PDF (3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Experimental study on airfoil flow separation control via an air-supplement plasma synthetic jet

Ru-Bing Liu1,2 ()Wen-Tao Wei1,3Hai-Peng Wan1Qi Lin1,2Fei Li4Kun Tang5,6
School of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen 361005, China
Chengdu Aircraft Design and Research Institute, Chengdu 610041, China
Shanghai Aerospace Control Technology Institute, Shanghai 201100, China
Rotor Aerodynamics Key Laboratory, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China
Science and Technology on Plasma Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

An air-supplement plasma synthetic jet (PSJ) actuator increases the air supplemental volume in the recovery stage and improves the jet energy by attaching a check valve to the chamber of a conventional actuator. To explore the flow control effect and mechanism of the air-supplement actuator, via particle image velocimetry experiments in a low-speed wind tunnel, the flow field and boundary layer characteristics of a two-dimensional airfoil surface under different actuation states were compared for different attack angles and jet orifices. The experimental results show that, compared with the conventional actuation state, the jet energy of the air-supplement PSJ is higher and the indirect mixing effect of the counter-vortex sequence produced by the jet-mainstream interaction is stronger. Furthermore, the boundary layer mixing effect is better, which can further suppress flow separation and improve the critical flow separation attack angle. Moreover, increasing the jet momentum coefficient can enhance the flow control effect. The findings of this study could provide guidance for the flow control application of air-supplement PSJs.

References

1
Grossman KR, Cybyk BZ, VanWie DM (2003) Sparkjet actuators for flow control. Paper presented at the 41st aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, 6-9 January 2003
2
Cybyk BZ, Simon DH, Land HB et al (2006) Experimental characterization of a supersonic flow control actuator. Paper presented at the 44th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, 9-12 January 2006
3
Popkin SH, Cybyk BZ, Land HB et al (2013) Recent performance-based advances in Sparkjet actuator design for supersonic flow applications. Paper presented at the 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Grapevine, 7-10 January 2013
4

Popkin SH, Cybyk BZ, Foster CH et al (2016) Experimental estimation of SparkJet efficiency. AIAA J 54(6):1831–1845

5

Zong HH (2018) Influence of nondimensional heating volume on efficiency of plasma synthetic jet actuators. AIAA J 56(5):2075–2078

6

Zong HH, Kotsonis M (2016) Electro-mechanical efficiency of plasma synthetic jet actuator driven by capacitive discharge. J Phys D Appl Phys 49(45):455201

7

Belinger A, Hardy P, Barricau P et al (2011) Influence of the energy dissipation rate in the discharge of a plasma synthetic jet actuator. J Phys D Appl Phys 44(36):365201

8

Wu SQ, Liu XY, Huang GW et al (2019) Influence of high-voltage pulse parameters on the propagation of a plasma synthetic jet. Plasma Sci Technol 21(7):074007

9

Caruana D, Barricau P, Gleyzes C (2013) Separation control with plasma synthetic jet actuators. Int J Aerodyn 3(1):71–83

10

Liu RB, Niu ZG, Wang MM et al (2015) Aerodynamic control of NACA 0021 airfoil model with spark discharge plasma synthetic jets. Sci China Technol Sci 58(11):1949–1955

11

Li Y, Liang H, Jia M et al (2017) Experimental investigation of enhancing wing aerodynamic performance by plasma synthetic jet. J Propuls Technol 38(09):1943–1949 (in Chinese)

12

Su Z, Li J, Liang H et al (2018) Experimental investigation of enhancing airfoil aerodynamic performance with multichannel plasma synthetic jet. J Propuls Technol 39(09):1928–1937 (in Chinese)

13

Zong HH, van Pelt T, Kotsonis M (2018) Airfoil flow separation control with plasma synthetic jets at moderate Reynolds number. Exp Fluids 59:169

14

Gu RY, Shan Y, Zhang JZ et al (2018) Numerical study on transport aircraft after-body flow separation control by spark jet. J Aerospace Power 33(8):1855–1863 (in Chinese)

15

Sun J, Niu ZG, Liu RB et al (2019) The wind tunnel test of the active flow control on the flying wing model based on the plasma synthetic jet. J Exp Fluid Mech 33(4):81–88 (in Chinese)

16

Zhou Y, Xia Z, Luo Z et al (2017) Effect of three-electrode plasma synthetic jet actuator on shock wave control. Sci China Technol Sci 60:146–152

17

Zhou Y, Xia Z, Luo Z et al (2019) Characterization of three-electrode SparkJet actuator for hypersonic flow control. AIAA J 57(2):879–885

18

Zhou Y, Xia ZX, Luo ZB et al (2017) A novel ram-air plasma synthetic jet actuator for near space high-speed flow control. Acta Astronaut 133:95–102

19

Li JF, Zhang XB (2020) Active flow control for supersonic aircraft: a novel hybrid synthetic jet actuator. Sens Actuat A Phys 302:111770

20

Emerick T, Ali MY, Foster C et al (2014) SparkJet characterizations in quiescent and supersonic flowfields. Exp Fluids 55:1858

21

Zhou Y, Xia ZX, Luo ZB et al (2019) Characterization of plasma synthetic jet actuator with cavity pressurization. J National Univ Defense Technol 41(6):12–18 (in Chinese)

22

Liu RB, Wang MM, Hao M et al (2016) Experimental research on air supplementing type plasma synthetic jet generator. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 37(6):1713–1721 (in Chinese)

23
Liu RB, Li F, Wei WT et al (2021) One-way valve and plasma synthetic jet actuator, China Patent ZL 202010788934.1, 13 July 2021
24

Liu RB, Wei WT, Li F et al (2022) Working mechanism of air-supplement plasma synthetic jet actuator. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin 43(8):125854 (in Chinese)

25

Amitay M, Smith DR, Kibens V et al (2001) Aerodynamic flow control over an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA J 39(3):361–370

26
Chen YS (2019) Performance improvements of plasma synthesis jet and application in active flow control. Dissertation, Xiamen University, Xiamen China (in Chinese)
27

Zong HH, Kotsonis M (2017) Interaction between plasma synthetic jet and subsonic turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids 29(4):045104

28

Zhao GQ, Zhao QJ, Gu YS et al (2015) Experimental investigation of synthetic jet control on large flow separation of airfoil during stall. Chin J Theoret Appl Mech 47(2):351–355 (in Chinese)

29

Feng HH, Liu Y, Wei ZY et al (2020) Numerical study on the effects of porous on the boundary layer of airfoil flow. Chin J Appl Mech 37(3):1160–1165 (in Chinese)

30
Cybyk BZ, Grossman KR, Wilkerson JT (2005) Single-pulse performance of the SparkJet flow control actuator. Paper presented at the 43rd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, 10-13 January 2005
31

Zong HH, Wu Y, Jia M et al (2016) Influence of geometrical parameters on performance of plasma synthetic jet actuator. J Phys D Appl Phys 49:025504

32

Zhou Y, Xia ZX, Luo ZB et al (2018) Experimental characteristics of a two-electrode plasma synthetic jet actuator array in serial. Chin J Aeronaut 31(12):2234–2247

33

He P, Dong JZ (2015) Effect of slot orientation on synthetic jet-based separation control in a serpentine inlet. J Aerosp Power 30(2):306–314 (in Chinese)

Advances in Aerodynamics
Pages 34-34
Cite this article:
Liu R-B, Wei W-T, Wan H-P, et al. Experimental study on airfoil flow separation control via an air-supplement plasma synthetic jet. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2022, 4(1): 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-022-00126-w
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return