Home Advances in Aerodynamics Article
PDF (2 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Evolutionary understanding of airfoil lift

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

This review attempts to elucidate the physical origin of aerodynamic lift of an airfoil using simple formulations and notations, particularly focusing on the critical effect of the fluid viscosity. The evolutionary development of the lift problem of a flat-plate airfoil is reviewed as a canonical case from the classical inviscid circulation theory to the viscous-flow model. In particular, the physical aspects of the analytical expressions for the lift coefficient of the plate-plate airfoil are discussed, including Newton’s sine-squared law, Rayleigh’s lift formula, thin-airfoil theory and viscous-flow lift formula. The vortex-force theory is described to provide a solid foundation for consistent treatment of lift, form drag, Kutta condition, and downwash. The formation of the circulation and generation of lift are discussed based on numerical simulations of a viscous starting flow over an airfoil, and the evolution of the flow topology near the trailing edge is well correlated with the realization of the Kutta condition. The presented contents are valuable for the pedagogical purposes in aerodynamics and fluid mechanics.

Keywords

LiftDragAirfoilCirculationKutta conditionTaylor-Sears conditionViscosityBoundary layerVorticityVortexLamb vectorBoundary enstrophy flux

References

1

McMaster J (1989) The flight of the bumblebee and related myths of entomological engineering: bees help bridge the gap between science and engineering. Am Sci 77(2): 164–169

Google Scholar
2

McLean D (2012) Understanding aerodynamics. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118454190

Crossref
3

Eastlake CN (2002) An Aerodynamicist’s view of lift, Bernoulli, and Newton. Phys Teach 40(3): 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1466553

Crossref Google Scholar
4

Anderson JD (2008) Introduction to flight, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

5

Bloor D (2011) The enigma of the aerofoil: rival theories in aerodynamics, 1909–1930. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Crossref
6

Babinsky H (2003) How do wings work? Phys Educ 38(6): 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/38/6/001

Crossref Google Scholar
7

Weltner K (1987) A comparison of explanations of the aerodynamic lifting force. Am J Phys 55(1): 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14960

Crossref Google Scholar
8

Anderson JD, Eberhardt S (2001) Understanding Flight. McGraw-Hill, New York

9

Templin RJ (2000) The Spectrum of animal flight: insects to pterosaurs. Prog Aerosp Sci 36(5-6): 393–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(00)00007-5

Crossref Google Scholar
10

Liu T (2007) Time-area-averaged momentum stream tube model for flapping flight. J Aircraft 44(2): 459–466. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.23660

Crossref Google Scholar
11

Prandtl L, Tietjen OG (1934) Fundamentals of hydro- and aeromechanics. Dover, New York

12

Milne-Thomson LM (1958) Theoretical aerodynamics. Dover, New York

13

Von Mises R (1959) Theory of Flight. Dover, New York

14
Theodorsen T, Garrick IE (1979) General potential theory of arbitrary wing sections. NACA Technical Report, NACA-TR-452
15

Glauert H (1983) The elements of aerofoil and airscrew theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511574481

Crossref
16
Jones RT (1979) Classical aerodynamic theory. NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, NASA-RP-1050
17

Sears WR (2011) Introduction to theoretical aerodynamics and hydrodynamics. AIAA Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.867743

Crossref
18

Ackrody JAD, Axcell BP, Ruban AI (2001) Early developments of modern aerodynamics. Elsevier, New York. https://doi.org/10.2514/4.475160

Crossref
19

Anderson JD (1997) A history of aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607

Crossref
20

Liu T, Wang S, He G (2017) Explicit role of viscosity in generating lift. AIAA J 55(11):3990–3994. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055907

Crossref Google Scholar
21

Rayleigh L (1876) On the resistance of fluids. London Edinburgh Dublin Philosophic Magazine J Sci 2(13):430–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786447608639132

Crossref Google Scholar
22

Lamb H (1945) Hydrodynamics. Dover, New York

23

Truesdell C (1954) The kinematics of vorticity. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19570370525

Crossref
24
Lanchester FW (1907) Aerodynamics. A. Constable and Company, London
25
Giacomelli R, Pistolesi E (1934) Historical sketch. In: Durand WF (ed) Aerodynamic theory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91489-8_4
Crossref
26
Kutta W (1902) Lift forces in owing fluids. Aero Mitt Ⅲ
27
Jowkowski N (1906) De la chute dans I’air de Corps l_egers de Forme allong_ee, Anim_es d’un Mouvement Rotatoire. Bulletin de I’Institute Aerodynamic de Koutchino, Petersbourg
28

Liu T, Misaka T, Asai K, Obayashi S, Wu JZ (2016) Feasibility of skin-friction diagnostics based on surface pressure gradient field.Meas Sci Technol 27(12):125304. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/12/125304

Crossref Google Scholar
29

Chen T, Liu T, Wang LP, Chen SY (2019) Relations between skin friction and other surface quantities in viscous flows. Phys Fluids 31:107101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5120454

Crossref Google Scholar
30

Liu T (2018) Skin-friction and surface-pressure structures in near-wall flows. AIAA J 56(10):3887–3896. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J057216

Crossref Google Scholar
31

Chen T, Liu T, Dong ZQ, Wang LP, Chen SY (2021) Near-wall flow structures and related surface quantities in wall-bounded turbulence. Phys Fluids 33:065116. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0051649

Crossref Google Scholar
32

Schlichting H (1979) Boundary-layer theory, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.324061

Crossref
33
Okamoto M (2006) An experimental study on aerodynamic characteristics of steady and unsteady airfoils at low Reynolds number. Dissertation, University of Tokyo, Tokyo
34

Wu JZ, Ma HY, Zhou MD (2006) Vorticity and vortex dynamics. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29028-5

Crossref
35

Marongiu C, Tognaccini R, Ueno M (2013) Lift and lift-induced drag computation by Lamb vector integration. AIAA J 51(6):1420–1430. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052104

Crossref Google Scholar
36

Noca F, Shiels D, Jeon D (1999) A comparison of methods for evaluating time-dependent fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives. J Fluids Structures 13(5):551–578. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0219

Crossref Google Scholar
37

Wang S, He G, Zhang X, Liu T (2015) Evaluation of lift formulas applied to low Reynolds number flows. AIAA J 53(1):161–175. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053042

Crossref Google Scholar
38

Wu JZ, Liu LQ, Liu T (2018) Fundamental theories of aerodynamic force in viscous and compressible complex flows. Prog Aerosp Sci 99:27–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.04.002

Crossref Google Scholar
39

Prandtl L (1918) Tragflügeltheorie. Ⅰ. Mitteilung. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Math Phys 1918:451–477

Google Scholar
40
Von Kármán T, Burgers JM (1935) General aerodynamic theory — perfect fluids. In: Durand WF (ed) Aerodynamic theory, vol Ⅱ. Dover, New York, pp 1–24
41

Saffman PG (1992) Vortex dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624063

Crossref
42

Bryant LW, Williams DH, Taylor GI (1926) An investigation of the flow of air around an aerofoil of infinite span. Phil Trans Royal Soc A 225:626–635. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1926.0005

Crossref Google Scholar
43

Taylor GI (1926) Note on the connection between the lift in an airfoil in a wind and the circulation round it. Phil Trans Royal Soc A 225:238–245

Google Scholar
44

Sears WR (1956) Some recent developments in airfoil theory. J Aero Sci 23(5):490–499. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.3588

Crossref Google Scholar
45

Sears WR (1976) Unsteady motion of airfoil with boundary-layer separation. AIAA J 14(2):216–220. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7072

Crossref Google Scholar
46

Liu T, Wang S, Zhang X, He G (2015) Unsteady thin airfoil theory revisited: application of a simple lift formula. AIAA J 53(6):1493–1502. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053439

Crossref Google Scholar
47

Von Kárman T, Sears WR (1938) Airfoil theory for non-uniform motion. J Aeronautic Sci 10(10):379–390. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.674

Crossref Google Scholar
48

Batchelor GK (1967) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800955

Crossref
49
Lighthill MJ (1963) Introduction of Boundary Layer Theory. In: Rosenhead L (ed) Laminar boundary layers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 46–113
50
Lighthill MJ (1995) Fluid Mechanics. In: Brown LM, Pais A, Pippard B (eds) Twentieth Century Physics, Vol. Ⅱ, Chap. 10, pp 795–912. Inst Phys Publishing & AIP Press, Melville, NY
51

Zhu JY, Liu TS, Liu LQ, Zou SF, Wu JZ (2015) Causal mechanism in airfoil-circulation formation. Phys Fluids 27(12):123601. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937348

Crossref Google Scholar
52
Liu T, Schulte M (2007) Flight testing education at Western Michigan University. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2007–0700, 08–11 January 2007, Reno. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-700
Crossref
53

Liu T, Liou W, Schulte M (2009) Aeroship: a hybrid flight platform. J Aircraft 46(2):667–674. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39950

Crossref Google Scholar
54
Germann KP (1997) Flight test evaluation of a differential global positioning system sensor in runway performance testing. MS Thesis, Mississippi State University, Jackson
55

Hunt JCR, Abell CJ, Peterka JA, Woo H (1978) Kinematical studies of the flows around free or surface-mounted obstacles; applying topology to flow visualization. J Fluid Mech 86(1):179–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112078001068

Crossref Google Scholar
56

Tobak M, Peake DJ (1982) Topology of three-dimensional separation flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 14(1):61–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.14.010182.000425

Crossref Google Scholar
Advances in Aerodynamics
Volume 3 Issue 1,
December 2021
Pages 37-37
DOI: 10.1186/s42774-021-00089-4
Cite this article:
Liu T. Evolutionary understanding of airfoil lift. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2021, 3(1): 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-021-00089-4
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return