AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Safety of digoxin in nonagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation: lessons from the Spanish Multicenter Registry

Pablo Domínguez-Erquicia1Sergio Raposeiras-Roubín1,2( )Emad Abu-Assi1,2María Cespón-Fernández1David Alonso-Rodríguez3Santiago Jesús Camacho-Freire4Naiara Cubelos-Fernández3Álvaro López-Masjuán Ríos4María Melendo-Viu1Andrés Íñiguez-Romo1,2
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain
Health Research Institute Galicia Sur, Vigo, Spain
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of León, León, Spain
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain
Show Author Information

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The association between digoxin and mortality is an unclear issue. In older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), where use of digoxin is frequent, the evidence of its safety is scarce. Our aim is to assess the safety of digoxin in nonagenarian patients with AF.

METHODS

We evaluated data from 795 nonagenarian patients with non-valvular AF from the Spanish Multicenter Registry. We analyzed the relationship between digoxin and all-cause mortality with the Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

Follow-up was 27.7 ± 18.3 months. Mean age was 92.5 ± 3.8 years, and 71% of nonagenarian patients were female. Digoxin was not associated with increased risk of mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.96−1.41, P = 0.130]. However, we found a significant increase in mortality in the subgroup with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (aHR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.13−3.57, P = 0.018), but not in the other subgroups of eGFR (30−59 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and ≥ 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2). When exploring the risk of mortality according to sex, male subgroup was associated with an increase in mortality (aHR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.02−2.14, P = 0.041). This was not observed in females subgroup (aHR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.81−1.29, P = 0.829). Based on the presence or absence of heart failure, we did not find significant differences (aHR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.87−1.65, P = 0.268 vs. aHR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.90−1.47, P = 0.273, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In our large registry of nonagenarian patients with AF, we did not find an association between digoxin and mortality in the total sample. However, in the subgroup analyses, we found an increase in mortality with the use of digoxin in men and in patients with an eGFR < 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

References

[1]

Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021; 42: 373−498.

[2]

Curtis AB, Gersh BJ, Corley SD, et al. Clinical factors that influence response to treatment strategies in atrial fibrillation: the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Am Heart J 2005; 149: 645−649.

[3]

Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, et al. Effect of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy on mortality, stroke, bleeding, and cardiac arrest among patients with atrial fibrillation: the CABANA randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 321: 1261−1274.

[4]

Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, et al. Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 1305−1316.

[5]

Angraal S, Nuti SV, Masoudi FA, et al. Digoxin use and associated adverse events among older adults. Am J Med 2019; 132: 1191−1198.

[6]

Van Gelder IC, Rienstra M, Crijns HJ, et al. Rate control in atrial fibrillation. Lancet 2016; 388: 818−828.

[7]

Raposeiras-Roubín S, Alonso Rodríguez D, Camacho Freire SJ, et al. Vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in nonagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21: 367−373.e1.

[8]

Domínguez-Erquicia P, Raposeiras-Roubín S, Abbu-Assi E, et al. Incidence, predictors of bleeding and prognosis of bleeding in anticoagulated nonagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 2021; 327: 217−222.

[9]

Lip GYH, Collet JP, Caterina R, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation associated with valvular heart disease: a joint consensus document from the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis, endorsed by the ESC Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease, Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of Southern Africa (CASSA), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), South African Heart (SA Heart) Association and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLEACE). Europace 2017; 19: 1757−1758.

[10]

Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, et al. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation 2004; 109: 1509−1513.

[11]

Whitbeck MG, Charnigo RJ, Khairy P, et al. Increased mortality among patients taking digoxin-analysis from the AFFIRM study. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 1481−1488.

[12]

Gheorghiade M, Fonarow GC, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Lack of evidence of increased mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation taking digoxin: findings from post-hoc propensity-matched analysis of the AFFIRM trial. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 1489−1497.

[13]

Washam JB, Stevens SR, Lokhnygina Y, et al. Digoxin use in patients with atrial fibrillation and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: a retrospective analysis of the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF). Lancet 2015; 385: 2363−2370.

[14]

Vamos M, Erath JW, Hohnloser SH. Digoxin-associated mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 1831−1838.

[15]

Ziff OJ, Lane DA, Samra M, et al. Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data. BMJ 2015; 351: h4451.

[16]

Jelliffe RW. An improved method of digoxin therapy. Ann Intern Med 1968; 69: 703−717.

[17]

Lopes RD, Rordorf R, De Ferrari GM, et al. Digoxin and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71: 1063−1074.

[18]

Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Wang Y, et al. Association of serum digoxin concentration and outcomes in patients with heart failure. JAMA 2003; 289: 871−878.

[19]

Shin JH, Kang KW, Kim JG, et al. Concurrent renal dysfunction with ischemic heart disease is an important determinant for cardiac and cerebrovascular mortality in patients on chronic digoxin therapy for atrial fibrillation. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2018; 37: 130−137.

[20]

Chamaria S, Desai AM, Reddy PC, et al. Digoxin use to control ventricular rate in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure is not associated with increased mortality. Cardiol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 314041.

[21]

Rathore SS, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Sex-based differences in the effect of digoxin for the treatment of heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1403−1411.

[22]

Domanski M, Fleg J, Bristow M, et al. The effect of gender on outcome in digitalis-treated heart failure patients. J Card Fail 2005; 11: 83−86.

Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Pages 809-815
Cite this article:
Domínguez-Erquicia P, Raposeiras-Roubín S, Abu-Assi E, et al. Safety of digoxin in nonagenarian patients with atrial fibrillation: lessons from the Spanish Multicenter Registry. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2021, 18(10): 809-815. https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.10.007

496

Views

22

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Published: 28 October 2021
© 2021 JGC All rights reserved
Return