. Ann For Sci 72: 835-864

 

Roscher C, Schumacher J, Gubsch M, Lipowsky A, Weigelt A, Buchmann N, Schmid B, Schulze ED (2012) Using plant functional traits to explain diversity-productivity relationships. PLoS One 7: e36760

 

Rüger N, Wirth C, Wright SJ, Condit R (2012) Functional traits explain light and size response of growth rates in tropical tree species. Ecology 93: 2626-2636

 

Ruiz-Benito P, Gómez-Aparicio L, Paquette A, Messier C, Kattge J, Zavala MA (2014) Diversity increases carbon storage and tree productivity in Spanish forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23: 311-322

 

Schuldt A, Assmann T, Bruelheide H, Durka W, Eichenberg D, Härdtle W, Kröber W, Michalski SG, Purschke O (2014) Functional and phylogenetic diversity of woody plants drive herbivory in a highly diverse forest. New Phytol 202: 864-873

 

Schumacher J, Roscher C (2009) Differential effects of functional traits on aboveground biomass in semi-natural grasslands. Oikos 118(11): 1659-1668

 

Silva-Flores R, Pérez-Verdín G, Wehenkel C (2014) Patterns of tree species diversity in relation to climatic factors on the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico. PLoS One 9: e105034

 
Smith TE (2020) Notebook for spatial data analysis. [online] http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~ese502/#notebook
 

Sonkoly J, Kelemen A, Valkó O, Deák B, Kiss R, Tóth K, Miglécz T, Tóthmérész B, Török P (2019) Both mass ratio effects and community diversity drive biomass production in a grassland experiment. Sci Rep 9: 1848

 

Tilman D (1997) Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78: 81-92

 
Tilman D (2001) Functional diversity. In: Encyclopedia of biodiversity. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-226865-2/00132-2 Accessed 26 Oct 2020
 

Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277: 1300-1302

 

Torres-Rojo JM, Magaña-Torres OS, Moreno-Sánchez F (2016) Predicción del cambio de uso/cobertura arbolada en México a través de probabilidades de transición. Agrociencia 50: 769-785

 

Vanclay JK (1994) Modelling forest growth and yield: applications to mixed tropical forest. CAB International, Wallingford

 

Vargas-Larreta B, López-Sánchez CA, Corral-Rivas JJ, López-Martínez JO, Aguirre-Calderón CG, Álvarez-González JG (2017) Allometric equations for estimating biomass and carbon stocks in the temperate forests of North-Western Mexico. Forests 8: 269

 

Vilà M, Vayreda J, Comas L, Ibáñez JJ, Mata T, Obón B (2007) Species richness and wood production: a positive association in Mediterranean forests. Ecol Lett 10: 241-250

 

Vile D, Shipley B, Garnier E (2006) Ecosystem productivity can be predicted from potential relative growth rate and species abundance. Ecol Lett 9: 1061-1067

 

Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D (2008) New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89: 2290-2301

 

Violle C, Navas ML, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116: 882-892

 
Vitousek PM, Hooper DU (1993) Biological diversity and terrestrial ecosystem biogeochemistry. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin, pp 3-14https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58001-7_1
 

Wang Z, Luo T, Li R, Tang Y, Du M (2012) Causes for the unimodal patterns of biomass and productivity in alpine grasslands along a large altitudinal gradient in semi-arid regions. J Veg Sci 24: 198-201

 

Wang J, Cheng Y, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Zhao X, Von Gadow K (2016) Relationships between tree biomass productivity and local species diversity. Ecosphere 7: 74

 

Wardle DA, Yeates GW, Barker GM, Bonner KI (2006) The influence of plant litter diversity on decomposer abundance and diversity. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 1052-1062

 

Weiner J, Thomas SC (2001) The nature of tree growth and the "age-related decline in forest productivity". Oikos 94: 374-376

 

Wright SJ, Kitajima K, Kraft NJB, Reich PB, Wright IJ, Bunker DE, Condit R, Dalling JW, Davies SJ, Díaz S, Engelbrecht BMJ, Harms KE, Hubbell SP, Marks CO, Ruiz-Jaen MC, Salvador CM, Zanne AE (2010) Functional traits and the growth-mortality trade-off in tropical trees. Ecology 91: 3664-3674

 

Wu X, Wang X, Wu Y, Xia X, Fang J (2015) Forest biomass is strongly shaped by forest height across boreal to tropical forests in China. J Plant Ecol 8: 559-567

 

Yuan Z, Ali A, Wang S, Gazol A, Freckleton R, Wang X, Lin F, Ye J, Zhou L, Hao Z, Loreau M (2018) Abiotic and biotic determinants of coarse woody productivity in temperate mixed forests. Sci Total Environ 630: 422-431

 

Zhang Y, Chen HYH (2015) Individual size inequality links forest diversity and above-ground biomass. J Ecol 103: 1245-1252

 

Zhang Y, Chen HYH, Reich PB (2012) Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis: diversity and productivity relationships. J Ecol 100: 742-749

Forest Ecosystems
Article number: 8
Cite this article:
Vargas-Larreta B, López-Martínez JO, González EJ, et al. Assessing above-ground biomass-functional diversity relationships in temperate forests in northern Mexico. Forest Ecosystems, 2021, 8(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00282-3

622

Views

7

Downloads

14

Crossref

17

Web of Science

19

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 22 July 2020
Accepted: 12 January 2021
Published: 31 January 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Return