AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (22.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Article | Open Access

Automatic Extraction Method of 3D Feature Guidelines for Complex Cultural Relic Surfaces Based on Point Cloud

Yuxin GENG1,2Ruofei ZHONG1,2( )Yuqin HUANG3Haili SUN1,2
College of Resources Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Key Laboratory of 3-Dimensional Information Acquisition and Application, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100048, China
Chinese Academy of Cultural Heritage, Beijing 100029, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Cultural relics line graphic serves as a crucial form of traditional artifact information documentation, which is a simple and intuitive product with low cost of displaying compared with 3D models. Dimensionality reduction is undoubtedly necessary for line drawings. However, most existing methods for artifact drawing rely on the principles of orthographic projection that always cannot avoid angle occlusion and data overlapping while the surface of cultural relics is complex. Therefore, conformal mapping was introduced as a dimensionality reduction way to compensate for the limitation of orthographic projection. Based on the given criteria for assessing surface complexity, this paper proposed a three-dimensional feature guideline extraction method for complex cultural relic surfaces. A 2D and 3D combined factor that measured the importance of points on describing surface features, vertex weight, was designed. Then the selection threshold for feature guideline extraction was determined based on the differences between vertex weight and shape index distributions. The feasibility and stability were verified through experiments conducted on real cultural relic surface data. Results demonstrated the ability of the method to address the challenges associated with the automatic generation of line drawings for complex surfaces. The extraction method and the obtained results will be useful for line graphic drawing, displaying and propaganda of cultural relics.

References

[1]

SCOPIGNO R, CALLIERI M, CIGNONI P, et al. 3D models for cultural heritage: beyond plain visualization[J]. Computer, 2011, 44(7): 48-55.

[2]
LEVOY M, PULLI K, CURLESS B, et al. The digital Michelangelo project: 3D scanning of large statues[C]//Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. New York, NY: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 2000.
[3]
KOLLER D, TURITZIN M, LEVOY M, et al. Protected interactive 3D graphics via remote rendering[C]//Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004 Papers. Los Angeles, CA: ACM, 2004: 695-703.
[4]

SANDRON D, TALLON A. Notre-Dame de Paris[M]. Paris: Parigramme, 2013.

[5]

FASSI F, ACHILLE C, FREGONESE L. Surveying and modelling the main spire of Milan Cathedral using multiple data sources[J]. The Photogrammetric Record, 2011, 26(136): 462-487.

[6]
RAHRIG M, LUIB A. Sri Dalada Maligawa - 3D-scanning and documentation of the temple of the sacred tooth Relic at Kandy, Sri Lanka[C]//Proceedings of ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Ottawa: ISPRS, 2017.
[7]

EDELSBRUNNER H, MÜCKE E P. Three-dimensional alpha shapes[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 1994, 13(1): 43-72.

[8]

WEINMANN M, JUTZI B, HINZ S, et al. Semantic point cloud interpretation based on optimal neighborhoods, relevant features and efficient classifiers[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2015, 105: 286-304.

[9]

ZHOU Jilai, ZHOU Mingquan, GENG Guohua, et al. A novel 3D model retrieval method based on shape index distribution[J]. International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 2016, 9(9): 325-332.

[10]
WEBER C, HAHMANN S, HAGEN H. Sharp feature detection in point clouds[C]//Proceedings of 2010 Shape Modeling International Conference. Washington, DC: IEEE, 2010: 175-186.
[11]
IOANNOU Y, TAATI B, HARRAP R, et al. Difference of normals as a multi-scale operator in unorganized point clouds[C]//Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on 3D Imaging, Modeling, Processing, Visualization & Transmission. Zurich, Switzerland: IEEE, 2012: 501-508.
[12]
BAZAZIAN D, CASAS J R, RUIZ-HIDALGO J. Fast and robust edge extraction in unorganized point clouds[C]//Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA). Adelaide, SA, Australia: IEEE, 2015.
[13]

TAYLOR C J, KRIEGMAN D J. Structure and motion from line segments in multiple images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1995, 17(11): 1021-1032.

[14]
MATINEC D, PAJDLA T. Line reconstruction from many perspective images by factorization[C]//Proceedings of 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Madison, WI: IEEE, 2003.
[15]
JAIN A, KURZ C, THORMÄHLEN T, et al. Exploiting global connectivity constraints for reconstruction of 3D line segments from images[C]//Proceedings of 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. San Francisco, CA: IEEE, 2010.
[16]

LIN Yangbin, WANG Cheng, CHEN Bili, et al. Facet segmentation-based line segment extraction for large-scale point clouds[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(9): 4839-4854.

[17]
HACKEL T, WEGNER J D, SCHINDLER K. Contour detection in unstructured 3D point clouds[C]//Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas, NV: IEEE, 2016: 1610-1618.
[18]
YU Lequan, LI Xianzhi, FU C W, et al. EC-Net: an edge-aware point set consolidation network[C]//Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Computer Vision. Munich: Springer, 2018.
[19]

ZHANG Weini, CHEN Linwei, XIONG Zhangyue, et al. Large-scale point cloud contour extraction via 3D guided multi-conditional generative adversarial network[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2020, 164: 97-105.

[20]

CHANG Y C, SONG G S, HSU S K. Automatic extraction of ridge and valley axes using the profile recognition and polygon-breaking algorithm[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 1998, 24(1): 83-93.

[21]

ZENG Wei, GU X D. Ricci flow for shape analysis and surface registration: theories, algorithms and applications[M]. New York, NY: Springer, 2013: 479-484.

[22]

FLOATER M S. Mean value coordinates[J]. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 2003, 20(1): 19-27.

[23]

KOENDERINK J J, VAN DOORN A J. Surface shape and curvature scales[J]. Image and Vision Computing, 1992, 10(8): 557-564.

[24]

LEE C H, VARSHNEY A, JACOBS D W. Mesh saliency[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2005, 24(3): 659-666.

[25]
TANG S, GODIL A. An evaluation of local shape descriptors for 3D shape retrieval[C]//Proceedings of SPIE 8290, Three-Dimensional Image Processing (3DIP) and Applications Ⅱ. Burlingame, CA: SPIE, 2012.
Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science
Pages 16-41
Cite this article:
GENG Y, ZHONG R, HUANG Y, et al. Automatic Extraction Method of 3D Feature Guidelines for Complex Cultural Relic Surfaces Based on Point Cloud. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, 2024, 7(1): 16-41. https://doi.org/10.11947/j.JGGS.2024.0103

127

Views

3

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Published: 20 March 2024
© 2024 Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science
Return